- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Currently, a new iteration of discussions is taking place.
- Most likely, new comments will not be taken into account by Working Group members in their work of developing the Recommendations. You are free however to continue discussing in the spirit of "discussing about Wikipedia is a work in progress". :)
I think leadership among the various communities is totally forgoten here when I read : "User groups, chapters, and WMF will be most influenced".
I believe that the contributor form the basis and backbone of our movement, and there are leaders among them too. We can't talk about leadership if they are not included in the target group. I see too many "leaders" very apt at positionning themselves on the political agenda of the movement, but who have no clue what contributing is. How can one be in position of leadership without knowing what the core of our activity (producing knowledge for free and for everyone) is? Nattes à chat (talk) 16:13, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks for this nuance of language we missed, and we will make sure it gets included or overall refined to be more inclusive Nattes à chat. --- FULBERT (talk) 13:14, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
From Catalan SalonEdit
Our experience says that leaders that have left is because of Community Health issues. Improving Health will improve our retention. If We invest in generation but not in retention, everything will fail again and again (...)