Open main menu
Meta

Strategy/Wikimedia movement/2018-20/Recommendations/ru

< Strategy‎ | Wikimedia movement‎ | 2018-20
This page is a translated version of the page Strategy/Wikimedia movement/2018-20/Recommendations and the translation is 0% complete.
Other languages:
Bahasa Indonesia • ‎Deutsch • ‎English • ‎Esperanto • ‎dansk • ‎español • ‎français • ‎italiano • ‎português • ‎português do Brasil • ‎русский • ‎українська • ‎العربية • ‎हिन्दी • ‎বাংলা • ‎中文 • ‎日本語
ПРОЦЕСС
МАТЕРИАЛЫ
РАБОЧИЕ ГРУППЫ
КОМАНДА
УЧАСТВОВАТЬ
RECOMMENDATIONS
Linked below please see draft recommendations for structural change for our movement. The recommendations were developed by the nine Wikimedia 2030 working groups and are the starting point for concrete conversations about the kind of future we want to create together to reach our Strategic Direction and its pillars of Knowledge as a Service and Knowledge Equity. Members of the working groups concluded their task of drafting recommendations for structural changes on November 1, 2019, and we thank them for their incredible effort. Focus over the next few months will be on synthesizing these draft recommendations into one coherent and accessible set.

What is this about?

Working group members have been working tirelessly for over a year to research the movement, analyze community input shared via community conversations, gain insight into external trends, and come to a shared vision across a diverse range of perspectives.

Draft Recommendations

A second iteration of the recommendations was developed by the working groups in September 2019 after many on- and offline conversations with diverse stakeholders from across our movement; at Wikimania 2019, on the Talk Pages of the 1st iteration of the draft recommendations, and at many in-person events such as regional summits and strategy salons. The very first iteration of the draft recommendations were shared in August 2019, which you can find below, presented in full and abbreviated versions and with translations available.

The recommendations are not final. In order to get them to that stage, your input is needed! Community voices are essential for bringing a broad perspective into the changes that will shape our future. This includes affiliates, groups and chapters, the Wikimedia Foundation, and communities across projects, languages, and geographies. We would like to hear what these changes would mean for you in your local or thematic context, what do you like about them, and where you potentially see red flags. And of course, always critically question whether these recommendations support the strategic direction.

How to Share Your Feedback

Feedback plays a vital role in validating and challenging the draft recommendations. It’s helpful to have guiding questions to help Wikimedian communities and organized groups evaluate the meaning, importance, and quality of the recommendations. Here are some suggestions:

  1. Read through the recommendations and provide your input on the talk pages of respective recommendations.
    • What do you like about this recommendation? What do you dislike? Why?
    • What does this recommendation mean for you in contexts that are meaningful to you - your language, your projects, your region, your affiliate group, your identity? How would you be affected?
    • What is important to keep in mind when implementing this recommendation? What values and ideas are important to preserve? Are there any red lines we should not cross?
    • Does this recommendation support our Strategic Direction to become the support system for the whole free knowledge movement?
  2. Reach out to a Strategy Liaison in your language or for your affiliate to share feedback, or lead a conversation of your own.
What’s Next?

Open community input will be accepted until September 15, after which working groups will further refine and harmonize their work using movement input as well as external advice and research. The final recommendations will be shared publicly in November, and discussions around implementation will begin in early 2020. Keep an eye out on the “Participate” page for timeline updates as they are available.


Draft recommendations per Working Group

Iteration 2 (September 2019)

