Strategy/Wikimedia movement/2018-20/Recommendations/ru

ОБЗОР

РЕКОМЕНДАЦИИ

КОМАНДА

ОТЧЕТЫ

ЧаВо

Создание нашего общего будущего Рекомендации по достижению видения Wikimedia 2030

Начнём ! Благодарность Добро пожаловать! Размышления редакторов Рассказ об изменениях Вклад сообщества Принципы Процесс Словарь

В 2017 году мы поставили перед собой амбициозную цель: к 2030 году стать основной инфраструктурой экосистемы свободных знаний. Как мы можем этого достичь? Мы анализировали, обсуждали и дорабатывали идеи, чтобы превратить их в рекомендации о том, как воплотить наше видение в жизнь. Эти рекомендации содержат информацию о том, что именно нам нужно предпринимать для устойчивого и инклюзивного роста и развития. Они раскрывают способы реализации новых возможностей и решения проблем сегодняшнего и завтрашнего дня. Кроме того, они рассказывают о том, как мы можем воплотить в жизнь равенство знаний и принцип знаний, как услуги. Таким образом, все, кто уже с нами или только планирует к нам присоединиться, могут внести свой эффективный вклад в инициацию, обмен и обеспечение доступа к свободным знаниям. Обеспечение устойчивого развития Создание культурных изменений для формирования инклюзивных сообществ Улучшить пользовательский опыт Обеспечение защиты и безопасности Обеспечение справедливости в процессе принятия решений Стимулирование и развитие распределенного лидерства Инвестиции в развитие навыков Управление внутренними знаниями Координация между заинтересованными сторонами Приоритетные темы для воздействия Инновации в области свободных знаний Оценка, возобновление и адаптация Планирование масштабирования инфраструктуры Начнём ! На следующих страницах вы найдете первую версию документа о стратегии движения, содержащую 13 рекомендаций по изменению, принципы, которые лежат в их основе, обзор процесса и описание изменений, описывающих, как эти рекомендации связывают и разрабатывают в целом, чтобы помочь согласоваться с нашим стратегическим направлением. Вы можете прочитать основной контент на арабском, английском, французском, немецком, хинди, португальском и испанском языках. Английская версия также содержит более длинный раздел «Принципы» и расширенные разделы «Почему» и «Как» для каждой рекомендации, которые предлагают дополнительное обоснование и контекст. Помимо этого, этот контент ссылается на более подробные разделы «Вклад сообщества» для каждой рекомендации. Эти идеи пришли со всего Движения и были выдвинуты в онлайн-дискуссиях, а также в автономном режиме в стратегических салонах по всему миру и в Wikimania. Содержание рекомендаций сильно взаимосвязано. Чтобы понять, как рекомендации связаны друг с другом, мы рекомендуем сначала прочитать описание изменений. Мы рекомендуем вам прочитать каждую рекомендацию и рассмотреть ее с точки зрения вашего сообщества или контекста. Если вы склонны, пожалуйста, оставьте свои мысли на странице обсуждения каждой рекомендации или на активных форумах в вашем языковом сообществе. Чтобы получить более глубокое понимание идей, лежащих в основе рекомендаций и послуживших основой для их развития, ознакомьтесь с разделом принципов. Наконец, разделы о процессе и будущих шагах описывают шаги, которые привели нас к этой точке и что будет дальше. Read these recommendations as a PDF: If you'd like to read through the recommendations in an offline or all-in-one format, you can find a PDF of the core document here, the extended version here, and the cover note here.

