Steward requests/Username changes/2017-03

Simple rename requests


Done. Savhñ 00:27, 2 March 2017 (UTC)


Done. Savhñ 12:41, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

Ryan O'Reily

Your account is being renamed. You can follow the status here. Savhñ 17:48, 8 March 2017 (UTC)


  Done per request #31492. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 00:10, 14 March 2017 (UTC)


Done. Savhñ 00:22, 15 March 2017 (UTC)


Done. Savhñ 00:23, 15 March 2017 (UTC)


— The preceding unsigned comment was added by Moazzafar (talk) Savhñ 00:21, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

Done. Savhñ 00:21, 15 March 2017 (UTC)


(moved from Talk:Steward requests --MF-W 14:07, 18 March 2017 (UTC))
For the record: Special:GlobalRenameQueue/request/31585/view. --MF-W 14:11, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
  Done I have renamed you to a username consisting of a series of randomly generated characters. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 14:19, 18 March 2017 (UTC)


Please login when leaving a request here. Stryn (talk) 18:17, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
  Not done you must log in first! --Alaa :)..! 13:23, 23 March 2017 (UTC)


  Done --Alaa :)..! 15:17, 22 March 2017 (UTC)


the old username: Mateo038 the new username IAmMateo — The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mateo038 (talk) 03:17, 22. marec 2017 (UTC)

@Mateo038: please use the form at Special:GlobalRenameRequest for such requests. — Yerpo Eh? 12:41, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
  Not done --Alaa :)..! 00:54, 26 March 2017 (UTC)


  Done --Alaa :)..! 12:47, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Kotlinski Takijaš

  Done --Alaa :)..! 16:14, 26 March 2017 (UTC)


  Donek6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 15:13, 27 March 2017 (UTC)


@K6ka: "wiki geek" is an acceptable name? --Alaa :)..! 10:07, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
Of course it is.   Donek6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 10:29, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

Mili Nair

"  Done --Alaa :)..! 08:23, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

Մոնթե Մելքոնյան

  Done --Alaa :)..! 09:37, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

Dax Israel

The rename you request doesn't seem to solve the issue that caused the block. Savhñ 22:54, 30 March 2017 (UTC)


  Done --Alaa :)..! 14:47, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

Requests involving merges, usurps or other complications


@Gacelp: Do you own both accounts? If so, please log in a make a confirmation edit both with Gacelp and Gacelperfinian and post the diff links here. If ownership of both accounts is confirmed, there's no need to wait for a month. We would usurp Gacelperfinian and then move back Gacelp to Gacelperfinian. —MarcoAurelio 17:33, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
Unfortunately, no, I don't have access to it. - Gacelp (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 05:51, 29 January 2017‎ (UTC).
I've notified the target user.   On hold until March 1, 2017. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 20:56, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
@K6ka and MarcoAurelio: sorry, but I forgot to suppress create of redirect, can you solve the problem that I made,please?--Alaa :)..! 06:46, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
Why should the redirects be suppressed? Stryn (talk) 15:39, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
@Stryn: When performing an usurpation, I must "Suppress creation of redirects"; otherwise it could cause problems with the userspace of the second account (The account that made the request) when it is renamed over.--Alaa :)..! 15:48, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
Indeed, when usurping, the move should be performed while suppressing the creation of redirects. To fix the mess you created, we'd preferably need an admin, since it involves deleting all pages redirecting to one of the "Gacelperfinian (usurp)" account so the pages that have been left at Gacelp can be moved back. Should this happen again, do not rename the user before you have the remaining redirects deleded, as that reduces the impact.
The 46 pages listed in the expandible below need to be deleted and replaced by the same page that remained under the Gacelp username. Savhñ 16:51, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
List of affected pages

Savhñ 16:51, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

Thanks @Savh: for help, I think @K6ka: can help here!--Alaa :)..! 17:03, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
raw list of pages


Savhñ 17:05, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

Ahh... this is quite a dilemma! Hrm. I'm an enwiki admin so I can delete those pages. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 17:10, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
OK, pages deleted. I assume we now must move all of those pages over? —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 17:16, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
Thanks @K6ka:, I think so--Alaa :)..! 17:19, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
  Done (Hopefully I didn't miss or break anything; do let me know if something isn't working right) —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 17:22, 1 March 2017 (UTC)


