Talk:Association of Wikipedians Who Dislike Making Broad Judgments About the Worthiness of a General Category of Article, and Who Are in Favor of the Deletion of Some Particularly Bad Articles, but That Doesn't Mean They Are Deletionists/Archives/2005
 | Please do not post any new comments on this page. This is a discussion archive first created in 2005, although the comments contained were likely posted before and after this date. See current discussion or the archives index. |
Donation
I, Cmputer, hereby donate ¤100 to the Association of Wikipedians Who Dislike Making Broad Judgments About the Worthiness of a General Category of Article, and Who Are in Favor of the Deletion of Some Particularly Bad Articles, but That Doesn't Mean They Are Deletionists (I still LOVE the title). Enjoy! --Cmputer 11:30 AM, 6 December 2008, Central Standard Time (By the way, this was, and is, a great idea.)
Brilliant. Shii, you've outdone yourself this time. Humblefool 23:47, 4 Feb 2005 (UTC)
This is definetly the most amazing thing i have seen on wikimedia or even wikipedia. Falphin 01:19, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
I think I'm becoming a redirectionist. Redirects rock. But there's no Association of Redirectionist Wikipedians, which makes me sad. Someone make it. I'll join. Proto 15:29, 9 August 2005 (UTC)
delete - BJAODN. Absurd but doesn't warrant a Wikipedia page. --65.92.161.97 20:12, 22 August 2005 (UTC)
- You can do that?? In that case, someone needs to slap one on Association of Conservative Semi-Prejudicial Wikipedians. We should not allow organizations dedicated to maintaining a particular POV. — Omegatron 21:45, 22 August 2005 (UTC)
delete - But that doesn't make me a Deletionist ;) 72.130.177.20 05:51, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
keep - Dear IP number, this is NOT Wikipedia, this is Wikimedia. If it offends or hinders you, get the hell out. Steinbach (formerly Caesarion) 12:47, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
Strong Delete. The name (and abbreviation is far to long! Instant delete! --86.22.139.93 17:03, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
- When are all of you going to realise that this is meta, not Wikipedia? And that the rules as valid on en: DO NOT APPLY HERE? This is an entirely different wiki, used as a reference for ALL Wikimedia projects, it is not a dependancy of the English Wikipedia! ! ! Steinbach (formerly Caesarion) 09:36, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
STRONG KEEP - I hate all Deletonists! Don't delete the article, even if it is wierd! 209.195.102.143 18:55, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
Weak speedy keep. I have a weak opinion that this article should be kept, but I believe strongly that it should be kept speedily. 71.201.53.112 22:10, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
New Party on WP- Exclusionism -you know it makes sense!
I appeal to all members of your association (whose name is tool ong to write) to consider joining my recently formed party on WP. It is called the Exclusionist Party (at the moment). As I am not a member of Meta I cant sign in but my user name on WP is 'Light current'. Please leave messages of support/condemnation/abuse on the exclusionist talk page. You know it makes sense to join my party!! 88.110.101.169 16:04, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
Page move?
Shouldn't this be at Association of Wikipedians Who Dislike Making Broad Judgements About the Worthiness of a General Category of Article, and Who Are in Favor of the Deletion of Some Particularly Bad Articles, but That Doesn't Mean They Are Deletionist. Surely, we're bringing riduicule on ourselves with our dodgy grasp of capitals. Flowerparty 12:17, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
- Isn't this a bad article? Why don't you delete it then?
- Don't know. I wouldn't like to make that kind of broad judgement. Flowerparty 11:28, 9 September 2005 (UTC)
- w:Wikipedia:Ignore all rules especially looney caps rules Ashibaka 05:28, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
Or, alternately, w:Be bold. I fixed the title. Matt Yeager 22:45, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
- I tend to disagree with that decision, on grounds that the AWWDMBJAWGCAWAIFDSPBATDMTD acronym is well established within the article and the accompanying graphic. This would require a change to AWWDMBJAWGCAWAIFDSPBATDMTAD throughout, which is rather a lot of trouble. Shmuel 13:45, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
Shorter Title? that's annoyingly long. --4.233.125.153 19:18, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
- One person's "annoying" is another person's "charming." Shmuel 13:45, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
- I wonder what a birthday cake for the association would be like—plenty of room for candles. 210.49.129.145 19:07, 4 February 2007 (UTC)