User talk:Teles/Archive/2013

Latest comment: 9 years ago by Chico in topic SUL account

Special Barnstar

  The Special Barnstar
Thank you for stopping me from those stupid behaviors. Makecat 03:30, 8 January 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Let's make it part of the past only. There is a lot work to do here and there and you have plenty of capacity to keep helping in the future if you want.—Teles «Talk to me ˱@ L C S˲» 03:46, 9 January 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Egyptian Arabic Wikipedia

Welcome.One users in Egyptian Arabic Wikipedia

  1. Creates pages of sabotage in the scope of Wikipedia and scope of Wikipedia Talk
  2. Creates pages of sabotage in the scope of
    1. Talk
    2. File talk
  3. Protects pages without any reason

Please Prevent him and drag him, the validity of the administrative -- 06:26, 9 January 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. I believe you need to take this issue to local community. I suggest you to use some place commonly used for broad discussion if you haven't done that already. Otherwise, you can contact the other sysops of that project. Not only they can read local language, but they are also aware of local rules. I am curious to read the thoughts that other local users have to share about it. Regards.—Teles «Talk to me ˱@ L C S˲» 08:07, 11 January 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]


    • Many thanks for your message. I have reverted the log deletion, the block was made by error. Exemption from IP block was to avoid problems with IP addresses that were prevented from opening accounts, I am happy to remove that if needed. Regarding Raafat's edits I am not sure what is happening there. He was given the sysop flag after a very long time of waiting, his nomination approval was delayed until he gets used to writing on arzwiki and there were no objection to his nomination this time , I have deleted the discussion page that was not written in Masry. I think he moved it from another page and did not want the information to be lost, Ultimately his edits are his responsibility and he should answer for the, At the moment there are only three sysops active on arzwiki and the other three are not active . I have removed the IP protection from the sysops as you requested.--Ghaly (talk) 00:19, 12 January 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Thanks for writing here. It is not that the removal is needed; it is just that the granting wasn't needed. Probably, the sysop that was granted the flag wasn't facing editing problems. So, maybe I am wrong, but it brings the idea that the granting of this flag is not following a good criteria. It is not a big deal though, especially if you are being careful when promoting non-sysops.
I am happy that you saved a part of your time to leave this message and for unhiding those logs. Keep up the good work.—Teles «Talk to me ˱@ L C S˲» 02:39, 12 January 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Sim Teles, é o ip daqui. Te mandei um email também. Você usou o checkuser pra descobrir? Fiz só para testar o Salebot. Logo já tomei bloqueio, achei que ia demorar umas mais edições. Tentei me desbloquear mas pelo visto não dá. Abraços. Gusta (talk) 20:42, 19 January 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Você testou o Salebot? Que tipo de teste é esse? Qual o propósito? Foi anunciado em algum lugar?—Teles «Talk to me ˱@ L C S˲» 20:45, 19 January 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Teles, se quisesse acabar com o projeto não teria feito na própria página, bloqueio nonsense? Gusta (talk) 20:46, 19 January 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Eu vejo um IP vandalizando uma página de usuário, exatamente como todos os outros vandalismos e eu devo adivinhar que é você? Sua página de discussão não é local para fazer testes desse tipo. Não deve escrever 'Vai tomar no cu' na sua página e esperar que outros adivinhem que se trata de um "teste" enquanto isso ocorre rotineiramente como vandalismo entre os mais grosseiros. Sinto muito se tinha intenção de fazer um teste, mas é o mesmo que dizer "apaguei um artigo inteiro, pois eu tava testando o Salebot". Não realizamos esse tipo de teste.—Teles «Talk to me ˱@ L C S˲» 20:50, 19 January 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Solicitei abertura de DB. Desculpe-me por tudo. Gusta (talk) 22:21, 19 January 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Wiki Project Med Foundation

Thank you for your interest in Wiki Project Med. We have created a non profit corporation in the state of New York to promote the aims of the Wikimedia Movement within the topic domain of medicine. This means we are and continue to promote the creation and release of "health care information in all languages" under an open license. This is being done primarily via speaking and collaborating with both individuals and organizations who share our goal. We are working on a number of collaborations already and are open to more ideas. We hope to be active globally and thus welcome all people who share these goals to join us. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 15:36, 21 November 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Nem sabia o que era um spam bot. Se ver algo estranho te aviso por aqui. Gusta (talk) 11:39, 6 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Sem problema. Se tiver certeza de que se trata do mesmo tipo de spam, pode bloquear também e depois avisar a mim ou em SRCU. Valeu pela ajuda.—Teles «Talk to me ˱@ L C S˲» 03:28, 7 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ariculo de Colombia en portugues

