Steward requests/Permissions/2018-05

Please do not post any new comments on this page. This is a discussion archive first created on 01 May 2018, although the comments contained were likely posted before and after this date. See current discussion.

Administrator access

Chabi@lfn.wikipedia

Hi! Could you please have administrator rights in the LFN Wikipedia for a month or so because nobody has those rights and we need to delete pages and make changes that only administrators can do. Thank you in advance. --Chabi (talk) 08:26, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

please open a local discussion lfn.wikipedia for 7 days, then re-apply again -- :)..! 15:30, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

We already had a voting for several users to become administrators and none of them have been granted any rights. If those ones who passed the votings are granted administrators rights there is no need for me to be one. Is it possible to give them those rights, please? --Chabi (talk) 19:17, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

why they not apply requests here after 7 days? -- :)..! 19:21, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

Because the only one who knows a bit about how Wikipedia works is me and I didn't even know about that. Shall I tell them to apply here or is it possible to given them rights straight away? --Chabi (talk) 19:23, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

or they think it'll be granted automatically! You can apply requests for all of them here, but you/them should apply separate requests for all of them with link to the above voting page. For recording and history purposes -- :)..! 19:35, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

Micael D.@pt.wikinews

Renew of my sysop estatute. Micael D. (talk) 14:27, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

your sysop flag will end on 12 June 2018, so please come back on 11 June for example -- :)..! 09:46, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

علاء Is this a valid vote or do I have to do another one when I renew? Micael D. (talk) 16:16, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

(I did this 7 days ago) Micael D. (talk) 16:17, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

will be valid, but leave it open until 11 June -- :)..! 16:44, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

محمد9088@arzwiki

Thank You محمد9088 (talk)

there's an active local bureaucrat -- :)..! 14:48, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

Thank You! :) --محمد9088 (talk) 14:57, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

سامر@ar.wikipedia

-- سامر (talk) 21:46, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

what rights are you requesting for? Please add a link to request on local wiki. Stryn (talk) 15:47, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

check user on ar.wikipedia. سامر (talk) 19:23, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

CheckUser rights? Then add a link to the discussion and add your request to the correct section (#CheckUser_access). Stryn (talk) 19:33, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

Can you check? — regards, 10:26, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

He told me there's no such CU permission request. CheckUser permission requires local election per CheckUser policy. — regards, 12:26, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

Der-Wir-Ing@de.wikipedia

Der-Wir-Ing was elected into the arbitration committee of dewiki. His term will start tonight UTC+2. Members of the arbitration committee are granted sysop rights during their term. Dschungelfan (talk) 14:53, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

That’s what local bureaucrats are for. NNW (talk) 15:20, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

Not done, there are local 'crats who can do this. Stryn (talk) 15:30, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

Luke081515@de.wikipedia

Luke081515 was elected into the arbitration committee of dewiki. His term will start tonight UTC+2. Members of the arbitration committee are granted sysop rights during their term. Dschungelfan (talk) 14:53, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

That’s what local bureaucrats are for. NNW (talk) 15:20, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

Not done, there are local 'crats who can do this. Stryn (talk) 15:30, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

Wibramuc@de.wikipedia

Wibramuc was elected into the arbitration committee of dewiki. His term will start tonight UTC+2. Members of the arbitration committee are granted sysop rights during their term. Dschungelfan (talk) 14:53, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

That’s what local bureaucrats are for. NNW (talk) 15:20, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

Not done, there are local 'crats who can do this. Stryn (talk) 15:30, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

Bureaucrat access

User TJ@fi.wikibooks

I was ok with removal of the bureaucrat rights, but it seems there's interest in having me around still which is ok as well. TJ (talk) 06:54, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

I am not sure what you want us to do? Ruslik (talk) 15:51, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

AAR. He got AAR notice in his talk page. — regards, 10:29, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

Acknowledged. Not done however, since you still retain the bureaucrat permission and we were notifying you that it could be lost. — regards, 10:29, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

CheckUser access

Oversight access

rxy@ja.wikipedia

--ぱたごん (talk) 09:10, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

36 support, no oppose, so 100% support, and +25~30 support as required. Already have 4 Oversights on local. Current Steward, so already have confidentiality agreement in place. . — regards, 13:35, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

Removal of access

Andhanq@sv.wikipedia

It is one year since Andhanq was elected to administrator, so it is time to do a new election, but Andhanq has not answered the question concerning a new nomination, so no new election has taken place. Svensson1 (talk) 20:39, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

Done, best regards. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 11:18, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

Hastrian@sv.wikipedia

It is one year since Hastrian was elected to administrator, so it is time to do a new election, but Hastrian is inactive since a few weeks, so no new election has taken place. Svensson1 (talk) 20:39, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

Done, best regards. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 11:18, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

Rex_Sueciæ@sv.wikipedia

It is one year since Rex Sueciæ was elected to administrator, so it is time to do a new election, but Rex Sueciæ does not want to continue as administrator. Svensson1 (talk) 20:39, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

Done, best regards. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 11:18, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

Cafemoloko@pl.wikisource

According to plwikisource inactivity policy, the user was asked whether she still wishes to hold the sysop right as she has taken no admin action for 12 months. User resigned. Please drop her sysop bit at plwikisource. Ankry (talk) 07:33, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

Done, best regards. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 11:19, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

Teukros@pl.wikisource

Please remove my sysop flag at Polish Wikisource. Thanks in advance, --Teukros (talk) 16:46, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

On hold for 1 day, standard for resignation of advanced permissions. — regards, 17:03, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

. Thank you for your service! — regards, 10:46, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

Quentinv57@testwiki

Inactive on testwiki in excess of 5 years, and globally inactive over 3 years. Testwiki has a 1 year standard desysop rule (testwiki:Wikipedia:Administrators). N.B. Left a note on frwikt for one of their crats to review if this user should be removed there as well. — 02:16, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

. 02:19, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

Test@test2wiki

Inactive >5 years, last global edit in 2016 appears to be vandalism on enwiki, also requesting account locking (listed at SRG). — 02:54, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

Done. 02:57, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

Bryan@test2wiki

Inactive >5 years, globally inactive since 2013. — 02:54, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

Done. 02:58, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

Ciphers@ar.wikibooks

• --rxy (talk) 13:12, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

WAN233@zh-classical.wikipedia

Per my request (talk) 05:10, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

On hold for 1 day, standard for resignation of advanced permissions --rxy (talk) 05:14, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for your services rxy (talk) 10:09, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

Theo10011@meta.wikimedia

Hello. Please remove Theo10011's admin access. He didn't make 10 edits, as requested per policy. Matiia (talk) 23:54, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

, thank you for your service! Cheers, Hoo man (talk) 09:35, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

Micha@de.wikipedia

Please remove my sysop rights on de.wikipedia. Thank you very much. --Micha (talk) 08:35, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

On hold for 1 day, standard for resignation of advanced permissions -- :)..! 13:06, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

11:47, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

Unsui@fr.wiktionary

Please remove my sysop rights on fr.wiktionary. Thank you very much. Unsui (talk) 09:32, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

On hold for 1 day, standard for resignation of advanced permissions -- :)..! 13:06, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

11:48, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

Thomas98@nl.wikinews

User:Thomas98 (talk) 23:27, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

On hold for 1 day, standard for resignation of advanced permissions -- :)..! 15:31, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

Done, thanks for your work. Stryn (talk) 10:40, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

Entlinkt@de.wikipedia

Per local inactivity policy. User has no edits since more than a year. 90 days ago he was informed about the upcoming removal of access. -- Dschungelfan (talk) 06:07, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

Ruslik (talk) 20:56, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

Kahusi@ja.wiktionary

I request for removing my sysop/bureaucrat flag. --kahusi (會話) 10:33, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

On hold for 1 day, standard for resignation of advanced permissions -- :)..! 10:49, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

. Thank you for your contributions as a bureaucrat. (talk) 00:48, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

Kahusi@ja.wikisource

I request for removing my sysop/bureaucrat flag. --kahusi (會話) 10:33, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

On hold for 1 day, standard for resignation of advanced permissions -- :)..! 10:49, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions. (talk) 00:50, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

Olena Zakharian@uk.wikinews

Per community decision. A1 (talk) 19:38, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

Apologies if I am mistaken but I don't see the user was notified about the removal vote, thus I do not feel confortable handling this. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 13:35, 7 April 2018 (UTC)

On the other hand, the user is listed as inactive at Admin_activity_review/2017/Data#ukwikinews so I'm less concerned. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 14:43, 7 April 2018 (UTC)

A link to a userpage works as a ping and notifies user authomatically, if I don`t mistaken. In the same time we don`t have any policies in Wikinews to notify user in another way. Yes, user was inactive and this was a reason for nomination. --A1 (talk) 15:55, 7 April 2018 (UTC)

Unless the user has opted to receive email notification, it only delivers the notification on wiki, so they won't know it unless they visit the wiki. Only authentic way to notify them is leaving a note on user talk (which always trigger email notification, and sending an email if they accept it). — regards, 16:03, 7 April 2018 (UTC)

Could you show me policy that require such type a of user notification for adminship removal? --A1 (talk) 20:17, 10 April 2018 (UTC)

Our standard inactivity rules, Admin Activity Review states they'll be notified of the upcoming desysop ("On wikis where no formal advanced rights review process exists locally, the stewards or their delegates will: ... notify those advanced rights holders who have exceeded the maximum allowed time period for inactivity. Such a notification (notice of maximum inactivity) will be sent as a message to the user's talk page on the wiki where they hold their respective rights.") and are given 1 month to follow up or face desysop. If you have alternative activity rules, you should tell us so we don't process ukwikinews under the standard rules. — regards, 09:35, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

Well, ukwn does not have an activity policy, but there was a vote for removal which is linked here, usually when there is a vote the policy is not relevant any more (even though slightly more people voted in the nomination resulting in her getting the rights). Usually policies are a way to de-flag for inactivity without a vote. Not that it matters, since the month designated ends tomorrow anyway. --Base (talk) 00:38, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

Just to confirm: I contacted Olena off-wiki, and she told me that she did not have energy to fight [for keeping these rights]. Thus I assume she accepted the decision to remove her rights as well — NickK (talk) 09:59, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

On hold until 14 May -- :)..! 18:55, 15 April 2018 (UTC)

-- :)..! 07:22, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

Hoo man@meta.wikimedia

Hello. Please remove Hoo man's admin access. He didn't make 10 edits, as requested per policy. Matiia (talk) 23:54, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

But I count 10 (and a protection) since 2018-01-11? -- 00:31, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

Policy says that edits need to be made before designated removal date (April 1). Matiia (talk) 00:46, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

Between 20171001 and 20180401 (local policy is within 6 months, not one year) Hoo man made: 9 "edits" and 11 "administrator actions", plus many other steward actions. Hoo man was also reconfirmed as a steward in March 2018. Meta:Meta–steward_relationship specifically calls out that stewards should honor the local policies as far as being a local admin goes. So yes this is the rule, but the rule seems a bit defective and possibly should be revisited (e.g. changing 10 "edits" to "edits or logged actions"). And if Hoo man applies for adminship tomorrow I really don't see the opposers putting up a good argument. — 02:09, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

If the user fails to make 10 edits within the period sysop is removed. Hoo_man unfortunatelly made 9. This is not the place to discuss the policy which I myself would love to see it amended for the benefit of the users and the bureaucrats running this process. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 11:29, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

I agree, the existing policy says this should be completed as-is. I've started a policy discussion at Meta talk:Administrators, and notably Hoo man has started a new RfA. — 11:32, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

Thank you. The situation in which Hoo man is now is quite ridiculous I'd say. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 11:35, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

On hold until 14 May 2018 Ruslik (talk) 18:52, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

There's no reason to wait. If Hoo man is re-elected, then he will be re-granted the admin flag, but the policy is clear and his access has to be removed for now. Matiia (talk) 19:37, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

See en:WP:IAR. And this especially applies when the rules lead to absurd results. StevenJ81 (talk) 15:06, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

I personally think that if Hoo man has pass his RFA on 14 May, he still can continue be admin on Meta. (talk) 15:20, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

I support what said. It should be removed then re-granted if he re-elected, for history and to be recorded -- :)..! 16:18, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

Meta:Administrators does not specify when exactly the removal has to take place. The date varied considerably in the past. This year it was delayed by 37 days. So, if it is removed 44 days after the due date (instead of merely 37 days) there will be no meaningful difference. Stewards after all do not always act instantly. Requests can seat many days here before being acted upon. Ruslik (talk) 18:47, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