Previous drafts

Introduction

Linked below please see draft recommendations for structural change for our movement. The recommendations were developed by the nine Wikimedia 2030 working groups and are the starting point for concrete conversations about the kind of future we want to create together to reach our Strategic Direction and its pillars of Knowledge as a Service and Knowledge Equity. Members of the working groups concluded their task of drafting recommendations for structural changes on November 1, 2019, and we thank them for their incredible effort. Focus over the following few months has been on synthesizing these draft recommendations into one coherent and accessible set. What is this about? Working group members have been working tirelessly for over a year to research the movement, analyze community input shared via community conversations, gain insight into external trends, and come to a shared vision across a diverse range of perspectives. Draft Recommendations A second iteration of the recommendations was developed by the working groups in September 2019 after many on- and offline conversations with diverse stakeholders from across our movement; at Wikimania 2019, on the Talk Pages of the 1st iteration of the draft recommendations, and at many in-person events such as regional summits and strategy salons. The very first iteration of the draft recommendations were shared in August 2019, which you can find below, presented in full and abbreviated versions and with translations available. The recommendations are not final. In order to get them to that stage, your input is needed! Community voices are essential for bringing a broad perspective into the changes that will shape our future. This includes affiliates, groups and chapters, the Wikimedia Foundation, and communities across projects, languages, and geographies. We would like to hear what these changes would mean for you in your local or thematic context, what do you like about them, and where you potentially see red flags. And of course, always critically question whether these recommendations support the strategic direction. How to Share Your Feedback Feedback plays a vital role in validating and challenging the draft recommendations. It’s helpful to have guiding questions to help Wikimedian communities and organized groups evaluate the meaning, importance, and quality of the recommendations. Here are some suggestions: Read through the recommendations and provide your input on the talk pages of respective recommendations. What do you like about this recommendation? What do you dislike? Why? What does this recommendation mean for you in contexts that are meaningful to you - your language, your projects, your region, your affiliate group, your identity? How would you be affected? What is important to keep in mind when implementing this recommendation? What values and ideas are important to preserve? Are there any red lines we should not cross? Does this recommendation support our Strategic Direction to become the support system for the whole free knowledge movement? Reach out to a Strategy Liaison in your language or for your affiliate to share feedback, or lead a conversation of your own. What’s Next? Open community input was accepted until September 15. After that date, working groups refined and harmonized their work using movement input as well as external advice and research.

Iteration 2 (September 2019)

Advocacy Transparency: A global network of Wikimedia advocates is built on community driven rules of engagement. Processes for decision making are known and comprehensible. There are established entry points for those who want to be involved or want to initiate advocacy activities Discuss Diversity: Community actively seeks and provides a good environment and tailored pathways that attracts more people from a variety and diversity of languages and cultural backgrounds to engage in advocacy for Wikimedia on a local or global level Discuss Global conversation: There is an established communication process for community advocates to have central conversations about advocacy Discuss Knowledge management: There is constant knowledge management about methods, cases, success stories, and failures for all advocates to access and learn from, processed and maintained by, with and for them Discuss Advocacy Hub: Movement advocacy efforts are streamlined and reinforced by a hub run with and for current and future advocates Discuss Common positioning: The advocacy priorities of the Wikimedia movement are clearly articulated through a shared, highly visible and living document Discuss Partnerships: Advocates for the Wikimedia movement are able to collaborate with and build upon an existing global network of partners working on aligned advocacy issues Discuss Empowerment of advocates: Advocacy is recognized and encouraged as a valid pathway in the Wikimedia Movement Discuss Self-Determination: Subsidiary decentralisation should be a model of collaboration for advocacy across the movement Discuss Protection of Advocates: Advocates have