Strategy/Wikimedia movement/2017/Sources/Wikimedia Italia
What group or community is this source coming from?
|name of group||Wikimedia Italia|
|virtual location (page-link) or physical location (city/state/country)||Napoli, Italia|
|Location type (e.g. local wiki, Facebook, in-person discussion, telephone conference)||In-person discussion (before the general assembly)|
|# of participants in this discussion (a rough count)||23|
The summary is a group of summary sentences and associated keywords that describe the relevant topic(s). Below is an example.
The first column (after the line number) should be a single sentence. The second column should be a comma-separated list of keywords about that sentence, and so on. Taken together, all the sentences should provide an accurate summary of what was discussed with the specific community.
|Line||Statement (summary sentence)||keywords|
|1||[Example 1: Sentence] Wikimedia stands for a purity of knowledge and facts, untainted by commercial interests or political agendas, and promotes a knowledge culture of balanced information and cited sources.||[Example 1: Keywords] independence, verifiability, facts matter|
|2||[Example 2: Sentence] We should explore new kinds of knowledge spaces, embracing innovation in order to survive and thrive in 2030.||[Example 2: Keywords] innovation, forms of knowledge|
Summary for the discussion:
|Line||Statement (summary sentence)||Keywords|
|1||We should work more on existing "hinges" between general public and specialised reviews/sources, to reduce obstacles to digital literacy||mediation, general public, specialised sources, digital literacy|
|2||We should challenge existing biases in the academic research fields, encouraging experts to continue to vary approaches and methodologies to include other points of view that may be of scientific interest.||systemic bias, academic research, NPOV, cultural differences|
|3||We should focus more on fostering a multi-lingual approach to open data and open knowledge, to lower the barrier between projects and ensure translation of knowledges||multi-linguism, open data, open knowledge, translation|
|4||“Wikify the world”: extending the participatory model of Wikipedia to the existing reality.||globalisation, growth|
|5||"Bread and data": form as much as possible the current generations, because in 2030 will be those who will be in command ;-)||growth, community building, participation, education|
|6||“Open by default”: the production of data and documents by public and private organizations, and by school and universities, will be open thanks to legal obligation.||copyright, open content|
|7||Creating a network of relationships with associations with same vision, to increase political pressure for the sharing of data and knowledge.||growth, diversity, community|
|8||Involving universities and scholastic centers to increase the quality of the content of the wiki projects.||quality of wikimedia projects|
|9||Making the GLAM a real gateway for knowledge sharing with the territory and with the citizenry.||GLAM, education, participation, social inclusion|
|10||Increasing integration of the wiki model and projects within the primary and secondary schools, developing the critical spirit.||education, participation|
|11||Challenge: Education institutions and public institution still mistrust towards Wikipedia||mistrust, skeptism, reliability|
|12||Challenge: Most people do not participate or participate passively to projects, without a pro-active attitude||passitivy, lack of engagement|
|13||Challenge: [People outside the movement] do not know the project and the movement||outreach, awareness|
|14||Challenge: Wikipedia suffers a problem of reputation||reputation, reliability|
|15||Challenge: there is conflict within the community on Wikipedia||conflict|
|16||We should strive to earn legitimacy from the institutions.||reputation, legitimacy, institutions|
|17||We should aim for partnerships with high-profile insitutions (e.g. ministry)||partnership, institution|
|18||We should swap the direction of the relationship between institution and Wikipedia (i.e. we should reach a situation where the istitution seeks Wikimedia as a partner and not the other way around)||insitution, partnership|
|19||We should work for healing the relation between the affiliates and the community on the projects||community, affiliates|
|20||We should collaborate with universities||partnership, universities|
If you need more lines, you can copy them from Strategy/Wikimedia movement/2017/Sources/Lines.
Detailed notes (Optional)Edit
If you have detailed notes in addition to the summary, you may add them here. For example, the notes may come from an in-person discussion or workshop. If your discussion happened on a wiki or other online space, you do not need to copy the detailed notes here.