Steward requests/Global permissions/2017-02

Requests for global rollback permissions

Global rollback for Kyube

Not ending before 8 February 2017 20:30 UTC

こんにちは。私ではありませんが,User:Kyube アカウントに global rollback の権限を付与していただくことは可能でしょうか?

理由は,複数の Wiki において グローバルに revert の強力な実績があるからです。--Charidri (talk) 20:30, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[]

  • Hi. Generally global rollback is not granted to users who do not request it for themselves. In case Kyube is indeed interested in being granted global rollback access, they should preferably come here and state so. Thank you and kind regards, --Vogone (talk) 20:51, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[]
  • Thank you for Charidri's recommendation. However, I don't intend to acquire any administrative permissions. --Kyube (talk) 01:27, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[]
    Marking as not done; candidate did not accept the nomination. Nor should we have nominations for these permissions. – Ajraddatz (talk) 04:57, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[]

Global rollback for Some Gadget Geek

Not ending before 15 February 2017 14:14 UTC

Hello, I have been actively performing rollbacks on Wikipedia on mainly the English and Simple English Wikipedias. However, I also do occasionally rollback suspicious edits on other language wikis, the most active being frwiki, nlwiki, dewiki, and eswiki. Having one global rollback right on all the wikis will allow me to save the hassle of having to use a tedious undo feature which often results in edit conflicts should the disruptive activity continue, or I be beaten to the revert. Your consideration is greatly appreciated. Thank you, Some Gadget Geek (talk) 14:14, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[]

  •   Strong oppose User is blocked in 3 wikis for vandalism. Additionally I do not see sufficient activity or a global need for this right. Alvaro Molina ( - ) 14:20, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[]
  •   Oppose No --Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 15:06, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[]
  •   Oppose per AlvaroMolina. Users who apply for global permissions need to be in good standing across Wikimedia. Given the fact that you are blocked in three wikis for vandalism, I cannot support your application. Sorry. Jianhui67 talkcontribs 15:30, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[]
  •   No. 1: Lack of cross-wiki experience. 2: Vandalism on nlwikibooks nlwikiquote srnwiki (examples) 3: I recommend to the candidate that he solves the situation of his blocks on three wikis and he join to the SWMT team for helping on reverts of vandalism on small wikis. I'm sorry, but with these problems is impossible to support this request. --Ks-M9 [disc.] 16:34, 10 February 2017 (UTC).[]
  •   Oppose per above. User has been blocked for vandalism elsewhere. -FASTILY 10:04, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[]
  •   Oppose per AlvaroMolina.- Peace1 (talk) at 05:14, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[]
  •   Weak oppose -   blocked on 3 wikis but I like him. Thanks. 2607:FB90:5F03:3BD3:0:7:3C80:5401 16:30, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[]
  •   Weak oppose - per above. Thanks -- 21:21, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[]

  Not done, Linedwell [talk] 14:15, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[]

Requests for global sysop permissions

Global sysop for Amire80

Not ending before 2 February 2017 22:11 UTC

I've been an editor in Wikipedia, Wikisource, and several other projects in Hebrew, English, and Russian since 2004. I'm a sysop in English Wikipedia, Hebrew Wikipedia, Hebrew Wikisource, and Hebrew Wiktionary. I'm a also a translator in since 2009, and a MediaWiki developer since 2011. In real life I am a staff member of the Wikimedia Foundation, but I am making this request with my volunteer community account and on my own behalf. I am fluent in Russian, Hebrew, and English, mostly fluent in Catalan, and can read Spanish, French, Italian, and Portuguese fairly well.

The reason for making this request is that I am frequently asked by editors on smaller wikis to find why are some functions on their sites don't work: Bashkir, Mari, Sakha, Marathi, Kabardian, and others, and sometimes also larger ones like Belarusian, Indonesian, Georgian, and Japanese. Almost always the reason is incorrect JavaScript code in Common.js, user scripts, or gadgets, or an incorrect AbuseFilter. To actually get it fixed I need to wait for the local administrator to make the fix, and then to test the fix, and ask for more corrections if needed. This is a slow and inefficient cycle, especially considering timezone differences.

Every now and then I also notice pages on small wikis that are clearly inappropriate (spam, wrong language, copyvio, etc.), and I mark the for deletion.