access to clearly defined and accessible safety measures enabling them to work without having their personal and communal security compromised Discuss Capacity Building Building Capacity for Capacity Building Discuss Matching human assets and online knowledge resources with capacity building needs Discuss Capacity Building Should Occur in Context Discuss Provide Capacity Building for Organizational Development Or: Supporting communities in achieving their organizational development goals Discuss Resources for Capacity Building Discuss Evaluating Capacity Building Discuss Online Training Discuss Mentoring and leadership development Discuss Recognizing Individuals Discuss Independently governed Capacity Building ‘Unit’ Discuss Community Health A joint set of rules we all agree to live by (a.k.a. Code of Conduct) Discuss Redefining power structures to better serve the communities Discuss Building the leadership of the future Discuss Structure for handling conflicts- before, during and after Discuss Investing in building an inclusive global community Discuss Newcomers are a key indicator to the success of the movement Discuss “Democratizing” participation (making Wikipedia/Wikimedia everyone’s responsibility) and reducing barriers for participationn Discuss Privacy and security for everyone Discuss Opening the circle: All terrain readiness Discuss Network to continually support community health Discuss Aligning resource allocation with community health goals Discuss Investing in equity-centered technologies Discuss Diversity Introducing people-centered principles within the Wikimedia movement Discuss Reaching a self-aware and dynamic structure aimed at community diversity and health Discuss Redesigning the platforms for more diversity of people and content experiences Discuss Planned community diversification Discuss Reflective policies for participation and governance Discuss Establishing partnerships in order to represent and protect worlds’ cultural diversity Discuss Decentralized administrative structure for resource allocation Discuss Bridging different local contexts and Wikimedia projects' notability and verifiability policies Discuss Partnerships Provide the knowledge needed for understanding and solving global issues Discuss Wikimedia as steward of the Free Knowledge Ecosystem Discuss Shared ecosystem of services and tools for content partnerships Discuss Data partnerships approach to fulfill the vision of knowledge as a service for our partners Discuss Focus on knowledge equity when determining priorities for Partnerships Discuss Partnerships as part of a Distributed Vision Discuss Partnerships as a shared and equitable resource and activity Discuss Prioritise documentation Discuss Invest in sharing knowledge about partnerships across the movement Discuss Support the skills development of people working on partnerships Discuss Invest in the leadership potential of community members Discuss Establish recognition principles for new partners for attribution and content donation Discuss Additional research for areas where we have identified issues but haven’t made recommendations Discuss Product & Technology Evaluate and Decentralize Technology Components Discuss Support Community Decision-making Discuss Open Product Proposal Process Discuss Deployment Council Discuss Disseminate Product Knowledge Discuss A. Improve Technical Contributor Engagement Discuss B. Modernize Technical Contributor Tooling Discuss Realize the Potential of the Third-Party Ecosystem Discuss Movement Technology Ethics Review Process Discuss Monitoring Product Trust and Availability Discuss Developing an Evolving Technology Vision and Strategy Discuss Resource Allocation Set Common Framework of Principles for Resource Allocation Discuss Design participatory decision making for Resource Allocation Discuss Recognize privileges / Design for equity Discuss Distribute existing structures Discuss Build Thematic hubs – to provide services to the free knowledge movement long term Discuss Ensure flexible approach to resource allocation in a complex, fast moving and changeable space Discuss Allocate resources for capacity and sustainability Discuss Allocate resources to new types of partners/organisations (essential infrastructure of the free knowledge ecosystem) Discuss Include knowledge consumers Discuss Revenue Streams Click here to learn more about the recommendations by RS Working Group Turn the Wikimedia API into a revenue source Provide Paid Wiki-related Services Monetize merchandise Expand global fundraising Develop non-fundraising revenue streams for affiliates Set a goal of financial sustainability for all movement actors Diversification of revenue channels Roles & Responsibilities Scenario Discuss All of this exists to support our primary purpose: free knowledge and its distribution (Original) Discuss &3. Decentralisation and self-management Discuss &5. Establish a Movement Charter Discuss Wikimedia movement organisations will be governed by inclusive, diverse, and accountable boards Discuss Capacity building Discuss

