- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it.
- Most likely, new comments will not be taken into account by the new three Working Group members in their work of developing the final Recommendations. You are free however to continue discussing in the spirit of "discussing about Wikipedia is a work in progress". :)
the core goal though not satisfied about the methods. These type of stuff shall be prioritized. Winged Blades of Godric (talk) 07:39, 11 August 2019 (UTC)
- (+1).--Vulphere 10:02, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
This recommendation is stating both that digital payment systems are bad for developing countries and that such countries like digital payment systems a lot. I think you should pick one of the two versions about the underlying facts. In my opinion what you want to say is that, while WMF currently gives priority to online payment methods which can bring the most revenue (the next are in India), you'd like Wikimedia to support even online payment methods which may be more expensive for us, just for the sake of inclusivity. Nemo 08:28, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
- Agree about the inherent contradiction. Winged Blades of Godric (talk) 10:54, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
From Catalan SalonEdit
Original text here.
It seems logical and reasonable, although it would be good to know which options and tools do we have to raise donations, independently of the mechanisms to achieve them. There would be a deep thinking about the ethics of the mechanisms to obtain donations.