Talk:Universal Code of Conduct/Enforcement draft guidelines review/bn

  Please remember to:


  Discussion navigation:


Universal Code of Conduct/Enforcement draft guidelines review

edit


'Overview'

edit

'Preventive work (articles 1 and 2 UCOC)'

edit

'Responsive work (article 3 UCOC)'

edit

'Principles for processing and filing of reported cases'

edit

'Providing resources for processing cases'

edit

'Types of violations and enforcement mechanism / groups'

edit

'Recommendations for the reporting and processing tool'

edit

'Recommendations for local enforcement structures'

edit

'Recommendations for how to process appeals'

edit

Open questions for the Community

edit

Escalation: Where do the complaints go, what instance/body/judge is supposed to process them.

edit

Regulations for appeal (after the previous question "Where do the complaints go" has been answered).

edit

Should the U4C committee also decide individual cases or process appeals?

edit

When should someone be able to initiate an appeal for a UCoC violation?

edit

What kinds of behavior or evidence would we want to see before granting an appeal?

edit

Who should handle the appeals process?

edit

How often should someone be allowed to appeal a UCoC violation decision?

edit

To what extent should individual Wikimedia projects be allowed to decide how they enforce the UCoC?

edit

How will people be chosen for the U4C committee?

edit
Our current recommended list of users include, but are not limited to: CheckUsers, oversighters, bureaucrats, administrators of local projects, arbitration committee members, Wikimedia Foundation employees, Affiliates, etc.

Should an interim committee be formed while the "U4C" committee is being created?

edit

Should global conduct committees, such as the Technical Code of Conduct committee, be merged into the proposed U4C?

edit

General comments

edit
Return to "Universal Code of Conduct/Enforcement draft guidelines review/bn" page.