Advocacy

  1. Transparency: A global network of Wikimedia advocates is built on community driven rules of engagement. Processes for decision making are known and comprehensible. There are established entry points for those who want to be involved or want to initiate advocacy activities
 Discuss
  1. Diversity: Community actively seeks and provides a good environment and tailored pathways that attracts more people from a variety and diversity of languages and cultural backgrounds to engage in advocacy for Wikimedia on a local or global level
 Discuss
  1. Global conversation: There is an established communication process for community advocates to have central conversations about advocacy
 Discuss
  1. Knowledge management: There is constant knowledge management about methods, cases, success stories, and failures for all advocates to access and learn from, processed and maintained by, with and for them
 Discuss
  1. Advocacy Hub: Movement advocacy efforts are streamlined and reinforced by a hub run with and for current and future advocates
 Discuss
  1. Common positioning: The advocacy priorities of the Wikimedia movement are clearly articulated through a shared, highly visible and living document
 Discuss
  1. Partnerships: Advocates for the Wikimedia movement are able to collaborate with and build upon an existing global network of partners working on aligned advocacy issues
 Discuss
  1. Empowerment of advocates: Advocacy is recognized and encouraged as a valid pathway in the Wikimedia Movement
 Discuss
  1. Self-Determination: Subsidiary decentralisation should be a model of collaboration for advocacy across the movement
 Discuss
  1. Protection of Advocates: Advocates have access to clearly defined and accessible safety measures enabling them to work without having their personal and communal security compromised
 Discuss

Recent changes in discussions

List of abbreviations:
N
This edit created a new page (also see list of new pages)
m
This is a minor edit
b
This edit was performed by a bot
D
Wikidata edit
(±123)
The page size changed by this number of bytes

9 December 2019

Capacity Building

  1. Building Capacity for Capacity Building
 Discuss
  1. Matching human assets and online knowledge resources with capacity building needs
 Discuss
  1. Capacity Building Should Occur in Context
 Discuss
  1. Provide Capacity Building for Organizational Development
    Or: Supporting communities in achieving their organizational development goals
 Discuss
  1. Resources for Capacity Building
 Discuss
  1. Evaluating Capacity Building
 Discuss
  1. Online Training
 Discuss
  1. Mentoring and leadership development
 Discuss
  1. Recognizing Individuals
 Discuss
  1. Independently governed Capacity Building ‘Unit’
 Discuss

Recent changes in discussions

List of abbreviations:
N
This edit created a new page (also see list of new pages)
m
This is a minor edit
b
This edit was performed by a bot
D
Wikidata edit
(±123)
The page size changed by this number of bytes

9 December 2019

Community Health

  1. A joint set of rules we all agree to live by (a.k.a. Code of Conduct)
 Discuss
  1. Redefining power structures to better serve the communities
 Discuss
  1. Building the leadership of the future
 Discuss
  1. Structure for handling conflicts- before, during and after
 Discuss
  1. Investing in building an inclusive global community
 Discuss
  1. Newcomers are a key indicator to the success of the movement
 Discuss
  1. “Democratizing” participation (making Wikipedia/Wikimedia everyone’s responsibility) and reducing barriers for participationn
Discuss
  1. Privacy and security for everyone
 Discuss
  1. Opening the circle: All terrain readiness
 Discuss
  1. Network to continually support community health
 Discuss
  1. Aligning resource allocation with community health goals
 Discuss
  1. Investing in equity-centered technologies
 Discuss

Recent changes in discussions

List of abbreviations:
N
This edit created a new page (also see list of new pages)
m
This is a minor edit
b
This edit was performed by a bot
D
Wikidata edit
(±123)
The page size changed by this number of bytes

9 December 2019

Diversity

  1. Introducing people-centered principles within the Wikimedia movement
 Discuss
  1. Reaching a self-aware and dynamic structure aimed at community diversity and health
 Discuss
  1. Redesigning the platforms for more diversity of people and content experiences
 Discuss
  1. Planned community diversification
 Discuss
  1. Reflective policies for participation and governance
 Discuss
  1. Establishing partnerships in order to represent and protect worlds’ cultural diversity
 Discuss
  1. Decentralized administrative structure for resource allocation
Discuss
  1. Bridging different local contexts and Wikimedia projects' notability and verifiability policies
 Discuss

Recent changes in discussions

List of abbreviations:
N
This edit created a new page (also see list of new pages)
m
This is a minor edit
b
This edit was performed by a bot
D
Wikidata edit
(±123)
The page size changed by this number of bytes

