Talk:Multiple point of view

There are no discussions on this page.

Wow, point of view, sympathetic point of view, critical point of view haven't even been defined from a meta perspective. That's disturbing considering that Wikinfo split off (and succeeded) based largely on this debate, and that was five years ago. Without some meta-level examination of POV, how in the world does one even know what NPOV is? Hmm.

…D.G.DeL-Dorchester Mass in definition with English Wikipedia, and preferably on the Talk section, which then allows the basis to conduct on a Mutiple point of view. My concern is the establishing of text which contains British Spellings and American Spellings and of its Language. I will research this variable within the texts of wikipedia as for it will conduct the learning matter and facting capabilities/11:22 a.m. e.s.t.208.209.43.3 16:19, 11 January 2008 (UTC) …The process started by D.G.DeL-Dorchester Mass in mid 2005 concerns catergories of Art Economics History in that order based on multiple points of view. 3-29-2011

…11:34 A.M. E.S.T. Mulitple Point of view on Knowledge. The research on knowledge is a great concern relating to a multible point of view it is interesting how our opinions and the characteristics on study are influenced through knowledge and the findings of it, as shall be continued with the research through wikipedia and wikimedia/11:44a.m.p.m.e.s.t.David George DeLancey 16:42, 11 January 2008 (UTC)//refinedDavid George DeLancey 00:35, 30 March 2011 (UTC)---Fixed the (e) in wikimedia 2:39 P.M. E.S.T. 11-4-2011David George DeLancey 18:41, 4 November 2011 (UTC)

Return to "Multiple point of view" page.