Hay un problema con el articulo de Colombia en version portuguesa, hay unos bibliotecarios que no dejan actualizar la informacion y manejan las cosas con mucha subjetividad, borran la pagina de discusion y no se hace nada para actualizarla, el articulo le hace falta mucha informacion si se compara con las versions en ingles, frances, y español. En cambio he tenido ayuda de bibliotecarios en el articulo en version Frances de Colombia, version ingles--Koldorogollo (talk) 18:34, 11 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Debes tentar una conversa con otros usuarios e decidir sobre la mejor versión del artículo. Yo no puedo hacer mucho; no puedo decidir por mí mismo. Lamento ver que usted está bloqueado ahora, pero puede editar de nuevo cuando el bloque expirar.—Teles «Talk to me ˱@ L C S˲» 02:35, 12 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Your IP address has been blocked on all wikis.
The block was made by Teles ( The reason given is Open proxy.
Start of block: 08:11, 27. фебруар 2013.
Expiry of block: 08:11, 27. фебруар 2014.}}

Please, help me what to do now?? I am not aware what's happened. Vitez Hirald (talk) 17:33, 27 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please, send mail to stewards wikimedia org with your user name and the IP that is blocked. You can also copy and paste the message you receive when being stopped from editing.—Teles «Talk to me ˱@ L C S˲» 21:34, 27 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]


I'm sorry, it was a mistake. I believed that I was in Wiki Data. I'm sorry. --Pere Serafi (talk) 06:56, 25 March 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

It is totally fine. Don't worry about it.—Teles «Talk to me ˱@ L C S˲» 07:00, 25 March 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Hi Teles, I've created User:Mathonius/Reports/Vertical bar spam this evening, following your suggestion on my talk page. Kind regards, Mathonius (talk) 00:12, 8 April 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Awesome! I will add info as long as find them.—Teles «Talk to me ˱@ L C S˲» 09:29, 8 April 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]


User shows date of birth as 2003. Has at least 17 edits. Will you check to be sure everything is all right. There is no need to acknowledge or respond. Thank you. Respectfully, Tiyang (talk) 04:53, 19 May 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, Tiyang. What exactly do you want me to check?—Teles «Talk to me ˱@ L C S˲» 05:05, 19 May 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Block user

Hey, can tou block the user "רוטר נט." on Hebrew Wiktionary because he talks dirty. Thanks, Dekel E (talk) 15:39, 30 May 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Editor @

Hello. I would like to inform you that I have granted you editor flag at the Arabic Wikipedia, all your edits there will be automatically marked as patrolled. Best regards.--Avocato (talk) 12:15, 28 July 2013 (UTC) Reply[reply]

Thanks. I will try not to vandalize too much.—Teles «Talk to me ˱@ L C S˲» 21:16, 29 July 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Quem faz injúria vil e sem razão,
Com forças e poder em que está posto,
Não vence; que a vitória verdadeira
É saber ter justiça nua e inteira.

Boas palavras para administradores? ~ DanielTom (talk) 23:54, 3 August 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Parecem boas, mas precisa de contexto pra que eu possa entender o motivo de postar aqui. Desculpe por eu não compreender toda a mensagem que quer passar ou de que forma pretende que eu reaja.—Teles «Talk to me ˱@ L C S˲» 05:17, 4 August 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Desculpe, não reparei na sua resposta. Tarde demais agora, mas obrigado pela sua disponibilidade. (Pelo menos deu para pôr nervosos os administradores que não sabem português, né?) Fique bem, DanielTom (talk) 18:41, 24 August 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Teles, obrigado por me adicionar ao grupo autopatrolled. --Jonas AGX (talk) 23:44, 14 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Por nada :) —Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 23:51, 14 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Hi. Please do the report [1] [2] Before ibid. thank you -- Дагиров Умар (talk) 18:36, 17 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Oomar. Look like it was done already. Regards!—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 19:10, 17 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Thank you very much for your reply! regards -- Дагиров Умар (talk) 12:14, 18 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Sorry but I have found two more reports so they [3] - [4] I did not find this message in a meta interpreter for this ask you to create a. --Дагиров Умар (talk) 12:43, 18 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Done. Please, check if everything is correct.—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 16:02, 18 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
All right. These messages have been in Russian. Thank you for your help, everything is OK. (I do not speak English I hope to write clear). regards -- Дагиров Умар (talk) 19:20, 18 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Autopatrol criteria