@SMAUG: please notify the target user on his enwiki talk page, see the instructions. --Stryn (talk) 20:07, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
@Stryn:, thanks for the information. Now I've notifid him. --SMAUG (TalkMy contributions) 20:25, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
  On hold until 30 Febr... eh... 2 March or something. :) --Stryn (talk) 20:29, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

  Done--Alaa :)..! 04:22, 2 March 2017 (UTC)


  On hold until the 7th of March. Savhñ 00:52, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

  Done--Alaa :)..! 08:01, 7 March 2017 (UTC)


@Salmanlla: Please notify the target account on their home wiki talk page, for instance with this message--Alaa :)..! 17:58, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
There are no pages available for editing throughout meta wiki Salmanlla (talk) 05:56, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
Done--|> User talk:Asauchi Salmanlla (talk) 06:27, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
  On hold until 2 April--Alaa :)..! 07:15, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
Notified on their homewiki (Russian Wikipedia),   On hold until April 4th. Savhñ 12:43, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
@Savh: why @WJBscribe: did the request? (See here)--Alaa :)..! 21:49, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
He did it, in my opinion inappropiately, based on a local request on Savhñ 21:58, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
@Savh: I think so and he didn't suppress the redirect (see here)! --Alaa :)..! 22:01, 7 March 2017 (UTC)


Done, account usurped based on the fact that it had been indefinitely blocked on, the only project where the account existed, since 2007. Savhñ 22:12, 7 March 2017 (UTC)


We are currently not able to merge global accounts, nor do we expect to be any time soon. There don't seem to be local accounts that could be moved from one global account to the other, and based on the lost access, it is likely something could go wrong when attempting to unify the global account. There is nothing we could do. Savhñ 22:16, 7 March 2017 (UTC)


Done. Your account is being renamed. Savhñ 10:26, 13 March 2017 (UTC)


@Burakolik: The account can be usurped (all its edits are non-constructive), but please notify the user on their talk page on Swedish Wikipedia of your intention using the this message. Savhñ 00:49, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

  • Hello @Savh:, I did it now. Would you check? Thank you. Burakolik (talk) 09:38, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
  On hold until the 17th of march to allow for a month. Savhñ 11:51, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
  Done--Alaa :)..! 09:13, 17 March 2017 (UTC)


AJORDAN (talk) 18:36, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

Please notify the target account on their talk page, for instance with this message. The account was not created last year, but probably predating account creation logs. Savhñ 20:03, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
Done. I also meant to say 2 years ago as that is what the Special:CentralAuth gave. AJORDAN (talk) 21:10, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
  On hold until the 18th of March, to allow a normal month for possible opposition. The global account was created two years ago as part of the SUL finalisation, but it's likely the account itself was created before 2006. Savhñ 21:32, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
  Done--Alaa :)..! 08:19, 18 March 2017 (UTC)


Don't lie. Your block reason is abusing multiple accounts. Declined. — regards, Revi 07:09, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

دن کیشوت

@دن کیشوت: The requested username is not eligible for usurpation. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 14:15, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
@K6ka: Why can not this be done? دن کیشوت (talk) 19:23, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
What conditions should be provided for this work? دن کیشوت (talk) 19:34, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
@دن كيشوت: the user accounts may be usurped if they does not have any edits (except deleted) or is a vandalism-only account where all the edits were straight reverted and can thus be deleted or has edits to userspace only that can be deleted, so the username that you choiced is not eligible for usurpation! you want to choice another one?--Alaa :)..! 19:49, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
Thank you both. دن کیشوت (talk) 20:32, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
  Not done --Alaa :)..! 20:45, 18 March 2017 (UTC)


@Hawajez: Please notify the target account. After a month & unless he replies, we will proceed with the usurpation. Savhñ 00:44, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
  On hold until 20th March.--Alaa :)..! 01:27, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
  Done--Alaa :)..! 19:59, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

Just confirming from this account so there's no doubt. (talk) 20:23, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
541 edits? *scoffs* —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 20:17, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
Haha I know, I know 😣. I just hope I'll get lucky and they'll agree to it or "Thunderstorm" will be possible. If neither of those work out I have a tertiary username that's not registered for a simple rename request. Ks0stm (TCG) 20:20, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
I don't think (Thunderstorm) is legal to usurpation! :/ --Alaa :)..! 20:47, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
@Ks0stm: Neither of those accounts can be usurped. Savhñ 17:52, 20 March 2017 (UTC)