9 December 2019

Partnerships

  1. Provide the knowledge needed for understanding and solving global issues
 Discuss
  1. Wikimedia as steward of the Free Knowledge Ecosystem
 Discuss
  1. Shared ecosystem of services and tools for content partnerships
 Discuss
  1. Data partnerships approach to fulfill the vision of knowledge as a service for our partners
 Discuss
  1. Focus on knowledge equity when determining priorities for Partnerships
 Discuss
  1. Partnerships as part of a Distributed Vision
 Discuss
  1. Partnerships as a shared and equitable resource and activity
Discuss
  1. Prioritise documentation
 Discuss
  1. Invest in sharing knowledge about partnerships across the movement
 Discuss
  1. Support the skills development of people working on partnerships
 Discuss
  1. Invest in the leadership potential of community members
 Discuss
  1. Establish recognition principles for new partners for attribution and content donation
 Discuss
  1. Additional research for areas where we have identified issues but haven’t made recommendations
 Discuss

Recent changes in discussions

List of abbreviations:
N
This edit created a new page (also see list of new pages)
m
This is a minor edit
b
This edit was performed by a bot
D
Wikidata edit
(±123)
The page size changed by this number of bytes

9 December 2019

Product & Technology

  1. Evaluate and Decentralize Technology Components
 Discuss
  1. Support Community Decision-making
 Discuss
  1. Open Product Proposal Process
 Discuss
  1. Deployment Council
 Discuss
  1. Disseminate Product Knowledge
 Discuss
  1. A. Improve Technical Contributor Engagement
 Discuss
  1. B. Modernize Technical Contributor Tooling
 Discuss
  1. Realize the Potential of the Third-Party Ecosystem
 Discuss
  1. Movement Technology Ethics Review Process
 Discuss
  1. Monitoring Product Trust and Availability
 Discuss
  1. Developing an Evolving Technology Vision and Strategy
 Discuss

Recent changes in discussions

List of abbreviations:
N
This edit created a new page (also see list of new pages)
m
This is a minor edit
b
This edit was performed by a bot
D
Wikidata edit
(±123)
The page size changed by this number of bytes

9 December 2019

Resource Allocation

  1. Set Common Framework of Principles for Resource Allocation
 Discuss
  1. Design participatory decision making for Resource Allocation
 Discuss
  1. Recognize privileges / Design for equity
 Discuss
  1. Distribute existing structures
 Discuss
  1. Build Thematic hubs – to provide services to the free knowledge movement long term
 Discuss
  1. Ensure flexible approach to resource allocation in a complex, fast moving and changeable space
 Discuss
  1. Allocate resources for capacity and sustainability
 Discuss
  1. Allocate resources to new types of partners/organisations (essential infrastructure of the free knowledge ecosystem)
 Discuss
  1. Include knowledge consumers
 Discuss

Recent changes in discussions

List of abbreviations:
N
This edit created a new page (also see list of new pages)
m
This is a minor edit
b
This edit was performed by a bot
D
Wikidata edit
(±123)
The page size changed by this number of bytes

9 December 2019

Revenue Streams

Click here to learn more about the recommendations by RS Working Group

  1. Turn the Wikimedia API into a revenue source
  2. Provide Paid Wiki-related Services
  3. Monetize merchandise
  4. Expand global fundraising
  5. Develop non-fundraising revenue streams for affiliates
  6. Set a goal of financial sustainability for all movement actors
  7. Diversification of revenue channels
 Discuss

Recent changes in discussions

List of abbreviations:
N
This edit created a new page (also see list of new pages)
m
This is a minor edit
b
This edit was performed by a bot
D
Wikidata edit
(±123)
The page size changed by this number of bytes

9 December 2019

Roles & Responsibilities

  1. Scenario
 Discuss
  1. All of this exists to support our primary purpose: free knowledge and its distribution (Original)
 Discuss
  1. &3. Decentralisation and self-management
 Discuss
  1. &5. Establish a Movement Charter
 Discuss
  1. Wikimedia movement organisations will be governed by inclusive, diverse, and accountable boards
 Discuss
  1. Capacity building
 Discuss

Recent changes in discussions

List of abbreviations:
N
This edit created a new page (also see list of new pages)
m
This is a minor edit
b
This edit was performed by a bot
D
Wikidata edit
(±123)
The page size changed by this number of bytes

9 December 2019

Iteration 1 (August 2019)

