User talk:Jusjih/Archives to 2013

tw.wikipedia

Hello. tw.wikipedia.org is the Wikipedia for the Twi language spoken in Africa. However, users frequently add Chinese articles there because they confuse it with the Taiwanese Wikipedia (tw being a common abbreviation for Taiwan). I was wondering if you could formulate a warning notice in Chinese to tell people that tw.wikipedia.org is not the Taiwanese Wikipedia (and preferably point them to zh.wikipedia.org). -- Prince Kassad 12:34, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

I see a Chinese news brief. I will take action.--Jusjih 18:02, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

I have formulated a warning notices in both English and traditional Chinese. Thanks for your report.--Jusjih 23:14, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

Question regarding Wikisource (possible huge addition to it)

I was referred to you as a good one to contact regarding this. Someone from GovernmentDocs.org contacted us via OTRS (Ticket#: 2010030310058917 if you have access) indicating that that site was going to be shut down soon and they were looking for someplace for all their content to go. I immediately thought of Wikisource as a good possibility. Would you be willing to contact this person and work with them on the details of what this might entail? If so, please email me the contact information I can provide this person so this process can begin. Thanks! ···日本穣^? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 06:36, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

Provided their contents are source texts with copyright license compatible with Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License 3.0 and the GFDL, English Wikisource can host them. Just tell them to post their works on Wikisource with evidence of licensing, such as your provided OTRS ticket number.--Jusjih 03:13, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

Notice of review of adminship

Hello,

In accordance with Meta:Administrators/Removal and because you have made fewer than ten logged actions over the past six months, your adminship is under review at Meta:Administrators/Removal/April 2010. If you would like to retain your adminship, please sign there before April 11, 2010. Kind regards, vvv^t 20:52, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

Thanks. I see your message via my email notice. I just signed my name with comment there.--Jusjih 02:10, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

SRP

Hello Jusjih, I've commented on your request. If you want to add something you are invited to do so or me or another steward will set the temporary bit. Regards, — Dferg ☎ 14:15, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

可否協助oversight

可否協助oversight [1]裡面有關封禁用戶有 陳霆、沈彥良、許瑜真、陋室、黃德偉 等名稱的帳號(如果必要,我可以列出)，因為影武者利用建立帶有人身攻擊的新用戶名稱對管理員做人身攻擊，並企圖讓搜尋引擎找到，已對管理員造成困擾。--Cloudcolors 03:09, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

有些我已經隱藏，因為公然侮辱他人的用戶名，足以違反海峽兩岸法律。建議您別直接列出完整公然侮辱他人的用戶名，關鍵字詞就行，我會找。謝謝來函。Jusjih 03:55, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

謝謝，關鍵詞如上面所列出的人名--Cloudcolors 07:55, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

使用Special:EmailUser/Jusjih就能不公開的送來完整公然侮辱他人的用戶名，也不會留在這份用戶討論頁面。正在處理也要時間。Jusjih 01:23, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

還有，剛才發現不登錄時的封禁列表更能找到尚待隱藏的惡性用戶名，然後另開視窗登錄處理。管理大量維基，時間有限，所以百科再有惡性用戶名要隱藏，歡迎這邊報告，我從電郵就能知情。謝謝。Jusjih 03:06, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

Edit requests

Please assist I have requested edits to the interwiki map due to a broken link; can you please assist me with this? Thanks. Koavf 01:24, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

Done. Please check.Jusjih 03:52, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

Thanks First off, I moved the request to the appropriate section: Talk:Interwiki_map#Requests_for_updates. Furthermore, it's not fixed on en.wp right now, but maybe it's updating soon. Thanks again. Koavf 06:34, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

Blocked on wikitionary for no apparent reason

I am a relatively long time wikipedia editor with reviewer and rollback rights with no knowledge of wikitionary. Recently, I made my first edit to wikitionary because I noticed that they included a word I didn't think existed. The word "despicability" does not feature in either the OED or the New Oxford American Dictionary and I have certainly never heard of it, or seen it used. On that note I tagged the page for deletion and left a note on the discussion page. For some absolutely ridiculous reason I was blocked for a period of one day by SemperBlotto. No reason, no warning, no explanation, nothing. And I can't even edit my talk page to appeal the block. Even if I had been wrong and if for some reason the OED and the NOAD had missed out this entry by mistake, surely there would at least have been a discussion or at most, and even this would be a step to far, a warning? As far as I am aware the noun for despicable is "despicableness". Regardless of whether I am right or wrong, I do not like being blocked unfairly and actually think that whoever this user Blotto is, he should get a telling off, and I am tempted to say "remove his admin rights". Admins don't behave like tyrannical fools. Maybe it was a mistake which I can understand but an explanation and an instant unblock are mandatory. I am appealing to you because you are an admin on wikitionary and furthermore a steward. I hope to hear from you soon. Jay-Sebastos 17:12, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