Well this situation is indeed a bit absurd. His RfA is obviously passing for now so we can wait and see at the end what happens. If his RfA fails the bit is removed, if his RfA passes, I'll take care of removing the bit and re-adding it instantly for future reference. Thanks, —MarcoAurelio (talk) 10:26, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

; removed, re-granted per RfA. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 10:17, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

SA 13 Bro@test2wiki

Please remove away my admin right on test 2 site, I doesn't wish to retain it, I had Email to Ajraddatz with Xaosflux to look after over there, thanks. (talk) 19:02, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

Done. If you ever need them back for testing, please let a local bureaucrat know. – Ajraddatz (talk) 19:08, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

User Fullerene@it.wikipedia

Please remove admin status. Fullerene has been already informed and thanked for his work. Thank you. --^{(beware of the moose)} 18:44, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

Done, with echoed thanks for their past work. – Ajraddatz (talk) 06:15, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

Marshmallych@test2.wikipedia

Please, remove all my rights in test2wiki because I want to make the contributions in non-test sites. I am installed MediaWiki on localhost in my computer, and I in test2wiki don't see the notable changes, comparing with classical MediaWiki 1.30. Also, I don't longer need this rights. 18:13, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

Well, I previously also Email to Ajraddatz for request PlyrStar93 and your right to be removed from test 2 site, which was I passed you the tools for maintenance tasks against on the LTA vandal Liza Veniza sock attack over there. As test site is a Pre-deployment version of MediaWiki legitimate testing efforts place, and is not a community, so it doesn't need to make the productive contributions over there. (talk) 19:06, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

SA 13 Bro. About Liza Veniza. Liza Veniza's socks will make vandal corrections, and they will be rollbacked out. 19:23, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

Also, LTA's accounts will be globally banned: fastly or longely. 19:24, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

Stewards and admins will continue monitor this LTA, don't need to worry about this crackpot vandal. (talk) 20:05, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

Marshmallych's test2wiki access removal request has been resolved by a test2wiki bureaucrat. — 19:37, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

Xaosflux, thanks. 08:30, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

Ravan@ar.wikipedia

User has not made the required 30 actions in the last 6 months. Please remove sysop rights.-- 09:43, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

Ruslik (talk) 20:58, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

WJBscribe@commons

Please remove sysop from my Commons account. I am not able to be sufficiently active on Commons to justify maintaining this. Many thanks, 13:30, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

On hold for 1 day, standard for resignation of advanced permissions -- :)..! 14:14, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for you past work -- :)..! 15:49, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

WJBscribe@meta

Please remove global-renamer from my account. I am not able to be sufficiently active to justify maintaining this. Many thanks, 13:30, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

On hold for 1 day, standard for resignation of advanced permissions -- :)..! 14:14, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for you past work -- :)..! 15:49, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Jadwiga@pl.wikipedia

Due to our policy, I hereby request removal of administrator access due to lack of administrative actions during a 1 year period (in the period from 2017-05-22). Openbk (talk) 15:14, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

Ruslik (talk) 18:11, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

Matma Rex@pl.wikipedia

Due to our policy, I hereby request removal of bureaucrat access due to lack of actions connected with these rights during a 1 year period (in the period from 2017-05-24 - action of removing from the edit filter manager group). Openbk (talk) 15:14, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

Ruslik (talk) 18:14, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

PlyrStar93@test2.wikipedia

Please remove my bereaucrat flag on this project, not seeing the need for this at test2 right now since it's unlikely for me to manage user rights for other users at this point. The sysop flag can keep for time being, should be handy to deal with occasional vandalism or disruptions, hopefully. _→← 21:08, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

Done. Matiia (talk) 21:15, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

DieselEngineRO@ro.wikipedia

I want to stop my activity at Romanian Wikipedia in the near future and patroller rights will be useless to me. Even if is not possible to do it now, after some time of inactivity someone will have to make this job.DieselEngineRO (talk) 15:45, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

Request withdrawn with <s></s>. — regards, 06:53, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

Freddy2001@de.wikipedia

Freddy2001 was granted sysop rights only for the time being member of the arbitration committee of dewiki. The term is ending tonight at UTC+2 -- Dschungelfan (talk) 14:59, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

We will remove the rights today at 22.00 UTC. Stryn (talk) 15:28, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

Done. Matiia (talk) 23:54, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

DerMaxdorfer@de.wikipedia

DerMaxdorfer was granted sysop rights only for the time being member of the arbitration committee of dewiki. The term is ending tonight at UTC+2 -- Dschungelfan (talk) 14:59, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

Sysop rights were granted for one year, so this will end automatically. Nothing to do for stewards. NNW (talk) 15:18, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

So marking as not done then. Stryn (talk) 15:28, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

Mautpreller@de.wikipedia

Mautpreller was granted sysop rights only for the time being member of the arbitration committee of dewiki. The term is ending tonight at UTC+2 -- Dschungelfan (talk) 14:59, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

Sysop rights were granted for one year, so this will end automatically. Nothing to do for stewards. NNW (talk) 15:18, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

So marking as not done then. Stryn (talk) 15:28, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

Grueslayer@de.wikipedia

Grueslayer was granted sysop rights only for the time being member of the arbitration committee of dewiki. The term is ending tonight at UTC+2 -- Dschungelfan (talk) 14:59, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

Sysop rights were granted for one year, so this will end automatically. Nothing to do for stewards. NNW (talk) 15:18, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

So marking as not done then. Stryn (talk) 15:28, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

Temporary permissions (expired and rejected requests only)

Wargo@pl.wikivoyage

—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Wargo (talk)

. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. Ruslik (talk) 19:44, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

removed — regards, 14:57, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Theklan@euwikisource

• Support to jumpstart this new project. V * ^discut. 07:17, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
  • . Regards, —MarcoAurelio (talk) 10:47, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

extended — regards, 14:57, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

فيصل@arwikiversity

I would like to request temporary adminship for 3 months (that can be extended later) for فيصل (romanized as Faisal). Faisal is a trusted user within Arabic Wikipedia community and he agreed to volunteer to take care of arwikiversity which is flooded with test/spam pages. He is an admin on arwiki as well as a rollbacker on Wikidata. The discussion on arwikiversity is linked above and nobody objected on the nomination of Faisal as admin. Thank you in advance. Meno25 (talk) 07:01, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

. Ruslik (talk) 19:24, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

removed — regards, 14:58, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Adam-Yourist@inhwikipedia

--Kaganer (talk) 13:57, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. Ruslik (talk) 20:42, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

removed — regards, 14:58, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Kaganer@inhwikipedia

. Ruslik (talk) 20:45, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

removed — regards, 14:58, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

夢蝶葬花@zhwikivoyage

Two support votes, no oppose or neutral votes. Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 03:25, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. Ruslik (talk) 12:56, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

extended — regards, 14:55, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

GeoO@hywikisource

Hello and Happy new year. It has been 6 months since the previous administration, is it possible to extend it a little bit. Thanks. :) -- 20:42, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

. --MF-W 22:40, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

extended — regards, 15:11, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Missatikamekw@atj.wikipedia

—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Benoit Rochon (talk)

. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. --MF-W 15:02, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

extended — regards, 15:11, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Jeannette Coocoo@atj.wikipedia

—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Benoit Rochon (talk)

. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. --MF-W 15:02, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

removed — regards, 15:11, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

हिंदुस्थान वासी@hiwikivoyage

--स (talk) 06:34, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. Ruslik (talk) 17:00, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

extended — regards, 15:11, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

स@hiwikivoyage

--स (talk) 06:34, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. Ruslik (talk) 17:03, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

extended — regards, 15:11, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

سمير تامر@arwikinews

Hi, on Arabic Wikinews there is no admin now. I suggested myself to other users on the website and I think they're accepting (p.s: this wiki hasn't enough user as we are at most of time two users working on the wiki). So I request a permanent adminship because there are many pages that need to be protected, deleted and many other stuff. Waiting for your answer... سمير تامر (talk) 23:34, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. There is not enough of a local community to grant permanent adminship, sorry. But your next period of temporary access can be 6 months or a year after this, and if the community grows then permanent access can be granted. – Ajraddatz (talk) 17:23, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

Thanks Ajraddatz, I will make sure that the Arabic Wikinews be more specific and organized. سمير تامر (talk) 16:04, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

removed — regards, 15:10, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Gius195@itWikiversity

The community of it.Wikiversity requests a temporary flag for 1 year for Gius195 too. --Samuele2002 (talk) 22:19, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

. – Ajraddatz (talk) 05:28, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

removed — regards, 15:09, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Аль-Гимравий@avwiki

I ask to give me admin rights. --Аль-Гимравий (talk) 21:43, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

Please give us a link to a discussion. --Stryn (talk) 13:59, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

link to a discussion Аль-Гимравий (talk)

No, I don't need your user talk page. But I found it myself: w:av:Википедия:Администраторасул статусалъе гІарзаби/Аль-Гимравий. On hold until 12 January. --Stryn (talk) 16:14, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

Link to the discussion modified by the user in Stryn's comment. Savh^ñ 13:53, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

. Savh^ñ 13:53, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Thank you for your trust! Аль-Гимравий (talk)

removed — regards, 15:09, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Huhbakker@nl.wikinews

After reopening nl.wikinews.org we yet had begun with the regulatory procedure, starting from June 29th at 18:00 h CEST = 16:00 h UTC. This procedure yet existed and we did follow the official procedure of 14 days. At 18:00 h CEST Huhbakker was elected administrator (3 support (=100%) - 0 oppose / a minimum support of 75% is requisite). Just for the record, we have rules how adminships end / can be ended. I ask you to grant the permanent administratorship to Huhbakker. The same is valid for me (Ymnes, see here above). Both started at exactly 18:00 h CEST because we made a restart to be sure that the official procedure was followed correctly (Dutch: "herstart" = English: "restart"). Thank you in advance. Ymnes (talk) 17:49, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

See my comments above. StevenJ81 (talk) 20:32, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

. --MF-W 00:05, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

- Objection, we are a community with rules. This project is reopened. We did everything by the rules that were put there by the community. It's a false statement that we elected ourselves: I did not elect for my candidacy, neither did Huhbakker. The rules state that this appointment is not temporary, so it should be granted for a undetermined time. Please stick to the rules of this particular project and decide according to the project rules. Ymnes (talk) 03:34, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

removed — regards, 15:08, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Ymnes@nl.wikinews

After reopening nl.wikinews.org I was given temporary "adminship for 2 weeks to deal with stuff that comes up"[1] by MF Warburg. He added: "Please put the adminship requests voted upon by the community". At that very moment we had begun with the regulatory procedure yet, starting from June 29th at 18:00 h CEST = 16:00 h UTC. This procedure yet existed and we did follow the official procedure of 14 days. At 18:00 h CEST I (Ymnes) was elected administrator (3 support (=100%) - 0 oppose / a minimum support of 75% is requisite). Just for the record, we have rules how adminships end / can be ended. I ask you to change my temporary administratorship into a permanent one. During the same procedure, Huhbaker was elected (see here below). Both started at exactly 18:00 h CEST because we made a restart to be sure that the official procedure was followed correctly (Dutch: "herstart" = English: "restart"). Thank you in advance. Ymnes (talk) 17:49, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

So, basically you elected yourselves as administrators. Ruslik (talk) 19:53, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

To be fair:

• The election started while the wiki was still in Incubator, but after the creation of the wiki was approved by LangCom.

Approximately half of the two-week period occurred after the wiki moved into its own subdomain.

• The members followed the rules they set up as a community (which as far as I can tell are similar to nlwiki's rules, and stricter than the minimum required by the stewards).
• The members worked on the wiki seriously in Incubator, and continue to work on it seriously in its own subdomain.

