Steward requests/Permissions/2015-02

Administrator access


I request temporary admin rights on ace.wikipedia for maintenance work only. No sysop at all, and now there are nor elections nor a lively community to vote.To be able to delete empty articles,block LTA, remove vandalism and move or protect pages.Grind24 (talk) 13:20, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Hello Grind24, you'll have to post a notification to a public noticeboard/discussion board on the local wiki anyway. Then, after at least seven days you can get here to request the rights. The (even non-existing) community needs to be given a chance to review the request. -Barras talk 13:29, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
I have now put a notification to a public noticeboard [1] and administrator right request page.As you said, we will wait seven days for community review.Grind24 (talk) 14:00, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

  On hold until 7 February  — billinghurst sDrewth 14:04, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Closed as unsuccessful by ex-admin Rachmat Wahidi w:ace:Special:diff/85833, Billinghurst.--AldNonUcallin?☎ 05:53, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
Not done per local closure. Ajraddatz (talk) 05:54, 4 February 2015 (UTC)


Currently, There is no administrator on Urdu Wiktionary (See list) , An administrator is important for such an important educational project, I request to grant me Administrator as well as Bureaucrat rights to help in the improvement and development of Urdu Wiktionary project.--عثمان خان شاہ (talk) 20:44, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

Admins are appointed by a consensus of the community so you will need to make your request there, and after a week stewards will evaluate it. Please link to any such discussion in the template field above. I do not think that stewards will be appointing crats to the wiki, there is no evident requirement.  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:53, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
the page is linked.--عثمان خان شاہ (talk) 17:37, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
Since future request for permissions (until a sufficient community will be built) should be managed here on meta, we won't probably give you bureacrat flag. The opposal(s) seems to deal with bureaucratship instead of adminship, then please update the local discussion. --Vituzzu (talk) 12:22, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  •   On hold Until February 11. -- Avi (talk) 17:49, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
    • I do not know Urdu, and Google translate is choppy, but it seems to me that the opposition posed by Irfan Ashad is significant in that it relates to both an incomplete knowledge of Urdu by the requester and behavioural concerns about the candidate. I would tend to close this as no consensus to approve, but it would be better if we had someone who knows Urdu (better than Google) confirm or refute my understanding. -- Avi (talk) 17:32, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
      • After talking with an Urdu speaker (albiet ur-1) it seems that most of the comments are directed at the candidate's poor understand of the language or wiki policies. With one support and one oppose, as well as dissenting comments, I am closing this as not done. Ajraddatz (talk) 23:20, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
        • Concur. -- Avi (talk) 03:19, 15 February 2015 (UTC)


This user has unanimous support in the voting.--Աշոտ1997 (talk) 20:31, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

Done. SPQRobin (talk) 21:08, 15 February 2015 (UTC)


Thanks, --Florence (talk) 22:52, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

The current temporary term still lasts until 19 March. --MF-W 21:28, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
This isn't a new vote either; it's the same one that originally granted the user temporary access. That said, with 8 support votes, and the other two admins being permanent, I think it would be acceptable to grant permenant adminship (or a longer temp run) instead of temporary access for 3 months. Ajraddatz (talk) 19:29, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
You may ask when later closer to expiration day Mardetanha talk 13:53, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
متشکرم. مشکلی نیست. من به اشتباه برج دو را با سه اشتباه گرفتم. درود --Florence (talk) 14:01, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
خواهش می‌کنم، دوستدار شما Mardetanha talk 14:14, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

Marek Mazurkiewicz@plwikinews

Closed as successful. Unfortunately, our bureaucrat is inactive (he will lose his rights soon). Last time a member of our community also got rights from a steward. Please, put this request "on hold" if necessary. Openbk (talk) 23:28, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

Done. Given your community has a local bureaucrat (though inactive), and the precedent from the past request, I've granted permanent adminship. Regards, Ajraddatz (talk) 19:19, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

