Talk:Fundraising and Funds Dissemination/Recommendations/Archives
|← Talk:Fundraising and Funds Dissemination/Recommendations||Talk:Fundraising and Funds Dissemination/Recommendations (Archives)|
This is an index of archives; for recent discussion, see Talk:Fundraising and Funds Dissemination/Recommendations. Please do not post new comments on these pages; if you wish to revive a discussion, either move it back to the main page or link to it. For help archiving pages, see Standard archival system.
These threads have been resolved or gone stale. If you have new or outstanding questions about them, please open conversation at the active talk page. If the section is lengthy, to keep the main page usable, a link to the archived discussion would be preferable to moving it back. If you do move it, please remove it from the archives so that the conversation remains together. --Maggie Dennis (WMF) 13:02, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
- 2012-01 Table of contents | Community vote | Recommendation based in a inaccurate survey | An alternative analysis of fundraising effectiveness | Cost of international transfers | Getting down to it | Wikimedia Foundation sites | Recommendation 4 | Comment moved from content page | Christophe Henner - Drop the data, focus on the issues | Context- Flawed and one-sided | Ideas on global accountability | Response from Chris Keating (The Land) | Dependence and sustainability | What's a better solution? | 2011 Fundraising targets | Schedule | Far from everything | Recommendation 2 | And if we shouldn’t search maximum efficiency? | So what | Question flowchart -- design questions for various scenarios | Wikimedia Foundation has been *unable* to find any evidence | Diversity is Strength | A pretty picture | Wikimedia UK - gross misrepresentation | No more payment processing greatly removes privacy and security risks - a false dichotomy | Iron law of oligarchy | The best path to independence | Schade einklich, | Italy | Questions from a Board member | Thanks Maggie, and a proposal for moving the pros-and-cons of chapters payment processing | Recommendation 1 | Just a short note from Wikimedia Germany | My own recommendations | Do chapters want non-monetary support from the Wikimedia Foundation? | recommendation #1 | Two fundamental questions | Wikimedia.com - separate the server operation from the Funds Allocation | Short term v Long term | Facilitation | Tax deductability | I've watched this for a while. Here are my thoughts
- 2012-02 Recommendation 3 is unclear | Proposals for funds allocation | Overheads with Global Collect? | Personal view on why I believe this is important | Funds should be distributed in ways that support mission work, agnostic with regard to where the money was raised | Countries with low fundraising potential | It's not just about the money | A question for chapters that aspire to payment-process | monopoly positions by chapters | What resources Wikimedians want