Iteration 1 (August 2019)
Abbreviated summaries of draft recommendations
 

Summaries have been prepared for easier engagement as well as translation into Arabic, French, German, Hindi, Mandarin, Brazilian Portugese, and Spanish. Translations will be uploaded as they become available:

Advocacy
  1. A global network of Wikimedia advocates is built on community driven rules of engagement. There are established entry points for those who want to be involved or want to initiate advocacy activities. Processes for decision making are known and comprehensible.
 Discuss
  1. Community actively seeks and provides a good environment and tailored pathways that attracts more people (professionals and volunteers) from a variety and diversity of languages and cultural backgrounds to engage in advocacy for Wikimedia on a local or global level.
 Discuss
  1. There is an established communication process for community advocates to have central conversations about advocacy.
 Discuss
  1. There is constant knowledge management about methods, cases, success stories, and failures for all advocates to access and learn from, processed and maintained by, with and for them.
 Discuss
  1. Movement advocacy efforts are streamlined and reinforced by a hub run with and for current and future advocates.
 Discuss
  1. The advocacy priorities of the Wikimedia movement are clearly articulated through a shared, highly visible and living document.
 Discuss

Recent changes in discussions

No changes during the given period match these criteria.
Capacity Building
  1. Building Capacity for Capacity Building
 Discuss
  1. Matching human assets and online knowledge resources with capacity building needs
 Discuss
  1. Capacity Building Should Occur in Context
 Discuss
  1. Provide Capacity Building for Organizational Development
    Or: Supporting communities in achieving their organizational development goals
 Discuss
  1. Resources for Capacity Building
 Discuss
  1. Evaluating Capacity Building
 Discuss
  1. Online Training
 Discuss
  1. Mentoring and leadership development
 Discuss
  1. Recognizing Individuals
 Discuss
  1. Independently governed Capacity Building ‘Unit’
 Discuss

Recent changes in discussions

No changes during the given period match these criteria.
Community Health
Discuss
Discuss
Discuss
Discuss

Recent changes in discussions

No changes during the given period match these criteria.
Diversity
  1. Code of Conduct
 Discuss
  1. Content Diversity Metrics and Guidelines
 Discuss
  1. Digitization and Resource Prioritization for Marginalized Groups
 Discuss
  1. Adopting Body Quotas for All Governing Bodies
 Discuss
  1. Identifying the Wikimedia Editing and Community Diversity Barriers in Each Country and Introduce Them in Wikidata
 Discuss
  1. Parameterized User Pages for Encouraging and Measuring Community Diversity
 Discuss
  1. Ombudsperson / Community-WMF Liaison
Discuss
  1. Resource Allocation for Securing Diversity in International Collaborations
 Discuss
  1. Terms of Use/Licensing Policy
 Discuss
  1. Wikioral, a Project with Voice Recordings
 Discuss
  1. Creating a Wikipedia Diversity Newsletter
 Discuss
  1. Language diversity
 Discuss
  1. Notability and Reliable Sources
 Discuss

Recent changes in discussions

List of abbreviations:
N
This edit created a new page (also see list of new pages)
m
This is a minor edit
b
This edit was performed by a bot
D
Wikidata edit
(±123)
The page size changed by this number of bytes

10 December 2019

9 December 2019

Partnerships

*Note: some of the recommendations are not based on full consensus of all the members of the working group yet. We are looking forward to discussing the nuances of these at Wikimania.

“How might we build Wikimedia into an effective convener of impactful partnerships, coalitions, and collective action based on a shared vision of free Open Knowledge Movement, such as the “Big Open” framework? What should be the purpose of such partnerships?”

Summary of recommendations

  1. A Framework that Supports Partnerships
 Discuss
  1. Partnerships as a shared and equitable resource and enterprise
 Discuss
  1. Partnerships as part of a Distributed Vision
 Discuss
  1. Partnerships need practices that foster institutional memory
 Discuss
  1. Define priorities for partnerships so that all key aspects of building the free knowledge ecosystem are covered
 Discuss
  1. A single point of entry for partners to engage with Wikimedia
 Discuss

“How do we develop technical infrastructure, capacities and the support we need in order to be an effective partner to share ‘the sum of all knowledge” and fulfill the vision of knowledge as a service for our partners?”