Iteration 1 (August 2019)

Abbreviated summaries of draft recommendations Summaries have been prepared for easier engagement as well as translation into Arabic, French, German, Hindi, Mandarin, Brazilian Portugese, and Spanish. Translations will be uploaded as they become available: Advocacy Capacity Building` Community Health Diversity Partnerships Product & Technology Resource Allocation Revenue Streams Roles & Responsibilities Advocacy A global network of Wikimedia advocates is built on community driven rules of engagement. There are established entry points for those who want to be involved or want to initiate advocacy activities. Processes for decision making are known and comprehensible. Discuss Community actively seeks and provides a good environment and tailored pathways that attracts more people (professionals and volunteers) from a variety and diversity of languages and cultural backgrounds to engage in advocacy for Wikimedia on a local or global level. Discuss There is an established communication process for community advocates to have central conversations about advocacy. Discuss There is constant knowledge management about methods, cases, success stories, and failures for all advocates to access and learn from, processed and maintained by, with and for them. Discuss Movement advocacy efforts are streamlined and reinforced by a hub run with and for current and future advocates. Discuss The advocacy priorities of the Wikimedia movement are clearly articulated through a shared, highly visible and living document. Discuss Capacity Building Building Capacity for Capacity Building Discuss Matching human assets and online knowledge resources with capacity building needs Discuss Capacity Building Should Occur in Context Discuss Provide Capacity Building for Organizational Development Or: Supporting communities in achieving their organizational development goals Discuss Resources for Capacity Building Discuss Evaluating Capacity Building Discuss Online Training Discuss Mentoring and leadership development Discuss Recognizing Individuals Discuss Independently governed Capacity Building ‘Unit’ Discuss Community Health Rules and regulations, decision making processes and leadership Discuss Community diversity and growth Discuss Safety Discuss Agile and responsive support of community health Discuss Diversity Code of Conduct Discuss Content Diversity Metrics and Guidelines Discuss Digitization and Resource Prioritization for Marginalized Groups Discuss Adopting Body Quotas for All Governing Bodies Discuss Identifying the Wikimedia Editing and Community Diversity Barriers in Each Country and Introduce Them in Wikidata Discuss Parameterized User Pages for Encouraging and Measuring Community Diversity Discuss Ombudsperson / Community-WMF Liaison Discuss Resource Allocation for Securing Diversity in International Collaborations Discuss Terms of Use/Licensing Policy Discuss Wikioral, a Project with Voice Recordings Discuss Creating a Wikipedia Diversity Newsletter Discuss Language diversity Discuss Notability and Reliable Sources Discuss Partnerships *Note: some of the recommendations are not based on full consensus of all the members of the working group yet. We are looking forward to discussing the nuances of these at Wikimania. “How might we build Wikimedia into an effective convener of impactful partnerships, coalitions, and collective action based on a shared vision of free Open Knowledge Movement, such as the “Big Open” framework? What should be the purpose of such partnerships?” Summary of recommendations A Framework that Supports Partnerships Discuss Partnerships as a shared and equitable resource and enterprise Discuss Partnerships as part of a Distributed Vision Discuss Partnerships need practices that foster institutional memory Discuss Define priorities for partnerships so that all key aspects of building the free knowledge ecosystem are covered Discuss A single point of entry for partners to engage with Wikimedia Discuss “How do we develop technical infrastructure, capacities and the support we need in order to be an effective partner to share ‘the sum of all knowledge” and fulfill the vision of knowledge as a service for our partners?” A central infrastructure for content partnerships requiring technical solutions Discuss Technical Partnership For Developments under a shared vision and resource collaboration Discuss Partnership framework for harnessing modern technological developments Discuss Data partnerships approach to fulfill the vision of knowledge as a service for our partners Discuss Create an internal knowledge-base to curate details of partnerships across the movement Discuss Develop Capacity Building Modules for running partnership Discuss “How can we empower people and organizations working on partnerships within our Movement to get the support they need to fulfill our potential and carry out diverse, sustainable, effective and impactful partnerships?” “How do we create an inclusive, movement-wide culture of sharing knowledge, skills, and practices on collaborations and partnerships - so that everyone in the movement can participate in and benefit from them?” Recognition. Encourage proper attribution for content donations so institutions working with us are proud of their contribution and are acknowledged for their contribution Discuss Encourage partnerships focusing on Knowledge gaps and knowledge equity Discuss Documentation as a priority, not an afterthought, ending a barrier to participation and capturing our methodology and instructions in formats accessible for our global audiences Discuss Product & Technology Decentralize Discuss Support Community Decisionmaking Discuss Open up Product Governance Discuss Deployment Council Discuss Tech Evangelism Discuss New Developer Engagement Models Discuss Growing the Third-Party Ecosystem Discuss Emerging Technology Ethics Advisory Panel Discuss Monitoring Product and Societal Impacts Discuss Resource Allocation Common Framework of Principles for Resource Allocation Discuss Participatory decision making for Resource Allocation Discuss Avoiding the pitfalls of privileges / Designing for diversity Discuss Distribute existing structures Discuss Build Thematic hubs – to provide services to the free knowledge movement long term Discuss Flexible approach to resource allocation in a complex, fast moving and changeable space Discuss Allocating resources for capacity and sustainability Discuss Allocate resources to new types of partners/organisations (essential infrastructure of the free knowledge ecosystem) Discuss Knowledge consumers Discuss Revenue Streams Turn the Wikimedia API into a revenue source Discuss Create a global support function for local affiliate fundraising Discuss Monetize Merchandise Discuss Providing Paid Wiki-related Services Discuss Develop non-fundraising revenue streams for affiliates Discuss Develop non-banner revenue streams for affiliates Discuss Set a goal of financial independence for all movement actors Discuss Diversification of revenue channel Discuss Movement wide principles for Revenue Streams Discuss Roles & Responsibilities Click here to learn more about the recommendations by R&R Working Group Power and responsibilities need to be redistributed on the principle of self management (subsidiarity) Decisions should be taken at the “lowest” possible level / as near as possible to the process/community/activity that will be affected by the decision To establish a framework for decision-making, there will be a charter of principles, values, and governance behaviours. The charter will be developed through an equitable process with broad and diverse participation. This charter will be owned by a global governance and accountability body All of this exists to support our primary purpose: free knowledge and its distribution Movement organizations are to be governed by diverse, inclusive and accountable bodies (mix of elected and appointed members) Capacity building, facilitation, coaching, leadership development will be built into these structures to enable all entities to develop at their speed. This will be supported by staff.