Wikiversity/Board of Regents

(English) This is an essay. It expresses the opinions and ideas of some Wikimedians but may not have wide support. This is not policy on Meta, but it may be a policy or guideline on other Wikimedia projects. Feel free to update this page as needed, or use the discussion page to propose major changes.

Wikiversity Board of Regents election is on the front burner at v: at last.

Our mock w:September (2009) election will run v:user:jtneill - dean of School:Psychology and his vice-dean - v:user:mikeu against wikiversity founders Cormac and JWSchmidt. The incumbents are being called to the carpet for allowing wikiversity to:

• end up in shambles
• go to the dogs
• deteriorate
• stagnate
• fail
• xxx
• yy
• z

LiquidThreads v:template:liquidThreads are the tools of the 2020's that the New Guarde is running on for an alliterative platform. Semantically, the platform is one of order & law (taxonomic style and referential integrity) with its new catalyst role appointed through a v:Wikiversity:Community Review via a w:consensus-driven process. The process is open to both {{custodian}} and {{user}} participation with facilited, moderated, constrained, documented, sliced, diced and pureed fine-grained processes for finding out just what the matter

Wikiversity:Guidelines are coming from above .. kind of like Hail & Fire.

But the bleeding edge is the custodial-catalytic dynamic that PROMISES to deliver a win-win allowing JWS and Cormac to rest on their laurels for a couple more years.

Wikiversity:Process: v:liquidThreads | v:Template:liquidThreads & v:Template:VOTE // v:Template:User | v:Template:Catalyst | v:Template:Custodian

The Jade Knight and SB Johnny may be running on a third interlingual GreenLight Party ticket. Quinobi 22:50, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

BTW, There is no cabal. --Quinobi 23:51, 30 August 2009 (UTC)