Bureaucrat access

محمد مجیب@sdwiki

(I want to be Bureaucrtas on Sindhi wikipedia --محمد مجیب (talk) 10:45, 4 February 2015 (UTC))

For a small community with no admin requests, there is no requirement for bureaucrats on that wiki.  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:51, 4 February 2015 (UTC)


Iopensa is the general manager for Wikimania 2016 and can take care of giving out further flags for the setup of the wiki. The discussion for her role was conducted as part of the bid process. For what it's worth, she already administers other wikis. Nemo 12:47, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

Done. I would have given the sysop flag but she can assign it herself anyway though now. Cheers, —DerHexer (Talk) 12:50, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

CheckUser access


The French Arbcom has appointed Superjuju10 as a CU. For the French Arbcom, Laszlo french (talk) 14:53, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

  On hold pending identification. Trijnsteltalk 21:08, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
  Done. Trijnsteltalk 22:11, 2 February 2015 (UTC)


The French Arbcom has appointed JeanBono as a CU. For the French Arbcom, Laszlo french (talk) 14:53, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

  On hold pending identification. Trijnsteltalk 21:08, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
  Done. Trijnsteltalk 13:45, 4 February 2015 (UTC)


Lechatjaune was elected for a one-year term as checkuser (44/1/0). As former member of Arbitration Committee, he is already been identified. Thanks in advance. Érico Wouters (msg) 19:14, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

  Done. Trijnsteltalk 20:15, 6 February 2015 (UTC)


Per linked local policy, due to the result of RfCU (97% votes in favour), I hereby request granting Wpedzich Check User privileges at plwiki. Wpedzich has already identified himself to WMF. Einsbor (talk) 21:56, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

  Done. Trijnsteltalk 22:00, 6 February 2015 (UTC)


The French Arbcom has appointed Akeron as a CU. For the French Arbcom, Laszlo french (talk) 14:53, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

  On hold pending identification. Trijnsteltalk 21:08, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
  Done :) Trijnsteltalk 23:19, 14 February 2015 (UTC)


  •   Done. -- Mentifisto 18:09, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
    Luckily, the vote has not finished yet, but do go ahead. odder (talk) 18:29, 14 February 2015 (UTC)


Csigabi was elected as CheckUser on hu.wikipedia. Hunyadym (talk) 09:22, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

  On hold pending identification. Trijnsteltalk 13:10, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
  Done. Trijnsteltalk 23:09, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

Oversight access

User Snowolf@enwiki

Per [3]. LFaraone (talk) 16:33, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

  Done. Trijnsteltalk 16:35, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

User Bonaditya@idwiki

Clear consensus there. -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 03:33, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

  Done ping @Trijnstel: @Snowolf: for ml/irc accesses. --Vituzzu (talk) 12:10, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
Done for IRC. There is no such thing as a global oversight mailing list (in contrary to cu-l), so nothing more for me to do. Trijnsteltalk 23:37, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

Removal of access

Benoit Rochon@wikidatawiki

Unfortunately, Benoit Rochon no longer meets the local activity requirement of performing at least 10 admin actions over the last 6 months and thus is to be removed as an administrator. Vogone (talk) 00:38, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

  •   Done Please thank the user for their service. -- Avi (talk) 08:40, 1 February 2015 (UTC)


Unfortunately, Tpt no longer meets the local activity requirement of performing at least 10 admin actions over the last 6 months and thus is to be removed as an administrator. Vogone (talk) 00:38, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

  •   Done Please thank the user for their service. -- Avi (talk) 08:40, 1 February 2015 (UTC)


User didnt run for re-election on SVWP, and their annual period ended in end of January. /Hangsna (talk) 08:12, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

Done, thanks for their service. Ajraddatz (talk) 08:23, 1 February 2015 (UTC)


User didnt run for re-election on SVWP, and their annual period ended in end of January. /Hangsna (talk) 08:12, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

