User talk:MarcoAurelio/Archives/2022-10
 | Please do not post any new comments on this page. This is a discussion archive first created in October 2022, although the comments contained were likely posted before and after this date. See current discussion or the archives index. |
The Signpost: 30 September 2022
- News and notes: Board vote results, bot's big GET, crat chat gives new mop, WMF seeks "sound logo" and "organizer lab"
- In the media: A few complaints and mild disagreements
- Special report: Decentralized Fundraising, Centralized Distribution
- Discussion report: Much ado about Fox News
- Traffic report: Kings and queens and VIPs
- Featured content: Farm-fresh content
- CommonsComix: CommonsComix 2: Paulus Moreelse
- From the archives: 5, 10, and 15 Years ago: September 2022
Notificación de traducción: Universal Code of Conduct/Revised enforcement guidelines/Announcement/Consultation Close
Hola, MarcoAurelio:
Has recibido esta notificación porque te inscribiste como traductor de español en Meta. La página Universal Code of Conduct/Revised enforcement guidelines/Announcement/Consultation Close está disponible para su traducción. Puedes traducirla aquí:
La prioridad de esta página es media.
Agradecemos enormemente tu ayuda. Traductores como tú hacen que Meta funcione como una verdadera comunidad multilingüe.
Puedes cambiar tus preferencias de notificación.
¡Gracias!
Los coordinadores de traducción de Meta, 02:16, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
ary.wikipedia global bots
Hi again, I've proposed global bots on ary.wikipedia and gotten this response: [1] It seems like they are okay with global bots but only in certain circumstances. Would this fall under "global bots (without policy)"? Rschen7754 19:34, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
- Hello @Rschen7754. Apologies for the late reply, I am having busy days. Looking at the local discussion I think the ary.wikipedia community does reject the Meta global bot policy and would prefer to have all bots to pass through the local approval process? The last statement on that page, that global bots are accepted on arywiki, as long as they only fix double redirects, or one of the errors in [this list] does not persuade me to add them to the "no policy" list considering the general opposition to adopt the global bot policy and the insistence to develop their own local policy. Erring in the side of caution, I'd list ary.wikipedia in the "proposal rejected" column. Feel free to consult with other stewards about this too as I'm likely going to be unavailable for some days. Apologies again for the late reply and for any inconvenience caused. Best regards, —MarcoAurelio (talk) 11:42, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks, I agree that it is better to be cautious on this one and I've listed accordingly. --Rschen7754 23:39, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
The Signpost: 31 October 2022
- From the team: A new goose on the roost
- News from the WMF: Governance updates from, and for, the Wikimedia Endowment
- Disinformation report: From Russia with WikiLove
- Featured content: Topics, lists, submarines and Gurl.com
- Serendipity: We all make mistakes – don’t we?
- Traffic report: Mama, they're in love with a criminal