User talk:Ruslik0/Archive/2020

Active discussions

Emblem-important.svg This is an archive of User talk:Ruslik0, please don't edit it.

Why is my IP blocked?Edit

I wanted to create an account and got this message:

This IP address is currently globally blocked. The global block log entry is provided below for reference:

   13:43, 9 October 2019: Ruslik0 ( globally blocked (expires on 9 October 2020 at 13:43, anonymous only) (edits · IP check · whois) (Long-term abuse) 

Please help.

Best regards,


Because it was used for abuse. Ruslik (talk) 17:50, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[]

adminship for Aereus646Edit

Hi, thx for approving my request at You did not specify if the adminship was granted to Aereus646 for one year. I hope so! Best wishes, --Luensu1959 (talk) 17:30, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[]

It was granted indefinitely. Ruslik (talk) 18:18, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[]
Thank you so much for helping our small Wiki! --Luensu1959 (talk) 08:35, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[]

Zabavuju flašku chlastu maskovanou jako zubní pastu global lockEdit

Hello, Rusliko, could you please specify why exactly you decided to impose a global (b)lock on this respected colleague of mine?
The reason provided (that I am able to find) is "Long-term abuse" - which sounds pretty vague to me, and perhaps quite mistaken. I must admit I've been rather shocked if not outraged at finding out about this block. I'm speaking now for Czech Wiktionary (not on its behalf!): this user has proved to be extremely useful, prolific and competent for our project. Moreover, (s)he was coming close to being eligible for adminship. Now (s)he is banned from everything & perhaps quite demotivated. Is this really proportionate and justifiable?
Would you please reconsider? Thank you for your openness of mind, --Pyprilescu (talk) 08:51, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[]

It was one of dozens socketpuppets that I locked yesterday. As to adminship, why not to make an admin out of User:ВАЅТАЯДЕМ ЅІ КЯАЈІМ СНГЕВА, for instance, or User:Každý Čech s instinktem se rodí Přece se to nevyhodí or User:Nejsem tak úplně zvyklá rodit vysazená na bicykla? Or even better, you can make all those socks admins. Why not? They belong to the same person anyway. Ruslik (talk) 18:32, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[]
What makes you refer to this user(name) as a sockpuppet? A sockpuppet of whose? How do you know that it is not his or her main account? (The user has never and nowhere claimed they were a beginner or it were their first and only account. We, insiders, know of course who they are but don't deny them right to have a fresh start or to abandon their previous nick.) If you looked at his or her editing history more carefully, you should be able to clearly see that the person in question has used it to provide, to deliver exclusively useful, meaningful and helpful edits, plenty of them, no destructive behavior, trolling or abuse whatsoever! Furthermore, (s)he has also developped lots of needed, hitherto missing templates and modules. Yes, their username is somewhat playful, but there is no profanity or aggression in it. I'm urging you, Ruslik: please, lift the block as soon as possible. Otherwise, you'd be seriously damaging our wikiproject. (Or shall I perhaps try to ask some other global admins to lift the block?) Thank you, --Pyprilescu (talk) 14:08, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
As to the other nicks, or sockpuppets as you call them, that you mention as blocked by you on Nov 13, none of them is offensive either and, apart from the first one, they editted for a few hours in total, offending nobody and destroyint/damaging/vandalizing nothing. Hence, none of them has earned being banned globally. As to for whom we, Czech Wiktionarians, would vote or not, it is completely our business and none of yours - or perhaps of those from Czech Wikipedia who tipped you off? -, unless I am very wrong. Isn't it? So next time you might keep your irony for... your domains. Thanks. --Pyprilescu (talk) 14:32, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[]
Здрасьте Руслик, могу-ли надеяться, что вы удостоите меня каким-нибудь ответом? Спасибо, --Pyprilescu (talk) 15:34, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[]
I am not inclined to unlock them. Ruslik (talk) 17:26, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[]

I looked up this account, by chance, looking up Talk here, and you, Pyprilescu, are wrong, while Ruslik is right. I know Czechs are known for their humour (hej, měl jsem českou přítelkyni a bydlel jsem tam sám), but this is against the goals of WP. Stop it. Zezen (talk) 15:04, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[]

