XML syntax

Ambox outdated content.svg

This page is outdated.
Please see Markup spec/DTD on MediaWiki.org for more up to date informations.

MediaWiki logo

Why would you output XMLEdit

The Wikitax aims at being as simple as possible to write. But if you want to reuse text of or for the Wikipedia you need to write a filter for each format. As far as I know the Wiki system only provides a conversion from Wikitax to HTML.

If there is an XML syntax for Wikitax and a convertion between both of them then:

  • You "only" need to write an XSLT filter to import/export other formats.
  • A PDF view of articles (with FO)
  • Editing articles in OpenOffice
  • A Wikipedia Client using OpenOffice as GUI? (Wikitax may be simple but people prefer WYSIWYG!)
  • How about a wysiwyg editor that doesn't take over a minute to load? ;)

Note: See http://wiki.auf-trag.de/ for an experimental python script that converts wiki articles to LaTeX or PDF-- Stw

Other side effects/benefits includeEdit

  • You could use another wiki syntax to write articles for wikipedia. Some people might like to write *foo* or <b>foo</b> or '''foo''' but it's all the same, isn't it?

PortabilityEdit

There will probably never be one XML format for all wikis. For the Wikipedia project we should define a format that is convertable to Wikitax and vice versa. every other converting tasks may work on top of this.

Other Wikis with XML formatsEdit

See alsoEdit