Talk:Stewards/Confirm/2022

Latest comment: 1 year ago by RadiX in topic Final decisions (by stewards)
This page allows for general discussion and questions regarding the 2022 steward confirmations.

Final decisions (by stewards) edit

Confirmation discussions will remain open from 28 February 2022, 17:30 (UTC) till 07 March 2022, 17:29 (UTC). This may be extended to two weeks for one or more confirmations at the discretion of the Election Committee if the committee believes further input is required before concluding. The Election Committee will close these discussions and implement the outcome (which also means making a decision in non-obvious cases).

This page is for steward discussion only. Please do not comment in this box unless you are a steward.

The summaries below provide a very strict overview of the most relevant confirmation comments.

Stewards: Please leave your comments right below the boxes after reviewing the actual confirmation comments and your understanding of relevant policies. You may summarize the confirmation discussions in individual comments, but no overall summary is given.

Status Candidate Notes
   Confirmed
-revi clear consensus to confirm
   Confirmed
AmandaNP clear consensus to confirm
   Confirmed
Base clear consensus to confirm
   Confirmed
Bsadowski1 clear consensus to confirm
   Confirmed
Cromium clear consensus to confirm
   Confirmed
Defender clear consensus to confirm
   Confirmed
DerHexer clear consensus to confirm
   Confirmed
HakanIST clear consensus to confirm
   Confirmed
Hoo man clear consensus to confirm
   Confirmed
Jon Kolbert clear consensus to confirm
   Confirmed
Linedwell clear consensus to confirm
   Confirmed
MarcGarver clear consensus to confirm
   Confirmed
MarcoAurelio clear consensus to confirm
   Confirmed
Martin Urbanec clear consensus to confirm
   Confirmed
Masti clear consensus to confirm
   Confirmed
Matanya clear consensus to confirm
   Resigned
Melos Did not run for reconfirmation
   Confirmed
MusikAnimal clear consensus to confirm
   Confirmed
Operator873 clear consensus to confirm
   Confirmed
RadiX clear consensus to confirm
   Confirmed
Ruslik0 clear consensus to confirm
   Confirmed
Sakretsu clear consensus to confirm
   Confirmed
Schniggendiller clear consensus to confirm
   Confirmed
Sotiale clear consensus to confirm
   Confirmed
Stanglavine clear consensus to confirm
   Confirmed
Stryn clear consensus to confirm
   Confirmed
Tegel clear consensus to confirm
   Confirmed
Teles clear consensus to confirm
   Confirmed
Tks4Fish clear consensus to confirm
   Confirmed
Trijnstel clear consensus to confirm
   Confirmed
Vituzzu clear consensus to confirm
   Confirmed
Wiki13 clear consensus to confirm
   Confirmed
Wim b clear consensus to confirm
   Confirmed
علاء clear consensus to confirm
Results
The confirmation discussions are now closed. Please check the results just above.
For the Election Committee, RadiX 17:31, 7 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

-revi edit

  Keep: 107 (no issues / activity on the lower side but has a history of being active / trusted / good work / skilled / competent / helpful / knowledgeable / strong judgement / collaborative / rational / no reason given)
  Remove: 4 (no willingness to help the community / no reason given)
  Neutral: 0

Note
You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. RadiX 17:37, 28 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

AmandaNP edit

  Keep: 99 (good work / very active / competent / helpful / hardworking / available on IRC / one of the most active stewards / no reason given)
  Remove: 1 (issues regarding blocking open proxies / unsustainable activity level throughout the year)
  Neutral: 1 (issues on lock evasion discussion / mostly good work)

Note
You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. RadiX 17:37, 28 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Base edit

  Keep: 81 (active enough / helpful / reachable / chill dude according to TonyBallioni / no issues / no reason given)
  Remove: 4 (activity level below reasonable / inactive)
  Neutral: 0

Note
You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. RadiX 17:37, 28 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Bsadowski1 edit

  Keep: 78 (very helpful / active / friendly / trusted / competent / available on IRC / reachable / one of the best stewards / knowledge of Star Wars is a true blessing and something of utmost importance for stewardship according to TonyBallioni / no issues / no reason given)
  Remove: 1 (no reason given)
  Neutral: 1 (acceptable cross-wiki work / unsatisfying overall work)