Late post, for reference: Pyprilescu operates a significant number of provocatively named sock accounts in the Czech Wiktionary, which he openly admits; the accounts' contributions are largely useful, though. It does not follow that the discussed account is Pyprilescu's, but he does have a rather peculiar idea of proper behavior as for user account creation and naming. Pyprilescu socks are usually not blocked in the Czech Wiktionary. I for one am very happy that User:Zabavuju flašku chlastu maskovanou jako zubní pastu is locked since it is obviously (to me) inappropriate user name, and I love it when sanity prevails. --Dan Polansky (talk) 08:50, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[]


That range which has been blocked by you once. I had lifted it for an urgent action and reblocked it. I don't know much about that range but I'm getting more and more complaints about it. So I have lifted the block. When you think it's necessary to have it blocked, please re-block it. Thanks, —DerHexer (Talk) 11:15, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[]

ROXELANA22 abuseEdit

This LTA is back, and I have filed another request on m:SRG. Can you please also run a sleeper check on the listed IP range and expand the Global + Local block to this range for at least 6-12 months? This appears to be his latest IP range, and he has abused at least 3 different /24 subnetworks on this range in the past 6 months; his IP ranges also appear to be stable for around 2 years at a time. He is back to his usual behavior of cross-wiki disruption and threatening of other editors. BTW, I would seriously like to see someone file a report at the WMF Trust & Safety team on this person, given the nature of their threats. LightandDark2000 🌀 (talk) 06:51, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[]

Can you please Globally Lock Sasonata and run a sleeper check on that account? I forgot to include it in my SRG report. BTW, thanks for the help. LightandDark2000 🌀 (talk) 09:13, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[]
@LightandDark2000:, and Ruslik0, blocking Roxelana is more of an art form than an exact science. Although I try and be as accurate as possible when blocking the socks, I make absolutely no guarantees that they are all Roxelana. And I guarantee not all stewards will know any more than me. Please bear that in mind when making requests. Related to this, there are usually other users on Roxelana networks, and blocking all of the networks will result in collateral. -- zzuuzz (talk) 10:14, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[]
I had suspected something like this. However, an anon-only IP block (like the one currently applied) would allow affected individuals with registered accounts to continue to edit. Others on the range who chose to remain anonymous are going to have to sit tight; the collateral from this group is the necessary price of curbing such destructive serial LTAs like this one. The more than decade-long abuse needs to end. LightandDark2000 🌀 (talk) 06:02, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[]


Please is this link giving you an error or not I want to debug something. Also please test whether any 'manage' or 'revoke' link is giving your an error too on Special:OAuthManageMyGrants. Thanks. – Ammarpad (talk) 10:22, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[]

Yes, it gives an error. Ruslik (talk) 10:25, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[]
As well as all 'manage' and 'revoke' links. Ruslik (talk) 10:27, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[]
OK thank you. – Ammarpad (talk) 10:47, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[]



Can you please unlock the IP range ? Since this range includes my IP I am currently not able to create a Wikipedia-account.

Thanks in advance. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Orthonormalverbraucher (talk)

@Orthonormalverbraucher: You have an account, please use this account to edit the Wikipedias, as our accounts work across all the wikimedia wikis per single user login.  — billinghurst sDrewth 21:29, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[]

Confirm the global block reason of User:壹壪Edit

User:壹壪 said that he had been global blocked because zhwiki sysop had blocked him for abusing multiple accounts. So his statement is real or not? Thank you. --SCP-2000 12:03, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[]

Furthermore, if he want to appeal that decision, where should he go to appeal? --SCP-2000 12:06, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[]
@SCP-2000: See under Steward_requests/Global/2019-10. It seems that MCC214 said he is a sock of 韩导名猿, with Manchiu locally blocking him as a duck (but didn't indicate who is the master). If he wants to appeal, stewards --Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 12:25, 12 March 2020 (UTC)corrected--Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 13:29, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[]
Pardon me of something wrong with the above comment. He posted the reply of stewards in telegram group #wikipedia-zh-help. In that email, a steward replied that he has been blocked at zhwiki, and he should appeal in zhwiki. Normally, the sysop in local cannot deal with the appeal of the global lock. And that email has a conflict with the normal situation. So I want to confirm that reply is real or not. Thank you. --SCP-2000 13:13, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[]
cc@Camouflaged Mirage: --SCP-2000 13:14, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[]
I cannot remember details but always checkusered those accounts in login wiki. That it is locked means that I found something at least very suspicious. Ruslik (talk) 14:28, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[]
So what will be that user way of appealing this? As they so called said a stew told them that they need to be locally unblocked for an unlock. Just for reference. Thanks much --Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 14:29, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[]
If the local block is lifted, I will lift the lock. Ruslik (talk) 14:47, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[]
Thank you. Will convey. --Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 14:52, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[]
Local admin has lifted the block.--Tiger- (talk) 15:39, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[]


