Steward requests/Permissions/2020-03

Warning! Please do not post any new comments on this page. This is a discussion archive first created on 01 March 2020, although the comments contained were likely posted before and after this date. See current discussion.

Administrator access

User Maax@sowiki

(Hi, I'm requesting to become administrator in somali wiki thanks)Maax (talk) 08:22, 25 February 2020 (UTC)

  On hold until 1 March 2020 Ruslik (talk) 19:05, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
  Granted for 1 year to expire on 2021-03-01. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. Ruslik (talk) 20:58, 1 March 2020 (UTC)

Samral@az.wikisource

Thank you. Turkmen talk 17:16, 1 March 2020 (UTC)

  Granted for 1 year to expire on 2021-03-01. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 17:32, 1 March 2020 (UTC)

Satirdan kahraman@trwikisource

This request meets all criteria. --Uğurkenttalk 14:10, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

  Granted for 3 months to expire on 2020-06-04. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. --Sotiale (talk) 15:15, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

Kaniivel@et.wikiquote

Requesting permanent admin rights as per community discussion and vote. Kaniivel (talk) 20:54, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

  Granted for 3 months to expire on 2020-06-06. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. —Thanks for the fish! talkcontribs 03:17, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

Sannita@napsource

Please renew Sannita's adminship. Thanks --Ruthven (msg) 09:26, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

{{TempSysop|3|2020|06|05||automsg=1}} --Martin Urbanec (talk) 09:29, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
@Martin Urbanec: I suggest setting a later expiration date. The flag was granted for 6 months last time. Chelin and Ruthven's adminship has been prolonged for 1 year--Sakretsu (炸裂) 21:32, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
Ruthven was able to get 6 votes in favor, out of 5 are users with at least some edits at the project. Sannita got just two votes, and I find it hard to find reasons for much longer flag duration. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 09:14, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
@Martin Urbanec: Sannita is a long time sysop on nap.wiki, it.wiki, wikidata, also active and clearly trusted on nap.wikisource as well. Such a short expiration date feels like a waste of time, and it doesn't make much sense for me to set the duration according to the number of votes (what about Chelin's renewed adminship which has been rightfully granted for 1 year with 3 votes in favor? :-)), but alright.--Sakretsu (炸裂) 11:41, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
@Martin Urbanec and Sakretsu: Agree with Sakretsu, we need administrators on our small wiki and Sannita is the most experimented one, active since 2006 on the Neapolitan project. --Chelin (talk) 09:25, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
  Granted for 1 year to expire on 2021-03-05. . Okay, convinced. Re-granted to 12m. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 13:14, 7 March 2020 (UTC)

Ehitaja@et.wikiquote

Requesting permanent admin rights as per community discussion and vote. Kaniivel (talk) 20:54, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

  Granted for 3 months to expire on 2020-06-06. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. —Thanks for the fish! talkcontribs 03:17, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
I don't think you understand the word "permanent" the same way most English speakers do. --Ehitaja (talk) 12:51, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
@Ehitaja: unfortunately, the community at etwikiquote is currently not large enough for us to grant permanent adminship. —Thanks for the fish! talkcontribs 14:46, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
Excellent. Now, can you, please, point me to the page where such rules are described? We took the vote without previous in-depth research in which communities do count and which not so much. Wouldn't want to repeat that mistake. --Ehitaja (talk) 15:09, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
@Ehitaja: We do not have a set-in-stone policy for that, we have an usual way of dealing with such requests, which is what was followed here: the term is decided at the granting steward's discretion. The closest there is is this page, which is just a guideline and not a policy. In this case, due to it being the first request of sysopship for etwq that I could find in our archives, I decided to grant for 3 months. —Thanks for the fish! talkcontribs 01:56, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
@Ehitaja: moreover, please avoid making any further snarky comment like the one above. Thanks.--Sakretsu (炸裂) 15:03, 7 March 2020 (UTC)

Aue Nai@mnw

Aue Nai (talk) 10:44, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

  On hold until 10 March 2020. --Sotiale (talk) 14:21, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
  Granted for 6 months to expire on 2020-09-13. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. --Sotiale (talk) 05:44, 11 March 2020 (UTC)

Harditaher@min.wiktionary

I'm Requesting permanent admin rights for Wiktionary Minangkabau. Harditaher (talk) 10:51, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