Given the situation, I personally would recommend a six-month starting term, which is at the longer end of usual practice for administrators in new wikis. Once the community becomes a little more established in its own subdomain, you and they can figure out what the proper term should be. But this election is certainly every bit as legitimate as any other RfA in a new subdomain. StevenJ81 (talk) ('crat on Incubator) 20:31, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

What is "a little more established"? 3 regular editors? 10 regular editors? 50 regular editors? The Banner (talk) 21:01, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

The short answer is: if it's 3 regular editors, future administrators will remain temporary. If it's 50, they may become permanent. That's why I say "once it's established, they can decide". It's up to the stewards, not me. StevenJ81 (talk) 21:29, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

. --MF-W 00:05, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

- Objection, we are a community with rules. This project is reopened. We did everything by the rules that were put there by the community. It's a false statement that we elected ourselves: I did not elect for my candidacy, neither did Huhbakker. The rules state that this appointment is not temporary, so it should be granted for a undetermined time. Please stick to the rules of this particular project and decide according to the project rules. Ymnes (talk) 03:34, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

I like to add: before Dutch Wikinews went to Incubator, there was an active admin team. In Incubator there was an active admin team. I can imagine when a new community is formed, adminship is temporary. However here it is an existing team that likes to continue, and does not want to be put back in time. There has been an active admin team (not just temporary), so it should be implemented here too. Romaine (talk) 15:58, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

In those years all together 12 moderators (=administrators) and 2 bureaucrats. (see the list here) Ymnes (talk) 16:25, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

There was an active admin team on the wiki at some time in the past: yes, possible. But irrelevant. The wiki would not have been closed if they had been active at the time of the closure. Also, there was no "active admin team" on Incubator. Wn/nl had 0 test-admins. --MF-W 19:20, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

Of course you are. Ubi societas, ibi et ius. I do not dispute that the election happened in accordance with your rules. I also do not understand why Ruslik wrote that comment to which I did not make a reference (as seen by the indentation). I gave you temporary adminship because of our (stewards') policies. --MF-W 19:20, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

But our community has composed rules for our project. Can you please re-look wether you may be held to ours? The current situation doesn't help our project, because we need to be able to appoint bureaucrats and bot bits as well. Ymnes (talk) 20:25, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

@Ymnes: This is normal procedure for a new project or a newly started project. That doesn't make a difference. And whether there are local rules or not doesn't matter either. The only thing that's been looked at is the size of the project, that means how many active users are on it. Right now the Dutch Wikinews is still in it's early days and then we always appoint temporary admins. That doesn't mean you will never become a permanent admin. Just that you need to re-apply after six months; then we will look at it again and see if the community has grown. Right now you have admin rights and can do whatever admins need to do. I'd advice you to focus on creating new articles and establishing a community. Your response that you need to be able to appoint bureaucrats and bot bits as well is nonsense. You don't need to appoint bureaucrats right now; the stewards serve as bureaucrats when a project doesn't yet have any, and they can also add bot bits when needed. The request page for that is SRB. Should you have more questions, do ask please. We're always happy to help. With regards, 12:35, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

I don't talk nonsense when I say that we don't want to be dependent on a foreign language stewart page. People come here from all kind of projects and don't know anything about the project at all. There is activity enough and we are far better off without Meta than with Meta. A lot of instruments overhere don't work so perfectly as they are presented here. Look alone the language committee. But a remark as Ruslik made, is also very untrue, and your statement that our project is new is as well. We have restarted, not started. Yet 3 people are back from then and around 26 people have come to edit in the last 10 days (see here, 10 days because we restarted at 5 July). We are adults. Please let us decide without this English page of Wikimedia. Ymnes (talk) 12:42, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

On a foreign language stewart [sic] page - you know I'm Dutch, so if that's the problem, just approach me. 13:33, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

Well, if you advice to write articles (and to be silent?), I really don't get your point. Being Dutch is just half of the story. Dutch Wikipedians didn't understand the project before the relaunch when it was presented to the language committee. The negativity was even sickening, and that's where we want to stay out. The project has had 12 administrators and 2 bureaucrats before. In the last days it's getting really populated again. What is your point anyway? Is it a matter of losing power of the stewards? Than it's not a fair process... This isn't a new projects here, but an existing one that restarted. We have a set of rules and are being overruled by other language stewards (you just came in). Please stop this arguing and accept that Dutch Wikinews is running again. Ymnes (talk) 14:18, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

And the necessity of more self dependence was not even expressed by me, but are written here by an experienced Wikimedian. The words are "in Dutch", what nearly no-one can read here. Other Wikinewsers do better understand, and even wrote an article on the reopening op Dutch Wikinews[2] Ymnes (talk) 16:04, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

Like I said: this is normal procedure for any new project or newly started project. It has nothing to do with you or this specific project. And I'm not even going to respond to your insinuation that the stewards might fear that they lose power. As if we're bored. Right. 16:20, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

There are some responses here that I don't like either. And why you write 'new' twice in one sentence, where this is untrue is incomprehensible. The fact that it isn't new, is the case. Are the regulations written down or a kind of common law? It looks like no real argument counts. Ymnes (talk) 16:41, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

Speaking as a former steward who already "lost power": in the past when stewards used to hand out permanent administrative rights to very small / new wikis with little community scrutiny (few voters), quite often the newly elected admins either became inactive after a few months and were never seen again, or it turns out that they started misusing their tools. In both cases it is then hard for stewards, or really anyone, to do anything about it; in the latter scenario, that is why RFC is full of complaints about broken small Wikimedia projects. Temporary adminship gives the community a chance to reevaluate after 6 months. --Rschen7754 17:17, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

The problem of Meta is the lack of affinity with this reopened project. It was revived in the incubator in 2012, in 2016 and again from January 2017. Until the start, two users worked 6 months, one 5 months and one 2 months to revive a news project. The definition of news is that it is old after one week. They all worked in vane during this time, to really understand the eager to restart it. In the last period since the application to get it reopened, it took two full months to produce news of which was known to be old when it would be reopened. The slow mode of the Language Committee took me to motivate two users to stay because they had really had it with the whole system. Don't tell me that quitters are born in the incubator. I know that you didn't say it so cruelly, but all the replies here show a lack of affinity with this project.

Looking back of what happens here at Meta again and again, is to meet the blogging society, like Wikipedians nagging - as if they have a magic glass sphere: "´we know that this is not going to work´" (if you had known him, you would have known he is multi blocked in English and Dutch, and just ruining our appetite). Another one nagging about things that can actually be said about him. Again another one that is hardly there any more on the projects.

Than at the reopening the whole project should be refixed, and gladly after ten days another heavy editor came to help us. Since we have to do it all by ourselves, and still we make it.

Meanwhile the project was edited yet by 26 different users, our articles are being translated to other Wikinews languages and a Amsterdam programmer asked about the possibilities to use the news on organization websites he develops. Be sure, our project is sexy! You don't quit such a thing.

So is it justified that we don't want to be here anymore on Meta. We don't want this negativity around of people that don't know how well it is functioning. 6 frameworks of news, filled on a regular basis, and all kinds of issues other Wikinews editions didn't even think of to bind readers and writers. This is what it is and what has been achieved. No, this project has not been built by quitters.

So far the motivational/emotional plead. But now the rules. I can understand that you hardly see reopened projects, but this Wikinews has its own set rules and they existed when the applications begun for the adminships. Whatever jurisdiction you may have, it doesn't apply here. One can say, why does it matter to apply after six months again...: the answer is just because no-one likes to be overruled by someone that doesn't have the right. Ymnes (talk) 19:23, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

The case is closed and you are welcome back in six month with a new request. If you want to change the practice regarding small wikis and temporary status you are welcome to bring that discussion to a more suitable location. Please don't change the status on closed cases. -- Tegel _(Talk) 19:31, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

On the basis of what rules do you decide? They don't exist here, do they?! Ymnes (talk) 19:47, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

Yemnes - Since you seems to be unhappy with this whole process, here is what our handbook advises on this situation "If the wiki has no community, or if it has too few active users to hold a meaningful discussion of the issue, it is probably advisable to grant temporary rather than permanent rights. Three months is a common period for temporary rights.". Here is the section you can read it from. Now, please stop pushing for it and build a good community on the project you have taken upon yourself to maintain. Please do realize that the project is still a wikimedia project and the governance and support that applies to such a project will always apply to your newly built project as well. --Jyothis (talk) 01:15, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

Apparently it's normal to give commands to others over here, but please understand that the willing are not the trolls. The behaviour over here should really change. At least you gave a link to the handbook. Thank you at least for that. Ymnes (talk) 06:48, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

extended — regards, 15:08, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

LIVE NIEUWS@nl.wikinews

Please can you give LIVE NIEUWS administrator rights for a undetermined time. He has been elected by our community with rules set by our community. Dutch Wikinews is a reopened project that has run since 2005, not a new one, so our community decides on these issues. Might you decide differently, please state why and on the basis of which current agreements set by the Meta community (with a link please). Ymnes (talk) 22:36, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

. The reason was already explained. - On a completely unrelated note, if you answer on my Incubator talk page, I can proceed with that stuff mentioned there. --MF-W 01:05, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

Yemnes - before you start asking for Link and commenting about this being temp, I just replied to you on the other long discussion with the same. --Jyothis (talk) 01:16, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

removed — regards, 15:07, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

DARIO SEVERI@pt.wikivoyage

This wiki doesn't have any bureaucrats and the last admins edit was on 24 august 2016 [3]. There is no against votes (4 support votes) for my permanent adminship request. Permanent adminship is hereby kindly requested.. The news about the request was also posted in the Wikivoyage:Bar dos viajantes on January, 09. [4]. DARIO SEVERI (talk) 01:02, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

. --MF-W 15:45, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

extended — regards, 15:07, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Castelobranco@eowiktionary

Request for permanent adminship. 11:55, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

. Due to the limited community size on eo.wiktionary, it seems to me wiser to grant this request for 1 year. Savh^ñ 20:36, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

Ok, no problem. Thanks! 20:39, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

removed — regards, 15:06, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

MKar@orwikisource

What is the requirement criteria so that a community will be considered as a big community ? Is our community eligible to elect a permanent administrator ? Mrutyunjaya Kar (talk) 14:30, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

That will depend on the size of the regular editing community. I'm putting this request on hold, to allow for a week of local discussion (to be considered on 26 January 2017) – Ajraddatz (talk) 15:57, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

. Savh^ñ 01:07, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

removed — regards, 15:06, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Romaine@nl.wikinews

Please grant Romaine administrator rights. He has been elected according to our procedure of two weeks, starting from 14th July, with full majority. Ymnes (talk) 21:25, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

. --MF-W 22:32, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

removed — regards, 15:05, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Wolverène@biwikipedia

Hello. Please provide me adminship rights on the Bislama Wikipedia. There are no administrators and I'm ready to be one who works against the vandalism/spam/nonsense pages. We can start from the temporary access. More info in the local discussion (see above). Thank you in advance. --Wolverène (talk) 11:55, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

On hold till 27 October 2017. Ruslik (talk) 17:43, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. Ruslik (talk) 19:20, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

Thanks, I'll start working right now. :) --Wolverène (talk) 20:39, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

removed — regards, 15:05, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Voskanyan@hywikiquote

--ԱշոտՏՆՂ (talk) 11:55, 28 January 2017 (UTC)

I can't see any confirmation that Voskanyan wants to be an admin there. --Stryn (talk) 12:51, 28 January 2017 (UTC)

I want to be an administrator on Armenian Wikiquote.--Voskanyan (talk) 07:50, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

. Savh^ñ 09:59, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

removed — regards, 15:04, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Wong128hk@zhwikiquote

Please grant me the temporary sysop flag. -- 05:15, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

Please hold on. I cannot trust this guy using the page for off-topic criticism without sincerely considering my questioning. Too many very new users are inflating the votes.--Jusjih (talk) 02:18, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

I asked this guy why he would nominate something for deletion on Chinese Wikibooks but then delete in just six days without asking other administrators, but he responded too aggressively and made the discussion too unfriendly, i.e. criticizing others without willingness to consider others' criticism. That is no place to do that, so restarting the vote may be desirable, if not entirely rejecting this request. Once again, please be wary of very new users inflating the votes.--Jusjih (talk) 02:26, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

It is because you frequently exaggerate the minor problems of others and you have the tendency to harass other users. Your comments here is the reason why I need to post out what you have done on different small wikis. Your comments here no doubt that can be used to verify what I have said and show that your comments are of low value to take as a reference. You have raised out that it is a misconduct during handling the deletions of two pages on zh.wikibooks. I have described the contents of that two pages and what the situations were during that time. As an admin, did you handle the case "on time"? Nope. "數字算式寶塔的推廣" which is the page I proposed to delete on 3 Feb 2017. You didn't handle it "on time". Let it be there for a month. Eventually, I needed to delete it by myself. [5] There is no guideline about how long should a RFD last for on zh.wikibooks. You have edited during that period. You're an experienced admin. I do believe that you should have checked the RFD page regularly as an admin. There is no objection on RFD regarding that page. No one can prove that it is not an original research. I don't see any problems regarding that deletion. For the wikibooks page regarding mahjong, I have described the problems of that page also. The problems are still there. Those users are not "new users". They all are actively contributing on zh.wiki. All wikimedia projects share a similar principle. The regulation may be different though. Therefore, they have the ability and eligibility to comment on RFA on other projects, especially the small projects in same language. Just like they have the ability and eligibility to comment on whether a user suitable to be a steward. Isn't it?-- 12:00, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