Удали с его ЛС текст о том, что он стюард (уже нет). Я не смог из-за фильтра правок. MBH (talk) 02:00, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[]


if it's rejected, can I create a bot request again? Aɳɳa∞ 21:45, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[]

In idwiki all bot requests must be handled by local bureaucrats. Ruslik (talk) 19:52, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[]

globally lock User:Daegu Metro Line 3Edit

globally lock User:Daegu Metro Line 3 (저는 영어를 이해하지 못합니다..)--대구버스매니아 (talk) 10:41, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[]

SRG. Ruslik (talk) 16:13, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[]


Hello Ruslan, Deryck from Wikimania here. I noticed that you've globally blocked User:香港獨立萬歲 following their block on zh.wp and a further block request by User:WikiBayer. I have reviewed their contributions on yue.wp and found that their contributions to the article namespace are generally productive and the problem was their user page where they stated a strong political opinion which presumably angered some admins on zh.wp, leading to the block, and subsequently indef block for socking ironically because they tried to negotiate a username change and unblock by editing without logging in.

I wonder if you may be kind enough to lift the global block, or even more radically, whitelist this user for yue.wp only, so I may negotiate an unblock condition with him (which for the case of yue.wp would be as simple as not using his user page for political statements that don't relate to Wikipedia)? Deryck C. 15:09, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[]

@Deryck Chan: You might be interested in Steward_requests/Global/2020-04#Global_unlock_for_香港獨立萬歲. Then I am asking for an unlock as I feel the same per you. I only withdrawn the unlock request as someone told me if not of a global lock they will be locally blocked on zh-yue. If it is not true, then I think I will press for the unlock of this user. There is no way to whitelist an user from global lock, the only way is to lift it all together, this is for accounts. For IP, then sysops are able to whitelist locally. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 15:48, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[]
I had read this before I locked this account. And actually have no desire to unlock it. Ruslik (talk) 16:22, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[]
@Camouflaged Mirage: As far as I'm aware, User:WikiBayer has not made any attempt to contact any yue.wp admin on the issue of blocking 香港獨立萬歲 (see yue:Special:貢獻/WikiBayer), nor is there any local discussion about blocking him (empty block log; no warning message on user talk). If you've seen anyone say this user would be blocked in yue.wp if not for the global block, I believe they had misinterpreted; what is meant was that there was nothing one could do on yue.wp locally because the account was globally locked. I also note that WikiBayer based his decision on the DeepL translator; as a native speaker of Boarisch he ought to have known that passing Cantonese text through a machine translator as if it was Standard Chinese is likely to lead to all sorts of misunderstanding, much as passing Boarisch text into ML as German. Deryck C. 16:24, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[]
I see Deryck Chan. Will leave it up to you. Thanks for the clarification, though zh user, I am zh-yue-0 so I had no way to verify Wikibayer claims. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 16:31, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[]
I should repeat that the yue.wp community agrees that this user's user page was overly promotional. However, WikiBayer seems to have based his decision to globally lock the user solely on an incorrect machine translation of the user page (which likely aggravated matters) and apparently with no consideration of the user's other contributions. This is why I'm suggesting lifting the global lock, and allow the user back on the condition of not using the user page for off-topic political advocacy, and a strong recommendation to change their username (though yue.wp is typically more liberal with allowing politically charged usernames than zh.wp, which is why the username itself was grounds for blocking at zh.wp but not yue.wp) Deryck C. 16:48, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[]
@Deryck Chan: I am amazed by your request. I am aware that machine translators are not 100% correct, but you can basically see what is being written. This user has no doubt against "Neutral Point Of View". violate. According to a sysop from the zh wiki, several socks misused. His uploaded pictures at commons only serve the purpose of spreading his political opinion. The uploaded pictures at Commons also had the goal of spreading his political opinion.--𝐖𝐢𝐤𝐢𝐁𝐚𝐲𝐞𝐫 👤💬 17:36, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[]
@WikiBayer: Thanks for your clarification; no I was unaware of his promotional uploads to Commons (because they had all been deleted), so as far as I was aware his only infractions had been politically promotional userpages, a username inappropriate for zh.wp, and technical socking (zh.wp enforces socking rules very literally). @Ruslik0: May I have clarification as to whether this is a global lock or global ban? Deryck C. 13:54, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[]
P.P.S. Again I should state that the yue.wp agrees that this user's (deleted) userpage was inappropriate because it was promotional, but "neutral point of view" is not supposed to apply outside the main / article namespace. The idea of a discussion page is that every editor should feel comfortable to state their point of view and then different editors can have a discussion to establish what the neutral point of view is! Deryck C. 23:42, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[]
This was a global lock. P.S. I am going to tolerate any calls to violence and this user seems to have been calling for violence. Ruslik (talk) 18:27, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[]
Thanks for the clarification. I'll bring these back to the yue.wp community. P.S. The "call for violence" is one of the areas where DeepML really screwed it up. The deleted user page did advocate that vandalism of symbols of an oppressive regime should be justified, though the sentence that WikiBayer quoted was a quotation from another forum, which DeepML messed up and which this user was quoting in order to express his disapproval of. Deryck C. 23:27, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[]
I personally see very little difference between calling or publicly endorsing violence. Both violate the basic principles of Wikimedia projects--𝐖𝐢𝐤𝐢𝐁𝐚𝐲𝐞𝐫 👤💬 11:51, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[]

