User:COIBot/XWiki/movie-do.net
< User:COIBot | XWiki
BOT generated Meta report. The bot reports here when:
- More than 66% of the placing and addition of this link has been performed by one editor.
- The user is adding more than 2 domains, but they all reside on the same server.
- The links are exclusively added by IPs.
- Several IPs are adding the link, but the IPs are in a close (/24) range.
LinksEdit
movie-do.net
- (LinkSearch: meta s/meta | en s/en | es s/es | de s/de | fr s/fr | ru s/ru | zh s/zh | simple s/simple | c s/c | d s/d | Wikipedias: top 20 · 40 · major wikis · gs )(Search: Google | en (G) | fr (G) | de (G) | meta (G) | backlinks | → links ←)
- (Reports: Report <-track | XWiki | Local | en | find entry)(DomainTools: whois | AboutUs | Malware? | Alexa)
- movie-do.net resolves to 198.252.106.210
- movie-do.net resolves to 198.252.106.210
198.252.106.210
- (LinkSearch: meta s/meta | en s/en | es s/es | de s/de | fr s/fr | ru s/ru | zh s/zh | simple s/simple | c s/c | d s/d | Wikipedias: top 20 · 40 · major wikis · gs )(Search: Google | en (G) | fr (G) | de (G) | meta (G) | backlinks | → links ←)
- (Reports: Report <-track | XWiki | Local | en | find entry)(DomainTools: whois | AboutUs | Malware? | Alexa)
- Link is not on the blacklist.
- Link is not on the domainredlist.
- COIBot Monitorlist search for link movie-do.net gives:
- movie-do.net (abused external link)
- None of the mentioned users is on the blacklist.
- Link is not on the whitelist.
- Link is not on the monitor list.
UsersEdit
No users found.
Selected additionsEdit
Too many link additions (7910)
EntryEdit
Log entry for the Spam blacklist:
\bmovie-do\.net\b # ADMINNAME # {{sbl-diff|#}}
; see [[User:COIBot/XWiki/movie-do.net]]
DiscussionEdit
Request Status - Stale
See COIBot report for more details.
Quick-created report. --COIBot (talk) 14:51, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
- Reverted @Beetstra: would you be so kind to purge this domain the "top links" it has a high wedged value — billinghurst sDrewth 14:55, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
New data reported. Too many records to analyse. --COIBot (talk) 15:45, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
Funny, only 5 diffs:
- +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
- | diff |
- +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
- | http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=648278435&oldid=644908718 |
- | http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=648278476&oldid=626138486 |
- | http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=648278864&oldid=648278582 |
- | http://jv.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=889502&oldid=836847 |
- | http://id.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=8778042&oldid=8778000&rcid=14437542 |
- +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
please have a look. --Dirk Beetstra T C (en: U, T) 03:46, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
- @Billinghurst: The first three edits were the problem. One editor adding 80k-150k of external links ... --Dirk Beetstra T C (en: U, T) 03:49, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
- @Beetstra: excellent, how we (did|do)n't have an abuse filter for that crap I will never know. — billinghurst sDrewth 04:03, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
- @Billinghurst: - I should give you direct read access to the db from shell. If you know how I grant that to you, please tell me and I will make it so.
- It would be great to have a monitoring global filter for edits that add >10 external links in one edit and where the edit is not a revert. And then one which blocks edits adding over 100 ELs and is not a revert. I still wonder how User:LiWa3 handled those edits - it must have been reporting the ELs out of one edit for about an hour .. --Dirk Beetstra T C (en: U, T) 06:49, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
- I should see if I can make LiWa3 throw a message into the global channel if s.o. adds more than XX links in one diff (regardless if it is a revert or not) - that might be reasonably trivial to program (though needs to be implemented in the core of the bot I think). --Dirk Beetstra T C (en: U, T) 06:52, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
- @Beetstra: I cannot comment on the proposal without knowing where your db is located. I have a login through bastion, though uncertain whether I can run queries of your data from there. — billinghurst sDrewth 12:52, 7 July 2015 (UTC)