Strategy/Wikimedia movement/2018-20/Recommendations/de

ÜBERSICHT

INFORMIEREN

ARBEITSGRUPPEN

MENSCHEN

MITMACHEN

VORSCHLÄGE

Hier findet ihr die Links zu den Empfehlungen für strukturelle Veränderungen unseres Movements. Diese Empfehlungen wurden von den neun Wikimedia-2030-Arbeitsgruppen herausgearbeitet und sind für die Zukunft unseres Movements entscheidend. Mit ihnen können wir einen ersten Einblick darin bekommen, wie wir die Struktur unseres Movements verändern könnten, damit wir in unserer strategischen Ausrichtung weiterkommen. Sie sind der Ausgang für konkretere Diskussionen darüber, welche Zukunft wir gemeinsam gestalten wollen.

Worum geht es hier?

Mitglieder der Arbeitsgruppen haben für ein Jahr ununterbrochen daran gearbeitet, unser Movement zu analysieren und die Beiträge der Diskussionen der Community, um Einsicht in Trends zu erhalten. So erhielten sie Einsicht in eine gemeinsame Sichtweise, aber auch in sehr unterschiedliche Perspektiven.

Empfehlungsentwürfe

A second iteration of the recommendations was developed by the working groups in September 2019 after many on- and offline conversations with diverse stakeholders from across our movement; at Wikimania 2019, on the Talk Pages of the 1st iteration of the draft recommendations, and at many in-person events such as regional summits and strategy salons. The very first iteration of the draft recommendations were shared in August 2019, which you can find below, presented in full and abbreviated versions and with translations available.

Die Empfehlungen sind noch nicht fertig. Um sie fertigzustellen wird dein Beitrag benötigt! Um einen umfassenden Blickwinkel auf die Veränderungen zu erhalten, welche unsere Zukunft prägen, sind die Beiträge der Community unentbehrlich. Das beinhaltet sie Sichtweisen von Chaptern und User Groups, der Wikimedia Foundation und der Communites aller Projekte. Wir möchten von euch hören, was euch die vorgeschlagenen Veränderungen bedeuten, auch in eurem lokalen und thematischen Kontext. Wir möchten wissen, was ihr an den Veränderungen mögt, aber auch was für euch inakzeptabel ist. Wir möchten auch, dass ihr euch immer fragt, ob diese Empfehlungen überhaupt die strategische Ausrichtung unterstützen.

Wie könnte ihr eure Rückmeldung mitteilen?

Das Feedback spielt bei der Bestätigung und der Infragestellung der Empfehlungsentwürfe eine entscheidende Rolle. Es hilft, Leitfragen zu haben, um den Wikimedia-Gemeinschaften und den organisierten Gruppen zu helfen, Inhalt, Bedeutung und Qualität der Empfehlungen zu veranschaulichen. Hier sind einige Vorschläge:

1. Lies dir die Empfehlungen durch und kommentiere sie auf den Diskussionsseiten der jeweiligen Empfehlungen.
   • Was gefällt dir an dieser Empfehlung? Was gefällt dir nicht? Warum beziehungsweise warum nicht?
   • Was bedeutet dir diese Empfehlung in Anbetracht deiner Sprache, deines Projekts, deiner Region, deines Chapters, deiner User Group und dir persönlich? Was für Konsequenzen hättte es für dich?
   • Was müssen wir beachten, wenn wir diese Empfehlung umsetzen? Welche Werte und Ideen müssen beibehalten werden? Welche Grenzen sollten wir nicht überschreiten?
   • Unterstützt diese Empfehlung unsere 'Stragegische Ausrichtung
   • Does this recommendation support our Strategic Direction das Unterstützungs-System für die gesamte Bewegung für freies Wissen zu werden?
2. Nimm Kontakt zu einer strategischen Kontaktperson auf. Diese gibt es für deine Sprache sowie für dein Chapter oder deine User Group.

Wie geht es weiter?

Die Beiträge der Gemeinschaft können noch bis zum 15. September aufgenommen werden. Danach werden die Arbeitsgruppen ihre Empfehlungen konkretisieren, mit euren Beiträgen sowie externenen Quellen und Forschungen. Die abschließenden Empfehlungen werden im November veröffentlicht. Anfang 2020 werden Diskussionen zur Umsetzung anfangen. Auf der Teilnahme-Seite sehr ihr den immer wieder aktualisierten Zeitplan.