Уведомление о переводе: Template:2030 movement brand project nav/textEdit

Здравствуйте, Ruslik0!

Вы получили это письмо, так как зарегистрировались на сайте «Meta» в качестве переводчика на следующий язык: русский. Страница Template:2030 movement brand project nav/text доступна для перевода. Вы можете перевести её здесь:

Приоритет этой страницы — высокий.

Мы были бы очень признательны за вашу помощь. Такие переводчики, как вы, помогают сделать сайт «Meta» подлинно многоязычным сообществом.

Вы можете поменять настройки оповещений.


Координаторы переводов сайта «Meta»‎, 07:51, 18 June 2020 (UTC)

For extend interface adminshipEdit

Hi Ruslik0, I was only the interface administrator of Santali wikipedia. My adminship is expired before couple of week. Hence, It would be very nice if you extend my adminship. Thanks in advance. Ramjit Tudu (talk) 16:02, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[]

SRP exits for this purpose. Ruslik (talk) 20:43, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[]

Уведомление о переводе: VisualEditor/Newsletter/2020/JulyEdit

Здравствуйте, Ruslik0!

Вы получили это письмо, так как зарегистрировались на сайте «Meta» в качестве переводчика на следующий язык: русский. Страница VisualEditor/Newsletter/2020/July доступна для перевода. Вы можете перевести её здесь:

Крайний срок для перевода этой страницы — the end of this week.

Мы были бы очень признательны за вашу помощь. Такие переводчики, как вы, помогают сделать сайт «Meta» подлинно многоязычным сообществом.

Вы можете поменять настройки оповещений.


Координаторы переводов сайта «Meta»‎, 20:26, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

German WikipediaEdit

Hi Rusliko, I hope that you will care. Article 103 of the German law prohibits a double punishment for a single offense, and the fact that the administrators refuse to accept my request for the deletion of my talk page Benutzer Diskussion:Edelseider is a case of double punishment. I am not suggesting an intent to take legal steps, I am stating, and forcefully so, that it is immoral. Thank you for your patience. --Edelseider (talk) 18:39, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[]

Article 103 of the German law does not apply to German Wikipedia or to any other Wikimedia project. Ruslik (talk) 12:40, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[]

About global lock.Edit

Hello, Mr. Ruslik. I found that you suspected me as an account of my friends. I assume that you are not absolutely wrong. But please reconsider something. First, I had to guide him to create an account. Second, his VPN (he uses VPN to get connected to internet) was being blocked by wiki. So, he had to use my PC several times. And one more thing, as he doesn't get allowed to use wiki because of his network. He has to quit from wiki. I hope you are not going to let something wrong happen. Thanks. ShohagS (talk) 03:52, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[]

It must be a very close friend indeed - he even signs messages using your name. Ruslik (talk) 08:55, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[]

That's he thanked me mentioning my name. He didn't know about singing then, I believe. But I think he is not going to be in wiki for a while. Thanks. ShohagS (talk) 12:43, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[]

Уведомление о переводе: Tech/News/2020/32Edit

Здравствуйте, Ruslik0!