Thank you for consideration. --Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 22:11, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[]

  •   Support! --Kaganer (talk) 22:54, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[]
  •   Strong support Why yes? :p I know the user personally and he does a great job in the movement and speaks a lot of languages (which is very handy for a global sysop). Moreover, Amir is a trusted user and also works for WMF in the very important field for me - language-related software. --Lingveno (talk) 23:02, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[]
  • Please note global sysops ought not to act where local administrators are available. So in fact nothing would change about this "slow and inefficient cycle", unfortunately. --Vogone (talk) 23:12, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[]
    • Fixing broken code after a request by the local administrators feels like "routine maintenance" to me. That said, if only a handful wikis were involved, those wikis may also consider a local adminship. Nemo 23:15, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[]
      • If the initiative comes from local administrators, of course. I have no objection to this request, if it really helps doing this work, but I wanted to point out the limited use case. --Vogone (talk) 23:17, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[]
    The requests are usually by editors, not administrators. Often there are no administrators, or they are barely active. In some of the cases I mentioned above the local admins didn't reply at all, and the fix was done by a global admin. --Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 01:04, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[]
  •   Support -jkb- 23:53, 19 January 2017 (UTC) - beside the dispüute above: I know Admire since many years from different jobs in some more wikisources - he's OK and trusty user. -jkb- 23:53, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[]
  •   Support! Amir is always trying to help. --HalanTul (talk) 00:59, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[]
  • Neutral - per Vogone. Not very convinced by his cross-wiki work (see cross-wiki activity) but there is a fine reason for requesting this right. So, I'm undecided for now. --Ks-M9 [disc.] 02:03, 20 January 2017 (UTC).[]
  •   Neutral  Support Although its activity is not so significant, I do not think it is a reason to oppose. Alvaro Molina (Let's Talk) 07:47, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[]
  •   Support -FASTILY 07:55, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[]
  •   Support trustworthy, will help. —Ah3kal (talk) 09:02, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[]
  •   Support - From an Amir to another. (Seriuosly he is one of the most prominent and trusted Wikipedians I've known) Amir (talk) 09:04, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[]
  •   Support Amir is working on small projects for a decade and we could just benefit from him being a global sysop. --Millosh (talk) 11:11, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[]
  •   Support - Trusted user. I thought he's a global sysop already. Wikicology (talk) 18:35, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[]
  •   Support no concerns here.--HakanIST (talk) 20:59, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[]
  •   Support --Rschen7754 21:11, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[]
  •   Strong support: I recommend him to be a   global administrator because he's a very good editor. Regards, 2602:304:68AD:3220:FD25:732E:F177:1A07 02:01, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[]
  •   Support. Amir is already four admins and is clearly trustworthy, and has very good reasons for volunteering for global sysop. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 07:00, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[]
  •   Strong support amir is need for global project --AFlorence (talk) 10:05, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[]
  •   Support experience + trustworthy. DARIO SEVERI (talk) 00:19, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[]
  •   Support why not? Jianhui67 talkcontribs 18:15, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[]
  •   Strong support: Per above. Thanks. 2607:FB90:5C91:62:0:0:4E53:9A01 03:46, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[]
  • We need more helping hands in this area and Amire's work seems fine. I must tell assign him the Global rollback as well. Good luck ! Amire :) Kaulder (contribs | talk) 06:06, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[]
    Locked account for sockpuppetry. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by MarcoAurelio (talk) 17:58, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[]
    • Really the account is sockpuppetry...?? According to the en:Wp:SOCKING, the use of multiple Wikipedia user accounts for an improper purpose is called sock puppetry. I don't see any improper behaviours from the account. It's possible check out every single contributions by him. It's constructive, helpful for the community. May some peoples will definetly say that policy don't apply here on Meta-Wiki community. This is actually fact. I also really believe this. -- 14:29, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[]
      • Sorry, but policies of other projects doesn't apply here. Only local policies apply here, in this case "en:WP:SOCKING" is a policy of enwiki and not a policy of Meta. --Ks-M9 [disc.] 16:41, 30 January 2017 (UTC).[]
  •   Support Strong support! Bennylin 09:58, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[]
  •   Support Has the experience and the cross wiki editing history to show a need. Reguyla (talk) 18:58, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[]
  •   Support. I have seen him around. RadiX 19:14, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[]
  •   Support trusted user--Biplab Anand (Talk) 07:33, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[]
  •   Support trusted user.- Peace1 (talk) at 12:05, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[]
  •   Support --Samuele2002 (talk) 21:36, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[]
  •   Support trusted.--Infinite0694 (Talk) 09:00, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[]
  •   Support I rarely contribute with something as trite as "of course", but in this case, that will do just fine. StevenJ81 (talk) 23:56, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[]
  •   Done - Clear consensus to promote. – Ajraddatz (talk) 22:55, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[]

Global sysop for Atcovi

Not ending before 12 February 2017 03:15 UTC

I'd like to request this right due to my increase need. I've been actively working on SWMT work for the last two months, and I've came across two wikis that I'd like to share as examples: vi.wikibooks and tl.wikibooks. At the Vietnamese Wikibooks, there are over 300 pages that have been blanked by this IP that actively contributes there. I would like to determine (instead of flooding #wikimedia-gs) whether these pages are worthy of deletion for no content, or the last contributor should be reverted and the original content be restored. At tl.wikibooks, several IPs come onto the website and vandalize several pages: (mainly: and I'd like to patrol this wiki and delete pages that are worthy of deletion. Obviously, these are only two examples and my work is not going to be entangled on these 2 specific wikis.