After reviewing your edits, I saw no valid reasons to support your tagging for speedy deletion of the word "despicability". You could better tag it {{rfd}} to request non-speedy deletion by discussion. In the other hand, I do not see valid reasons per wikt:Wiktionary:Blocking policy for SemperBlotto to block you so fast. Simply ruling, you and that blocking admin both have had "wrong ways" that should be easily corrected. I am telling that blocking admin, who was blocked earlier, to think more carefully next time, but I cannot erase your block log.Jusjih 22:35, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

RE: Your untagged files

That files are facsimil copies of public documents from goverment institutions. I really don't know how to tag them with a license. Patricio.lorente 11:44, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

Ready to run

Thank you Jusjih for the acceptance of my candidacy as a permanent sysop in Nepali Wikipedia. I felt more responsible and ready to run in the course of development of Nepalese Wikipedia. Regards.--गणेश पौडेल 06:29, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

Free license related questions

Hello, Jusjih. I noticed your contributions here, and thought you may also have some idea about this topic. If you have any helpful suggestions, I'd appreciate it if you could comment on this thread. Thanks in advance, Chaojoker 10:05, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

I replied there, but I cannot formally give you legal advice.Jusjih 17:41, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

Your untagged images

Sources and licenses, please?

• File:LinksFR.20031109.zip

The following ones with non-commercial copyright license is not compatible with Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License 3.0 or the GFDL, so they may be deleted per Meta:Deletion policy:

• File:WikiMedia-Servers-IP.png
• File:WikiMedia-Servers-IP.dia
• File:WikiMedia-Servers.png
• File:WikiMedia-Servers2.png
• File:WikiMedia-Servers3.png

Jusjih 23:09, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

Hello Jusjih

We HAVE to keep this files. They are of historical importance (2003-2004). If you really really want the licence (NC) changed, I will be happy to sign whatever paper is required to have them placed under the Wikimedia Foundation copyright.

Again, please do not delete those.

Ashar Voultoiz 22:44, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

Hello Jusjih

Following your request and with a notification by Aude, I have licensed the file under CC-by-sa-3.0 and GFDL-self.

Thanks for your notification! Ashar Voultoiz 19:50, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

RE: My untagged images

Both are my own works, I would like to release them with cc-by-sa-2.0 license. Hope you can provide suitable templates for them. Thanks. --Kurniasan 13:54, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

My untagged images

Hello. I would need some help :)

Would you care have a look here ? Thanks

Anthere 21:43, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

Transwiki

There a group of article at s:Wikisource:Proposed deletions#Anecdotes & Epigrams to transwiki to wikiquote and hopefully merge into q:Diogenes of Sinope, Following the directions at Help:Transwiki I have manually moved one in and documented at q:Talk:Diogenes of Sinope and q:Wikiquote:Transwiki log/Articles moved to here. I see that you have import tools to do the full move from wikisource to wikiquote, if you would like to move them all that would be great, if not I will continue with the manual move next week. JeepdaySock 11:03, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

Temporary sysop access - Devunt@kowikinews

Hello Jusjih. You gave here temp access to Devunt to expire on 2011-09-12, and the thread is listed at Steward_requests/Permissions/Approved_temporary as it will expire on 2011-09-11.

There should be a mistake somewhere, but I don't know what was your real decision. Thanks and have a good evening ! -- Quentinv57 ^(talk) 15:06, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

I do not know how exactly 2011-09-11 was entered, but since I said till --09-12 and it is so listed at Steward_requests/Permissions/Approved_temporary, it will expire on --09-12.--Jusjih 15:16, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

In fact, it was not listed so in the temp access pages (it was listed one year before), and that's why I sent you a message. But now I've moved it to 2012 [2], so that should be okay. -- Quentinv57 ^(talk) 16:21, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

Your vote

Hello, Jusjih. I've fixed one of your votes on current stewards elections (diff). Can you, please, check if everything is correct now? Thanks in advance.” T_ele^s (T _{@ L C S}) 04:33, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

It is fine now. Thanks. I am unsure what caused the bug.--Jusjih 12:10, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

temp admin rights.