Die Empfehlungsentwürfe der Arbeitsgruppen

Iteration 2 (September 2019)

Advocacy

Transparency: A global network of Wikimedia advocates is built on community driven rules of engagement. Processes for decision making are known and comprehensible. There are established entry points for those who want to be involved or want to initiate advocacy activities	Discuss
Diversity: Community actively seeks and provides a good environment and tailored pathways that attracts more people from a variety and diversity of languages and cultural backgrounds to engage in advocacy for Wikimedia on a local or global level	Discuss
Global conversation: There is an established communication process for community advocates to have central conversations about advocacy	Discuss
Knowledge management: There is constant knowledge management about methods, cases, success stories, and failures for all advocates to access and learn from, processed and maintained by, with and for them	Discuss
Advocacy Hub: Movement advocacy efforts are streamlined and reinforced by a hub run with and for current and future advocates	Discuss
Common positioning: The advocacy priorities of the Wikimedia movement are clearly articulated through a shared, highly visible and living document	Discuss
Partnerships: Advocates for the Wikimedia movement are able to collaborate with and build upon an existing global network of partners working on aligned advocacy issues	Discuss
Empowerment of advocates: Advocacy is recognized and encouraged as a valid pathway in the Wikimedia Movement	Discuss
Self-Determination: Subsidiary decentralisation should be a model of collaboration for advocacy across the movement	Discuss
Protection of Advocates: Advocates have access to clearly defined and accessible safety measures enabling them to work without having their personal and communal security compromised	Discuss

Recent changes in discussions

No changes during the given period match these criteria.

Capacity Building

Building Capacity for Capacity Building	Discuss
Matching human assets and online knowledge resources with capacity building needs	Discuss
Capacity Building Should Occur in Context	Discuss
Provide Capacity Building for Organizational Development Or: Supporting communities in achieving their organizational development goals	Discuss
Resources for Capacity Building	Discuss
Evaluating Capacity Building	Discuss
Online Training	Discuss
Mentoring and leadership development	Discuss
Recognizing Individuals	Discuss
Independently governed Capacity Building ‘Unit’	Discuss

Recent changes in discussions

No changes during the given period match these criteria.

Community Health

A joint set of rules we all agree to live by (a.k.a. Code of Conduct)	Discuss
Redefining power structures to better serve the communities	Discuss
Building the leadership of the future	Discuss
Structure for handling conflicts- before, during and after	Discuss
Investing in building an inclusive global community	Discuss
Newcomers are a key indicator to the success of the movement	Discuss
“Democratizing” participation (making Wikipedia/Wikimedia everyone’s responsibility) and reducing barriers for participationn	Discuss
Privacy and security for everyone	Discuss
Opening the circle: All terrain readiness	Discuss
Network to continually support community health	Discuss
Aligning resource allocation with community health goals	Discuss
Investing in equity-centered technologies	Discuss

Recent changes in discussions

No changes during the given period match these criteria.

Diversity

Introducing people-centered principles within the Wikimedia movement	Discuss
Reaching a self-aware and dynamic structure aimed at community diversity and health	Discuss
Redesigning the platforms for more diversity of people and content experiences	Discuss
Planned community diversification	Discuss
Reflective policies for participation and governance	Discuss
Establishing partnerships in order to represent and protect worlds’ cultural diversity	Discuss
Decentralized administrative structure for resource allocation	Discuss
Bridging different local contexts and Wikimedia projects' notability and verifiability policies	Discuss

Recent changes in discussions

No changes during the given period match these criteria.

Partnerships

Provide the knowledge needed for understanding and solving global issues	Discuss
Wikimedia as steward of the Free Knowledge Ecosystem	Discuss
Shared ecosystem of services and tools for content partnerships	Discuss
Data partnerships approach to fulfill the vision of knowledge as a service for our partners	Discuss
Focus on knowledge equity when determining priorities for Partnerships	Discuss
Partnerships as part of a Distributed Vision	Discuss
Partnerships as a shared and equitable resource and activity	Discuss
Prioritise documentation	Discuss
Invest in sharing knowledge about partnerships across the movement	Discuss
Support the skills development of people working on partnerships	Discuss
Invest in the leadership potential of community members	Discuss
Establish recognition principles for new partners for attribution and content donation	Discuss
Additional research for areas where we have identified issues but haven’t made recommendations	Discuss

Recent changes in discussions

No changes during the given period match these criteria.

Product & Technology

Evaluate and Decentralize Technology Components	Discuss
Support Community Decision-making	Discuss
Open Product Proposal Process	Discuss
Deployment Council	Discuss
Disseminate Product Knowledge	Discuss
A. Improve Technical Contributor Engagement	Discuss
B. Modernize Technical Contributor Tooling	Discuss
Realize the Potential of the Third-Party Ecosystem	Discuss
Movement Technology Ethics Review Process	Discuss
Monitoring Product Trust and Availability	Discuss
Developing an Evolving Technology Vision and Strategy	Discuss

Recent changes in discussions

No changes during the given period match these criteria.