We generally discourage users being brought in from other wikis to vote on requests. The local community should be able to decide who is an admin, even if the local community is very small. That said, I see consensus among the active local community to grant temporary access, though I would like a second opinion from another steward first. – Ajraddatz (talk) 20:56, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

I strongly disagree your theory of my harassing others. I was just asking why nominate a page to delete then delete it in just six days (too fast), not whether that would be original research. Why reacted so harshly and impatiently to my simple question? And why close my being nominated for adminship on Chinese Wikibooks back on 24 August 2010 too fast [6] when the only bureaucrat was Shizhao but not you, without asking Shizhao first? (That act exceeded your adminship.) Please note that your patience, and politeness have yet to improve in order to be a truly trusted administrator, by considering phrases like "please, thanks, excuse me, sorry" (請﹑謝謝﹑對不起﹑遺憾). Thanks for your acknowledging my experienced adminship and this is why I tend to have higher standard for adminship. Excuse me, if anyone's higher standard for adminship is your big concern, sorry, then please use your existing adminship more cautiously, rather than applying for it on more wikis. Other than Wikipedia, Chinese wikis tend to be too small to have sizable community to quickly monitor the activities. Thanks for discouraging cross-wiki voting. Before granting adminship, please also carefully consider that impatient administrator may lack trust. Thanks.--Jusjih (talk) 23:38, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

It is a norm to not using admin tools with COI. It seems that your high standard do not apply everywhere. For instance, the revisions containing the criticisms to you. [7]

Actually, it is a same problem between the issue of AFD and the RFA of yours. There is no rules about how long should a AFD last for. And I received no objection about deleting that page not until now. No one can show us it is not a original research. It can be SNOW. On the other hand, there was a threshold of receiving at least six votes to be valid. Anyone can be the person to judge whether a RFA received six votes. I was the one supporting you to be sysop of zh.wikibooks during two RFA. I regret that I have not raised out the problems of having too high threshold at the VP on time. But it does not mean that I agree not to follow the rule. You may say, "hey Wikipedia is not bureaucracy. We should ignore the rule that hinder the development of the wiki." I will say these rules should be used with extra caution and not with subjective view. In your case, either a steward or a bureaucrat should raise out a objective based evidence to ignore the threshold of receiving at least six votes to be valid. For example, raise out the actual differences of the numbers of active users between two periods of time and show that the difference is significant enough. Ummm... To improve the situation, I think I should freeze your RFA and raise out the discussion at Village Pump to change the threshold. If you think that your first RFA can be SNOW to pass, it is strange that you are not agree with the closure of a RFD with SNOW, with "Wikipedia is not bureaucracy" and with "Ignore all rules".

I am sorry that I lose my temper and patient to one who always WP:POINT, forces other to follow his suggestions, double standards and do not think that he got any mistakes even there is a user with plenty amount of contribution was forced to leave BY HIM.

That's all. -- 03:42, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

It is my fault if you think that it is a norm that RFD should at least last for a week and I deleted a page that should be deleted a day before. I apologize for it.-- 04:00, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

In addition to your latest apology, please also understand that:

1. Requesting adminship implies consent to be examined by the community. Candidates are to adapt to the community, including reasonable criticism, not the community adapting to candidates. Even unreasonable criticism has to be politely answered to get the sympathy from disinterested third party.
2. Criticizing existing and prospective administrators, bureaucrats, etc, is routinely inevitable. For example, I got this at least once in 2015 [8] when asked about how active I was as a bureaucrat on Wikimedia Commons. I accepted the criticism and resigned, but remaining an administrator there has been much easier.
3. Therefore, please also consider apologizing for excessively long counter-criticism here and on Chinese Wikiquote. With nothing personal, power-hungry impatience is bad for adminship. Thanks.--Jusjih (talk) 04:14, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

Nope. I won't beg for the sympathy. "真理越辯越明" (The more the truth is debated, the clearer the truth becomes.) Throughout the debates here and on zh.wikiquote, it is proven that your criticisms are unreasonable. To consider a serial of events I mentioned before, it is clearly proven that your objection is of low value. I just point out the fact. You request I need to treat you politely. So have you politely treated Wcjd? Have you apologized for what you have done on him? Speaking "please, sorry, excuse me, etc" does not make you polite, if you do not do it with respect to others. Doing these thing without respect; it can be called as hypocritical. -- 11:06, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

Good grief, this is m:SRP, not w:en:WP:ANI. --Rschen7754 18:12, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

. --MF-W 16:28, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

removed — regards, 15:04, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Midleading@zhwikisource

I have passed the request for adminship process on zhwikisourceMidleading (talk) 01:23, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. Ruslik (talk) 16:31, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

removed — regards, 15:03, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

損齋@zh-classicalwikipedia

I have been the Admin of Classical Chinese Wikipedia since last year and have completed 2 terms in 1 year. I hereby request another term(1 year if possible) to keep and maintain the community. The community currently has only 1 active admin(Which is me). The statement is made several weeks ago. Thank you very much.----損齋 (talk) 20:35, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

To be extended on 2 February when the current term expires. --MF-W 09:58, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

. --MF-W 14:09, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

My gratitude. I Will also put other two locally nominated sysops here to see what can be done.Our Community is having more active users and we decided to elect one or two more sysop.----損齋 (talk) 18:36, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

removed — regards, 15:03, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Davidzdh@zh-classicalwikipedia

I have been the admin of Classical Chinese wikipedia for 6 months. During this time I dealted with vandalism and did jobs to help this wiki develop. I hereby request to prolong my admin duty for another 6 months. The local announcement is made today. Thank you very much. - 10:43, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

On hold till 6 August 2017. Ruslik (talk) 18:09, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. Stryn (talk) 12:25, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

extended — regards, 15:02, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Stalinjeet Brar@pa.Wiktionary

permanent adminship requested ---Stalinjeet Brar (talk) 07:06, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

On hold till 9 November 2017. Ruslik (talk) 18:22, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. Ruslik (talk) 19:21, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

removed — regards, 15:02, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Kairat Zamirbekov@ky.wikipedia

Hi! I have been admin of Kyrgyz Wikipedia for last 3 months. During this time managed to make many amendments. If possible, please pronlongate my admin access for 1 year. I have many plans that I need to implement.--Kairat Zamirbekov (talk) 12:30, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

On hold till 11 August. Stryn (talk) 12:26, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

. -- Stryn (talk) 17:40, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

removed — regards, 15:30, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

WAN233@zh-calssical wikipedia

Classical Chinese Wikipedia administrators and active users are relatively small, there is a large backlog of unattended station, so request to become an administrator, thank you.-- (talk) 04:54, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. Stryn (talk) 15:57, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

removed — regards, 15:30, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Ilya@ukwikibooks

I did 38% of all edits in ukwikibooks since Jan 2016. It is 4 times more than next active user on ukwikibooks in the same period. I did not count two users who post numerous articles that are not eligible for wikibooks as it is their original theories and are not educational. I tried to bring attention of existing admins to this on 2 Jan 2017 nominating those articles for deletion, however, only one of four sets of pages where deleted, other 3 sets where ignored. And these users continued to fill ukwikibooks with such pages without any reaction from admins. Then I nominated myself for admin, but again noone reacted for a week, until I asked other people to come. Ilya (talk) 19:24, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

If ignored then other sysops do not think that articles should be deleted.-- () 19:49, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

Why not state your position then? I translated and suggested the rule about What is Wikibooks and nominated the articles according to it. --Ilya (talk) 14:33, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

Please raise your concerns clearly on the local discussion page. Savh^ñ 11:37, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

I did it on 2 Jan 2017 as I mentioned and linked before. --Ilya (talk) 11:44, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

. Granting temporary adminship due to the community size, even though there are other permanent admins on the project and you were one yourself before. Once the year has gone by, open a new request and permanent adminship will be considered again. Savh^ñ 01:09, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

removed — regards, 15:29, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Katxis@jamwiki

Second temporary sysop term expires 2-18-2017. Seeking renewal for one year. StevenJ81 (talk) 14:38, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

on hold till 17 February. 19:04, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

• . Discussion open sufficient length of time without significant opposition. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. -- Avi (talk) 02:28, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

removed — regards, 15:28, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Nickispeaki@ukwikinews

Only one vote, but still it's positive. Visem (talk) 22:12, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

. – Ajraddatz (talk) 22:21, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

removed — regards, 15:28, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Saroj Uprety@dty.wikipedia

Temporary adminship--Saroj Uprety (talk) 13:39, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

On hold till 25 August 2017. Ruslik (talk) 17:05, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. Ruslik (talk) 20:20, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

removed — regards, 15:28, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

MZaplotnik & Hladnikm@slwikiversity

I request for the prolongation of admin rights (after first, second, third and fourth approval) for 1 year. After 10 days of discussion being open no user has objected. Both admins make admin and clean-up actions (see logs [11] and [12]).--M ^(contribs) 20:41, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

. -- Ajraddatz (talk) 06:22, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

extended — regards, 15:27, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

مھتاب احمد@sdwikipedia

--There is no active admin on sindhi wikipedia see. Thank you--   10:11, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

On hold until 6 June. Stryn (talk) 13:02, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

We also need a steward rights for one user at Sindhi Wikipedia, I would like to be steward, I'm ex-admin at sdwiki.JogiAsad (talk) 04:32, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

Not possible. Please don't write here about any unrelated requests. Stryn (talk) 10:14, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

Stryn sorry for unrelated request.--   07:39, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

جناب جوگی یہ صرف میٹا پر ہوتے ہیں بھلا سندھی ویکی پر کب سے ہونے لگ گئے؟ --   07:39, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

. --MF-W 18:07, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

removed — regards, 15:26, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Lifeway@mhr.wikipedia

I ask to give administrator rights in Mari Wikipedia. Lifeway (talk) 08:29, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

On hold till 6 September 2017. Ruslik (talk) 12:36, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. Ruslik (talk) 18:30, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

removed — regards, 15:26, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Murbaut@map-bmswiki

I want to renew myadminship. Thank for see. Murbaut (talk) 11:17, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

. – Ajraddatz (talk) 16:15, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

removed — regards, 15:26, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

R96340@zh.wiktionary

The user is requesting for temporary adminship to fight against vandal and do daily cleanings. They request for a month, but some of voters believe that three months is a more proper length. --WhitePhosphorus (talk) 18:21, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. Ruslik (talk) 19:49, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

removed — regards, 15:25, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

The Discoverer@gomwikipedia

Requesting for temporary adminship for housekeeping tasks. The Discoverer (talk) 17:54, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

On hold till March 15. Stryn (talk) 18:40, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

. Savh^ñ 18:04, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

removed — regards, 15:25, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

User Tiven2240@mrwikisource

After the desypnosis of user:Mahitgar for misusing administrative powers (link above) marathi Wikisource and Wiktionary has no active Administrator. There are improvements left in these wiki and of cleanups required for which I request for temporary adminship on this wiki for atleast 6 months as I find no active community on these wiki's for a permanent vote. Tiven2240 (talk) 12:01, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

Please, start a discussion on mr.wikisource. In addition, Mahitgar is still a sysop in mr.wikisource. Ruslik (talk) 16:13, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

I have started the discussion here. Mahitgar is still a sypnosis but not active on any of the projects after his report on SN --Tiven2240 (talk) 16:57, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

On hold till 16 December 2017. Ruslik (talk) 18:55, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. Ruslik (talk) 19:22, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

removed — regards, 15:25, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

अजीत कुमार तिवारी@hiwikipedia

Discussion is for short time sysop rights. So, he can get granted 3 months sysop rights on hiwiki. () 20:00, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. -- Stryn (talk) 10:35, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

removed — regards, 15:24, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Pegasovagante@it.wikiversity

Thanks. -- 22:34, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

. 22:48, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Thanks -- 10:37, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

removed — regards, 15:24, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Kulmalukko@fiwikivoyage

. Stryn (talk) 15:57, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

removed — regards, 15:24, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

باسم@ar.wikiquote

-- :)..! 21:51, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

. 01:01, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

removed — regards, 15:23, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Iliev@bg.wikisource

Our Bulgarian community is dealing with a particularly persistent cross-project vandalism and harassment, chiefly from the PavelStaykov and Modernator-related groups, the latter operating for as long as 7 years now. The introduction of an AI anti-vandalism bot and the (semi-)automated blocking of open proxies (currently at over 300,000 individual IPs and almost 8,500 ranges) have almost completely curbed the abuse on bgwiki, but some of the vandalism then spilled to other projects, notably the BG wiktionary, quote, and source. The first two have already been taken care of, so amongst the important local projects for the Bulgarian community wikisource remains the only vulnerable one. It is going to need constant attention, so in perspective I'll be seeking a permanent adminship, but a temporary one for a start would do just as fine, knowing what's the usual procedure. I'll also be trying to cover as much as possible of the other typical sysop activities that I already take care of on bgwiki, bgwikt and bgquote.

