Vandalism reports/Archives/2018-01

69.165.131.31

Persistent Removal of Content on vi.wikibooks. --Samuele2002 (Talk!) 23:43, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

  Done the ip is blocked by User:Trijnstel --Samuele2002 (Talk!) 00:12, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

124.106.131.35

Resumption of cross-wiki disruption of my talkpages that had operated about eight months ago as 124.106.141.186. Userpage vandalism on fr, ja, ko, commons and others, starting on en. --Acroterion (talk) 12:48, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

Another spate today. The IP seems reasonably stable. Acroterion (talk) 23:40, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

83.220.236.177

188.32.114.250

188.32.0.0/16

108.160.158.68, 108.160.144.0/20, 108.160.156.0/22

2607:5300:100:0:0:0:0:500

2607:5300:100:0:0:0:0:501

81.177.140.11

Toppole69

  • Status:    In progress
  • Toppole69 [stalktoy] – [cross-wiki edits]
  • Cross-wiki useless edits, sometimes removing content, sometimes just adding a space character to articles for no reason. User is incapable of making productive edits (even after half a year) and is not known to be capable of language. An IP address could be related: Steward_requests/Checkuser#Toppole69@. User made edits on enwiki, commons, here, siwiki, they just don't care. "Suggestions for monitoring strategies, blocks etc.": I guess if you block the user they will just create a new account, but at least whenever the user makes an edit anywhere it needs to be actively checked and given a red flag or something. I don't know what tools are available to do anything like that. Alexis Jazz (talk) 23:02, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
    •   Support.   — Jeff G. ツ 23:12, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
    For general xwiki low-level, infrequent, incoherent abuse there isn't much you can reliably do to prevent it. I see that the account has been blocked, so we may just have to leave it at that. I would suggest that you ask Ruslik0 to keep a record of a CU if they did it as part of their lock. That reference point is useful for any recurrence.  — billinghurst sDrewth 04:28, 28 January 2018 (UTC)