Strategy/Wikimedia movement/2017/Sources/Cycle 3/Hindi Community one on one discussions
What group or community is this source coming from?
|name of group||Hindi Wikipedia Community|
|virtual location (page-link) or physical location (city/state/country)|
|Location type (e.g. local wiki, Facebook, in-person discussion, telephone conference)||WhatsApp, Hangouts, Messenger|
|# of participants in this discussion (a rough count)||2|
The summary is a group of summary sentences and associated keywords that describe the relevant topic(s). Here is an example.
|Line||Week #||Key insight||Summary Statement||Overall||Keyword|
|1||1||A||Example: Knowledge needs to be more relevant. We need much easier ways to add images and videos. Many people want more diverse content, and we need ways to make these easy to crowd-source. We need new projects devoted to this effort that work well.||supportive||example|
|2||1||A||Example: If we start doing things other than long-form, cited articles, we will dilute the integrity of the projects.||concern||example|
|3||example||example||example table only||neutral||example|
Taken together, all the summary sentences should provide an accurate summary of what was discussed with the specific community.
Fill in the table below, using these 2 keys.
- Key Insight
- The Western encyclopedia model is not serving the evolving needs of people who want to learn.
- Knowledge sharing has become highly social across the globe.
- Much of the world's knowledge is yet to be documented on our sites and it requires new ways to integrate and verify sources.
- The discovery and sharing of trusted information have historically continued to evolve.
- Trends in misinformation are increasing and may challenge the ability for Wikimedians to find trustworthy sources of knowledge.
- Mobile will continue to grow. Products will evolve and use new technologies such as artificial intelligence, augmented reality, and virtual reality. These will change how we create, present, and distribute knowledge.
- As the world population undergoes major shifts, the Wikimedia movement has an opportunity to help improve the knowledge available in more places and to more people.
- Readers in seven of our most active countries have little understanding of how Wikipedia works, is structured, is funded, and how content is created.
- Overall (either)
|Line||Week #||Key insight||Summary Statement||Overall||Keyword|
|1||1||A||We should not change our current encyclopedic model.||concern||encyclopedic model|
|2||1||A||We should include more audio-visual content but we should also focus on making it available in multiple languages.||supportive||audio-visual|
|3||1||B||Wikipedia should not compete with social media platforms.||concern||social media|
|4||1||A||We can create a platform such as Wikisearch in which answers to simple questions can be answered with the help of Wikidata.||supportive||Wikisearch|
|5||1||B||Whenever people need reliable information in big quantity, they will come to Wikipedia||concern||reliability|
|6||1||A||We should promote Wikibooks and Wikiversity as learning platforms.||supportive||learning platform|
|7||1||A||We can start a new project which has question-answers.||supportive||new project|
|8||1||A||We should focus on having more audio-visual content. It will have people who can’t see as well.||supportive||audio-visual|
|9||1||B||A lot of information on Social Media also comes from Wikipedia. People just might not know it.||neutral||social media|
|10||1||A||For learners, it is easy to understand concepts with the help of audio-visual.||supportive||audio-visual|
|11||1||A||People believe in seeing rather than reading.||supportive||visual|
|12||1||A||We should focus on audio-video content but then most members of our community won’t be able to make videos or edit them if some revisions are required.||neutral||audio-visual|
|13||1||B||We should integrate social media platforms with Wikipedia. Maithili Wikipedia has already done it.||supportive||integration|
|14||2||C||We should first back those sources back to life which are not available anymore. Such as newspapers which have stopped getting published. We should scan them and then use them as sources.||neutral||newspapers|
|15||2||C||We should have some experts who can write books about oral cultures and then those books can be used as a reference on Wikipedia.||supportive||documenting by writing|
|16||2||C||We can get some newspapers to document oral cultures and we use them as a reference.||supportive||documentation by newspapers|
|17||2||C||I don’t think it would be good to use videos as references.||concern||videos as references|
|18||2||C||We should start a new project like WikiResearch which will be documeting knowledge from various cultures.||supportive||WikiResearch|
|19||2||C||I saw a proposal for a project named wikiculture on meta recently. We should consider that.||supportive||new project|
|20||2||C||We can hire unknown reviewers who will be responsible for reviewing oral knowledge from a certain culture.||supportive||reviewers|
|21||2||C||We should use videos to document oral culture.||supportive||videos|
|22||3||E||We should use more than one sources especially in case of newspapers.||supportive||multiple sources|
|23||3||E||We should keep blacklisting newspapers known for publishing wrong information.||supportive||blacklisting|
|24||3||E||If there is bias in the sources itself then there is nothing that we can do.||neutral||bias|
|25||3||E||It is impossible to control all the mediums. We would have to search for the reliable sources.||supportive||search|
|26||3||E||It is difficult but we can start a project called WikiResearch but even then we won’t be able to tell whether research done on this project is unbiased.||neutral||WikiResearch|
|27||4||F||If we want to increase the creation of content then we should invest more into mobile technology.||supportive||mobile devices|
|28||4||F||For better presentation of content, we should use svg as it is easily translatable.||supportive||easily translatable images|
|29||4||F||It is not Wikipedia’s job to provide internet access to everyone.||neutral||access|
|30||4||F||It would be good to partner with AI platforms like Google Assistant and Siri to increase our reach.||supportive||Artificial Intelligence|
|31||3||E||Quality sources should be given importance.||supportive||quality sources|
|32||3||E||Misinformation on Wikipedia is an issue related to Community Health and the community should find out ways deal with the issue.||supportive||Community Health|
|33||3||E||Unsourced controversial information should be removed immediately.||supportive||removal of controversial information|
|34||3||E||We should not decide what is right and what is wrong.||neutral||right and wrong|
|35||5||G||Many people in developing countries don’t know that Wikipedia exists in their language and they just search in English.||neutral||multilingual|
|36||5||H||Changes can be made in the mobile interface to better inform our readers.||supportive||interface|
If you need more lines, you can copy them from Strategy/Wikimedia movement/2017/Sources/Lines.
Detailed notes (Optional)Edit
If you have detailed notes in addition to the summary, you may add them here. For example, the notes may come from an in-person discussion or workshop. If your discussion happened on a wiki or other online space, you do not need to copy the detailed notes here.