Many thanks in advance,
14:41, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

. --MF-W 18:36, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

removed — regards, 15:22, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Uchup19@su.wikiquote

--Uchup19 (talk) 03:19, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

The wiki is not big enough to get permanent administrators. We can grant you a temporary adminship again. Stryn (talk) 14:27, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

{{Inprogress}} until March 31. -- Avi (talk) 14:34, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

. Discussion open sufficient length of time with no significant opposition. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. -- Avi (talk) 18:02, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

removed — regards, 15:22, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

YaganZ@la.wiktionary

Hello, my sysop status is about to expire on 2017-04-02 and I'm asking for a renewal.

I'm still the sole administrator of this project, and I think, there should be at least some person to observe and block vandalism and SPAM locally.

In addition to my contributions as a normal user, there's a lot of maintenance to be done. For this purpose sysop rights are very helpful, for it's occasionally necessary to delete pages or to modify system pages.

Thanks for your assistance.

YaganZ (talk) 11:22, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

{{On hold}} until April 3. Stryn (talk) 14:31, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

• . Discussion open sufficient length of time without significant opposition. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. -- Avi (talk) 14:21, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

removed — regards, 15:22, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

蘭斯特@zhwikiquote

Request temp sysop.--蘭斯特 (talk) 13:50, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. – Ajraddatz (talk) 17:12, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

removed — regards, 15:22, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Mashoi7@olo.wikipedia

I'm requesting admin rights to Livvi-Karelian Wikipedii since it has no admins at the moment. I had test-admin rights to this Wikipedia in the incubator. Mashoi7 (talk) 18:08, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

On hold until 7 April. Funny language btw, kevätkuu, a "spring month" in Finnish :D Stryn (talk) 18:13, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

Clerking note: affirming that this user was a test-admin of this wiki in the Incubator. StevenJ81 (talk) 20:48, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

. --MF-W 10:21, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

removed — regards, 15:21, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Ilja.mos@olo.wikipedia

I am requesting Livvi-Karelian Wikipedia administrator rights. I was one of the test-admins in incubator and now would like to continue. I'm native Karelian and Livvi-Karelian speaker. Ilja.mos (talk) 06:51, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

through April 8. -- Avi (talk) 14:22, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Clerking note: affirming that this user was a test-admin of this wiki in the Incubator. StevenJ81 (talk) 20:48, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

. --MF-W 10:21, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

removed — regards, 15:21, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Mashoi7@olo.wikipedia

I'm requesting admin rights to Livvi-Karelian Wikipedii since it has no admins at the moment. I had test-admin rights to this Wikipedia in the incubator. Mashoi7 (talk) 18:08, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

On hold until 7 April. Funny language btw, kevätkuu, a "spring month" in Finnish :D Stryn (talk) 18:13, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

Clerking note: affirming that this user was a test-admin of this wiki in the Incubator. StevenJ81 (talk) 20:48, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

. --MF-W 10:21, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

removed — regards, 15:21, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Ilja.mos@olo.wikipedia

I am requesting Livvi-Karelian Wikipedia administrator rights. I was one of the test-admins in incubator and now would like to continue. I'm native Karelian and Livvi-Karelian speaker. Ilja.mos (talk) 06:51, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

through April 8. -- Avi (talk) 14:22, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Clerking note: affirming that this user was a test-admin of this wiki in the Incubator. StevenJ81 (talk) 20:48, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

. --MF-W 10:21, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

removed — regards, 15:21, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Global editinterface for Petrb

. —MarcoAurelio 09:07, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

removed — regards, 15:16, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Global editinterface for Nemo bis

Matiia (talk) 03:47, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

removed — regards, 15:01, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

==

Pirsharafshah@glkwikipedia

GLK Wikipedia is so small and we can't voting every 3 month. pleased you to grant me administrator access at least for 12 months.--Pirsharafshah (talk) 20:25, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

I dont see any new discussion at Wikipedia:قأوه دیکؤن/کارکیاگری, please start a fresh discussion and leave it for a week even if there is no community.-- 05:52, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

. 19:34, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

Pirsharafshah@glkwikipedia

GLK Wikipedia is so small and we can't voting every 3 month. pleased you to grant me administrator access at least for 12 months.--Pirsharafshah (talk) 20:25, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

I dont see any new discussion at Wikipedia:قأوه دیکؤن/کارکیاگری, please start a fresh discussion and leave it for a week even if there is no community.-- 05:52, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

. 19:34, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

Expiring: 7 May 2018

Global IP block exempt for Ans

My network does not allow direct access to most web site at specific hours of each day. At those hours, Tor is the only way for me to access and edit wikimedia projects.

thanks, --Ans (talk) 11:53, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

. —MarcoAurelio 12:18, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

removed — regards, 15:18, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Rachmat04@acewiki ====

I'd like to renew my adminship at acewiki. My last access ended one month ago. Thank you. ··· Rachmat04 · 16:48, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

. . Linedwell ^[talk] 23:48, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

Please follow the instructions: Stewards: Please use {{Systmp}} for approved temporary requests. Approved temporary access requests are listed at SRAT. Requests are moved to that page by a bot. Stryn (talk) 09:07, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for the reminder, I wasn't sure it was stll necessary, due to the modification of Special:UserRights to manage by itself the temporary permissions. Regards, Linedwell ^[talk] 09:20, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

Expiring: 3 June 2018

Pirsharafshah@glkwikipedia

GLK Wikipedia is so small and we can't voting every 3 month. pleased you to grant me administrator access at least for 12 months.--Pirsharafshah (talk) 20:25, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

I dont see any new discussion at Wikipedia:قأوه دیکؤن/کارکیاگری, please start a fresh discussion and leave it for a week even if there is no community.-- 05:52, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

. 19:34, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

Expiring: 7 May 2018

Global IP block exempt for Ans

My network does not allow direct access to most web site at specific hours of each day. At those hours, Tor is the only way for me to access and edit wikimedia projects.

thanks, --Ans (talk) 11:53, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

. —MarcoAurelio 12:18, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

removed — regards, 15:18, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Rachmat04@acewiki ====

I'd like to renew my adminship at acewiki. My last access ended one month ago. Thank you. ··· Rachmat04 · 16:48, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

. . Linedwell ^[talk] 23:48, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

Please follow the instructions: Stewards: Please use {{Systmp}} for approved temporary requests. Approved temporary access requests are listed at SRAT. Requests are moved to that page by a bot. Stryn (talk) 09:07, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for the reminder, I wasn't sure it was stll necessary, due to the modification of Special:UserRights to manage by itself the temporary permissions. Regards, Linedwell ^[talk] 09:20, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

Expiring: 3 June 2018

Pirsharafshah@glkwikipedia

GLK Wikipedia is so small and we can't voting every 3 month. pleased you to grant me administrator access at least for 12 months.--Pirsharafshah (talk) 20:25, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

I dont see any new discussion at Wikipedia:قأوه دیکؤن/کارکیاگری, please start a fresh discussion and leave it for a week even if there is no community.-- 05:52, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

. 19:34, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

Expiring: 7 May 2018

Global IP block exempt for Ans

My network does not allow direct access to most web site at specific hours of each day. At those hours, Tor is the only way for me to access and edit wikimedia projects.

thanks, --Ans (talk) 11:53, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

. —MarcoAurelio 12:18, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

removed — regards, 15:18, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Rachmat04@acewiki ====

I'd like to renew my adminship at acewiki. My last access ended one month ago. Thank you. ··· Rachmat04 · 16:48, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

. . Linedwell ^[talk] 23:48, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

Please follow the instructions: Stewards: Please use {{Systmp}} for approved temporary requests. Approved temporary access requests are listed at SRAT. Requests are moved to that page by a bot. Stryn (talk) 09:07, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for the reminder, I wasn't sure it was stll necessary, due to the modification of Special:UserRights to manage by itself the temporary permissions. Regards, Linedwell ^[talk] 09:20, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

Expiring: 3 June 2018

Expiring: 7 May 2018

Global IP block exempt for Ans

My network does not allow direct access to most web site at specific hours of each day. At those hours, Tor is the only way for me to access and edit wikimedia projects.

thanks, --Ans (talk) 11:53, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

. —MarcoAurelio 12:18, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

removed — regards, 15:18, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Expiring: 13 May 2018

Global editinterface for Petrb

. —MarcoAurelio 09:07, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

removed — regards, 15:16, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Global editinterface for Nemo bis

Matiia (talk) 03:47, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

removed — regards, 15:01, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Pirsharafshah@glkwikipedia

GLK Wikipedia is so small and we can't voting every 3 month. pleased you to grant me administrator access at least for 12 months.--Pirsharafshah (talk) 20:25, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

I dont see any new discussion at Wikipedia:قأوه دیکؤن/کارکیاگری, please start a fresh discussion and leave it for a week even if there is no community.-- 05:52, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

. 19:34, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

Pirsharafshah@glkwikipedia

GLK Wikipedia is so small and we can't voting every 3 month. pleased you to grant me administrator access at least for 12 months.--Pirsharafshah (talk) 20:25, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

I dont see any new discussion at Wikipedia:قأوه دیکؤن/کارکیاگری, please start a fresh discussion and leave it for a week even if there is no community.-- 05:52, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

. 19:34, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

Expiring: 7 May 2018

Global IP block exempt for Ans

My network does not allow direct access to most web site at specific hours of each day. At those hours, Tor is the only way for me to access and edit wikimedia projects.

thanks, --Ans (talk) 11:53, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

. —MarcoAurelio 12:18, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

removed — regards, 15:18, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Rachmat04@acewiki ====

I'd like to renew my adminship at acewiki. My last access ended one month ago. Thank you. ··· Rachmat04 · 16:48, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

. . Linedwell ^[talk] 23:48, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

Please follow the instructions: Stewards: Please use {{Systmp}} for approved temporary requests. Approved temporary access requests are listed at SRAT. Requests are moved to that page by a bot. Stryn (talk) 09:07, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for the reminder, I wasn't sure it was stll necessary, due to the modification of Special:UserRights to manage by itself the temporary permissions. Regards, Linedwell ^[talk] 09:20, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

Expiring: 3 June 2018

Pirsharafshah@glkwikipedia

GLK Wikipedia is so small and we can't voting every 3 month. pleased you to grant me administrator access at least for 12 months.--Pirsharafshah (talk) 20:25, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

I dont see any new discussion at Wikipedia:قأوه دیکؤن/کارکیاگری, please start a fresh discussion and leave it for a week even if there is no community.-- 05:52, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

. 19:34, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

Expiring: 7 May 2018

Global IP block exempt for Ans

My network does not allow direct access to most web site at specific hours of each day. At those hours, Tor is the only way for me to access and edit wikimedia projects.

thanks, --Ans (talk) 11:53, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

. —MarcoAurelio 12:18, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

removed — regards, 15:18, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Rachmat04@acewiki ====

I'd like to renew my adminship at acewiki. My last access ended one month ago. Thank you. ··· Rachmat04 · 16:48, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

. . Linedwell ^[talk] 23:48, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

Please follow the instructions: Stewards: Please use {{Systmp}} for approved temporary requests. Approved temporary access requests are listed at SRAT. Requests are moved to that page by a bot. Stryn (talk) 09:07, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for the reminder, I wasn't sure it was stll necessary, due to the modification of Special:UserRights to manage by itself the temporary permissions. Regards, Linedwell ^[talk] 09:20, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

Expiring: 3 June 2018

Pirsharafshah@glkwikipedia

GLK Wikipedia is so small and we can't voting every 3 month. pleased you to grant me administrator access at least for 12 months.--Pirsharafshah (talk) 20:25, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

I dont see any new discussion at Wikipedia:قأوه دیکؤن/کارکیاگری, please start a fresh discussion and leave it for a week even if there is no community.-- 05:52, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

. 19:34, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

Expiring: 7 May 2018

Global IP block exempt for Ans

My network does not allow direct access to most web site at specific hours of each day. At those hours, Tor is the only way for me to access and edit wikimedia projects.

thanks, --Ans (talk) 11:53, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

. —MarcoAurelio 12:18, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

removed — regards, 15:18, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Rachmat04@acewiki ====