  On hold until 12 March 2020. --Sotiale (talk) 11:49, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
it's been 7 days and the community has unanimously agreed to grant adminship. Please advise. Muhraz (talk) 06:18, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
  Granted for 1 year to expire on 2021-03-12. I've discussed this with fellow stewards, and our conclusion was that we'd prefer having more than one temporary admin before granting permanent adminship. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 12:05, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Vit Koz@be.wikibooks

Prolong. No one against in discussion. Vit; talk 09:03, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

  Not done I'm sorry, but this discussion is already very old. Please start a new one. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 14:35, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

Vit Koz@be.wikiquote

Prolong. No one against in discussion. Vit; talk 09:03, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

  Not done I'm sorry, but this discussion is already very old. Please start a new one. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 14:35, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

MJL@scowiki

4 days has passed since the closing date. No local crat. Minorax (talk) 06:41, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
  Granted for 1 year to expire on 2021-03-18. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. --Sotiale (talk) 15:24, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
@Minorax and Sotiale: W00t! Thank you both! :D –MJLTalk 17:36, 18 March 2020 (UTC)

Rahmatdenas@minwiki

Community has approved a permanent adminship. Please advise. Muhraz (talk) 06:49, 19 March 2020 (UTC)

  Done I see you grant IP block exemption to sysops, that's unnecessary, as sysops are exemped by just being sysop --Martin Urbanec (talk) 10:31, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
Thank you. The IP exemption was granted to several early Minangkabau editors as trusted users, long before this user was elected sysop. Muhraz (talk) 11:46, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
I referred to [1] for instance, where you granted IPBE to a current admin. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 15:22, 19 March 2020 (UTC)

Ozymandias@ptwikisource

I would like to renew my sysop term on pt.Wikisource [2] to update and perform basic administration activities. The project was communicated in [3], because the community is too small for voting. Ozymandias (talk) 23:55, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

  On hold until 19 March. --Sotiale (talk) 06:54, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
  Granted for 6 months to expire on 2020-09-20. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. --Sotiale (talk) 04:25, 20 March 2020 (UTC)

Tarawneh@arwikiversity

Hello, please grant this user sysop flag on arwikiversity for 6 months, as he supervise a project to introduce wikiversity on the Jordanian universities --Alaa :)..! 20:51, 25 March 2020 (UTC)

  Granted for 6 months to expire on 2020-09-25. Ruslik (talk) 20:55, 25 March 2020 (UTC)

Interface administrator access

SM7@bhwikipedia

One Month Temporary access needed to update gadgets. Nearly all such gadgets are installed by me and I have experience as well as Interface admin rights on hi.wikipedia --SM7--talk-- 05:30, 11 March 2020 (UTC)

Done. --Sotiale (talk) 05:38, 11 March 2020 (UTC)

MJL@scowiki

4 days has passed since the closing date. No local crat. Minorax (talk) 06:41, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
@MJL: I haven't seen any request for IA in request field, there is no IA on scowiki. Would you please confirm? Thanks! --Sotiale (talk) 15:26, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
@Sotiale: I'd like IA to be able to make some enwiki gadgets I translated more widely available, if that's alright. –MJLTalk 17:39, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
@MJL:   Procedural note Per Interface administrators, you have to have 2FA enabled. Could you do that? --Martin Urbanec (talk) 10:47, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
@Martin Urbanec: I've just enabled it for Scots Wikipedia and my phone. It's using TOTP, so I hope that's alright. –MJLTalk 21:55, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
  Granted for 1 year to expire on 2021-03-18. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. —Thanks for the fish! talkcontribs 22:04, 20 March 2020 (UTC)

B20180@thwikiquote

Hello, I nominated B20180 to be interface-admin on Thai Wikiquote. A local discussion started since 7 March 2020. I'm sure that he enabled 2FA because he is interface-admin on Thai Wikibooks and Thai Wikisource (please see CentralAuth). Best regards, Geonuch (talk) 01:53, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

Done. --Sotiale (talk) 03:17, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

Bureaucrat access

CheckUser access

Oversight access

Someguy1221@en.wikipedia

For the Arbitration Committee, Katietalk 22:28, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

  Done. Trijnsteltalk 22:34, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

Removal of access

Stewart@zhwiki

Per local policy regarding inactive sysops. User:Stewart has been inactive for more than six months (since 2019-08-04) and was notified of the removal a month ago (on 2020-02-04). Please remove their sysop flag, thanks. --Tiger- (talk) 12:08, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