@Omandra: Unfortunately there's nothing we can do here. To address your questions:
  1. We can't recover passwords for other users.
  2. It is not possible to merge accounts and their edit histories.
  3. I don't know the processes for selecting adminship on the Ilocano Wikipedia; however, we can't simply grant you administrator rights there. You'll have to go through the community processes for getting adminship there again, since we have no way of verifying that you are the same person as "Tarong" (This is a security issue; imagine all the havoc we would cause if we took the bad guy's word for it and gave them adminship!)
k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 20:16, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
Yes, I thought about that and the security issues attached to it. That's too bad. It is what it is. Thanks for the input, though. I will connect with the other admin there. In terms of security though, I want to make sure our site is secure. Can a Steward block the admin rights for my old username, Tarong, and just keep the username there for our site's history and its long edit history (in case I recover/remember my password)? I will just point to it with my new username account. The other admin at the Ilocano Wikipedia is Lam-ang and this is talk page for this, mostly in English --Omandra (talk) 21:19, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
Please file requests for adminship, after (re)gaining local approval, on SRP. Unless you can prove ownership of both accounts, which at this point seems rather complicated, we cannot take actions based on what you say. Savhñ 18:39, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

Razi Kazmi

It is not possible to merge the contributions of two accounts. Savhñ 18:40, 20 March 2017 (UTC)


Done. Savhñ 18:42, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

Scott Martin 2@global

@Scott: Please notify the target account & allow for a month for a possible reply. Savhñ 00:45, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
I've notified the target user.   On hold until the 21th of March.--Alaa :)..! 01:24, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
  Done --Alaa :)..! 06:39, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Kasun g92

@Kasun g92: Please notify the target account on their talk page, for instance with this message.--Alaa :)..! 10:15, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
Done :) — The preceding unsigned comment was added by Kasun g92 (talk)
Please do so on their home wiki talk page and not on meta. That is the wiki they created their account on in this case. Savhñ 12:24, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
  On hold until the 21st of March.--Alaa :)..! 01:10, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
  Done --Alaa :)..! 06:40, 21 March 2017 (UTC)


Since all the edits by Bankster have been immediately reverted and in no way contributed to the project, I think it's usurpable. Please leave a message, such as the this one, on the user's talk page. After that, it'll be on hold for a month. Savhñ 22:01, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
It's already done. I'll be waiting for a resolution. Thank you. -Bankster1 (talk) 01:48, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
  On hold until the 21st of March. Savhñ 12:22, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
  Done --Alaa :)..! 06:42, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Jay Jagdish

@Jay Jagdish: yes, username eligible for usurpation but unfortunately your account can't request usurpation because usurpation policy says that user who requests usurpation must have at least 400 edits or be an administrator on some Wikimedia project). Thanks--Alaa :)..! 22:15, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

Masclet (originally Masclet)