I'd like to renew my adminship at acewiki. My last access ended one month ago. Thank you. ··· Rachmat04 · 16:48, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

. . Linedwell ^[talk] 23:48, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

Please follow the instructions: Stewards: Please use {{Systmp}} for approved temporary requests. Approved temporary access requests are listed at SRAT. Requests are moved to that page by a bot. Stryn (talk) 09:07, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for the reminder, I wasn't sure it was stll necessary, due to the modification of Special:UserRights to manage by itself the temporary permissions. Regards, Linedwell ^[talk] 09:20, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

Expiring: 3 June 2018

Expiring: 7 May 2018

Global IP block exempt for Ans

My network does not allow direct access to most web site at specific hours of each day. At those hours, Tor is the only way for me to access and edit wikimedia projects.

thanks, --Ans (talk) 11:53, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

. —MarcoAurelio 12:18, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

removed — regards, 15:18, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Expiring: 13 May 2018

Global editinterface for Petrb

. —MarcoAurelio 09:07, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

removed — regards, 15:16, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Global editinterface for Nemo bis

Matiia (talk) 03:47, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

removed — regards, 15:01, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Pirsharafshah@glkwikipedia

GLK Wikipedia is so small and we can't voting every 3 month. pleased you to grant me administrator access at least for 12 months.--Pirsharafshah (talk) 20:25, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

I dont see any new discussion at Wikipedia:قأوه دیکؤن/کارکیاگری, please start a fresh discussion and leave it for a week even if there is no community.-- 05:52, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

. 19:34, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

Pirsharafshah@glkwikipedia

GLK Wikipedia is so small and we can't voting every 3 month. pleased you to grant me administrator access at least for 12 months.--Pirsharafshah (talk) 20:25, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

I dont see any new discussion at Wikipedia:قأوه دیکؤن/کارکیاگری, please start a fresh discussion and leave it for a week even if there is no community.-- 05:52, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

. 19:34, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

Expiring: 7 May 2018

Global IP block exempt for Ans

My network does not allow direct access to most web site at specific hours of each day. At those hours, Tor is the only way for me to access and edit wikimedia projects.

thanks, --Ans (talk) 11:53, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

. —MarcoAurelio 12:18, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

removed — regards, 15:18, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Rachmat04@acewiki ====

I'd like to renew my adminship at acewiki. My last access ended one month ago. Thank you. ··· Rachmat04 · 16:48, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

. . Linedwell ^[talk] 23:48, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

Please follow the instructions: Stewards: Please use {{Systmp}} for approved temporary requests. Approved temporary access requests are listed at SRAT. Requests are moved to that page by a bot. Stryn (talk) 09:07, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for the reminder, I wasn't sure it was stll necessary, due to the modification of Special:UserRights to manage by itself the temporary permissions. Regards, Linedwell ^[talk] 09:20, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

Expiring: 3 June 2018

Pirsharafshah@glkwikipedia

GLK Wikipedia is so small and we can't voting every 3 month. pleased you to grant me administrator access at least for 12 months.--Pirsharafshah (talk) 20:25, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

I dont see any new discussion at Wikipedia:قأوه دیکؤن/کارکیاگری, please start a fresh discussion and leave it for a week even if there is no community.-- 05:52, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

. 19:34, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

Expiring: 7 May 2018

Global IP block exempt for Ans

My network does not allow direct access to most web site at specific hours of each day. At those hours, Tor is the only way for me to access and edit wikimedia projects.

thanks, --Ans (talk) 11:53, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

. —MarcoAurelio 12:18, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

removed — regards, 15:18, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Rachmat04@acewiki ====

I'd like to renew my adminship at acewiki. My last access ended one month ago. Thank you. ··· Rachmat04 · 16:48, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

. . Linedwell ^[talk] 23:48, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

Please follow the instructions: Stewards: Please use {{Systmp}} for approved temporary requests. Approved temporary access requests are listed at SRAT. Requests are moved to that page by a bot. Stryn (talk) 09:07, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for the reminder, I wasn't sure it was stll necessary, due to the modification of Special:UserRights to manage by itself the temporary permissions. Regards, Linedwell ^[talk] 09:20, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

Expiring: 3 June 2018

Pirsharafshah@glkwikipedia

GLK Wikipedia is so small and we can't voting every 3 month. pleased you to grant me administrator access at least for 12 months.--Pirsharafshah (talk) 20:25, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

I dont see any new discussion at Wikipedia:قأوه دیکؤن/کارکیاگری, please start a fresh discussion and leave it for a week even if there is no community.-- 05:52, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

. 19:34, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

Expiring: 7 May 2018

Global IP block exempt for Ans

My network does not allow direct access to most web site at specific hours of each day. At those hours, Tor is the only way for me to access and edit wikimedia projects.

thanks, --Ans (talk) 11:53, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

. —MarcoAurelio 12:18, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

removed — regards, 15:18, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Rachmat04@acewiki ====

I'd like to renew my adminship at acewiki. My last access ended one month ago. Thank you. ··· Rachmat04 · 16:48, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

. . Linedwell ^[talk] 23:48, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

Please follow the instructions: Stewards: Please use {{Systmp}} for approved temporary requests. Approved temporary access requests are listed at SRAT. Requests are moved to that page by a bot. Stryn (talk) 09:07, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for the reminder, I wasn't sure it was stll necessary, due to the modification of Special:UserRights to manage by itself the temporary permissions. Regards, Linedwell ^[talk] 09:20, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

Expiring: 3 June 2018

Expiring: 7 May 2018

Global IP block exempt for Ans

My network does not allow direct access to most web site at specific hours of each day. At those hours, Tor is the only way for me to access and edit wikimedia projects.

thanks, --Ans (talk) 11:53, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

. —MarcoAurelio 12:18, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

removed — regards, 15:18, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Expiring: 13 May 2018

Global editinterface for Petrb

. —MarcoAurelio 09:07, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

removed — regards, 15:16, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Global editinterface for Nemo bis

Matiia (talk) 03:47, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

removed — regards, 15:01, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Expiring: 8 April 2018

Onegaborg@olo.wikipedia

I would like to request administrator rights for Livvi-Karelian Wikipedia. I made original request to start this Wikipedia. In the meantime I have some objections against the order of this election. There is no any rules yet in Livvi-Karelian Wikipedia for election right now. I think that it can cause some misuse in favour of other candidates. Use of the same IP-address for several different votes should be forbidden too. --Onegaborg (talk) 20:12, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Clerking note: This user did in fact launch the original RFL. StevenJ81 (talk) 20:49, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

. --MF-W 10:21, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

removed — regards, 15:21, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Lee@si.wiktionary

I am a sysop from Sinhala Wikipedia and I held the temporary sysop flag on this project (now expired). This is a small project with very little active contributors. I extended the vote again but there were no new participants. I am a native speaker of Sinhala so I would be a better candidate than global sysops in handling issues that require knowledge in Sinhala. Therefore I am requesting temporary sysop right for another year. Lee (talk) 15:36, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

Please don't "extend" previous requests but create a clearly visible new one. --MF-W 18:39, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

A new vote created at: si:wikt:වික්ෂනරි:පරිපාලකවරු#Lee_2. --Lee (talk) 15:20, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

On hold until October 7 (1 week). 01:18, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Local request specifies an end date of 13 Oct; on hold til then. – Ajraddatz (talk) 17:11, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. – Ajraddatz (talk) 19:34, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

removed — regards, 15:20, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Naudefj@afwiktionary

After a long standstill af.wiktionary is being reactivated. I am Dutch & the only active sysop there. Naudefj is a native speaker and has been sysop at af.wikipedia for a long time

Jcwf (talk) 19:37, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

. Ruslik (talk) 20:09, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

removed — regards, 15:20, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Handrian@el.wikivoyage

I've been the Greek Wikivoyage administrator for the last two years and I would like to continue for another year. --Handrian (talk) 04:08, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

On hold until April 18. Stryn (talk) 15:41, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

. -- Stryn (talk) 16:01, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

removed — regards, 15:20, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

DonCamillo@hawiki

Hello, the Wikipedia in Hausa doesn't have a user community strictly speaking right now and there is no formal local permissions procedure. I'm one of the very few active contributors, working together with Wikimedia Nigeria in order to increase contributions from Hausa speakers, and able to speak basic Hausa. I'm a quite experienced user (20k+ edits) and was an administrator on fr.wikipedia from 2006 to 2015 (desysoped at my own request). I was sysoped for 4 months in July on ha:... but it expired recently and I'm still the only "local" admin. The admin tools would be very useful in order to fight vandalism on ha.wikipedia, improve the main page, solve copyright violation issues, etc. Thanks a lot for your help. DonCamillo (talk) 9 October 2017 (UTC)

hi, please start a new discussion on Wikipedia. Stryn (talk) 07:19, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

Sure, here it is. --DonCamillo (talk) 11:54, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

Thanks, On hold till 18 October. Stryn (talk) 12:35, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. -- Stryn (talk) 15:36, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

extended — regards, 15:20, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Giromin Cangiaxo@lij.wikipedia

Hi! I've been the ligurian wikipedia administrator for the last six months and I would like to continue. Thanks! Giromin Cangiaxo (talk) 15:21, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Please start a new voting. Stryn (talk) 19:54, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

So . Stryn (talk) 13:51, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

A new voting is in progress. Thanks! Giromin Cangiaxo (talk) 16:29, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

{{on hold}} until April 24. Stryn (talk) 16:49, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

. Discussion open sufficient length of time with no significant opposition. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. -- Avi (talk) 14:53, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

removed — regards, 15:19, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Gurlal Maan@pawikisource

Please grant me admin rights on Punjabi Wikisource.--Gurlal Maan (talk) 10:44, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

for 6 months. 02:41, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

Template is missing... Stryn (talk) 04:37, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

. I thought we had talked about dropping the template now that expires are automatic... 11:55, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

extended — regards, 15:19, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

User 1Or@hewikinews

Thanks, 1Or (talk) 06:26, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

• . Discussion open sufficient length of time without significant opposition. Response too sparse for permanent status, though. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. -- Avi (talk) 15:58, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

removed — regards, 15:18, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Leonardo José Raimundo@ptwikinews

With 7 support votes and none opposes, and 1 week of discussion, the user has been elected administrator in Portuguese Wikinews. Thanks — ( - ) 21:58, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. 01:26, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

removed — regards, 15:17, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Xelgen@hywikisource

Hi, I'm requesting extension of my sysop right on Armenian Wikisource, for technical upkeep (Gadgets, Abuse Filter other MediaWiki namespace related things), mainly related to Wikisource tools project. I have wiki sysop experience of 8 years on Armenian Wikipedia. Xelgen (talk) 20:16, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

• . To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. -- Avi (talk) 19:57, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

removed — regards, 15:17, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Beko@hywiktionary

Hi. Please give me the admin flag again, It's my sixth request and, if possible, give me administrator rights for longer period. I'm an admin in the hywiktionary since 2014. Beko (talk) 06:37, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

. . 14:27, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

removed — regards, 15:14, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Theklan@euwikisource

• Support to jumpstart this new project. V * ^discut. 07:17, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
  • . Regards, —MarcoAurelio (talk) 10:47, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

extended — regards, 14:57, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Expiring: 20 May 2018

فيصل@arwikiversity

I would like to request temporary adminship for 3 months (that can be extended later) for فيصل (romanized as Faisal). Faisal is a trusted user within Arabic Wikipedia community and he agreed to volunteer to take care of arwikiversity which is flooded with test/spam pages. He is an admin on arwiki as well as a rollbacker on Wikidata. The discussion on arwikiversity is linked above and nobody objected on the nomination of Faisal as admin. Thank you in advance. Meno25 (talk) 07:01, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

. Ruslik (talk) 19:24, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

removed — regards, 14:58, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Adam-Yourist@inhwikipedia

--Kaganer (talk) 13:57, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. Ruslik (talk) 20:42, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

removed — regards, 14:58, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Kaganer@inhwikipedia

. Ruslik (talk) 20:45, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

removed — regards, 14:58, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Expiring: 28 May 2018

夢蝶葬花@zhwikivoyage

Two support votes, no oppose or neutral votes. Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 03:25, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. Ruslik (talk) 12:56, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

extended — regards, 14:55, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Expiring: 2 June 2018

GeoO@hywikisource

Hello and Happy new year. It has been 6 months since the previous administration, is it possible to extend it a little bit. Thanks. :) -- 20:42, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

. --MF-W 22:40, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

extended — regards, 15:11, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Missatikamekw@atj.wikipedia