Resource Allocation

Set Common Framework of Principles for Resource Allocation	Discuss
Design participatory decision making for Resource Allocation	Discuss
Recognize privileges / Design for equity	Discuss
Distribute existing structures	Discuss
Build Thematic hubs – to provide services to the free knowledge movement long term	Discuss
Ensure flexible approach to resource allocation in a complex, fast moving and changeable space	Discuss
Allocate resources for capacity and sustainability	Discuss
Allocate resources to new types of partners/organisations (essential infrastructure of the free knowledge ecosystem)	Discuss
Include knowledge consumers	Discuss

Recent changes in discussions

No changes during the given period match these criteria.

Revenue Streams

Click here to learn more about the recommendations by RS Working Group

Turn the Wikimedia API into a revenue source Provide Paid Wiki-related Services Monetize merchandise Expand global fundraising Develop non-fundraising revenue streams for affiliates Set a goal of financial sustainability for all movement actors Diversification of revenue channels

Discuss

Recent changes in discussions

No changes during the given period match these criteria.

Roles & Responsibilities

Scenario	Discuss
All of this exists to support our primary purpose: free knowledge and its distribution (Original)	Discuss
&3. Decentralisation and self-management	Discuss
&5. Establish a Movement Charter	Discuss
Wikimedia movement organisations will be governed by inclusive, diverse, and accountable boards	Discuss
Capacity building	Discuss

Recent changes in discussions

No changes during the given period match these criteria.

Iteration 1 (August 2019)

Iteration 1 (August 2019)

