Strategy/Wikimedia movement/2017/Sources/Cycle 3/Hindi Community one on one discussions


What group or community is this source coming from?

name of group Hindi Wikipedia Community
virtual location (page-link) or physical location (city/state/country)
Location type (e.g. local wiki, Facebook, in-person discussion, telephone conference) WhatsApp, Hangouts, Messenger
# of participants in this discussion (a rough count) 2


The summary is a group of summary sentences and associated keywords that describe the relevant topic(s). Here is an example.

Line Week # Key insight Summary Statement Overall Keyword
1 1 A Example: Knowledge needs to be more relevant. We need much easier ways to add images and videos. Many people want more diverse content, and we need ways to make these easy to crowd-source. We need new projects devoted to this effort that work well. supportive example
2 1 A Example: If we start doing things other than long-form, cited articles, we will dilute the integrity of the projects. concern example
3 example example example table only neutral example

Taken together, all the summary sentences should provide an accurate summary of what was discussed with the specific community.

Fill in the table below, using these 2 keys.

Key Insight
  1. The Western encyclopedia model is not serving the evolving needs of people who want to learn.
  2. Knowledge sharing has become highly social across the globe.
  3. Much of the world's knowledge is yet to be documented on our sites and it requires new ways to integrate and verify sources.
  4. The discovery and sharing of trusted information have historically continued to evolve.
  5. Trends in misinformation are increasing and may challenge the ability for Wikimedians to find trustworthy sources of knowledge.
  6. Mobile will continue to grow. Products will evolve and use new technologies such as artificial intelligence, augmented reality, and virtual reality. These will change how we create, present, and distribute knowledge.
  7. As the world population undergoes major shifts, the Wikimedia movement has an opportunity to help improve the knowledge available in more places and to more people.
  8. Readers in seven of our most active countries have little understanding of how Wikipedia works, is structured, is funded, and how content is created.
Overall (either)
  • supportive
  • concern
  • neutral
Line Week # Key insight Summary Statement Overall Keyword
1 1 A We should not change our current encyclopedic model. concern encyclopedic model
2 1 A We should include more audio-visual content but we should also focus on making it available in multiple languages. supportive audio-visual
3 1 B Wikipedia should not compete with social media platforms. concern social media
4 1 A We can create a platform such as Wikisearch in which answers to simple questions can be answered with the help of Wikidata. supportive Wikisearch
5 1 B Whenever people need reliable information in big quantity, they will come to Wikipedia concern reliability
6 1 A We should promote Wikibooks and Wikiversity as learning platforms. supportive learning platform
7 1 A We can start a new project which has question-answers. supportive new project
8 1 A We should focus on having more audio-visual content. It will have people who can’t see as well. supportive audio-visual
9 1 B A lot of information on Social Media also comes from Wikipedia. People just might not know it. neutral social media
10 1 A For learners, it is easy to understand concepts with the help of audio-visual. supportive audio-visual
11 1 A People believe in seeing rather than reading. supportive visual
12 1 A We should focus on audio-video content but then most members of our community won’t be able to make videos or edit them if some revisions are required. neutral audio-visual
13 1 B We should integrate social media platforms with Wikipedia. Maithili Wikipedia has already done it. supportive integration
14 2 C We should first back those sources back to life which are not available anymore. Such as newspapers which have stopped getting published. We should scan them and then use them as sources. neutral newspapers
15 2 C We should have some experts who can write books about oral cultures and then those books can be used as a reference on Wikipedia. supportive documenting by writing
16 2 C We can get some newspapers to document oral cultures and we use them as a reference. supportive documentation by newspapers
17 2 C I don’t think it would be good to use videos as references. concern videos as references
18 2 C We should start a new project like WikiResearch which will be documeting knowledge from various cultures. supportive WikiResearch
19 2 C I saw a proposal for a project named wikiculture on meta recently. We should consider that. supportive new project
20 2 C We can hire unknown reviewers who will be responsible for reviewing oral knowledge from a certain culture. supportive reviewers
21 2 C We should use videos to document oral culture. supportive videos
22 3 E We should use more than one sources especially in case of newspapers. supportive multiple sources
23 3 E We should keep blacklisting newspapers known for publishing wrong information. supportive blacklisting
24 3 E If there is bias in the sources itself then there is nothing that we can do. neutral bias
25 3 E It is impossible to control all the mediums. We would have to search for the reliable sources. supportive search
26 3 E It is difficult but we can start a project called WikiResearch but even then we won’t be able to tell whether research done on this project is unbiased. neutral WikiResearch
27 4 F If we want to increase the creation of content then we should invest more into mobile technology. supportive mobile devices
28 4 F For better presentation of content, we should use svg as it is easily translatable. supportive easily translatable images
29 4 F It is not Wikipedia’s job to provide internet access to everyone. neutral access
30 4 F It would be good to partner with AI platforms like Google Assistant and Siri to increase our reach. supportive Artificial Intelligence
31 3 E Quality sources should be given importance. supportive quality sources
32 3 E Misinformation on Wikipedia is an issue related to Community Health and the community should find out ways deal with the issue. supportive Community Health
33 3 E Unsourced controversial information should be removed immediately. supportive removal of controversial information
34 3 E We should not decide what is right and what is wrong. neutral right and wrong
35 5 G Many people in developing countries don’t know that Wikipedia exists in their language and they just search in English. neutral multilingual
36 5 H Changes can be made in the mobile interface to better inform our readers. supportive interface

If you need more lines, you can copy them from Strategy/Wikimedia movement/2017/Sources/Lines.

Detailed notes (Optional)Edit

If you have detailed notes in addition to the summary, you may add them here. For example, the notes may come from an in-person discussion or workshop. If your discussion happened on a wiki or other online space, you do not need to copy the detailed notes here.