Wikimedia Meta-Wiki

Meta:Requests for oversight/-revi

< Meta:Requests for oversight
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a closed Meta-Wiki request. Please do not modify it.

-revi edit

Good day. I'd like to nominate -revi for local oversight permissions at Meta-Wiki. As steward, -revi has in the past approached our team requesting that edits and logs (included those derived from his performance of his steward duties) be suppressed. I think that we can just trust him to do that job himself which will certainly improve our response against harassment. Also, while the level of requests we receive is low, I would prefer to have more people in the team so the requests we receive through the mailing list could be addressed faster and more time zones are covered. Currently we're just two. I'd like to clarify that nowadays we have no such a problem with regards to avalaibility or with delays in the processing of local oversight, but we should aim for not having them in the future. -revi is a steward and a local oversighter in the Korean Wikipedia, so he already has experience with the tool. I feel he can certainly be trusted with this access and I hope the community thinks likewise and can support this nomination. Thank you, —MarcoAurelio (talk) 15:52, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Candidate acceptance: I am happy to accept the nomination. — regards, Revi 15:55, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support as nominator. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 15:55, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support can't beat the nom but still 2nd. =P. Demonstrated need and clearly competent and qualified.--Cohaf (talk) 15:58, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support Support --Rschen7754 17:23, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Support Support, his role as a steward and commitment to the community makes him a trustworthy candidate. Esteban16 (talk) 17:40, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Support Support.--HakanIST (talk) 19:15, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Support Support --Novak Watchmen (talk) 20:14, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Support Support sure. Revi is active and able to respond to oversight requests. – Ajraddatz (talk) 20:43, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Support Support. Hiàn (talk) 21:40, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Support. --Stïnger （会話） 22:02, 19 January 2019 (UTC).[reply]
  10. Support Support active sysop, long term user, expect them to respond to requests appropriately. — xaosflux Talk 22:08, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Support Support But please take care of yourself and don’t burnout. Trijnsteltalk 23:23, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    I'd like to clarify that I know when I am burning out and take a (deserved) wikibreak when I feel I am burning out. — regards, Revi 18:09, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  12. What Xaosflux and Trijnstel said. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 23:25, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Support. RadiX∞ 01:39, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Support Support -Nihlus 03:40, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Support Support obviously, revi is more than qualified and is one the best Wikimedians we have. I will note though that one of the reasons we need more oversighters on meta is because of the pointless removal of those who were active and held the permission. TonyBallioni (talk) 06:03, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  16. LGTM. Kind regards, — TBhagat (contribs | talk) 07:04, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Support Support Can't see a solid resaon to oppose. But I'd keep Trijnstel's concern in mind if I were you. Leaderboard (talk) 07:08, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Support Support --Eurodyne (talk) 07:36, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Support Support Of course. Vermont (talk) 11:53, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Support Support happy support, obviously qualified for the role. Jianhui67 talk★contribs 14:36, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Support Support -- Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 18:22, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Support Support.—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 21:11, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Support Support —AlvaroMolina (✉ - ✔) 22:54, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Support. Stryn (talk) 08:57, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Support Support Natureium (talk) 20:13, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Support Support Biggest support possible. Saederup92 (talk) 14:51, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Support Support — JJMC89 (T·C) 17:48, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Support Support ToBeFree (talk) 04:41, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Support Support --Defender (talk) 08:42, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Support Good choice. --Vogone (talk) 09:15, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Support Support --Alaa :)..! 13:10, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Support. --MF-W 18:43, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Done. 32 supports - 0 opposes → 100% of approval. Matiia (talk) 20:53, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above request page is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Comments about this page should be made in Meta:Babel or Meta:Requests for help from a sysop or bureaucrat.
Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Meta:Requests_for_oversight/-revi&oldid=18816477"