—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Benoit Rochon (talk)

. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. --MF-W 15:02, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

extended — regards, 15:11, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Jeannette Coocoo@atj.wikipedia

—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Benoit Rochon (talk)

. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. --MF-W 15:02, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

removed — regards, 15:11, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

سمير تامر@arwikinews

Please, give sysop flag for 6 months -- :)..! 19:36, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

. Ruslik (talk) 22:36, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

Expiring: 14 September 2018

R96340@zhwiktionary

The election has come to an end. Please grant him the temporary sysop flag. A longer period is recommended. Thank you. 09:41, 14 March 2018 (UTC)

. To prolong the adminship, please start another election at least eight days before the temporary access expires, and after a week post the request again to this page. If it is clear that the community is large enough, it might be worth considering a year or even permanent adminships. Thank you for the note. (talk) 12:03, 14 March 2018 (UTC)

Expiring: 14 September 2018

فيصل@arwikinews

Please, give sysop flag for 6 months -- :)..! 17:20, 14 March 2018 (UTC)

. To prolong the adminship, please start another election at least eight days before the temporary access expires, and after a week post the request again to this page. thank you for requesting. (talk) 17:34, 14 March 2018 (UTC)

Expiring: 4 October 2018

Nickispeaki@ukwikinews

Renewal of status. --Visem (talk) 17:08, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

{{done}}. Thank you for the note. (talk) 17:50, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

For those who are interested: it was given for 6 months. Stryn (talk) 20:05, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

. . (Using {{Systmp}}) — regards, 09:30, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

Expiring: 7 October 2018

Pirsharafshah@glkwikipedia

GLK Wikipedia is so small and we can't voting every 3 month. pleased you to grant me administrator access at least for 12 months.--Pirsharafshah (talk) 20:25, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

I dont see any new discussion at Wikipedia:قأوه دیکؤن/کارکیاگری, please start a fresh discussion and leave it for a week even if there is no community.-- 05:52, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

. 19:34, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

Expiring: 5 January 2018

GeoO@hywikisource

Hello and Happy new year. It has been 6 months since the previous administration, is it possible to extend it a little bit. Thanks. :) -- 20:42, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

. --MF-W 22:40, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

extended — regards, 15:11, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Missatikamekw@atj.wikipedia

—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Benoit Rochon (talk)

. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. --MF-W 15:02, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

extended — regards, 15:11, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Jeannette Coocoo@atj.wikipedia

—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Benoit Rochon (talk)

. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. --MF-W 15:02, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

removed — regards, 15:11, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

हिंदुस्थान वासी@hiwikivoyage

--स (talk) 06:34, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. Ruslik (talk) 17:00, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

extended — regards, 15:11, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

स@hiwikivoyage

--स (talk) 06:34, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. Ruslik (talk) 17:03, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

extended — regards, 15:11, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Expiring: 7 January 2018

سمير تامر@arwikinews

Hi, on Arabic Wikinews there is no admin now. I suggested myself to other users on the website and I think they're accepting (p.s: this wiki hasn't enough user as we are at most of time two users working on the wiki). So I request a permanent adminship because there are many pages that need to be protected, deleted and many other stuff. Waiting for your answer... سمير تامر (talk) 23:34, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. There is not enough of a local community to grant permanent adminship, sorry. But your next period of temporary access can be 6 months or a year after this, and if the community grows then permanent access can be granted. – Ajraddatz (talk) 17:23, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

Thanks Ajraddatz, I will make sure that the Arabic Wikinews be more specific and organized. سمير تامر (talk) 16:04, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

removed — regards, 15:10, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Expiring: 9 January 2018

Gius195@itWikiversity

The community of it.Wikiversity requests a temporary flag for 1 year for Gius195 too. --Samuele2002 (talk) 22:19, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

. – Ajraddatz (talk) 05:28, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

removed — regards, 15:09, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Expiring: 12 January 2018

Аль-Гимравий@avwiki

I ask to give me admin rights. --Аль-Гимравий (talk) 21:43, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

Please give us a link to a discussion. --Stryn (talk) 13:59, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

link to a discussion Аль-Гимравий (talk)

No, I don't need your user talk page. But I found it myself: w:av:Википедия:Администраторасул статусалъе гІарзаби/Аль-Гимравий. On hold until 12 January. --Stryn (talk) 16:14, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

Link to the discussion modified by the user in Stryn's comment. Savh^ñ 13:53, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

. Savh^ñ 13:53, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Thank you for your trust! Аль-Гимравий (talk)

removed — regards, 15:09, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Expiring: 14 January 2018

Huhbakker@nl.wikinews

After reopening nl.wikinews.org we yet had begun with the regulatory procedure, starting from June 29th at 18:00 h CEST = 16:00 h UTC. This procedure yet existed and we did follow the official procedure of 14 days. At 18:00 h CEST Huhbakker was elected administrator (3 support (=100%) - 0 oppose / a minimum support of 75% is requisite). Just for the record, we have rules how adminships end / can be ended. I ask you to grant the permanent administratorship to Huhbakker. The same is valid for me (Ymnes, see here above). Both started at exactly 18:00 h CEST because we made a restart to be sure that the official procedure was followed correctly (Dutch: "herstart" = English: "restart"). Thank you in advance. Ymnes (talk) 17:49, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

See my comments above. StevenJ81 (talk) 20:32, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

. --MF-W 00:05, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

- Objection, we are a community with rules. This project is reopened. We did everything by the rules that were put there by the community. It's a false statement that we elected ourselves: I did not elect for my candidacy, neither did Huhbakker. The rules state that this appointment is not temporary, so it should be granted for a undetermined time. Please stick to the rules of this particular project and decide according to the project rules. Ymnes (talk) 03:34, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

removed — regards, 15:08, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Ymnes@nl.wikinews

After reopening nl.wikinews.org I was given temporary "adminship for 2 weeks to deal with stuff that comes up"[13] by MF Warburg. He added: "Please put the adminship requests voted upon by the community". At that very moment we had begun with the regulatory procedure yet, starting from June 29th at 18:00 h CEST = 16:00 h UTC. This procedure yet existed and we did follow the official procedure of 14 days. At 18:00 h CEST I (Ymnes) was elected administrator (3 support (=100%) - 0 oppose / a minimum support of 75% is requisite). Just for the record, we have rules how adminships end / can be ended. I ask you to change my temporary administratorship into a permanent one. During the same procedure, Huhbaker was elected (see here below). Both started at exactly 18:00 h CEST because we made a restart to be sure that the official procedure was followed correctly (Dutch: "herstart" = English: "restart"). Thank you in advance. Ymnes (talk) 17:49, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

So, basically you elected yourselves as administrators. Ruslik (talk) 19:53, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

To be fair:

• The election started while the wiki was still in Incubator, but after the creation of the wiki was approved by LangCom.

Approximately half of the two-week period occurred after the wiki moved into its own subdomain.

• The members followed the rules they set up as a community (which as far as I can tell are similar to nlwiki's rules, and stricter than the minimum required by the stewards).
• The members worked on the wiki seriously in Incubator, and continue to work on it seriously in its own subdomain.

Given the situation, I personally would recommend a six-month starting term, which is at the longer end of usual practice for administrators in new wikis. Once the community becomes a little more established in its own subdomain, you and they can figure out what the proper term should be. But this election is certainly every bit as legitimate as any other RfA in a new subdomain. StevenJ81 (talk) ('crat on Incubator) 20:31, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

What is "a little more established"? 3 regular editors? 10 regular editors? 50 regular editors? The Banner (talk) 21:01, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

The short answer is: if it's 3 regular editors, future administrators will remain temporary. If it's 50, they may become permanent. That's why I say "once it's established, they can decide". It's up to the stewards, not me. StevenJ81 (talk) 21:29, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

. --MF-W 00:05, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

- Objection, we are a community with rules. This project is reopened. We did everything by the rules that were put there by the community. It's a false statement that we elected ourselves: I did not elect for my candidacy, neither did Huhbakker. The rules state that this appointment is not temporary, so it should be granted for a undetermined time. Please stick to the rules of this particular project and decide according to the project rules. Ymnes (talk) 03:34, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

I like to add: before Dutch Wikinews went to Incubator, there was an active admin team. In Incubator there was an active admin team. I can imagine when a new community is formed, adminship is temporary. However here it is an existing team that likes to continue, and does not want to be put back in time. There has been an active admin team (not just temporary), so it should be implemented here too. Romaine (talk) 15:58, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

In those years all together 12 moderators (=administrators) and 2 bureaucrats. (see the list here) Ymnes (talk) 16:25, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

There was an active admin team on the wiki at some time in the past: yes, possible. But irrelevant. The wiki would not have been closed if they had been active at the time of the closure. Also, there was no "active admin team" on Incubator. Wn/nl had 0 test-admins. --MF-W 19:20, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

Of course you are. Ubi societas, ibi et ius. I do not dispute that the election happened in accordance with your rules. I also do not understand why Ruslik wrote that comment to which I did not make a reference (as seen by the indentation). I gave you temporary adminship because of our (stewards') policies. --MF-W 19:20, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

But our community has composed rules for our project. Can you please re-look wether you may be held to ours? The current situation doesn't help our project, because we need to be able to appoint bureaucrats and bot bits as well. Ymnes (talk) 20:25, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

@Ymnes: This is normal procedure for a new project or a newly started project. That doesn't make a difference. And whether there are local rules or not doesn't matter either. The only thing that's been looked at is the size of the project, that means how many active users are on it. Right now the Dutch Wikinews is still in it's early days and then we always appoint temporary admins. That doesn't mean you will never become a permanent admin. Just that you need to re-apply after six months; then we will look at it again and see if the community has grown. Right now you have admin rights and can do whatever admins need to do. I'd advice you to focus on creating new articles and establishing a community. Your response that you need to be able to appoint bureaucrats and bot bits as well is nonsense. You don't need to appoint bureaucrats right now; the stewards serve as bureaucrats when a project doesn't yet have any, and they can also add bot bits when needed. The request page for that is SRB. Should you have more questions, do ask please. We're always happy to help. With regards, 12:35, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

I don't talk nonsense when I say that we don't want to be dependent on a foreign language stewart page. People come here from all kind of projects and don't know anything about the project at all. There is activity enough and we are far better off without Meta than with Meta. A lot of instruments overhere don't work so perfectly as they are presented here. Look alone the language committee. But a remark as Ruslik made, is also very untrue, and your statement that our project is new is as well. We have restarted, not started. Yet 3 people are back from then and around 26 people have come to edit in the last 10 days (see here, 10 days because we restarted at 5 July). We are adults. Please let us decide without this English page of Wikimedia. Ymnes (talk) 12:42, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

On a foreign language stewart [sic] page - you know I'm Dutch, so if that's the problem, just approach me. 13:33, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

Well, if you advice to write articles (and to be silent?), I really don't get your point. Being Dutch is just half of the story. Dutch Wikipedians didn't understand the project before the relaunch when it was presented to the language committee. The negativity was even sickening, and that's where we want to stay out. The project has had 12 administrators and 2 bureaucrats before. In the last days it's getting really populated again. What is your point anyway? Is it a matter of losing power of the stewards? Than it's not a fair process... This isn't a new projects here, but an existing one that restarted. We have a set of rules and are being overruled by other language stewards (you just came in). Please stop this arguing and accept that Dutch Wikinews is running again. Ymnes (talk) 14:18, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

And the necessity of more self dependence was not even expressed by me, but are written here by an experienced Wikimedian. The words are "in Dutch", what nearly no-one can read here. Other Wikinewsers do better understand, and even wrote an article on the reopening op Dutch Wikinews[14] Ymnes (talk) 16:04, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

Like I said: this is normal procedure for any new project or newly started project. It has nothing to do with you or this specific project. And I'm not even going to respond to your insinuation that the stewards might fear that they lose power. As if we're bored. Right. 16:20, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

There are some responses here that I don't like either. And why you write 'new' twice in one sentence, where this is untrue is incomprehensible. The fact that it isn't new, is the case. Are the regulations written down or a kind of common law? It looks like no real argument counts. Ymnes (talk) 16:41, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

Speaking as a former steward who already "lost power": in the past when stewards used to hand out permanent administrative rights to very small / new wikis with little community scrutiny (few voters), quite often the newly elected admins either became inactive after a few months and were never seen again, or it turns out that they started misusing their tools. In both cases it is then hard for stewards, or really anyone, to do anything about it; in the latter scenario, that is why RFC is full of complaints about broken small Wikimedia projects. Temporary adminship gives the community a chance to reevaluate after 6 months. --Rschen7754 17:17, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

The problem of Meta is the lack of affinity with this reopened project. It was revived in the incubator in 2012, in 2016 and again from January 2017. Until the start, two users worked 6 months, one 5 months and one 2 months to revive a news project. The definition of news is that it is old after one week. They all worked in vane during this time, to really understand the eager to restart it. In the last period since the application to get it reopened, it took two full months to produce news of which was known to be old when it would be reopened. The slow mode of the Language Committee took me to motivate two users to stay because they had really had it with the whole system. Don't tell me that quitters are born in the incubator. I know that you didn't say it so cruelly, but all the replies here show a lack of affinity with this project.

