Open main menu

Grants:IdeaLab/Project Accuracy

statusDRAFT
Project Accuracy
Organize and recruit, coordinate project teams, and create an editorial review board.
targetEnglish Wikipedia, but it can be expanded to include other languages.
strategic priorityImprove quality, expand reach, retain editors
start yearplease add a start year
end yearplease add a end year
budget (USD)please add the amount you are requesting (USD)
grant typeplease specify whether this grant is for an individual, group, or organization
creatorAtsme
contact(s)• atsme@outlook.com
created on06:36, Tuesday, March 15, 2016 (UTC)


Project ideaEdit

What is the problem you're trying to solve?Edit

Project Accuracy will help resolve loss of readership, editor retention, and Wikipedia's image as an unreliable source.

What is your solution?Edit

Coordinate FA contributors and existing project teams to form a qualified Editorial Review Board (ERB) comprising members (both on & off WP) who meet eligibility requirements for fact-checking articles and corroborating accuracy of information to the cited sources, level of reliability for the cited sources, and quality of the overall presentation of the article. Ideally, WPA will have 5 or 7 Primary Project Coordinators (PPC) who will coordinate review efforts by drawing relative reviewers from a pool of 100+/- qualified reviewers (accredited academia, as well as experts & professionals) who will comprise the ERB. Upon completion of the review process by the ERB, the article will be promoted as "reviewed and approved" (RAA) by affixing the WPA's gold seal to top of the article page. WP's own guideline for editors summarizes a reliable source as published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy, yet WP itself has not earned such a reputation; therefore, is considered unreliable which has resulted in a steady decline in readership. An ERB will be the starting point for resolving the reliability issues. Over time and with the help of targeted promotions, readers will come to recognize WP as a reliable resource for all levels of academia which is essential for sustainability. Readership will increase exponentially with reliability. Having one's article promoted by the ERB (which should also afford some level of protection to the article such as pending changes review) will further serve to create a sense of pride and accomplishment, thereby contributing in a positive way to editor retention as well as recruitment. WPA will also oversee promotion "drives" and encourage rewards and recognition for articles promoted to RAA status.

Project goalsEdit

The primary goals are to:

  • Increase quality of Wikipedia articles
  • Increase reliability of Wikipedia articles
  • Promote/improve collaboration among experienced editors
  • Promote existing editors retention

Get involvedEdit

ParticipantsEdit

EndorsementsEdit

Expand your ideaEdit

Would a grant from the Wikimedia Foundation help make your idea happen? You can expand this idea into a grant proposal.

Expand into an Individual Engagement Grant
Expand into a Project and Event Grant

PlanEdit

ActivitiesEdit

PLACEHOLDER TEXT

ImpactEdit

Target readershipEdit

PLACEHOLDER TEXT

Fit with strategyEdit

What crucial thing will the project try to change or benefit in the Wikimedia movement? Please select the Wikimedia strategic priority(ies) that your project most directly aims to impact and explain how your project fits. Most projects fit all strategic priorites. However, we would like project managers to focus their efforts on impacting 1-2 strategic priorities. Examples of strategic priorities can be found at here.

Measures of successEdit

Please provide a list of both quantitative and qualitative criteria that will be used determine how successful the project is. You will need to report on the success of the project according to these measures after the project is completed. See the PEG Program Resources for suggested measures of success. Note: In addition to your project-specific measures of success, you will also be asked to report on some Global Metrics at the end of your final report. Please keep this in mind as you plan, and we'll support you as you begin your project.

Resources and risksEdit

ResourcesEdit

PLACEHOLDER TEXT

RisksEdit

PLACEHOLDER TEXT

BudgetEdit

Please provide a detailed breakdown of project expenses according to the instructions here. See Budget Guidelines. Grantees are subject to line-item scrutiny of expenses. Changes to the approved budget beyond 10% in any category must be approved in advance.

Project budget tableEdit

PLACEHOLDER TEXT

Total cost of projectEdit

PLACEHOLDER TEXT

Total amount requestedEdit

Total amount requested from the Project and Event Grants Program.

Additional sources of revenueEdit

Additional sources of revenue, other than the Project and Event Grants Program, that may fund part of this project, and amounts funded.

Non-financial requirementsEdit

See a description of non financial assistance available. Please inform the Wikimedia Foundation (WMF) of any requirements for non-financial assistance now.

Community notificationEdit

You are responsible for notifying relevant communities of your proposal, so that they can help you! Depending on your project, notification may be most appropriate on a village pump, talkpage, mailing list. Please paste a link below to where the relevant communities have been notified of this proposal, and to any other relevant community discussions. Need notification tips?