I just noticed the local policy says that the removal should be confirmed and brought here by a local bureaucrat. So this request should be suspended until a local bureaucrats confirm it. Apologize for my carelessness.--Tiger- (talk) 12:18, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
As a local b'crat, I confirm the case listed above. Stang 12:24, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
  Done--BRP ever 12:27, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

Cambalachero@commons

Failed to sign within one month of notification. 4nn1l2 (talk) 01:04, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

  Done by BRPever --DannyS712 (talk) 01:24, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Wvk@commons

Failed to sign within one month of notification. 4nn1l2 (talk) 01:04, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

  Done by BRPever --DannyS712 (talk) 01:23, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Ronhjones@commons

Failed to sign within one month of notification. 4nn1l2 (talk) 01:04, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

  Done by BRPever --DannyS712 (talk) 01:24, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

ChrisiPK@commons

Failed to sign within one month of notification. 4nn1l2 (talk) 01:04, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

  Done by BRPever --DannyS712 (talk) 01:24, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

NativeForeigner@en.wikipedia

Please remove CheckUser access. For the Arbitration Committee, Katietalk 22:32, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

  Done. Trijnsteltalk 22:34, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

Dario (WMF)@metawiki

Please remove transwiki rights. See note at Meta:Requests for help from a sysop or bureaucrat; transwiki rights can only be removed by stewards. Account is globally locked ("No longer works for WMF"). Thanks, --DannyS712 (talk) 17:49, 17 March 2020 (UTC)

  DoneThanks for the fish! talkcontribs 19:42, 17 March 2020 (UTC)

Daniel Case@enwiki

Please remove the Oversight permission. Thanks. For the Arbitration Committee, Katietalk 23:02, 18 March 2020 (UTC)

  Done --Martin Urbanec (talk) 23:16, 18 March 2020 (UTC)

AnnaKhrobolova (WMUA)@uawikimedia

Hi, please remove sysop flag from the user, they are no longer a press secretary. Wearing WMUA Board secretary hat, Base (talk) 20:29, 19 March 2020 (UTC)

  Done --Martin Urbanec (talk) 23:43, 19 March 2020 (UTC)

Kattenkruid@nlwiki

Kattenkruid is deceased on March 19, 2020. Wutsje (talk) 21:12, 20 March 2020 (UTC)

  Done, condolences for the family and friends. —Thanks for the fish! talkcontribs 21:49, 20 March 2020 (UTC)

Danny B.@skwikt

New rules for adminship were approved on January 23 in a vote linked above. Vote was 2:1 in favor plus one vote past deadline bringing the total to 3:1. One user challenged legitimacy of the whole vote (see discussion). The newly approved rules require admins to request reelection every year. Danny B. was pinged on January 23. He did not reapply for adminship during the last 30 days nor did he post any comment regarding renewal of his adminship. Per the new rules, admins who do not reapply automatically lose adminship. — Robert Važan (talk) 09:06, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