Hi, please notice to use {{systmp}} when granting temp admin access, to ensure successful auto-archive by bot. Matanya 07:58, 5 October 2011 (UTC)

Done adding the substituted template, but wouldn't that cause the second copied archive at Steward requests/Permissions/Approved temporary?--Jusjih 09:42, 5 October 2011 (UTC)

Hello Jusjih. I edited the template and made minor changes to your message here. The bot will archive the requests on Steward requests/Permissions/Approved temporary automatically, once this and this will be approved. Your opinion is welcomed too, ofc. Have a good evening. -- Quentinv57 ^(talk) 16:42, 5 October 2011 (UTC)

Copyright of proposed logos

You left notices on my talk page concerning problems with the copyright of a bunch of proposed logos used the last time Wikibooks discussed changing its logo. Do you happen to know what if any the common practice is for licensing logos that were uploaded for that purpose? --darklama 17:11, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

Unfortunately no. When proposed logos are not formally accepted by Wikimedia, they would not be tagged Template:CopyrightByWikimedia. Those uploaded by 2006-12-29 might be eligible for Template:GFDL-presumed when reasonably able to presume in good faith, but those uploaded after that date, including yours, do not fit the presumption as Special:Upload warns that images without information about source, authorship and license will be deleted. If you did make these proposed logos by your own, please declare the ownership and the licensing to the image pages, then you may remove my notices to your talk page after the images are properly sourced and licensed. Thanks.--Jusjih 17:24, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

I figured CopyrightByWikimedia might not be appropriate for logos not formally accepted. Thanks for the information. --darklama 17:33, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

Actually on second thought, some of those proposed logos are variations of the current Wikibooks logo. Do you think those can be tagged with CopyrightByWikimedia? --darklama 18:00, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

Maybe yes per commons:Template:Copyright by Wikimedia.--Jusjih 18:22, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

RSP comment

Please take a look at SRP#Teak@hy.wikisource. Thanks. ― Teak 16:12, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

Comp1089@kvwiki

Hello Jusjih. I think there is a little problem here (you removed rights that were just extended by Trijnstel, please see these log entries). Have a nice day and all the best for 2012 ! -- Quentinv57 ^(talk) 10:36, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

Then that section at Steward requests/Permissions/Approved temporary should have been relocated with a new expiry. I just relocated the section.--Jusjih 11:19, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

Checkuser

" Inconclusive" means exactly what? That is not the same account? I'm still newbie here in Checkuser and i don't know how it works correctly. Web2365 02:31, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

No identical IPs are associated with the usernames in question. Privacy policy here cannot allow me to tell you which IPs are involved.--Jusjih 02:36, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

I know that you cannot tell me the IP, but the checkuser is done only by checking the user's IP? If the user does not have a dynamic IP and changing? Here in Brazil there are some internet's plans that do not have dynamic IP. Web2365 02:50, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

After submitting the result to the closed mailing list (CheckUser-l), any other checkuser who can determine any abuse will tell. I can answer you no more about this matter. CheckUser#Use_of_the_tool governs when the tool may or may not be used.--Jusjih 14:39, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

Inactive Asturian Wiktionary administrator

Hi, Jusjih. I've just seen your message about the inactivity of my account. I am back to wikipedia world after 4 years of making other projects relating to Asturian language (Aspell, Hunspell for Firefox and LibreOffice, LanguageTool, etc.) but now i've returned. Please keep active my administrator flag, I will start contributing soon. Thanks in advance! Best regards! --Esbardu (talk) 13:42, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

You are welcome as long as you remember your privilege and safeguard your password.--Jusjih (talk) 16:02, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

changing account name

I'd like to change my account name globally. Is there a way to do so, I've got a lot of Global accounts attached. THe name I'm looking for won't be taken globally. ----Rsrikanth05 (talk) 09:56, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

Please read the instruction at Steward requests/Username changes, but I can change your username on Wikimedia Commons as a bureaucrat there.--Jusjih (talk) 15:24, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

Orel Beilinson@ang.wikipedia

Hi Jusjih. Please see my concerns about you giving admin rights to Orel Beilinson on Steward requests/Permissions#Orel Beilinson@ang.wikipedia. Trijnstel_talk 12:35, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for your message. As credible concerns wonder if the new temporary administrator can be trusted based on the privileged actions, I have provisionally reversed granting the flags, including his or her "self-promotion".--Jusjih (talk) 15:07, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