Kurzfassungen der Empfehlungsentwürfe Es gibt auch Zusammenfasungen, die einfacher zu lesen sind, sowie Übersetzungen ins Arabische, Deutsche, Hindi, Brasilianische Portugiesisch und Spanisch. Die Übersetzungen werden laufend aktualisiert. Vernetzung und Lobbyarbeit Aufbau von Kapazitäten Gesundheit der Community Diversität Partnerschaften Produkt und Technologie Ressourcenverteilung Einnahmequellen Rollen und Verantwortlichkeiten Vernetzung und Lobbyarbeit A global network of Wikimedia advocates is built on community driven rules of engagement. There are established entry points for those who want to be involved or want to initiate advocacy activities. Processes for decision making are known and comprehensible. Discuss Community actively seeks and provides a good environment and tailored pathways that attracts more people (professionals and volunteers) from a variety and diversity of languages and cultural backgrounds to engage in advocacy for Wikimedia on a local or global level. Discuss There is an established communication process for community advocates to have central conversations about advocacy. Discuss There is constant knowledge management about methods, cases, success stories, and failures for all advocates to access and learn from, processed and maintained by, with and for them. Discuss Movement advocacy efforts are streamlined and reinforced by a hub run with and for current and future advocates. Discuss The advocacy priorities of the Wikimedia movement are clearly articulated through a shared, highly visible and living document. Discuss Letzte Änderungen in den Diskussionen No changes during the given period match these criteria. Aufbau von Kapazitäten Building Capacity for Capacity Building Discuss Matching human assets and online knowledge resources with capacity building needs Discuss Capacity Building Should Occur in Context Discuss Provide Capacity Building for Organizational Development Or: Supporting communities in achieving their organizational development goals Discuss Resources for Capacity Building Discuss Evaluating Capacity Building Discuss Online Training Discuss Mentoring and leadership development Discuss Recognizing Individuals Discuss Independently governed Capacity Building ‘Unit’ Discuss Letzte Änderungen in den Diskussionen No changes during the given period match these criteria. Gesundheit der Community Rules and regulations, decision making processes and leadership Discuss Community diversity and growth Discuss Safety Discuss Agile and responsive support of community health Discuss Letzte Änderungen in den Diskussionen No changes during the given period match these criteria. Diversität Code of Conduct Discuss Content Diversity Metrics and Guidelines Discuss Digitization and Resource Prioritization for Marginalized Groups Discuss Adopting Body Quotas for All Governing Bodies Discuss Identifying the Wikimedia Editing and Community Diversity Barriers in Each Country and Introduce Them in Wikidata Discuss Parameterized User Pages for Encouraging and Measuring Community Diversity Discuss Ombudsperson / Community-WMF Liaison Discuss Resource Allocation for Securing Diversity in International Collaborations Discuss Terms of Use/Licensing Policy Discuss Wikioral, a Project with Voice Recordings Discuss Creating a Wikipedia Diversity Newsletter Discuss Language diversity Discuss Notability and Reliable Sources Discuss Letzte Änderungen in den Diskussionen No changes during the given period match these criteria. Partnerschaften *Note: some of the recommendations are not based on full consensus of all the members of the working group yet. We are looking forward to discussing the nuances of these at Wikimania. “How might we build Wikimedia into an effective convener of impactful partnerships, coalitions, and collective action based on a shared vision of free Open Knowledge Movement, such as the “Big Open” framework? What should be the purpose of such partnerships?” Summary of recommendations A Framework that Supports Partnerships Discuss Partnerships as a shared and equitable resource and enterprise Discuss Partnerships as part of a Distributed Vision Discuss Partnerships need practices that foster institutional memory Discuss Define priorities for partnerships so that all key aspects of building the free knowledge ecosystem are covered Discuss A single point of entry for partners to engage with Wikimedia Discuss “How do we develop technical infrastructure, capacities and the support we need in order to be an effective partner to share ‘the sum of all knowledge” and fulfill the vision of knowledge as a service for our partners?” A central infrastructure for content partnerships requiring technical solutions Discuss Technical Partnership For Developments under a shared vision and resource collaboration Discuss Partnership framework for harnessing modern technological developments Discuss Data partnerships approach to fulfill the vision of knowledge as a service for our partners Discuss Create an internal knowledge-base to curate details of partnerships across the movement Discuss Develop Capacity Building Modules for running partnership Discuss “How can we empower people and organizations working on partnerships within our Movement to get the support they need to fulfill our potential and carry out diverse, sustainable, effective and impactful partnerships?” “How do we create an inclusive, movement-wide culture of sharing knowledge, skills, and practices on collaborations and partnerships - so that everyone in the movement can participate in and benefit from them?” Recognition. Encourage proper attribution for content donations so institutions working with us are proud of their contribution and are acknowledged for their contribution Discuss Encourage partnerships focusing on Knowledge gaps and knowledge equity Discuss Documentation as a priority, not an afterthought, ending a barrier to participation and capturing our methodology and instructions in formats accessible for our global audiences Discuss Letzte Änderungen in den Diskussionen No changes during the given period match these criteria. Produkt und Technologie Decentralize Discuss Support Community Decisionmaking Discuss Open up Product Governance Discuss Deployment Council Discuss Tech Evangelism Discuss New Developer Engagement Models Discuss Growing the Third-Party Ecosystem Discuss Emerging Technology Ethics Advisory Panel Discuss Monitoring Product and Societal Impacts Discuss Letzte Änderungen in den Diskussionen No changes during the given period match these criteria. Ressourcenverteilung Common Framework of Principles for Resource Allocation Discuss Participatory decision making for Resource Allocation Discuss Avoiding the pitfalls of privileges / Designing for diversity Discuss Distribute existing structures Discuss Build Thematic hubs – to provide services to the free knowledge movement long term Discuss Flexible approach to resource allocation in a complex, fast moving and changeable space Discuss Allocating resources for capacity and sustainability Discuss Allocate resources to new types of partners/organisations (essential infrastructure of the free knowledge ecosystem) Discuss Knowledge consumers Discuss Letzte Änderungen in den Diskussionen No changes during the given period match these criteria. Einnahmequellen Turn the Wikimedia API into a revenue source Discuss Create a global support function for local affiliate fundraising Discuss Monetize Merchandise Discuss Providing Paid Wiki-related Services Discuss Develop non-fundraising revenue streams for affiliates Discuss Develop non-banner revenue streams for affiliates Discuss Set a goal of financial independence for all movement actors Discuss Diversification of revenue channel Discuss Movement wide principles for Revenue Streams Discuss Letzte Änderungen in den Diskussionen No changes during the given period match these criteria. Rollen und Verantwortlichkeiten Hier findet ihr mehr über die Empfehlungen der Arbeitsgruppe Rollen und Verantwortlichkeiten Power and responsibilities need to be redistributed on the principle of self management (subsidiarity) Decisions should be taken at the “lowest” possible level / as near as possible to the process/community/activity that will be affected by the decision To establish a framework for decision-making, there will be a charter of principles, values, and governance behaviours. The charter will be developed through an equitable process with broad and diverse participation. This charter will be owned by a global governance and accountability body All of this exists to support our primary purpose: free knowledge and its distribution Movement organizations are to be governed by diverse, inclusive and accountable bodies (mix of elected and appointed members) Capacity building, facilitation, coaching, leadership development will be built into these structures to enable all entities to develop at their speed. This will be supported by staff. Discuss Recent changes in discussions No changes during the given period match these criteria.