  1. A central infrastructure for content partnerships requiring technical solutions
 Discuss
  1. Technical Partnership For Developments under a shared vision and resource collaboration
 Discuss
  1. Partnership framework for harnessing modern technological developments
 Discuss
  1. Data partnerships approach to fulfill the vision of knowledge as a service for our partners
 Discuss
  1. Create an internal knowledge-base to curate details of partnerships across the movement
 Discuss
  1. Develop Capacity Building Modules for running partnership
 Discuss

“How can we empower people and organizations working on partnerships within our Movement to get the support they need to fulfill our potential and carry out diverse, sustainable, effective and impactful partnerships?”

“How do we create an inclusive, movement-wide culture of sharing knowledge, skills, and practices on collaborations and partnerships - so that everyone in the movement can participate in and benefit from them?”

  1. Recognition. Encourage proper attribution for content donations so institutions working with us are proud of their contribution and are acknowledged for their contribution
 Discuss
  1. Encourage partnerships focusing on Knowledge gaps and knowledge equity
 Discuss
  1. Documentation as a priority, not an afterthought, ending a barrier to participation and capturing our methodology and instructions in formats accessible for our global audiences
 Discuss

Recent changes in discussions

No changes during the given period match these criteria.
Product & Technology
  1. Decentralize
 Discuss
  1. Support Community Decisionmaking
 Discuss
  1. Open up Product Governance
 Discuss
  1. Deployment Council
 Discuss
  1. Tech Evangelism
 Discuss
  1. New Developer Engagement Models
 Discuss
  1. Growing the Third-Party Ecosystem
 Discuss
  1. Emerging Technology Ethics Advisory Panel
 Discuss
  1. Monitoring Product and Societal Impacts
 Discuss

Recent changes in discussions

No changes during the given period match these criteria.
Resource Allocation
  1. Common Framework of Principles for Resource Allocation
 Discuss
  1. Participatory decision making for Resource Allocation
 Discuss
  1. Avoiding the pitfalls of privileges / Designing for diversity
 Discuss
  1. Distribute existing structures
 Discuss
  1. Build Thematic hubs – to provide services to the free knowledge movement long term
 Discuss
  1. Flexible approach to resource allocation in a complex, fast moving and changeable space
 Discuss
  1. Allocating resources for capacity and sustainability
 Discuss
  1. Allocate resources to new types of partners/organisations (essential infrastructure of the free knowledge ecosystem)
 Discuss
  1. Knowledge consumers
 Discuss

Recent changes in discussions

No changes during the given period match these criteria.
Revenue Streams
  1. Turn the Wikimedia API into a revenue source
 Discuss
  1. Create a global support function for local affiliate fundraising
 Discuss
  1. Monetize Merchandise
 Discuss
  1. Providing Paid Wiki-related Services
 Discuss
  1. Develop non-fundraising revenue streams for affiliates
 Discuss
  1. Develop non-banner revenue streams for affiliates
 Discuss
  1. Set a goal of financial independence for all movement actors
 Discuss
  1. Diversification of revenue channel
 Discuss
  1. Movement wide principles for Revenue Streams
 Discuss

Recent changes in discussions

No changes during the given period match these criteria.
Roles & Responsibilities

Click here to learn more about the recommendations by R&R Working Group

  1. Power and responsibilities need to be redistributed on the principle of self management (subsidiarity)
  2. Decisions should be taken at the “lowest” possible level / as near as possible to the process/community/activity that will be affected by the decision
  3. To establish a framework for decision-making, there will be a charter of principles, values, and governance behaviours. The charter will be developed through an equitable process with broad and diverse participation.
  4. This charter will be owned by a global governance and accountability body
  5. All of this exists to support our primary purpose: free knowledge and its distribution
  6. Movement organizations are to be governed by diverse, inclusive and accountable bodies (mix of elected and appointed members)
  7. Capacity building, facilitation, coaching, leadership development will be built into these structures to enable all entities to develop at their speed. This will be supported by staff.
 Discuss

Recent changes in discussions

No changes during the given period match these criteria.


Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Strategy/Wikimedia_movement/2018-20/Recommendations/ru&oldid=19566943"