Вы получили это письмо, так как зарегистрировались на сайте «Meta» в качестве переводчика на следующий язык: русский. Страница Tech/News/2020/32 доступна для перевода. Вы можете перевести её здесь:

Мы были бы очень признательны за вашу помощь. Такие переводчики, как вы, помогают сделать сайт «Meta» подлинно многоязычным сообществом.

Вы можете поменять настройки оповещений.


Координаторы переводов сайта «Meta»‎, 05:26, 31 July 2020 (UTC)

Уведомление о переводе: Tech/Server switch 2020Edit

Здравствуйте, Ruslik0!

Вы получили это письмо, так как зарегистрировались на сайте «Meta» в качестве переводчика на следующий язык: русский. Страница Tech/Server switch 2020 доступна для перевода. Вы можете перевести её здесь:

Приоритет этой страницы — средний.

Мы были бы очень признательны за вашу помощь. Такие переводчики, как вы, помогают сделать сайт «Meta» подлинно многоязычным сообществом.

Вы можете поменять настройки оповещений.


Координаторы переводов сайта «Meta»‎, 13:03, 15 August 2020 (UTC)

reason for lockEdit

Hi Ruslik, today I have seen by a chance the block log of user Connaisseur de Paris here. The reason you gave is "Long-term abuse: Alkim und Alfons", which is a very old story. The user has been checked as an sock puppet of Meister und Margarita, sie here and here. Can you change it? By the way, Meister und Margarita has another new socks: User:L'amico Fritz and User:Il ragazzo Franz. See you, cheers -jkb- 18:03, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[]

What to change? Summary? Ruslik (talk) 18:08, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[]
The justification, or reason for the lock. Connaisseur de Paris is no sock af Alkim or Alfons, but the sock of Meister an Margerita. Cheers -jkb- 18:30, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[]
Summaries cannot be changed. In addition, Meister und Margarita is itself a sock of Alkim and Alfons. Ruslik (talk) 18:50, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[]
No, that is wrong. The present Sock of Alfons is Khatschaturjan, see here (both living in Switzerland), Alkim hs no present socks, see here. Meister und Margarita is personally known to many Users mostly from Vienna. Sure you cannot change the summary, but you can edit a new lock which will overwrite the old one. Cheers, -jkb- 19:13, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[]
CU data indicate that Meister und Margarita was a sock of Alkim and Alfons. Ruslik (talk) 19:20, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[]
well, never mind, but never have heard this on german wp, although we habe had some 12 CUs to meister. So long, -jkb- 19:26, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[]
This is old data from 2015. Ruslik (talk) 19:27, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[]

We sent you an e-mailEdit

Hello Ruslik0/Archive/2020,

Really sorry for the inconvenience. This is a gentle note to request that you check your email. We sent you a message titled "The Community Insights survey is coming!". If you have questions, email

You can see my explanation here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:45, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[]

Banned from WikiEdit


    I have recently created an account on Wikipedia only to have it globally locked for "long term abuse." It seems I am not the only one with this issue. Is there a reason for this? Have I made an error?
-Costontine21 (locked account userid)
Unlocked. Ruslik (talk) 19:33, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[]
Thanks! Costontine21 (talk) 15:44, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[]

IP-Address banEdit

Hi! I wanted to add a talk on Wikipedia, and saw, that my address (Vodafone, Germany, Mobile Data) was banned from the editing, tho it was not with a VPN, or something else which could explain that. It seems to be part of this address: 2A00:20:2000:0:0:0:0:0/40 (Has that something to do with internet provider?) If you want a picture or something like that, just ask me. Thanks, --WoelfiVW (talk) 11:51, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[]

Oh sorry for bothering, I did not see that I was not registered. Thanks for reading ^^ WoelfiVW (talk) 13:52, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[]