In addition, I would also like to block users. Recently I had to revert over 20 edits of page-blankers on ko projects, see: and In the future, I'd like to put an immediate stop onto these vandals rather than wait for another global sysop to do it.

I hope that I am elected as a global sysop because I have shown, with evidence, a true need for this right. Thanks. --Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 03:15, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[]

  •   Neutral I do not see a demonstrated global need, however, I do not doubt that it would do a good job. I would like to see more opinions. Alvaro Molina (Let's Talk) 03:26, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[]
  •   Neutral I need to think about this one. You've done fine as a global rollbacker but global sysop is hard to monitor (misuse of the right can go undetected for a long time), and the past issues of 2013-2014 give me pause. --Rschen7754 08:03, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[]
  • Oppose There are still a few points (e.g. distinguishing what is a good wiki for a GS to act on or not) where I do not feel comfortable granting access, but I see most of the reasons why previous requests (for any other permission) were rejected no longer apply. Considering the great development and maturing over the past years, I suppose a further request in 1-2 years could be ready to be granted. For the current need, however, I would suggest requesting temporary local adminship on the two wikis in question in order clean up. Kind regards, --Vogone (talk) 09:31, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[]
Just to be clear, I'm aware of what wikis are for GS and not (I've read Here, I'll show why vo.wikibooks would be a GS wiki. This is because all of these wikis have inactive admins, see (Mxn, last contributed nearly a year ago, with admin action the same). I thought I'd clarify this, because I believe I do know which wiki is GS and which is not. EDIT: I'd also like to clarify that I would like to work globally as a sysop, not on these wikis I've listed... these were just examples. I think requesting local adminship on four wikis would seem hat-collectish of me. --Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 15:26, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[]
  • Neutral, I see your cross-wiki work at small wikis, however I'm not seeing a demostrated use of this right. Perhaps on the future, but now I don't know. --Ks-M9 [disc.] 13:55, 29 January 2017 (UTC).[]
ks-M9 do you mean you don't see me using this right on any other wiki? I have sysop rights on en.wikibooks for nearly two years now, if that is what you are referring to. --Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 15:06, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[]
  • weak oppose for now, keep up the good work, but I think more experience is needed cross the language barier. —Ah3kal (talk) 09:21, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[]
  •   Support in these years I saw an impressive growth in Atcovi's commitment and skills, I'd prefer a WSNT but I want to encourage him in following this path. --Vituzzu (talk) 17:31, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[]
    @Vituzzu: What does WSNT mean? "Would support next time"? PiRSquared17 (talk) 23:12, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[]
    @PiRSquared17: See wiktionary:WSNT: "I will support (him/her/them/you) next time" (well, it's bizzare to find it in the Italian wiktionary and not elsewhere... O.o). --Lucas (talk) 18:08, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[]
{{strong support}}: I like when he's an administrator on Wikibooks. His edits were constructive. Thanks, 2602:304:68AD:3220:E9E1:136E:19D7:E9F5 02:00, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[]
Struck troll !vote. -FASTILY 20:07, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[]
  •   Neutral I started writing something, but then noticed that Vogone had said the same thing up above. So I'm neutral, but would support something along the lines of what Vogone suggested as an interim test. StevenJ81 (talk) 23:53, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[]
{{strong support}} for now. Thanks, 2602:304:68AD:3220:6579:27EC:1313:9E76 17:18, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[]
Struck troll !vote. -FASTILY 20:07, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[]
  •   Support no doubt Atcov will make good use of the tools. --Druddigon (talk | contributions) 21:10, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[]
  •   Support. I agree with Vituzzu, and I also think the current need has not been clearly demonstrated, as Vogone said. However, I am simply giving to the candidate the credit of trust, because he will benefit from the tools in the work he does on some small wikis. RadiX 02:26, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[]
  •   Support per Vituzzu. Jianhui67 talkcontribs 16:10, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[]
  •   Weak support - per above. Thanks, 03:43, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[]
  •   Support, mostly per Radix and Vito. I think he would not misuse the rights.--Syum90 (talk) 17:55, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[]
  •   Support. I agree with RadiX. Furthermore, I analyzed Atcovi's edits and actions on some projects and I think he's prepared for the role. Érico (talk) 23:18, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[]
  •   Strong oppose I don't usually use the fancy templates, but here it is appropriate. I agree with Vogone's concerns. I still do not think this user has improved; that he is yet again requesting here shows that. --MF-W 23:34, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[]
MF-W, "that he is yet again requesting here shows that." I don't understand. Is there something wrong me with me requesting gs rights? And I don't understand "again". Please explain so I can improve, I am open for criticism. Thanks. --Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 03:02, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[]
Should I link to your previous requests? --MF-W 16:46, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[]
I am aware that I have requested gr two times and gs once (this time). --Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 17:21, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[]