Hi Teles, what is the autopatrolled criteria here? Or can I just get it straightaway? I would want my edits to be autopatrolled. I have rollback rights on Commons and rollback and reviewer rights in en-wiki. Thanks. Jianhui67 Talk 08:01, 24 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. It is not so different from criteria elsewhere. Experience on other wikis may help, but you have to have a little local practice too just to make sure you understand how is Meta working place. Regards.—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 08:13, 24 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Wikipedia needs 50 good articles and Commons needs more than 500 edits. So what is the criteria here? I know Meta is the place where the global rights are given. Aren't the policies almost the same as Commons? Jianhui67 Talk 08:22, 24 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
You are probably referring to English Wikipedia. We don't count edits here; we just check if edits are correct, if the user can be trusted. That's a bit subjective, but requirements are not as difficult to meet as on Commons and English Wikipedia.—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 08:32, 24 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
So are my edits here okay? You can see my contributions on Commons. Have been heavily reverting vandalism during these days. Jianhui67 Talk 09:27, 24 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
They seem to be fine... not sure if they are enough to show that you know our policies. Having your own edits autopatrolled is not a big deal and I wouldn't worry about it. Your editing won't be affected for not having it and community is thankful for your help in the same way.—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 10:36, 24 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Yes. I think I have quite a good grasp of Meta policies. I would like my own edits to be autopatrolled as I am going to edit Meta related articles. Jianhui67 Talk 12:09, 24 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hi. Can you reply to my message? Thanks. Jianhui67 Talk 08:46, 25 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
And by the way, can administrators give out rollback rights to users? The page Administrator says so that they can do that. Jianhui67 Talk 05:33, 26 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
You have only a few edits other that those done in "user" namespace. There is not many to make a decision. It is the natural process to edit a little with no flag and, if edits are fine, autopatrol is given. So, I would wait a little more time.
That page may be referring to other Wikimedia projects in general as I think rollback is given by administrators by default. Meta doesn't have this group though.—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 08:31, 26 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Oh. But is there a way to propose a user group called rollback here? Jianhui67 Talk 09:45, 26 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You can definitely propose that. I suggest you to do it on Meta:Babel with your reasons.—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 21:31, 26 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Previous (very old!) discussion: Meta:Babel/Archives/2009-04#Proposal_to_instate_non-admin_rollback. PiRSquared17 (talk) 21:37, 26 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
So should I propose the rollback rights given the past discussion? Jianhui67 Talk 08:34, 27 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Feel free to propose it, if you think we should have a local rollbackers group on Meta. PiRSquared17 (talk) 18:02, 27 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Hi Teles! I've just closed your RfCU as successful and granted you the rights. Congrats and have fun! -Barras talk 23:59, 26 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Congratulations! (Parabéns!) PiRSquared17 (talk) 00:05, 27 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Thanks!—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 00:58, 27 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
A big big big and heartiest congratulations to you for becoming a CU. Hope you are enjoying your new right.  --Pratyya (Hello!) 05:11, 27 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hey! Thank you! :) —Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 07:07, 27 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Steward request

I requested for the Bureaucrat access at here. Kindly see the same and clearup the process, as it is long pending, & further Hindi wiki has no B'crat at present. --Ashish Bhatnagar talk 13:39, 29 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hey, Ashish. It is unlikely to be decided by only one steward as it is not the most simple case of changing user rights.
I have some questions... What are the thoughts of community about this? How did local users received those changes that were done in their community? What do you think that is different now in comparison with 2 years ago?—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 14:33, 29 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The consensus acquired is not 2 years old, but is for the duration 11 Aug-28 Sept.2013 only, i.e. a fresh one. That old consensus has already matured the Bureaucrat access, & I only quoted that, as a previous experience, else:
  1. What community thinks is what the fresh consensus is here.
  2. Nothing is different in two years from my side, but that the status of B'crat is relinquished, what is rerequested for.

--Ashish Bhatnagar talk 10:50, 30 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

What I wanted with my question is to know that previous mistakes won't happen again. Did anybody learnt anything from what happen? What did you learnt from that and how do you plan to avoid those mistakes?—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 13:13, 1 October 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This IP is a open proxy. --Kolega2357 (talk) 23:23, 1 October 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Are you sure it is 'open'? I couldn't confirm that after a quick search.—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 23:27, 1 October 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
That write Confirmed proxy server. --Kolega2357 (talk) 23:30, 1 October 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
We must be sure whether this is an 'open' proxy (example) or not before blocking as open proxy.—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 21:51, 2 October 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Note: Linked site on my previous message seems to change with time, so it may represent what I meant at that moment.—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 03:08, 11 October 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Hi Teles, I wanted to ask you if you can grant me the autopatroller user right or not? I would want my edits to be automatically patrolled while I am editing Meta-related articles and templates. I am a patroller on Commons, reviewer on English Wikipedia and local rollbacker on 3 Wikimedia projects. I would also want to revert vandalism here (if I cam find some). I have did a lot of anti-vandalism work on Commons, Simple English and English Wikipedia. I hope that you can grant me the autopatroller right here. Thanks. Jianhui67 talkcontribs 14:09, 19 October 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Sorry if I wasn't clear in my previous messages a few days ago. The answer is 'no' as your edits are too few and recent. That usually comes without any request when a sysop believes your participation is enough. If any other sysop thinks you are ready for that now, it will be granted. Also, it doesn't affect your participation here in any way. Regards.—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 22:15, 20 October 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
23 days is not a few days ago. So when an admin see my edits are enough so they will grant me this right? How many edits will that take? I am already a patroller on Commons and Commons patrollers are autopatrolled. Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:13, 21 October 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Yeah, when an admin check your edits and see that they are fine, that will be granted with no need for a request. There is not a defined number for that.—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 23:56, 21 October 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Minha conta travada