See sv:Special:Diff/29272930. -- Innocent bystander (talk) 08:18, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
Done, thanks for their service. Ajraddatz (talk) 08:23, 1 February 2015 (UTC)


User didnt run for re-election on SVWP, and their annual period ended in end of January. /Hangsna (talk) 08:12, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

Done, thanks for their service. Ajraddatz (talk) 08:24, 1 February 2015 (UTC)


User didnt run for re-election on SVWP, and their annual period ended in end of January. /Hangsna (talk) 08:12, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

Done, thanks for their service. Ajraddatz (talk) 08:25, 1 February 2015 (UTC)


User didnt run for re-election on SVWP, and their annual period ended in end of January. /Hangsna (talk) 08:12, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

Done, thanks for their service. Ajraddatz (talk) 08:25, 1 February 2015 (UTC)


Hexasoft did not ask for a renewal of his CU rights and was therefore not renewed as a CU. Local discussion is here. For the French Arbcom, Laszlo french (talk) 14:53, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

  Done Ruslik (talk) 19:54, 2 February 2015 (UTC)


Mmenal did not ask for a renewal of his CU rights and was therefore not renewed as a CU. Local discussion is here. For the French Arbcom, Laszlo french (talk) 14:53, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

  Done Ruslik (talk) 19:56, 2 February 2015 (UTC)


Back in 2006, I accepted Bastique's nomination to become the first Asian language bureaucrat, but as the roles of bureaucrats have reduced with no more user renaming, I am voluntarily resigning as a bureaucrat, but keeping my administrator flag.--Jusjih (talk) 03:43, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

  On hold for a day--Shanmugamp7 (talk) 04:24, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
Done--Shanmugamp7 (talk) 05:00, 3 February 2015 (UTC)


Hafenbar made no edit or log entry in the past 365 days. Please remove his sysop flag per local policy. Regards, NNW (talk) 17:38, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Done. SPQRobin (talk) 18:08, 4 February 2015 (UTC)


Removal of sysop and Bureaucrat flags after community discussion. Discussion time limit has elapsed. Results were eight (8) for removal (of both admin and bureaucrat flags) and three (3) for keep. Community agreed that this was simply due to inactivity and would be considered "without prejudice". Thank you, ---- Cirt (talk) 00:57, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

  Done Ruslik (talk) 20:23, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
This is now moot because the discussion has been re-closed but, for future reference, policy at en.wikiquote is that only local Bureaucrats should close a vote of confidence and bring the request here. ~ Ningauble (talk) 21:59, 6 February 2015 (UTC)


Quadell was asked by BD2412 if he planned to be active again on Wikiquote. His response: "I have no plans to work on Wikiquote again, but if I do, it won't be in the capacity of an administrator. Thanks.Quadell" I followed up and asked if it would be alright for me to ask a Steward to remove his sysop rights DIFF. Quadell replied: "That would be fine." Thank you, ---- Cirt (talk) 21:00, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

Done. --MF-W 00:34, 8 February 2015 (UTC)


Removal of Bureaucrat and Sysop flags. Currently inactive at Wikiquote due to education obligations. I asked if it would be alright for me to ask a Steward to remove both his Bureaucrat and Sysop rights, and he replied, "Sure." Please note that this is "without prejudice", and not "under a cloud", simply inactivity because of schooling. Thank you, ---- Cirt (talk) 11:27, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

  Done--Vituzzu (talk) 11:58, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

Hayabusa future@id.wikipedia

I'd like to request for my oversight access in removed as I have been inactive for quite a long period of time. --Hayabusa future (talk) 09:30, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

  Done Thanks for your past work as OS--Shanmugamp7 (talk) 09:50, 9 February 2015 (UTC)


