Wikimedia Blog/Drafts/Free knowledge author visits European parliament members

(POSTED ON THE WIKIMEDIA BLOG ON FRIDAY APRIL 24 AT 3PM PT)

Title ideas

Recommended:

• A Wikimedian asks European Parliament members for copyright reform

Alternates:

• My meetings with the European Parliament about public domain and copyright law
• Free knowledge author visits European parliament members (not very good)
• European parliament members talk with a Wikimedia editor
• European parliament copyright talks and a statement for public domain
• Copyright and public domain, wikimedian meets the European parliament
• Open European parliament and copyright reform
• European parliament opens to Wikimedia editor for copyright talks

Summary

A brief, one-paragraph summary of the post's content, about 20-80 words. On the blog, this will be shown in the chronological list of posts or in the featured post carousel on top, next to a "Read more" link.

European copyright laws are very complex, making it hard to share free knowledge. To address this issue, a longtime Wikimedia contributor traveled to Brussels to meet members of the European Parliament and explain why copyright reform is needed.

Body

European copyright laws are very complex, as shown in this map: only countries highlighted in green allow taking pictures of buildings in public places -- a law known as "freedom of panorama". Free knowledge advocates are asking that all European Union countries adopt this law. Map by Quibik, freely licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.

Last week, I was in Brussels, meeting with Members of the European Parliament (MEPs), to talk about copyright from the perspective of a Wikimedia projects editor. I met 9 MEPs, representing all political groups (EFD, EPP, NI, S&D). All expressed support and some long-term work collaborations were established.

During that time, the Industry, Research and Technology committee (ITRE) approved an opinion [please fix broken link] in strong support of the public domain, which among other things "calls on the Commission to explore the possibility of significantly shortening the duration of the harmonized terms of copyright protection." It proposes a legal definition of ‘public domain’ works -- to ensure that such works are protected against private appropriation through digitization or other means.

What I told the European Parliament

What did I tell MEPs? It was easy for me, because I don't have to negotiate or represent anyone: our proposals and demands are all in the open; nothing is secret, since they can read all the details on our wikis. I just told them my story as Wikimedia volunteer contributor to thousands of Wikiquote and Wikipedia articles; I also shared the stories of other editors I know through the network of our association, Wikimedia Italia.

• As a photographer, when I take a picture of a public space, I consider that photo to be my own work. I should have full copyright over the photo and decide what to do with it, whether it's about selling it for work, or publishing it under a free license on Wikimedia Commons for inclusion in a Wikipedia article -- or both. When I visit another country, I just want to take photos, without having to study the local law; when I upload the photo on the web, I don't want to worry where the server is located and what their local law says on the matter. Hence I support the freedom of panorama law and I think it should be enforced in all European Union countries. (Freedom of panorama permits taking photos or videos of buildings in public places.)
• Additionally, as an Italian citizen I think that people wishing to increase global public awareness of our cultural heritage should be allowed to do so freely. They currently can't: Wiki Loves Monuments Italy was only possible thanks to hundreds of resolutions by municipalities and other entities, obtained by Wikimedia Italia. A lot of paperwork for just a few monuments -- and no practical solutions for photographing millions of other monuments: why so much red tape?
• As a Wikipedia author, journalist and popularizer, I could save time and do a better job if works by public officials were with in the public domain -- like a ministry's informational page on a recent law, or a museum's description of a topic. These public officials would only see their work furthered. If I'm writing about space exploration, I can't take photos myself, but I can use NASA images freely thanks to PD-Gov -- while most images from the European State Agency (ESA) stay locked in drawers.

The perspective I tend to give is one of an author of freely licensed content. This helps further two underlying principles at the core of copyright reform.

• It's important to remember that Wikimedia projects are made by several millions authors, who edit pages or upload files; our hundreds of millions of "users" are always just a click away from co-authoring this free content. Our main issue is that copyright legislators still think of copyright as something held by a few culture workers (and their "representatives") as opposed to an undistinguished mass of billions of "users", which they view as passive and parasitical in nature: as long as the Internet is seen as a "value tree", copyright laws will always fail to be realistic and achieve their goals.
• Moreover, I believe the Public Domain Manifesto should always be stressed: public domain should be the foundation on which all authors build their own contribution to our culture. When a work becomes public domain, we should view this as a success and the beginning of a new life -- not the end of the story. It's just the end of an exclusive relationship with the copyright holder.

How we got here

Wikimedia Italia started its first copyright reform campaigns in 2007. Recently, we sent our own response to the 2014 European Union copyright consultation, stressing issues we faced -- such as with Wiki Loves Monuments and digitizing books in Italy. Several other volunteer chapter members in Europe helped with similar documents. The consultation seemed to reach a dead end, as it proved that current laws are unbalanced but there was no energy to change their underlying paradigm.

Things changed in 2015. After the new European Commission made copyright reform a priority, the European Parliament took the lead in summarizing the situation and the way ahead: a non-binding report drafted by Julia Reda is being discussed in the European Parliament committees and will be voted on by some committees this week. The draft comes from a "minority" of the Parliament, but is just common sense -- and it managed to put all real issues and possible solutions on the table, opening a wide discussion in institutions.

This time we are ready, thanks to the support of Dimitar Dimitrov for the EU policy initiative. Many groups have agreed on two clear demands: universal freedom of panorama (FOP) and public domain for works created by public sector employees (PD-Gov). So we don't feel alone. Dimitar has been particularly helpful because he monitors the process continuously from Brussels , and alerts us when we can help.

For Wikimedia Italia and many other "weasels", this is a volunteer activity: motivation is key. Last February, Dimitar asked us to take the phone and call a MEP to raise their attention and point them to our position statement; that sounded easy enough: why not do it, if just a few minutes on the phone can make the difference? I started calling and I kept track of that work on our wiki, so all chapter members could check and have their say. I was happy to discover that many MEPs were happy to talk with a citizen like me: about 20 answered my calls, from all Italian political groups. Turns out the European Parliament is full of people who care and who are happy to listen to someone other than the usual professional corporate lobbyists.

Given the positive response from Italian MEPs, Dimitar suggested that I join him in Brussels for a week, as the first "visiting weasel". Once again, I was unable to refuse, and was happy to make the trip: after all, a flight from Milan to Brussels costs less than 100 Euros -- and it's a good investment compared to the years spent talking to the Italian governors, who never gave us an answer. It was easy to get a handful of meetings scheduled and more half-confirmed. The transparency register offers a seamless accreditation system.

Federico Leva, Wikimedia Italia

in collaboration with Dimitar Dimitrov, Wikimedian

Notes

• The week in question is from 13 to 17 April 2015.

Ideas for social media messages promoting the published post:

Twitter (@wikimedia/@wikipedia):

A Wikimedian asks European Parliament members for copyright reform (link)

(Tweet text goes here - max 117 characters)
---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|------/

Facebook/Google+

• European copyright laws are very complex, making it hard to share free knowledge. To address this issue, a longtime Wikimedia contributor traveled to Brussels to meet members of the European Parliament and explain why copyright reform is needed. (link)