WikiJournal User Group/Meetings/2022-02-09
WikiJournal User Group
Open access • Publication charge free • Public peer review • Wikipedia-integrated
Dates and locations:
- Feb 9, 2022, 8am UTC
- Feb 7, 2022, 6pm UTC
Attendees
editFeb 9
- Eric Youngstrom
- Thomas Shafee
- Kelee Pacion
- Andrew Leung
- Roger Watson
- Gwinyai Masukume (first 5 mins)
Feb 7
- Eric Youngstrom
- Andrew Leung
- Roger Watson
- Gwinyai Masukume
- Robert L. Findling
Agenda
edit- Re-Grouping
- Agree priority tasks (using method to be determined) and form working groups or task groups to achieve those.
- Suggested priorities.
- Utilizing technical editors
- Current working group suggestions:
- Funding applications (from WMF and externally), HR, finance
- Quality improvements & indexing
- Updating Citation Metrics
- Technical development
- Partnership-forming and outreach
- Video content & social media combined
- Peer review turnaround whips
- Procedures for handling stale submissions
- Others? Combinations?
Notes
edit- Regrouping and sustainability
- Discussion of WikiJ Humanities
- Discussion of successes- conference presentations, awards.
- Lag time for reviews
- How to develop better infrastructure to sustain the growth of the journals
- Need a managing editor for each journal
- Can we make it more parallel across all four journals
- Need operations in place to move things along
- What things can be consolidated and managed by one person
- Who manages the paid staff?
- Need to pay technical editors with new grant funding
- Address immediate backlog of articles stuck in the queue
- Student internship to create SOPs
- What makes a journal successful- editor in chief makes quick decisions
- Triage and desk reject
- So, might be, in broad brushstroke
- Feb: $500-1000 in back pay (?? Sarah, you would know best)
- Mar: $1000 in reboot and planning
- April: $2000
- May: $8,000
- June: $12,000
- July: $12,000
- August: $8,000
- Jack Nunn, Andrew both have confirmed willingness to work with Tech Editors (with Thomas Shafee in a consulting role)
- Rolling list of tasks- any member of editorial board can direct tech editors
- Technical wishlist link - we can get a developer hired to tackle some of these
Action Items
edit- Address back end of process- assist with finding reviewers- Andrew Leung
- Andrew needs technical editors (link to technical editors description and task summary)
- We have budget to hire at least 3 additional technical editors, as 3 had left
- Technical editors do not have to reside in USA
- Technical editors can contact authors of articles that are stuck without a peer review coordinator
- Andrew will meet with Eric, Jack and technical editors to discuss strategies for moving forward
- Thomas will send Andrew, Eric and Jack the position description
- Andrew needs technical editors (link to technical editors description and task summary)
- Roger volunteered to work as the “whip” for WikiJM to check on the status of peer review and where things are getting stuck. Kelee for WikiJS
- Develop a workflow for rejection- Thomas will do WJS rejection, Gwinyai will do the WJM rejection
- One central person receive the initial article- can quick reject here
- Determine which editor (associate editors/middle layer) to send it on to- at this point the associate editor finds the action editor
- Action editor builds the review team and moves the process along
- Kelee to contact current editors - ask about renewing their interest in the journal, getting the process started, asking what the boundaries are.