--Bencmq (talk) 15:21, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

  •   On hold 24 hours per SOP. -- Avi (talk) 15:23, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
    • Oops, sorry I did not specify. Please remove CU and keep the rest :) --Bencmq (talk) 15:25, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
    • :-( Trijnsteltalk 15:27, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
      • We usually wait 24 hours for self-reqs anyway. -- Avi (talk) 15:28, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • FWIW, I still think removing rights from oneself anywhere is no problem at all. --MF-W 16:03, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
    • People can want to relinquish any right in a fit of pique, not just adminship. Waiting for self-req's doesn't cause any harm and may even prevent regret. If there is reason time is of the essence (compromised account), then that should be communicated directly. -- Avi (talk) 01:44, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
@Hoo man: Seems the log entry is not there for this also. Can you please look into this?. Thanks.--Shanmugamp7 (talk) 05:34, 11 February 2015 (UTC)


I inform stewards to remove my rights from Sanskrit Wikipedia as i have taken retirement from Wikipedia and not active on wikipedia since a long time. I also request to remove any right if assigned to me from any wikipedia. My user account can also be deleted if possible. With Regards --Mayur (talkEmail) 11:45, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

  •   On hold Standard operating procedure for self-requests. -- Avi (talk) 15:24, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
    • For what it's worth, we do not delete accounts. The only other wiki you are a sysop on is testwiki @Snowolf: --Rschen7754 02:23, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
Done, removed sysop rights on sa wiki.--Shanmugamp7 (talk) 12:36, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Abuse filter@angwikibooks

  1. Per Closing projects policy, all sysops should be removed.
  2. angwikibooks is closed and will not be reopened per Language proposal policy, and sysop flag of this account is useless as abuse filter will block nobody. --GZWDer (talk) 04:24, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
  •   Done Thank him for his service. Should it be re-opened, per policy, have him link to this request fro reactivation. -- Avi (talk) 04:33, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
    • This is a MediaWiki software account, not a person. While I don't object to this, it doesn't really do anything since nobody will be blocked by the software on a wiki that isn't edited. --Rschen7754 04:35, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
      • Always pays to remove unused vectors of access, IMO (safe and sorry et al). -- Avi (talk) 15:22, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
        • Even when it is a system account, i.e. operated by extension only? Would it be likewise prudent to block "MediaWiki default" or "Global rename script" to make sure that they are never abused (even though, like this, they can't be)? IMO this was a silly action and response, but it isn't worth changing at this point. Ajraddatz (talk) 15:26, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
          • Not block, but remove rights. It's just safer overall, IMO. -- Avi (talk) 15:30, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
            • I think that, from a practical point of view, removal has no effects at all. --Vituzzu (talk) 11:47, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
            • Indeed, the "rights" are hard-coded and global abuse filters are managed from meta. If this was indeed about security, then one would rather disable the entire AbuseFilter extension on angwikibooks … Vogone (talk) 17:55, 12 February 2015 (UTC)


VIGNERON * discut. 11:55, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

  On hold SOP for self-requests. -- Avi (talk) 15:23, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
24h later, I confirm my request for removal of my admin rights on the Breton Wikipedia. A galon, VIGNERON * discut. 11:42, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
Done. Thank you for your service. Savhñ 11:58, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
Thank you. I'm still around and still sysop on numerous other wikimedia projects ;) Cdlt, VIGNERON * discut. 17:20, 12 February 2015 (UTC)


The above user inactive in last 2 year. Please remove his Bureaucrat and Administrator access as per community decision. this link is rule for inactive Administrator and Bureaucrat users. Thank you--Roshankerala (talk) 07:02, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

  • I see that Junaidpv has not edited MlWiki since 2013-07-10 10:13. Unfortunately, Google translate is rather choppy on those pages; the best I can make out is a discussion of 50 edits in 6 months or a year, but I cannot see whee anything was approved. Can you please state what is MlWiki's authoritative policy for administrator and bureaucrat activity in English, please? Thank you for your patience. -- Avi (talk) 15:29, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Policy: 1 കഴിഞ്ഞ ആറു മാസത്തിനുള്ളിൽ ഒരു തിരുത്തു പോലും നടത്തിയിട്ടില്ല., = Minimum 1 edit must in last 6 months
  • 2 കഴിഞ്ഞ ഒരു വർഷത്തിനുള്ളിൽ അമ്പതു തിരുത്തുകൾ നടത്തിയിട്ടില്ല. = AND minimum 50 edits must in last year.--Roshankerala (talk) 06:15, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
  •   Done. Please thank the user for his service, although he probably wont see it, not having logged an edit in so long. -- Avi (talk) 17:26, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Yes. Thanks--Roshankerala (talk) 05:21, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