Note
You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. RadiX 17:37, 28 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Cromium edit

  Keep: 59 (active enough given the circumstances / active enough / behind the scene tasks should be considered / no reason given)
  Remove: 1 (unsatisfying overall work / stewardship isn't about trustworthy)
  Neutral: 4 (no reason given)

Note
You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. RadiX 17:37, 28 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Defender edit

  Keep: 63 (moderately active / active enough / reasonable activity level throughout the year / good work at SRG / no issues / no reason given)
  Remove: 0
  Neutral: 1 (not doing 'real' steward work)

Note
You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. RadiX 17:37, 28 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

DerHexer edit

  Keep: 109 (responsive oversighter / active everywhere / good long-term work besides low activity this year / active enough / trustworthy / no concerns / good job / experienced / no issues / no reason given)
  Remove: 1 (no reason given)
  Neutral: 1 (unrelated comment - user has been blocked)

Note
You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. RadiX 17:37, 28 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

HakanIST edit

  Keep: 70 (active enough / active throughout the year / helpful / no concerns / no issues / no reason given)
  Remove: 2 (low activity level / silent)
  Neutral: 0

Note
You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. RadiX 17:37, 28 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hoo man edit

  Keep: 74 (activity level has improved since last confirmation / helpful / no issues / no reason given)
  Remove: 0
  Neutral: 0

Note
You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. RadiX 17:37, 28 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Jon Kolbert edit

  Keep: 73 (active / wonderful work / great steward / helpful in blocking proxies / proxies work / highly active in proxyblocking / the most active steward of 2021 / vegetarian - something of utmost importance for stewardship according to TonyBallioni / no issues / no reason given)
  Remove: 1 (alleged bias in the 'Rodhullandemu' case)
  Neutral: 1 (lacks involvement in SRG)

Note
You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. RadiX 17:37, 28 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Linedwell edit

  Keep: 56 (active enough / no issues / no reason given)
  Remove: 1 (activity level has not improved in 2 years)
  Neutral: 1 (activity should be increased)

Note
You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. RadiX 17:37, 28 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

MarcGarver edit

  Keep: 58 (active / uncontroversial user / no issues / no reason given)
  Remove: 0
  Neutral: 1 (active enough at cross-wiki spamblocks but lacks involvement other areas)

Note
You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. RadiX 17:37, 28 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

MarcoAurelio edit

  Keep: 109 (a grandee among the stewards / one of the most active stewards / quick responses / loves cats according to BRPever and Zabe / consistently good work / active throughout the year / active all around / active in every task / helpful in AAR tasks / no concerns / no issues / no reason given)
  Remove: 0
  Neutral: 0

Note
You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. RadiX 17:37, 28 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Martin Urbanec edit

  Keep: 133 (active in every task / one of the most active stewards / very active / extremely capable / very helpful / sound / valuable steward / reachable / reachable on IRC / does 'real' steward work / no issues / no reason given)
  Remove: 8 (untrustworthy / discussion at English Wikipedia Village Pump / offensive comment / cases of misuse or even abuse of steward rights - no examples provided)
  Neutral: 1 (question about whether - or not - an action should be performed by WMF staff or stewards)

Note
You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. RadiX 17:37, 28 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Masti edit

  Keep: 82 (very helpful / very active in account locking and IP blocking / helpful with LTA / good work / no issues / no reason given)
  Remove: 0
  Neutral: 0

Note
You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. RadiX 17:37, 28 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Matanya edit

  Keep: 70 (active enough / solid and good work / no issues / no reason given)
  Remove: 0
  Neutral: 1 (question about whether - or not - an action should be performed by WMF staff or stewards)

Note
You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. RadiX 17:37, 28 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

MusikAnimal edit

  Keep: 85 (active in almost every task / great vandal fighter / active enough / technically skilled / very good admin and interface admin on enwiki / always assumes good faith / no issues / no reason given)
  Remove: 0
  Neutral: 0

Note
You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. RadiX 17:37, 28 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Operator873 edit

  Keep: 75 (good work at SRG / valuable work / impressive work / very active / trusted / helpful / competent / reachable on IRC / friendly / humble / diplomatic / unfortunately unable to get a hold of him according to TonyBallioni / no issues / no reason given)
  Remove: 0
  Neutral: 0

Note
You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. RadiX 17:37, 28 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