The vote of the proposer usually is not counted. So, the result is 2:1. In addition, I find it is strange the proposer closed the discussion that he himself initiated. Ruslik (talk) 14:02, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
@Ruslik0: Hi Ruslik. I am starting to feel like you are the only steward here :-) Anyway, to the point... I would love to have there a community large enough to meet these standards (not counting proposer's vote; vote closed by someone else; defined voting rules; strict eligibility criteria; etc.). The community is unfortunately small and most editors do not participate in most votes and discussions (see past discussions and proposals). I sometimes get thanks on top of votes, but that probably doesn't count. If it helps, I can add that this removes admins who obtained adminship in votes with legitimacy no higher than this one - they just voted for each other with help from some socks. — Robert Važan (talk) 18:39, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
You just accused a number of long-term users of socketpuppetry without providing any evidence. However, looking at the discussion for this new policy a saw that strange things happened. The discussion was initially supposed to run for a month and should have finished on 29 December but nevertheless was not closed until 23 January, which by curious coincidence is just two days after Cetiletý pedone-marciatore voted for you. I looked at this account and discovered that it had lain dormant since April 2019 but then reactivated on 21 January, voted (among other edits) for the proposal and finally made some more edits on 22 January. After that it disappeared again but on 23 January you closed the discussion as I said above. Does not this pattern look like sock-puppetry? Ruslik (talk) 19:26, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
@Ruslik0: That's a lot of questions. Let me explain one by one. Those three "long-term users" you are talking about have less than 5 edits in skwikt mainspace and two of them have just a small number of edits globally (1 2 3). It's 1 sock and 2 cross-project invitations for canvassing by my judgement (which I have somewhat incorrectly summed as socks above). The vote about the new rules was closed on January 5 where I have also offered two weeks of extra time for people to propose tightening of voting rights. Since nobody proposed anything, I did the final close on January 23. You can see in the discussion that I transparently invited everyone showing some activity on skwikt. User "Cetiletý pedone-marciatore" doesn't appear to be a sock, judging by content of his edits and his global edit count. Nevertheless, if you suspect sock account, do a UserCheck. — Robert Važan (talk) 15:28, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Still the discussion was finally closed just as the last vote appeared. In addition, why was not the opinion of Lenka64 taken into account? He was obviously against this proposal. Ruslik (talk) 20:54, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
The temporal correlation with the last vote is just a consequence of this vote being encouraging. Lenka64 is a woman. Her comments regarding the proposal itself are on the negative side but still ambivalent, definitely not "obvious". She is challenging legitimacy of the whole vote instead (as mentioned above). Also, I am refraining from guessing people's voting preferences, because there would be no end to speculation if we went down that route. I have nevertheless listened to Lenka64 when she objected to the lax voting rights by adding basic voting right requirements and leaving time for her to propose her own. — Robert Važan (talk) 04:10, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
You can not just ignore people who challenge legitimacy of the voting itself. For all practical purposes they are against this proposal. And by the way I do not believe in improbable correlations. Based on the three arguments mentioned above I am not sure that I am going to recognize this policy as legitimate. Ruslik (talk) 05:27, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
I am not ignoring Lenka64. I have adjusted the proposal based on her feedback. I tried to argue with her reasonably. I have also mentioned her objections to legitimacy of the vote in the original comments for this request. It is up to you whether you interpret such objections to the vote itself as equivalent to negative vote. The problem with such interpretation is that you could as well start counting the two thanks I received for closing the vote and related updates to project pages as positive votes. As I have said, there is no end to speculation once you start guessing people's preferences. Nevertheless, this is indeed a low turnout and tight majority vote and its evaluation is up to you. Since this vote was intended to solve the problematic situation on skwikt, rejection of the vote results on meta will likely lead to my attempt to resolve the problems on skwikt via RfC. If you don't consider the vote, then at least remove sysop rights from Zdenekk2's inactive account. — Robert Važan (talk) 14:21, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
The rights of Zdenekk2 will be removed in due course when the time comes. Ruslik (talk) 18:18, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
Zdenekk2's case is neither important nor urgent, but read Nota bene point 3 in the policy you linked. Zdenekk2 should lose adminship under both the old or the new local rules. Keeping his adminship would signal you consider both the old and the new rules illegitimate. — Robert Važan (talk) 11:31, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
Please, give me a link to the local policy. Ruslik (talk) 12:33, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
@Ruslik0: This is the previous version of the page about admins role, talking about 6 months inactivity period. New policy is at https://sk.wiktionary.org/wiki/Wikislovn%C3%ADk:%C5%BDiados%C5%A5_o_pr%C3%A1va_spr%C3%A1vcu. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 16:29, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
This is again a "may be" policy. Ruslik (talk) 20:35, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
There has been no actual policy provided with regards to the inactivity rules. Therefore not done. — regards, Revi 15:22, 26 March 2020 (UTC)

User JAn Dudík@skwikt

Reason is the same as for Danny B. above. — Robert Važan (talk) 09:06, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

Same as Danny B. — regards, Revi 15:22, 26 March 2020 (UTC)

User Zdenekk2@skwikt

Reason is the same as for Danny B. and JAn Dudík above. In case of Zdenekk2, there is an additional reason of inactivity. Zdenekk2 made his last edit globally more than a year ago. This is a reason to lose adminship even per the old rule about 6-month inactivity that was controversial but nevertheless respected by stewards. — Robert Važan (talk) 09:06, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

Same as Danny B. — regards, Revi 15:22, 26 March 2020 (UTC)

Khamul1@cs.wikipedia

Please remove my administrator rights. Thanks in advance. --Khamul1 (talk) 12:56, 26 March 2020 (UTC)

  On hold for 1 day, standard for resignation of advanced permissions. --Sotiale (talk) 13:02, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
  Done Thank you for your service. --Sotiale (talk) 13:13, 27 March 2020 (UTC)

