Strategy/Wikimedia movement/2017/Sources/Drafting/Wikimedia Indonesia


  • Discussion coordinators summarize and submit local feedback to the draft via the summary skeleton.
  • If a point is "above the bar" (priority 1) - strong sentiment by the local community that something absolutely needs to change, be removed or added - then the coordinator also adds comments to the talk page on Meta as well while referencing the sources statement - do this on an ongoing basis.
  • A - Direction: The future we imagine (green box).
  • B - Remaining sections: Reasoning, Implications.
  • 1 - This is absolutely necessary change (either to keep or to eliminate)
  • 2 - This is a change, but not absolutely necessary
Section Priority Summary statement Overall sentiment Keyword or phrase
B 2 Most of the content we have created is in the form of long-form encyclopedia articles and still images which leaves out many other types of knowledge, such as video, voice (not spoken article - but simply to accommodate people who’s still in oral tradition) supportive but need a good wording culture, video, voice, oral tradition,
B 2 “It is how, by 2030, Wikimedia will become the essential infrastructure of the network of free knowledge, and anyone who shares our commitment will be able to join us.”It is necessary to point out which (infrastructure) we offer to anyone who has common goals with us to ensure and to reassure them that “we” are going to be a main foundation to spread free knowledge to everyone all the time. approval infrastructure, free knowledge, commitment
A - “As a social movement, we will focus our efforts on the knowledge and communities that have been left out by structures of power and privilege.” approval empowering, weak, communities, underrepresented
B - “The distributed structure of our network will help us adapt to local contexts.”Every language has their own culture, most of underrepresented language communities need more articles about their culture before going to more common articles. Most of Indonesian local languages Wikipedia, for example, lack of local content or culture. approval local context, diverse,
B - “We will continue our commitment to providing useful information that it is reliable, accurate, and relevant to users.”The word “reliable” should be prioritized because our system is very different among the communities, thus there are big gaps in between, protecting articles from vandals is very important to make Wikimedia as a trusted movement.In addition, we need to make a clarity on how Wikipedia systems work in defending those articles from disturbing edits, and if it is possible, providing real example from Wikipedia on how it is done. approval but need to elaborate more in the real projects realiable, accurate, good system
B - “As technology spreads through every aspect of our lives, Wikimedia's infrastructure needs to be able to communicate easily with other connected systems.”We need tools to make our communication between user group, community, and chapter is easier. approval communication, tool, networking

Detailed notes (Optional)Edit

If you have detailed notes in addition to the summary, you may add them here. For example, the notes may come from an in-person discussion or workshop. If your discussion happened on a wiki or other online space, you do not need to copy the detailed notes here.