Strategy/Wikimedia movement/2017/Sources/Cycle 2/Turkish Wikipedia
What group or community is this source coming from?
|name of group||Wikimedia Community User Group Turkey (WMTR)|
|virtual location (page-link) or physical location (city/state/country)||Turkey|
|Location type (e.g. local wiki, Facebook, in-person discussion, telephone conference)||Email group|
|# of participants in this discussion (a rough count)||35|
The summary is a group of summary sentences and associated keywords that describe the relevant topic(s). Below is an example.
|Theme (refer to key)||Question (refer to key)||Summary Statement||Keyword|
|1||A||2||I think that Healthy, Inclusive Communities is critical because without a welcoming environment for new readers and users, we will not have an impact in any of these other areas.||Community Health|
|2||B||1||The Augmented Age is more important than the other themes because with improved technology and new ways to contribute information, we would be able to quickly produce more quality content in more languages.||Technology|
Taken together, all the summary sentences should provide an accurate summary of what was discussed with the specific community.
Fill in the table, using these 2 keys.
- Theme key
- Healthy, inclusive communities
- The augmented age
- A truly global movement
- The most trusted source of knowledge
- Engaging in the knowledge ecosystem
- Questions key
- What impact would we have on the world if we follow this theme?
- How important is this theme relative to the other 4 themes? Why?
- Focus requires tradeoffs. If we increase our effort in this area in the next 15 years, is there anything we’re doing today that we would need to stop doing?
- What else is important to add to this theme to make it stronger?
- Who else will be working in this area and how might we partner with them?
|Line||Theme (refer to key)||Question (refer to key)||Summary Statement||Keywords|
|1||D||1||Wikipedia is not being regarded as a reliable source by some internet users, especially by academicians; by focusing on this theme our projects would be respected more and therefore both its usage and contributions to it would increase.||Reaching academicians, respect|
|2||A||2||Healthy, inclusive communities would also would effect the other themes such as making it possible to become a more trusted source of knowledge. And this would be possible by promoting using/contributing Wikipedia among students and academicians with education programs.||education, academia, trusted source|
|3||C||4||Opening regional and/or country offices would make this theme stronger. Having official agencies would be helpful in establishing healthy communication with future formal partnerships.||partnerships, formal, official, agency, regional, country|
|4||A||2||Healthy and organized communities should be the main theme that we should be focusing on because other themes such as becoming the most trusted source of knowledge and spreading the movement globally would only be possible if there is a healthy and organized community to work on those. All themes are related with each other; i.e to become a trusted medical source it's neccessary to include some medical experts in the community first. It appears that including people from every background is essential for other themes.||inclusion, trusted source|
|5||A||2||In the community it's observed that the amateur spirit is diminished; many experienced users left the platform and they are not being replaced by new users since the newcomers are being "bited". Therefore, the theme of healthy, inclusive communities theme should have priority.||amateur sipirit, biting newcomers|
|6||C||2||It is of utmost importance to ensure that everywhere in the world people from all socio-economic status will reach free knowledge in every language.||every language, different socio-economic statuses|
If you need more lines, you can copy them from Strategy/Wikimedia movement/2017/Sources/Lines.
Detailed notes (Optional)Edit
If you have detailed notes in addition to the summary, you may add them here. For example, the notes may come from an in-person discussion or workshop. If your discussion happened on a wiki or other online space, you do not need to copy the detailed notes here.