Looking back of what happens here at Meta again and again, is to meet the blogging society, like Wikipedians nagging - as if they have a magic glass sphere: "´we know that this is not going to work´" (if you had known him, you would have known he is multi blocked in English and Dutch, and just ruining our appetite). Another one nagging about things that can actually be said about him. Again another one that is hardly there any more on the projects.

Than at the reopening the whole project should be refixed, and gladly after ten days another heavy editor came to help us. Since we have to do it all by ourselves, and still we make it.

Meanwhile the project was edited yet by 26 different users, our articles are being translated to other Wikinews languages and a Amsterdam programmer asked about the possibilities to use the news on organization websites he develops. Be sure, our project is sexy! You don't quit such a thing.

So is it justified that we don't want to be here anymore on Meta. We don't want this negativity around of people that don't know how well it is functioning. 6 frameworks of news, filled on a regular basis, and all kinds of issues other Wikinews editions didn't even think of to bind readers and writers. This is what it is and what has been achieved. No, this project has not been built by quitters.

So far the motivational/emotional plead. But now the rules. I can understand that you hardly see reopened projects, but this Wikinews has its own set rules and they existed when the applications begun for the adminships. Whatever jurisdiction you may have, it doesn't apply here. One can say, why does it matter to apply after six months again...: the answer is just because no-one likes to be overruled by someone that doesn't have the right. Ymnes (talk) 19:23, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

The case is closed and you are welcome back in six month with a new request. If you want to change the practice regarding small wikis and temporary status you are welcome to bring that discussion to a more suitable location. Please don't change the status on closed cases. -- Tegel _(Talk) 19:31, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

On the basis of what rules do you decide? They don't exist here, do they?! Ymnes (talk) 19:47, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

Yemnes - Since you seems to be unhappy with this whole process, here is what our handbook advises on this situation "If the wiki has no community, or if it has too few active users to hold a meaningful discussion of the issue, it is probably advisable to grant temporary rather than permanent rights. Three months is a common period for temporary rights.". Here is the section you can read it from. Now, please stop pushing for it and build a good community on the project you have taken upon yourself to maintain. Please do realize that the project is still a wikimedia project and the governance and support that applies to such a project will always apply to your newly built project as well. --Jyothis (talk) 01:15, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

Apparently it's normal to give commands to others over here, but please understand that the willing are not the trolls. The behaviour over here should really change. At least you gave a link to the handbook. Thank you at least for that. Ymnes (talk) 06:48, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

extended — regards, 15:08, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Expiring: 16 January 2018

LIVE NIEUWS@nl.wikinews

Please can you give LIVE NIEUWS administrator rights for a undetermined time. He has been elected by our community with rules set by our community. Dutch Wikinews is a reopened project that has run since 2005, not a new one, so our community decides on these issues. Might you decide differently, please state why and on the basis of which current agreements set by the Meta community (with a link please). Ymnes (talk) 22:36, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

. The reason was already explained. - On a completely unrelated note, if you answer on my Incubator talk page, I can proceed with that stuff mentioned there. --MF-W 01:05, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

Yemnes - before you start asking for Link and commenting about this being temp, I just replied to you on the other long discussion with the same. --Jyothis (talk) 01:16, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

removed — regards, 15:07, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Expiring: 23 January 2018

DARIO SEVERI@pt.wikivoyage

This wiki doesn't have any bureaucrats and the last admins edit was on 24 august 2016 [15]. There is no against votes (4 support votes) for my permanent adminship request. Permanent adminship is hereby kindly requested.. The news about the request was also posted in the Wikivoyage:Bar dos viajantes on January, 09. [16]. DARIO SEVERI (talk) 01:02, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

. --MF-W 15:45, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

extended — regards, 15:07, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Expiring: 24 January 2018

Castelobranco@eowiktionary

Request for permanent adminship. 11:55, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

. Due to the limited community size on eo.wiktionary, it seems to me wiser to grant this request for 1 year. Savh^ñ 20:36, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

Ok, no problem. Thanks! 20:39, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

removed — regards, 15:06, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Expiring: 27 January 2018

MKar@orwikisource

What is the requirement criteria so that a community will be considered as a big community ? Is our community eligible to elect a permanent administrator ? Mrutyunjaya Kar (talk) 14:30, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

That will depend on the size of the regular editing community. I'm putting this request on hold, to allow for a week of local discussion (to be considered on 26 January 2017) – Ajraddatz (talk) 15:57, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

. Savh^ñ 01:07, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

removed — regards, 15:06, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Expiring: 28 January 2018

Romaine@nl.wikinews

Please grant Romaine administrator rights. He has been elected according to our procedure of two weeks, starting from 14th July, with full majority. Ymnes (talk) 21:25, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

. --MF-W 22:32, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

removed — regards, 15:05, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Wolverène@biwikipedia

Hello. Please provide me adminship rights on the Bislama Wikipedia. There are no administrators and I'm ready to be one who works against the vandalism/spam/nonsense pages. We can start from the temporary access. More info in the local discussion (see above). Thank you in advance. --Wolverène (talk) 11:55, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

On hold till 27 October 2017. Ruslik (talk) 17:43, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. Ruslik (talk) 19:20, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

Thanks, I'll start working right now. :) --Wolverène (talk) 20:39, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

removed — regards, 15:05, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Expiring: 30 January 2018

Voskanyan@hywikiquote

--ԱշոտՏՆՂ (talk) 11:55, 28 January 2017 (UTC)

I can't see any confirmation that Voskanyan wants to be an admin there. --Stryn (talk) 12:51, 28 January 2017 (UTC)

I want to be an administrator on Armenian Wikiquote.--Voskanyan (talk) 07:50, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

. Savh^ñ 09:59, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

removed — regards, 15:04, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Wong128hk@zhwikiquote

Please grant me the temporary sysop flag. -- 05:15, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

Please hold on. I cannot trust this guy using the page for off-topic criticism without sincerely considering my questioning. Too many very new users are inflating the votes.--Jusjih (talk) 02:18, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

I asked this guy why he would nominate something for deletion on Chinese Wikibooks but then delete in just six days without asking other administrators, but he responded too aggressively and made the discussion too unfriendly, i.e. criticizing others without willingness to consider others' criticism. That is no place to do that, so restarting the vote may be desirable, if not entirely rejecting this request. Once again, please be wary of very new users inflating the votes.--Jusjih (talk) 02:26, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

It is because you frequently exaggerate the minor problems of others and you have the tendency to harass other users. Your comments here is the reason why I need to post out what you have done on different small wikis. Your comments here no doubt that can be used to verify what I have said and show that your comments are of low value to take as a reference. You have raised out that it is a misconduct during handling the deletions of two pages on zh.wikibooks. I have described the contents of that two pages and what the situations were during that time. As an admin, did you handle the case "on time"? Nope. "數字算式寶塔的推廣" which is the page I proposed to delete on 3 Feb 2017. You didn't handle it "on time". Let it be there for a month. Eventually, I needed to delete it by myself. [17] There is no guideline about how long should a RFD last for on zh.wikibooks. You have edited during that period. You're an experienced admin. I do believe that you should have checked the RFD page regularly as an admin. There is no objection on RFD regarding that page. No one can prove that it is not an original research. I don't see any problems regarding that deletion. For the wikibooks page regarding mahjong, I have described the problems of that page also. The problems are still there. Those users are not "new users". They all are actively contributing on zh.wiki. All wikimedia projects share a similar principle. The regulation may be different though. Therefore, they have the ability and eligibility to comment on RFA on other projects, especially the small projects in same language. Just like they have the ability and eligibility to comment on whether a user suitable to be a steward. Isn't it?-- 12:00, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

We generally discourage users being brought in from other wikis to vote on requests. The local community should be able to decide who is an admin, even if the local community is very small. That said, I see consensus among the active local community to grant temporary access, though I would like a second opinion from another steward first. – Ajraddatz (talk) 20:56, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

I strongly disagree your theory of my harassing others. I was just asking why nominate a page to delete then delete it in just six days (too fast), not whether that would be original research. Why reacted so harshly and impatiently to my simple question? And why close my being nominated for adminship on Chinese Wikibooks back on 24 August 2010 too fast [18] when the only bureaucrat was Shizhao but not you, without asking Shizhao first? (That act exceeded your adminship.) Please note that your patience, and politeness have yet to improve in order to be a truly trusted administrator, by considering phrases like "please, thanks, excuse me, sorry" (請﹑謝謝﹑對不起﹑遺憾). Thanks for your acknowledging my experienced adminship and this is why I tend to have higher standard for adminship. Excuse me, if anyone's higher standard for adminship is your big concern, sorry, then please use your existing adminship more cautiously, rather than applying for it on more wikis. Other than Wikipedia, Chinese wikis tend to be too small to have sizable community to quickly monitor the activities. Thanks for discouraging cross-wiki voting. Before granting adminship, please also carefully consider that impatient administrator may lack trust. Thanks.--Jusjih (talk) 23:38, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

It is a norm to not using admin tools with COI. It seems that your high standard do not apply everywhere. For instance, the revisions containing the criticisms to you. [19]

Actually, it is a same problem between the issue of AFD and the RFA of yours. There is no rules about how long should a AFD last for. And I received no objection about deleting that page not until now. No one can show us it is not a original research. It can be SNOW. On the other hand, there was a threshold of receiving at least six votes to be valid. Anyone can be the person to judge whether a RFA received six votes. I was the one supporting you to be sysop of zh.wikibooks during two RFA. I regret that I have not raised out the problems of having too high threshold at the VP on time. But it does not mean that I agree not to follow the rule. You may say, "hey Wikipedia is not bureaucracy. We should ignore the rule that hinder the development of the wiki." I will say these rules should be used with extra caution and not with subjective view. In your case, either a steward or a bureaucrat should raise out a objective based evidence to ignore the threshold of receiving at least six votes to be valid. For example, raise out the actual differences of the numbers of active users between two periods of time and show that the difference is significant enough. Ummm... To improve the situation, I think I should freeze your RFA and raise out the discussion at Village Pump to change the threshold. If you think that your first RFA can be SNOW to pass, it is strange that you are not agree with the closure of a RFD with SNOW, with "Wikipedia is not bureaucracy" and with "Ignore all rules".

I am sorry that I lose my temper and patient to one who always WP:POINT, forces other to follow his suggestions, double standards and do not think that he got any mistakes even there is a user with plenty amount of contribution was forced to leave BY HIM.

That's all. -- 03:42, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

It is my fault if you think that it is a norm that RFD should at least last for a week and I deleted a page that should be deleted a day before. I apologize for it.-- 04:00, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

In addition to your latest apology, please also understand that:

1. Requesting adminship implies consent to be examined by the community. Candidates are to adapt to the community, including reasonable criticism, not the community adapting to candidates. Even unreasonable criticism has to be politely answered to get the sympathy from disinterested third party.
2. Criticizing existing and prospective administrators, bureaucrats, etc, is routinely inevitable. For example, I got this at least once in 2015 [20] when asked about how active I was as a bureaucrat on Wikimedia Commons. I accepted the criticism and resigned, but remaining an administrator there has been much easier.
3. Therefore, please also consider apologizing for excessively long counter-criticism here and on Chinese Wikiquote. With nothing personal, power-hungry impatience is bad for adminship. Thanks.--Jusjih (talk) 04:14, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

Nope. I won't beg for the sympathy. "真理越辯越明" (The more the truth is debated, the clearer the truth becomes.) Throughout the debates here and on zh.wikiquote, it is proven that your criticisms are unreasonable. To consider a serial of events I mentioned before, it is clearly proven that your objection is of low value. I just point out the fact. You request I need to treat you politely. So have you politely treated Wcjd? Have you apologized for what you have done on him? Speaking "please, sorry, excuse me, etc" does not make you polite, if you do not do it with respect to others. Doing these thing without respect; it can be called as hypocritical. -- 11:06, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

Good grief, this is m:SRP, not w:en:WP:ANI. --Rs