Strategy/Wikimedia movement/2017/Sources/Cycle 3/WikiDonne's User Group
Information
editWhat group or community is this source coming from?
name of group | WikiDonne's User Group |
virtual location (page-link) or physical location (city/state/country) | w:it:Progetto:WikiDonne/Strategia#Wiki_2030 |
Location type (e.g. local wiki, Facebook, in-person discussion, telephone conference) | Local wiki; Facebook page and group; in-person discussions |
# of participants in this discussion (a rough count) | 10 |
Summary
editThe summary is a group of summary sentences and associated keywords that describe the relevant topic(s). Below is an example.
Line | Week # | Key insight | Summary Statement | Overall | Keyword |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 1 | A | Example: Knowledge needs to be more relevant. We need much easier ways to add images and videos. Many people want more diverse content, and we need ways to make these easy to crowd-source. We need new projects devoted to this effort that work well. | supportive | example |
2 | 1 | A | Example: If we start doing things other than long-form, cited articles, we will dilute the integrity of the projects. | concern | example |
3 | example | example | example table only | neutral | example |
Taken together, all the summary sentences should provide an accurate summary of what was discussed with the specific community.
Fill in the table, using these keys.
- Questions key
- The Western encyclopedia model is not serving the evolving needs of people who want to learn.
- Knowledge sharing has become highly social across the globe.
- Much of the world's knowledge is yet to be documented on our sites and it requires new ways to integrate and verify sources.
- The discovery and sharing of trusted information have historically continued to evolve.
- Trends in misinformation are increasing and may challenge the ability for Wikimedians to find trustworthy sources of knowledge.
- Mobile will continue to grow. Products will evolve and use new technologies such as artificial intelligence, augmented reality, and virtual reality. These will change how we create, present, and distribute knowledge.
- As the world population undergoes major shifts, the Wikimedia movement has an opportunity to help improve the knowledge available in more places and to more people.
- Readers in seven of our most active countries have little understanding of how Wikipedia works, is structured, is funded, and how content is created.
- Overall (either)
- supportive
- concern
- neutral
Line | Week # | Key insight | Summary Statement | Overall | Keyword |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 1 | A | Increasing the authority of what has been written | support | reliability |
2 | 1 | A | Put the wikimedians in the best condition to develop their passion and achieve greater results from their commitment | supportive | community |
3 | 1 | A | Involving institutional bodies in our projects | supportive | institutional collaboration |
4 | 1 | A | Increasing collaboration with associations that have similar interests (organizations that deal with open source software, freedom of view) | supportive | collaboration |
5 | 1 | A | Making pressures on parliaments to emanate laws in favor of free knowledge | concern | institution |
6 | 1 | A | Help wikipedians organize themselves as affiliates, especially in African countries | supportive | affiliates/community |
7 | 1 | A | By supporting affiliates (chapter, user groups, thematic organizations) through | supportive | affiliates/community |
8 | 1 | A | Strengthening the Movement (direct dialogue with affiliates) | supportive | affiliates/community |
9 | 1 | B | Oral sources, audio and video recordings to be used as sources | supportive | cources |
10 | 2 | C | Writing rumors about controversial phenomena (eg the voice on the Blue Whale phenomenon has not been maintained because it is not considered encyclopedic as a real phenomenon or even as a fake) | concern | controversial phenomena |
11 | 2 | C | Returning all opinions in a neutral and balanced way | neutral | neutral point of view |
12 | 2 | C | Choosing only really reliable sources | concern | reliability |
13 | 2 | C | Involving qualified people in writing the articles | support | authority |
14 | 2 | C | Funding research on controversial phenomena or important to our movement (eg research on the language used in our projects, as a tool to measure the reason for the abandonment of experienced users, the degree of welcome of new users and the most appropriate way to feel Existing users) | support | metrics, survey |
15 | 2 | D | It will have to take into account an invaluable wealth of the "south of the world," accepting as official the oral sources (what is being considered in this discussion thread). | support | community |
16 | 2 | D | The more it adapts to the habits of users, the way they are used to the knowledge, the more it will be "at your fingertips" | awareness | users habits |
17 | 3 | E | By covering demographic growth countries (African countries) | support | diversity |
18 | 3 | E | Strengthening projects in the less represented languages | support | diversity |
19 | 3 | E | Strengthening the diversity of every type (gender, language etc) | support | diversity |
If you need more lines, you can copy them from Strategy/Wikimedia movement/2017/Sources/Lines.
See also
editDetailed notes (Optional)
editIf you have detailed notes in addition to the summary, you may add them here. For example, the notes may come from an in-person discussion or workshop. If your discussion happened on a wiki or other online space, you do not need to copy the detailed notes here.