Where do I request adminship for af.wikiquote? Any advice greatly appreciated. JMK (talk) 12:13, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[]

You should request it locally and after you have a consensus you can apply on SRP. Ruslik (talk) 16:20, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[]
I suspect that there is no community on af.wikiquote, and consequently that there is nobody there who can reach a consensus. I could be the first to have any formal status there. JMK (talk) 16:40, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[]

Some questions about removing sysop rightsEdit

For a big project like Chinese Wikipedia, in what conditions would a sysop have his rights removed without local consensus and not in a voluntary way? ΣανμοσαThe Trve Lawe of free Monarchies 15:06, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[]

If a local inactivity policy demands removal otherwise in emergency only. Ruslik (talk) 08:08, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[]
So in what circumstances would a case be identified as "emergency"? ΣανμοσαThe Trve Lawe of free Monarchies 14:09, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[]
In general, en:WP:BEANS. But for example, something as stupid as writing a bot that edit wars with other admins while the user goes to sleep. Someone who did this ---> --Base (talk) 14:47, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[]

Community Wishlist Survey 2021: InvitationEdit

SGrabarczuk (WMF)

18:25, 20 November 2020 (UTC)


hi, You said here that you are doing permanent authorization, but now I'm not even an steward. Can you solve this problem, thanks. --Satirdan kahraman (talk) 17:24, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[]

Done. Ruslik (talk) 21:09, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[]

Community Wishlist Survey 2021Edit

SGrabarczuk (WMF)

16:09, 11 December 2020 (UTC)

How can I Replace Arabic digits to Arabic-indic digits on pnbwikiEdit

plz guide me how can I replace Arabic digits (123456789) to Arabic-indic digits(۱۲۳۴۵۶۷۸۹) by default for everyone going to "pnbwiki"

Thanx, --Abbas dhothar (talk) 21:48, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[]

No idea. Ruslik (talk) 10:17, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[]

Уведомление о переводе: Wikimedia CHEdit

Здравствуйте, Ruslik0!

Вы получили это письмо, так как зарегистрировались на сайте «Meta» в качестве переводчика на следующий язык: русский. Страница Wikimedia CH доступна для перевода. Вы можете перевести её здесь:

Приоритет этой страницы — средний.

Мы были бы очень признательны за вашу помощь. Такие переводчики, как вы, помогают сделать сайт «Meta» подлинно многоязычным сообществом.

Вы можете поменять настройки оповещений.


Координаторы переводов сайта «Meta»‎, 07:42, 17 December 2020 (UTC)

2 Factor Auth tester permissionsEdit

Hi, I applied for 2 Factor Auth tester permissions and you marked my request as done, but my global groups didn't change. Is there a reason for that? --ZabeMath (talk) 15:01, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[]

Help pleaseEdit

I am the editor of Ukrainian Wikipedia. I have a request for a global block to Vujko Mytró (, who is already blocked in English Wikipedia and Russian Wikipedia ( Among other things, it has more than 50 blockades on Ukrainian Wikipedia, as well as harassment of users from outside Wikipedia, such as Facebook (the latter has a decision of the Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests: Вікіпедія:Запити на арбітраж/Переслідування користувачем Бучач-Львів (новий)). But he continues to persecute and retrieve. Ukrainian Wikipedia administrators do not react in any way. He supplanted many adequate editors. Therefore, Vujko Mytró, who is blocked for such actions in two Wikipedias, should be blocked globally. Thank you very much --Jphwra (talk) 18:47, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[]

For such requests there exists SRG. Ruslik (talk) 20:40, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[]

Steward requests/permissions : wawikiEdit


I send you this message in order to confirm you that the bureaucrat of wawiki write on this page that he agreed that I become a administrator (the last message of my section) :

Sincerely yours,

Èl-Gueuye-Noere —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Èl-Gueuye-Noere (talk) 20:35, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[]

Request - New UserEdit

Hi I'm not sure on the process here, but I am trying to create a new account and it says my IP address is withing a range of blocked IP addresses so I can't. This is obviously something I have no knowledge or involvement of and have never had a Wikipedia account before.

I was hoping to simply create a page and log back out can you let me know what I need to dp/prove to be allowed to do this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 01:54, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[]

Return to the user page of "Ruslik0/Archive/2020".