RadiX edit

  Keep: 77 (has the finest sense of humour of any steward, exquisite taste in coffee/wine and vast knowlegde of riots, things of utmost importance for stewardship according to TonyBallioni / no issues / no reason given)
  Remove: 0
  Neutral: 0

Note
You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. RadiX 17:37, 28 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ruslik0 edit

  Keep: 90 (very active / active throughout the year / one of the most qualified stewards / no issues / no reason given)
  Remove: 0
  Neutral: 0

Note
You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. RadiX 17:37, 28 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Sakretsu edit

  Keep: 74 (active enough / no issues / good at locking LTAs / very active / good experience / relevant CU work / polite / friendly / no issues / no reason given)
  Remove: 0
  Neutral: 0

Note
You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. RadiX 17:37, 28 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Schniggendiller edit

  Keep: 81 (good activity level / moderate activity level / active / good work / no reason given)
  Remove: 0 (no reason given)
  Neutral: 1 (unrelated comment - user has been blocked)

Note
You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. RadiX 17:37, 28 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Sotiale edit

  Keep: 111 (one of the best stewards ever / active everywhere / great work overall / outstanding work at SRCU / excellent CU work / the most active steward at SRCU / combat of sockpupptry, LTA and cross-wiki abuse / very helpful / calm / kind / wise / reachable / does not have an "InstantPot" according to TonyBallioni / no issues / no reason given)
  Remove: 1 (no reason given)
  Neutral: 0

Note
You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. RadiX 17:37, 28 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Stanglavine edit

  Keep: 73 (active / helpful / always available on IRC / no issues / helpful in AAR tasks / no reason given)
  Remove: 0
  Neutral: 0

Note
You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. RadiX 17:37, 28 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Stryn edit

  Keep: 75 (active enough / reasonably active / reachable / no issues / no reason given)
  Remove: 0
  Neutral: 0

Note
You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. RadiX 17:37, 28 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Tegel edit

  Keep: 77 (good at fighting LTA / active / no issues / no reason given)
  Remove: 1 (no reason given)
  Neutral: 0

Note
You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. RadiX 17:37, 28 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Teles edit

  Keep: 66 (great work with spambots / very active / no issues / no reason given)
  Remove: 0
  Neutral: 0

Note
You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. RadiX 17:37, 28 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Tks4Fish edit

  Keep: 97 (very helpful / friendly / trusted / reliable / sound / active / very active / competent / responsible / helpful with proxy global blocking / no issues / no reason given)
  Remove: 1 (no reason given)
  Neutral: 0

Note
You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. RadiX 17:37, 28 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Trijnstel edit

  Keep: 89 (active enough / no doubt / good work / helpful / helpful with requests at SRG and dealing with backlogs / good person / no issues / no reason given)
  Remove: 1 (communication issue)
  Neutral: 1 (no reason given)

Note
You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. RadiX 17:37, 28 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Vituzzu edit

  Keep: 81 (trusted / excellent steward / hardworking / helpful / no issues / no reason given)
  Remove: 1 (no reason given)
  Neutral: 0

Note
You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. RadiX 17:37, 28 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Wiki13 edit

  Keep: 67 (very active / helpful / good at dealing with open proxies / available on IRC / no issues / is a user after my own heart according to TonyBallioni / no reason given)
  Remove: 0
  Neutral: 0

Note
You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. RadiX 17:37, 28 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Wim b edit

  Keep: 67 (active enough / always available / reachable / no concerns / no issues / no reason given)
  Remove: 0
  Neutral: 0

Note
You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. RadiX 17:37, 28 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

علاء edit

  Keep: 102 (successful at dealing with sockpuppetry / helpful / helpful at SRG / active / kind and generous person / helpful in AAR tasks / helpful in cross-wiki issues / no issues / no reason given)
  Remove: 1 (no reason given)
  Neutral: 0

Note
You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. RadiX 17:37, 28 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

All stewards running for confirmation edit

Note
Should you be decided to drop your comment here, please don't forget to add Confirm all or Remove all to your text. Thanks, RadiX 17:37, 28 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Note
The discussion below applies to all stewards listed in the sections above, except the one commenting. RadiX 22:01, 28 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Outcome:   All confirmed. RadiX 17:31, 7 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Return to "Stewards/Confirm/2022" page.