Notice of review of adminship

Hello Jusjih. In accordance with Meta:Administrators/Removal and because you have made fewer than ten logged administrator actions over the past six months, your adminship is under review at Meta:Administrators/Removal/October 2012. If you would like to retain your adminship, please sign there before October 08, 2012. Kind regards, -- MarcoAurelio (talk) 09:42, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

bureaucrats on ku.wikt

Hi Jusjihin

the bureaucrats on ku.wiktionary are inactive after 2011.Currenty I am a administrator on ku.wikt.I am interested in being a bureaucrat.I requested for the bureaucrat flag but it wasn't accepted.And said it was said that ku.wikt have too many active users to have bureaucrats.I sent an e-mail to Erdal Ronahi (the in active 'crat) , but he didn't answer it.Thanks--85.176.158.19 13:58, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

Notice of review of adminship (April 2013)

Hello Jusjih. In accordance with Meta:Administrators/Removal and because you have made fewer than ten logged administrator actions over the past six months, your adminship is under review at Meta:Administrators/Removal/April 2013. If you would like to retain your adminship, please sign there before April 08, 2013. Kind regards. -- MarcoAurelio 14:45, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

Distributed via Global message delivery, 14:45, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

Ayie7791@ace.wikipedia

Hi,

I believe you were not aware there was an ongoing discussion in our internal list. Could you please take a look at it? Thanks! Elfix 08:39, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

Where in the internal list? Which date? Which topic?--Jusjih (talk) 16:04, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

Temporarily undone the flag grant. Temporary flag may be better.--Jusjih (talk) 16:13, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

Hi Jusjih. After my earlier request was rejected, is there any chance for me to submit the same request again at this time? because I feel that Wikipedia bahsa Aceh desperately need local admin. Thank you.--Ayie7791 (talk) 11:03, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

You may want to try starting over a new vote, but I cannot guarantee its acceptance if other stewards have reasonable doubts.--Jusjih (talk) 11:19, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

Korean wikisource

talk about Removing bureaucrat and administrator flags: No more vote since 20th May. As of 21th June, 5 support removing, 2(including one adimin) opposing removing, 2(including one adimin) nullity. All of supporters are inactive user, whose contributions are under 20. One of opposer is admin(me). One of nullity is admin but his purpose is opposing. It has been almost 6 month since you have proposed the voting. Now, please judge the consensus. ØSalamander (Talk / Contributions) 23:12, 20 June 2013 (UTC)

WaitWaitWait. When did meta remove Caffelice's adminship? WITHOUT ANY NOTIFICATION TO KOREAN WIKISOURCE?? Isn't this a neglecting ko wikisource community? Why and when did meta do that? ØSalamander (Talk / Contributions) 01:17, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

There was no neglecting ko wikisource community, as the flags were already removed on 2013-01-08 [3]. The opposing votes were entered too late. As you have just 5 administrators, 2 being inactive after 2011, I recommend your wiki to get new bureaucrats only after you get much more administrator. Thanks.--Jusjih (talk) 04:36, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

All of the users who support votes, except you, their contribution numbers are under 20 and active in ko wikipedia, not ko wikisource. Some user have only one contribution numberㅡyes, that was VOTE itself. Is this a removing according to normal consensus? ØSalamander (Talk / Contributions) 07:37, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

Sorry, I can't understand your comment, sir. Well, do you know, the support users had less-contribution than total 20, or date of their account creation? Thanks. --Idh0854 (talk) 13:02, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

Hoo man's global interface rights

It has always been practice not to remove rights from users currently undergoing reconfirmation, but to wait for their effects. Please restore Hoo man's rights in light of Steward requests/Global permissions#Global editinterface for Hoo man. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 04:31, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

Extended for another year per wide supports.--Jusjih (talk) 05:02, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

temporary permissions of sysop

Hi Jusjih, I'm a sysop at vi.wikipedia, a translator at translatewiki.net, I also active contributor at vi.wikivoyage. Can I apply for sysop right at vi.wikivoyage for some months to help technical relate to mediawiki? If yes (without waiting for comunity vote at here), then I will apply this right. Thank in advance. Best regards,--Cheers! (talk) 04:37, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

adminship on mhr.wikipedia.org

Hello. The new voting is over. Summarize, please. --Санюн Вадик (talk) 14:39, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Notice of review of adminship

Hello Jusjih. In accordance with Meta:Administrators/Removal and because you have made fewer than ten logged administrator actions over the past six months, your adminship is under review at Meta:Administrators/Removal/October 2013. If you would like to retain your adminship, please sign there before October 08, 2013. Kind regards, Barras talk 14:20, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

Hi. I guess on the removal page it gets missed, however, I just wanted to let you know that as a steward you are always able to edit protected pages on any wiki, that right is included in our package. Not that it matters much, I just thought you may wanted to know that. Regards, -Barras talk 10:13, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the information.--Jusjih (talk) 05:38, 3 October 2013 (UTC)