Senhor Teles, que negócio é esse de travar minha conta definitiva, MIL973, pois parei para sempre de criar fantoches desde o final de agosto e nunca mais editei na Wikipédia desde esta época e pararei de editar nela por tempo indeterminado até que minha conta (MIL973) seja destravada. Nunca mais quero saber de vandalismo, nem de contas de ataque, nem de nomes impróprios e parei com isso desde aquele tempo. Se Bigralf, Stuckkey e outros foram desbloqueados, por que não posso ter uma segunda chance, pois todos nós erramos? Eu, por volta do mês de maio do ano passado, nem tinha noção das regras da Wikipédia. Era um novato. Eu corrigia erros gramaticais, como "À Osasco fui em fevereiro de 2010", "previlégio", "Se formou em 1937" e outros. Eu necessito de defesa, como num júri popular. Agradeço-lhe de todo o meu coração! Obrigado! 13:42, 23 October 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Vou falar com um administrador do Wikcionário. Se ele aceitar que seja desbloqueado mesmo sabendo quem é, por mim tudo bem, já que promete não cometer os mesmos erros de antigamente. Na Wikipédia, acho difícil que alguém aceite sua volta. Eu sou um dos que não aceitam pelo longo histórico de coisas erradas que fez.—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 19:17, 23 October 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Obrigado, Senhor Teles! Tenha um ótimo término de tarde de quarta-feira! 20:38, 23 October 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Feito. Espero que entenda que o que ocorreu aqui é algo raro e que ao menor sinal de abuso a conta voltará a ser bloqueada. Espero que queira mesmo aproveitar essa oportunidade e que possa contribuir sem problemas.—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 23:41, 25 October 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Amilton de Cristo

Thanks. I locked these and some others.—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 03:28, 29 October 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your User Page

Dear Teles. I saw that you allow users to translate your userpage's header. I didn't see Bengali (bn). So I have added Bengali to the list.  --Pratyya (Hello!) 06:39, 31 October 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Awesome! Thank you!—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 13:37, 31 October 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Cannot add wikilinks !

Dear Teles,

I'm sysyop of tk wiki. I cannot add wikilinks in wikidata. That is, the "add" option is not displayed below the language list. I'm not sure what happened. Could you please help me or direct me to whom who can help? Thank you in advance. --Hanberke (talk) 05:53, 11 November 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, Hanberke. I am not active on Wikidata, but I think you will find somebody to help you here: d:Wikidata:Project chat. I hope that helps. Regards.—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 22:04, 11 November 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Surpassed Global Blocks

Hey Teles, Just so you know your two recent global blocks ( and are currently being surpassed by Just thought I'd tell you :) John F. Lewis (talk) 18:37, 8 December 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

They are now, but range block was previously set for anonymous only and that is why a hardblock on each IP could make a difference. That range should remain softblocked IMO unless it is proven that they were used for spam outside of Meta. Thanks for the note. —Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 18:44, 8 December 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
(ec) Yeah, we checked at the same time and I modified a global block and blocked that same range on meta too. :) Trijnsteltalk 18:44, 8 December 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

SUL account

I am the swedish sv:Användare:GO and I`m trying to create a SUL account but there is a pt user GO on pt.wikinews, pt.wikiquote, and pt.wiktionary. I`m wondering what I´ll have to do to take over those accounts, they haven`t been used since 18 juli 2007.--GO (talk) 14:35, 16 December 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi! Three different cases:
For Wiktionary, you can request here: pt:wikt:Wikcionário:Mudança do nome de usuário.
For Wikinews, they don't have local bureaucrats, so that can be done by a steward. However, I don't know what are their policies about usurping an account with edits, so I asked local users what to do here.
Wikiquote have local bureaucrats, but they don't have a specific page to ask, so I left a message on bureaucrats' pages: [5], [6].
I hope that will help you.—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 16:00, 17 December 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

.. Thanks for your help.--GO (talk) 10:51, 18 December 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A conta anterior GO no pt.wikiquote foi renomeada para GO (SUL). --Chico (talk) 16:52, 21 December 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Return to the user page of "Teles/Archive/2013".