Strategy/Wikimedia movement/2017/Sources/Cycle 2/WikiJournal
|name of group||WikiJournal User Group|
|virtual location||Talk:Strategy/Wikimedia movement/2017/Cycle 2|
|Location type||local wiki|
|# of participants in this discussion||3|
The summary is a group of summary sentences and associated keywords that describe the relevant topic(s).
|Theme (refer to key)||Question (refer to key)||Summary Statement||Keyword|
|1||A||1||Improved tutorials and training - well trained newbies remain surprisingly positive despite criticism (73% experienced reversion and 56% experienced correction, yet 95% stated beneficial interactions)  Even basic positive feedback and rewards during training make a big difference (doi:10.1080/1369118X.2014.888459)||Community Health|
|3||E||1||This clearly affects the reputation of the encyclopedia, and how well its regarded as an authoritative and reliable source. Ideally, we can be the integration point between the expert/scholarly/academic/technical communities and the general public.||Community|
Editathons and Wikipedians in residence seem to have been quite productive for this. Possibly also support for experiences trainers in editing to train/advise partners. More focussed support may be possible by making hybrid platforms that bridge the gap between Wikipedia projects and possible partners e.g.:
Obvious partnership targets include:
- Theme key
- Healthy, inclusive communities
- The augmented age
- A truly global movement
- The most trusted source of knowledge
- Engaging in the knowledge ecosystem
- Questions key
- What impact would we have on the world if we follow this theme?
- How important is this theme relative to the other 4 themes? Why?
- Focus requires tradeoffs. If we increase our effort in this area in the next 15 years, is there anything we’re doing today that we would need to stop doing?
- What else is important to add to this theme to make it stronger?
- Who else will be working in this area and how might we partner with them?