ChristianBier, Effeietsanders, Grin, Guillom, J Milburn, Juliancolton, TheDJ, Zirland @ Wikimedia Commons

Due to our inactivity policy (criterion #3), I hereby request the removal of administrator rights from the aforementioned users. They have all been listed in the previous inactivity run and failed to perform the required number of admin actions in the past six months (see exact statistics). Thank you! odder (talk) 20:30, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

  Done. -- Mentifisto 21:04, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
@Mentifisto: Thank you! I have now contacted all those users and left them short notes, thanking for their service to the Commons community. odder (talk) 21:18, 14 February 2015 (UTC)


  Done (and re-formatted). -- Mentifisto 02:30, 15 February 2015 (UTC)


inactive for 6 months, and still no edits for 1 month after notification, per local policy the sysop access should be removed.--Kegns 23:14, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

Done. Savhñ 08:38, 17 February 2015 (UTC)


inactivity, ditto.--Kegns 23:14, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

Done, thank you. Savhñ 08:39, 17 February 2015 (UTC)


Please remove my administrator access. Thank you!--6AND5 (talk) 19:36, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

  On hold for 24 hours. Ruslik (talk) 19:51, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
Hello, time has ended.--6AND5 (talk) 15:46, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
Done, though 2 more hours remaining in the 24 hours period. Thanks --Shanmugamp7 (talk) 17:26, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
Thanks--6AND5 (talk) 17:35, 19 February 2015 (UTC)


A community consensus has been reached to remove Nanobug's admin rights due to over eight years of inactivity and failure to provide e-mail contact ability, as required by our project. BD2412 T 23:29, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

Done. Savhñ 23:35, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

~Pyb @ Wikimedia Commons

Please kindly remove administrator privileges from the account of ~Pyb. Upon the users' own request, they will be moved to a different account operated by them (see the discussion above for details). Thank you. odder (talk) 11:34, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

Done--Shanmugamp7 (talk) 11:38, 20 February 2015 (UTC)


Please remove my administrator privileges. Raghith (talk) 06:45, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

  On hold for 1 day, standard for resignation of advanced permissions  — billinghurst sDrewth 13:04, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
  Done. -- Mentifisto 07:20, 22 February 2015 (UTC)


Ou0430 (talk) 07:06, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

  Done. -- Mentifisto 07:20, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
Thank you.Ou0430 (talk) 07:32, 22 February 2015 (UTC)


    • While this is non-controversial, as commons is a home wiki for me, I'll hold off for now. There is no reason to wait 24 hours; the waiting occurred on the commons already. -- Avi (talk) 17:55, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
Done, thanks for their service. Ajraddatz (talk) 19:15, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Checkusers and oversighters on nowiki

We (the functionaries) came to the conlusion that the need for these tools on the Norwegian Wikipedia, since the volume is so low that the tools are rarely used, and hence we don't feel confident with how to use the tools when we need them. We would rather have this function served by the stewards, who are more competent in their use. The discussion where this was decided is archived on no:Wikipedia:Tinget/Arkiv/2014-48#Avslutning av IP-kontrollør funksjon (CU). If you require any information, translation or clarification, just ping me. Jon Harald Søby (talk) 19:09, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Thanks Jon for the explanation, this is a very responsible act. --Nemo 19:14, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
  •   Done Thank you all for your service and volunteer activities. -- Avi (talk) 19:16, 23 February 2015 (UTC)