Zhuyifei1999@commonswiki

Please remove all my rights on Commons. Loss of trust, confidence, and interest. --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 05:40, 26 March 2020 (UTC)

Sorry to see this.   On hold for 1 day, standard for resignation of advanced permissions. — regards, Revi 06:09, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
  •   Keep 4nn1l2 (talk) 07:46, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
    No please. Elves can die for losing a will to live, I can surely leave for losing a will to stay? Though, I'm not ruling out the possibility of returning in the far future. Thanks for the moral support though. --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 07:59, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
    Really, really sad to see this. Thanks for your hard work throughout the years. Hope that you'll come back. Minorax (talk) 08:07, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
    +1. Really sadden to see this. :( Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 09:23, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
  • "If you love someone, set them free. If they come back, they're yours" This is a sad day, but I don't want to tie Zhuyifei down.   Alexis Jazz (ping me) 15:16, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Moral support for   Keep. I understand that this is self-requested de-sysop, so this will likely not matter. Could we at least extend the standard 1 day waiting period for resignation of advanced permissions to something like 7 days, as I do not see the condition of 'loss of trust' fulfilled? --Schlurcher (talk) 15:43, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
    Trust in the other direction --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 16:32, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
Hello people, this page is not a place to signal whether you support or oppose this removal requests. Please refrain from such comments. If you have something to say, you know where to go. (their talk page) Thank you! — regards, Revi 15:51, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
Sure, if you think the talk page is the better place to make a request for this request, please see: [4] --Schlurcher (talk) 15:59, 26 March 2020 (UTC)

  Done Already he responded to e-mail(he did edit here), and did not require time to change his mind or think. It may be painful to ask someone who wants to leave to stay here. Thank you for your service and good luck. --Sotiale (talk) 06:23, 27 March 2020 (UTC)

Majora@commonswiki

Please remove my sysop bit from Commons as well as my global OTRS user group. I am retiring from Wikimedia. If allowed by policy could you please lock my alternate account, User:Majora's Incarnation, as well as this account when you are finished. I won't be coming back. Thank you. Majora (talk) 20:34, 27 March 2020 (UTC)

Hey Majora. I haven't said explicitly, but I need to make sure you know my retirement has barely anything to do with your post on AN/U. Don't feel guilty about it. --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 21:08, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
I apologize to the stewards for this message as it probably doesn't belong here. I will be brief. This has very little to nothing to do with you, Zhuyifei1999 although I do appreciate you thinking about me. I firmly believe that people should be accountable for their actions. I always have. That is one of my core beliefs and forms quite a large part of my personality. That is what I have always strived for. The recent events show the complete and utter lack of accountability amongst, supposedly, some of the most trusted members of the Commons community. Ignoring requests for comment and wheel warring were enough to make me question my presence here. The responses by other administrators to sweep even attempts at accountability under the rug and away from the community is what finally broke me. I told myself a long long time ago that if Wikimedia ever became more of a hobby, if it ever affected me in a way that causes undue distress, that I would immediately step away and not look back. That day has unfortunately come. I won't be responding to any other inquires. Clean breaks are easier to accomplish after all. --Majora (talk) 22:40, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
  On hold for 1 day, standard for resignation of advanced permissions --Martin Urbanec (talk) 22:07, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
  Done Thanks for your service. I have requested removal of your OTRS hat at OTRS wiki. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 19:44, 28 March 2020 (UTC)

Miscellaneous requests

Frank Murmann@de.wikipedia

I would like to request import rights for the German Wikipedia to assist the few existing importers in fulfilling import requests by import upload. --Frank Murmann (talk) 17:54, 24 March 2020 (UTC)

What is the procedure for requesting import rights in German Wikipedia? Ruslik (talk) 20:43, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
Wow, dewiki already has 13 XML importers - seems a bit heavy, is there much of a backlog at w:de:Wikipedia:Importwünsche? — xaosflux Talk 17:56, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
The page for XML-Upload is de:Wikipedia:Importwünsche/Importupload. There are currently mostly only two XML-importer active. Best regards, Luke081515 18:44, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
  Done Linked discussion sounds to be good for this privilege. Frank Murmann has already shown dewiki trusts them, because they're a sysop. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 20:19, 26 March 2020 (UTC)

Temporary permissions (expired and rejected requests only)