Masclet~enwiki, your username was changed due to SUL finalisation. The username you seem to want to usurp does not appear eligible for usurpation as they've made a sizable number of significant edits that can't simply be ignored. Mere inactivity is not enough to make an account eligible for usurpation. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 02:03, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
What's a sizable number of edits for you? Target user has 0 undeleted edits and 0 deleted edits. An SUL account (primary eswiki) exists for the target user, with 22 total edits on 3 wikis. Requesting user (me) has 80 edits. An SUL account (primary enwiki) exists for the requesting user, with 80 total edits on 9 wikis. PS. I've sent this user 3 messages in different languages, let's see if he/she contests my usurpation request. Masclet~enwiki (talk) 02:12, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
By the way, I've never agreed with SUL finalisation. Masclet~enwiki (talk) 02:15, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
(edit conflict) @Masclet~enwiki: Don't forget about the "significant" part of my comment as well. It does not appear to be the case that all of the user's edits were reverted immediately after they were made, nor is it the case that the user's edit history only consists of minor edits. Given this, I do not think a usurpation is possible here.
P.S. You merely not agreeing with SUL finalisation is not a reason to contest it. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 02:18, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
You're not being totally fair K6ka, this user hasn't been active for a very long time and hasn't contested my claim, therefore I'd request you to wait and see if he has something to say before you take a unilateral action or decision. Thank you Masclet~enwiki (talk) 02:25, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
@Masclet~enwiki: I haven't even closed or changed the status of your request yet, so I haven't even made a decision on your request. I am not saying that your request is void; I am saying that the requested username is not eligible for usurpation. Granted, if they agree to the usurpation then we may proceed, but if they don't respond we can't usurp them. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 02:30, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
@K6ka: According to WP:USURP it is eligible (have a look). To be honest I don't understand why it is not eligible here or for you. Moreover I thought if this user does not contest my request or do nothing, the request may be filled, and his/her account would be moved to a generic username. Is that right? Masclet~enwiki (talk) 02:51, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
@Masclet~enwiki: The information at WP:USURP is outdated and is not up to date with current global rename policies. AnomieBOT only looked at local English Wikipedia account status and not global account status; when we usurp you, we must look at global account status because renames are done globally (It is not "fair" to usurp someone just because they had no edits on the English Wikipedia when they had edits on another Wikimedia wiki). Accounts are not usurped merely by inactivity, as I stated: if the user has made significant edits, they can not be usurped without their consent, so if they do not consent, the usurpation request cannot proceed. Usurpations are generally done if 1) The user has made zero edits; 2) The user has made edits that were all reverted; or 3) The user has made edits that were all deleted. There is no formal global usurpation policy but these are roughly the guidelines global renamers follow right now. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 13:47, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
@K6ka: you should update your system if you think it's outdated and has errors (in my opinion I think it works fine). The usurpation page says I'm eligible for it so I (still) don't get your negative answers and why you regard over a dozen (20) of normal edits as significant and a sizeble number of edits... Furthermore this user who you class as a "significant" contributor (which is obviously not) stopped making contributions to Wikipedia almost a decade ago (2008), therefore this means he has abandoned the project, so I don't think we need his authorisation to usurp his name, as he's not an active user. Masclet~enwiki (talk) 18:19, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
(edit conflict) @Masclet~enwiki: That is not "my system"; that's a system the English Wikipedia had for many years, and it is no longer up to date with recent developments. Back then, renames were done locally so each individual wiki had more control over their own rename process. Now, as all renames are done globally, all wikis must now follow the global rename policy. There is no global usurpation policy yet but in general we follow the proposals and discussions set out at Requests for comment/Global usurpation policy 2. Lastly you continue to ignore my statement that "inactivity alone does not make a username eligible for usurpation" and continue to make your case that the username you are requesting is eligible for usurpation when in fact it is not. I have stated that iff the user consents to the usurpation then we may proceed, but if they do not, we can't force them to give up their name. You continuing to ignore information that goes against your beliefs isn't helping you at all right now. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 18:42, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
OK, I understand, I'll leave it then... Thank you for the information anyway. Masclet~enwiki (talk) 20:14, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
  Not done --Alaa :)..! 00:51, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

Евгений Музыченко

@Евгений Музыченко: FYI, we can't delete or merge accounts (and neither can you, so you cannot actually delete your own account). —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 13:50, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
@K6ka:Does it mean that it is technically impossible to rename my current account to "Eugene Muzychenko", and to use a Latin transliteration I should choose a different one?Евгений Музыченко (talk) 14:43, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
@Евгений Музыченко: We can usurp the "Eugene Muzychenko" account, meaning that we can rename "Eugene Muzychenko" to a different name, and then rename "Евгений Музыченко" to "Eugene Muzychenko". If you have the password for "Eugene Muzychenko", you can post here confirming that you own the account so we can go ahead with the usurpation. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 15:28, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
@K6ka: Excellent, it would be OK. I have passwords for both accounts so let's go ahead. Since current "Eugene Muzychenko" account is not linked to valuable history, you can rename it as you want.Евгений Музыченко (talk) 15:41, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
@Евгений Музыченко: Please log in as "Eugene Muzychenko" and post here with that account confirming that the account belongs to you. Thanks, —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 15:14, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
@K6ka: Here I am.Eugene Muzychenko (talk) 16:36, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
  Done --Alaa :)..! 17:25, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