  1. Samsam22
  2. Eskandarany
  3. Ramsis_II
  4. Mahmudmasri

--ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 10:13, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

@ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2: is there a local policy about inactivity? Would you please do a very short summary of its contents. Is there a local discussion that has taken place to which you can provide a wikilink? Thanks.  — billinghurst sDrewth 10:16, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
I think we can safely close this request as "not done". The user hasn't edited arzwiki since 7 August 2014 and I doubt he knows a lot about the local policies with his 200 local edits there... (Though, correct me if I'm wrong!) Trijnsteltalk 23:27, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
  •   Not done -- Avi (talk) 15:40, 24 February 2015 (UTC)


inactivity: 3 visits in 4 years inactive since more than a year as per local policy thus all privileges must be removed, sysop privilege not used since 4 years. --Kasallamä (talk) 17:30, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

It looks like they were active as recent as yesterday. Ajraddatz (talk) 18:00, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
That was last year. We've 2015 now. --Kasallamä (talk) 06:53, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
  On hold until 28 Feb 2015 Only a couple of days past a year. I have pinged the user on their talk page and asked them to respond here within the week.  — billinghurst sDrewth 13:03, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
  Done einsbor talk 23:36, 28 February 2015 (UTC)


DaB. missed the affirmation of 2/3 of the voters in his sysop re-election. NNW (talk) 15:23, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

  •   Done Please thank DaB for his service. -- Avi (talk) 16:20, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

Temporary permissions (expired and rejected requests only)


Global IPBE, see Steward requests/Global permissions/2015-01#‎Global IP block exempt for Mjbmr. — Revi 08:13, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

removed --Shanmugamp7 (talk) 03:09, 4 February 2015 (UTC)


I request temporary admin rights on sc.wikipedia. One of the two admins is not contributing since 2010, and now there are nor elections nor a lively community to vote.--L2212 (talk) 18:46, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Please, start a local discussion. Ruslik (talk) 18:58, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
  On hold until 7 August election proceeding.  — billinghurst sDrewth 06:43, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
For what it is worth, it seems that the two admins are somewhat active; one as of June 15, the other as of August 3 of this year. However, as they appear for a few edits and then are absent for months, if not years at a time, this will be granted for 6 months.
  •   Granted for 6 months to expire on 2015-02-08. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. -- Avi (talk) 04:39, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
    Expired and removed. Pundit (talk) 08:46, 8 February 2015 (UTC)


(I want to be admin to delete empty articles and improve the kabyle wikipedia.) SalemB (talk) 10:49, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

  On hold till 11 December 2014. Ruslik (talk) 12:30, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
  Granted for 3 months to expire on 2015-2-11. Ajraddatz (talk) 07:12, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
removed Ajraddatz (talk) 07:39, 11 February 2015 (UTC)


I as the local bureaucrat just granted adminship for 2 months to expire on 2015-02-14.--Jusjih (talk) 07:32, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

Expired and removed. Pundit (talk) 06:58, 14 February 2015 (UTC)


—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Zylbath (talk)

On hold until 15 Aug. --MF-W 13:08, 9 August 2013 (UTC)
  Granted for 1 year and 6 months to expire on 2015-02-15. --MF-W 22:23, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
removed Ajraddatz (talk) 03:50, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

Pratyya Ghosh@bnwiktionary

This request will end at 19 February 2014. So I'm requesting here not to remove my right till that time. Now this time I haven't asked permanent sysop bit, but requested for 1 year. Thanks.   --Pratyya (Hello!) 06:18, 13 February 2014 (UTC)

  On hold until 19 February I will make a note on the temporary permissions, and hopefully it will be noticed.  — billinghurst sDrewth 12:10, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
  Granted for 1 year to expire on 2015-02-19. -- Jusjih (talk) 05:20, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
removed Ajraddatz (talk) 06:22, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

