Talk:WikiReviews
If there is to be any research on any wiki (be it Wikiresearch, Wikiversity or Wikiwhatsoever) there will be the need of a reviewing concept that goes beyond summerizing and making comments like good structured text, easy understandable, only few spellnig errors.
As the potential reviewers are not people payed for this work there will be the need to qualify what kind of review has been done. For example, remarks like checked the computations and fixed minor typos or same work can be found at XXX or work is an extension of YYY with stress on ZZZ would be very helpfull and could be standardized and packed into templates.
Further it will be of advantage if the reviewers are graded in some way.
It is also essential for a research that the review(s) and the article are crosslinked so readers of the reviewed article can see wether and to what extend a review has been done. 217.94.146.56 13:59, 1 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Start a discussion about WikiReviews
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Meta the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve WikiReviews.