دن کیشوت

@دن کیشوت: I don't think that this name is acceptable! you knew that it mean "العالم المجنون" (Mad scientist)! --Alaa :)..! 20:44, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
The user name is acceptable. I've written with a different language and are not to be confused with another account. دن کیشوت (talk) 21:09, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
@دن کیشوت: I knew! but the name mean Mad scientist, saw I don't think it is acceptable (see here). I'll wait the replay from another renamers!--Alaa :)..! 21:16, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
@Savh and K6ka:--Alaa :)..! 20:41, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
@علاء: I would consider "Mad scientist" to be an acceptable username. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 20:44, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
I agree to change my username to "mad scientist". دن کیشوت (talk) 17:35, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
Please if it is an acceptable username assign it to me. دن کیشوت (talk) 16:23, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
I'll wait @Savh: replay. @دن کیشوت: Thanks for waiting --Alaa :)..! 17:41, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
I would consider a translated version of "Mad scientist" an appropiate username, if that's the question. Savhñ 17:46, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
@Savh: can you deal with this request, please? (note here). Thanks--Alaa :)..! 18:49, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
I have no knowledge of any Arabic language, and cannot really evaluate whether the username would be appropiate. I however do think that if it's a standard translation of "Mad scientist", it shouldn't be a problem. Savhñ 18:54, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
@Savh: umm after look to username policies in diff. wiki, I found it's appropriate name (maybe inappropriate in only), so we can chnage to it, but I think in need a usurpation, yeah?--Alaa :)..! 19:43, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
The name he links isn't exactly identical to the one that exists. Since the other account hasn't contributed either, there is no reason, at least in my opinion, to usurp the account. However, should the difference be so minimal (which I'm not able to evaluate) that the alternate spelling could lead to confusion, I would encourage an usurpation. If it goes against policy and the user intends to be active on, he might want to reconsider his name choice. Savhñ 23:31, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
To give an example with Latin characters, I would not consider a rename to Сa 08 (the C being a cyrillic Es) appropiate due to its probable confusion with Ca 08. Savhñ 23:38, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
@Savh and K6ka: Thanks for clarification, I found the difference now (In requested name he use Persian letter (ی) but the exist one use Arabic one (ي)), and as I read here that we must not rename to Persian letter (Amir said: Just global renames should be aware of this similarity and don't rename to similar ones)- see this discussion! so as I read that we can rename to (دانشمند ديوانه) and not to (دانشمند دیوانه), because at the first name contain (ي) but the second contain (ی), thereby the username need usurpation! hope you understand me :) --Alaa :)..! 06:37, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Yes. دانشمند ديوانه (with Arabic Ya) needs usruption. Amir (talk) 11:59, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
@Ladsgroup: can you deal with this request? --Alaa :)..! 14:49, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Yeah, sure. Amir (talk) 01:52, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

During usurption, I've got "The new username matches the following TitleBlacklist entry: .*(?i:[کك]چل|خ(و|)له|د[یي]وانه|مجنون|ماست شل|ماس شل).*". Either this record should be deleted or he/she should chose another username. In either case, I'm not super helpful Amir (talk) 08:51, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

@دن کیشوت: as you read that we can't change to this name too! would you chose another one or just close the request? Thanks fro wait--Alaa :)..! 11:02, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
@علاء: I do not understand why you do not consider my request? دن کیشوت (talk) 07:01, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
This user name seems a bit humorous. But according to Wikipedia policy, there is no prohibition for that. دن کیشوت (talk) 09:27, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
@دن کیشوت: I'm satisfied in your request and as I mention to Amir to do it, but there's a technical issue with change to names contain Persian letter (ی), and as Amir said above that the blacklist contain the word (ديوانه) so we can't change to it! I repeat technical issue! --Alaa :)..! 13:46, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Please do not create technical problems. The technical problems could be averted. Why did you enter my suggested username to the Blacklist? Can you whatever you want to enter the black list? دن کیشوت (talk) 20:33, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
I'm not "چل" I'm not "ماست شل" and I'm not "خ(و|)له" I'm not... دن کیشوت (talk) 20:33, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
@دن کیشوت: I can't enter the blacklist! and I don't edit it and add your name!!! I mention another GR and he said that there's a technical issue with Persian letter (ی)! --Alaa :)..! 22:37, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
  Not done no response since 3 days. Thanks--Alaa :)..! 04:12, 29 March 2017 (UTC)


Here is the other account. — The preceding unsigned comment was added by Emybuntu (talk)

  Done --Alaa :)..! 04:10, 29 March 2017 (UTC)