Les Meloures@lb.wiktionary

Hi, please can my adminship on lb:Wiktionary be renewed. See please former discussions to avoid to begin the old tralala again. Best Regards --Les Meloures (talk) 14:11, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

  On hold
Instructions on top of this page require that you: a) post a notice to the local wiki; b) use the correct template, pointing to the local (current) discussion or notice. Thank you for your understanding. --M/ (talk) 10:56, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
Please be so kind and have a look at former requests an discussions. I did a compilation here
If you think that my sysopship is not usefull or needed, so please let me know what sysop or stewart I may contact to do all changements on lb:wiktionary. Actually a new user with several IP-logins is using lb:Wiktionary again as playstation. If this project can not be surveyed so we better close it, in despite of all the work that was done and I need no more to beg for adminship. --Les Meloures (talk) 11:38, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
Stewards are not required to - and at least, speaking for me, not capable of - judging your contributions. The requirements for you to get another period of adminship on lb.wiktionary are even simpler: post a notice (just a line saying you are requesting sysop bit) and then come back here after one week. This is not begging, it's only the normal procedure that I cannot change or ignore. You can also have your tools never removed: just post the request one week prior to expiration. Thank you, M/ (talk) 22:07, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
Thank you for your simple answer, that makes me think that you did not read this. I am the only luxemburgish speaking member that is registered, and so the only who is confirmed a nativ speaking member. Why shall i do a post to a community that doesn't exist. Can you explain that nonsense? But i will do it if nonsens is needed. --Les Meloures (talk) 17:42, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
I have read your "history", but our guidelines require that you just "notify" your renewal on wiki. Please do that, it's just one line every year! --M/ (talk) 18:09, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
Is done an I will come back in a week. So far thank you. --Les Meloures (talk) 16:31, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Perfect,   On hold until 25 Feb. --M/ (talk) 17:02, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
  Granted for 1 year to expire on 2015-02-25. -- Jusjih (talk) 02:55, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
removed Ajraddatz (talk) 06:12, 27 February 2015 (UTC)


I have consensus to continue as an administrator.
- Sarrus (ct) 09:22, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

  Granted for 1 year and 6 months to expire on 2015-02-11. --MF-W 01:42, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
extended Ajraddatz (talk) 07:39, 11 February 2015 (UTC)


Please prolong my sysop rights that had been previously granted for three months. At this point only I am active editor․. Thank you.--Beko (talk) 19:40, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

On hold until 12 May 2014. Ajraddatz (talk) 20:36, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
  Granted for 6 months to expire on 2014-11-12. Ajraddatz (talk) 05:17, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
  • extended. Pundit (talk) 06:28, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Expired and removed. Pundit (talk) 11:47, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
  • extended See here. Avi (talk) 16:14, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

محمد مجیب@sdwikipedia

(I want to be admin to delete empty articles and improve the Sindhi wikipedia for always.) محمد مجیب (talk) 2:50, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

Requests should be posted for at least one week. On hold at least until Dec 21. --M/ (talk) 10:45, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
  Granted for 3 months to expire on 2015-02-21. Ajraddatz (talk) 19:17, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

extended --MF-W 02:35, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

Miscellaneous requests

Importers @itwikiversity

In Italian wikiversity there is no active admin. We want to ask if it is possible to have transwiki import permission (module already enabled) to the small set of active users:

There are some pages waiting to be imported for many years in it.wikipedia (w:it:Wikipedia:Proposte_di_trasferimento#Wikiversit.C3.A0) and sometimes some imports for templates are needed. We ask the permissions for more than one user because none of us contributes steadily during the year, and one doesn't have to wait to another user's return to import something. Also I think that transwiki import is not a very powerful permission, so it can be assigned to more than one user. Thank you --Fede Reghe (talk) 07:14, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

  Granted for 1 year to expire on 2016-02-02. transwiki rights; v:it:Special:PermanentLink/85024 local consensus.


Done. —DerHexer (Talk) 13:31, 9 February 2015 (UTC)