  Not done Although I agree about Atcovi's improvement, I don't think there is clear consensus to promote at this time, Please feel free to re-apply later. --07:38, 18 February 2017 (UTC) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Shanmugamp7 (talk)

Requests for global IP block exemption

Global IP block exempt for Bruno Rene Vargas

He requested global IP block exempt because a recent global blockade has made my current IP is blocked and was made by Vituzzu. This prevents me edit the project in which more I work daily, Wikipedia in Spanish. The message that appears is as follow: "Tu dirección IP está en un rango que ha sido bloqueada en todos los wikis.

Vituzzu ( realizó el bloqueo. La razón dada es Open proxy:, soften Ticket#2015091810022551.

Inicio del bloqueo: 15:39 3 jul 2016 Expiración del bloqueo: 15:30 2 abr 2020". Bruno Rene Vargas (talk) 11:52, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[]

You just need to login to circumvent this block, but if you don't know whatever you're using a VPN or VPS then there might be some problem with the way you connect to the Internet. --Vituzzu (talk) 22:41, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[]

Global IP block exempt for Dylan620 II

I attempted to revert vandalism from a classmate on Wikinews and found myself unable to do so because the IP of the computer I am currently using (17:57 Feb 22) is globally blocked, due to cross-wiki vandalism from my classmate on this same computer last week. The fact that the cross-wiki vandal in question seems to be primarily active when our class is in session gives me a chance to catch this person's vandalism as it takes place. I would like to be globally IP block exempt so that global blocks levied against my classmate will not hinder my efforts to fight their vandalism, plus I believe that global IPBE may come in handy should I face similar situations in the future. However, I acknowledge that my cross-wiki experience (Dylan620, Dylan620 II) isn't the widest or deepest, with the vast majority of my activity being on the English Wikipedia, so I understand if this application is turned down on those grounds. --Dylan620 II (talk) 17:57, 22 February 2017 (UTC) (edited 02:31, 23 February 2017 (UTC))[]

Why did you create the second account? Ruslik (talk) 18:35, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[]
@Ruslik0: The second account is for use over public Internet connections (such as when I'm on my university campus, for example). I'm requesting global IPBE for my alternate account only - it's unnecessary for my main account, which I use in private settings, such as at home. --Dylan620 II (talk) 22:25, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[]
Updated my signature with the one I use for this account at enwiki to make it more obvious that it is for use in public - I probably should have done that from the onset to avoid any confusion. --Dylan620's public alt (I'm all ears) 22:44, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[]
  Done Ruslik (talk) 19:26, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[]

Global IP block exempt for Rachmat04

Dear all. I'm currently using a VPN service when connected to a public Wi-Fi as a security reason. I am aware that the IP address used by the service is blocked globally, thus I am not able to edit, especially on Commons where I help file moving there. I have already IP block exemption flag on my home wikis, however I do not have it on Commons. Therefore, I am requesting this global flag to enable myself edit on Wikipedia and other Wikimedia projects. Temporary one would be fine. Your consideration is appreciated. Thank you. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · 08:30, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[]

  Done Ruslik (talk) 19:47, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[]
Many thanks. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · 00:33, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[]

Requests for global rename permissions

Global rename for علاء

Not ending before 15 February 2017 12:47 UTC

Hello, I'm applying for global rename permissions because at my home wiki, the Arabic wikipedia, I often work with users to change there violates names and blocking accounts that do not meet the local username policy. Users blocked for a username violation or notified that their usernames do not meet policy often request a change in username, and having the ability to perform these renames would enhance my ability to perform this work. I have carefully read the global rename policy and our local username policy (I'd focus essentially on requests from Ar-wiki), and on the same time the global renames who speak native Arabic absent for along time and some requests accumulated until I sent a massage to them to deal with applications--Alaa :)..! 12:47, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[]

I'm sysop and bureaucrat on Arabic Wikipedia(verify) and OTRS member--Alaa :)..! 12:47, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[]
  •   Support I know Alaa for a long time on arwiki where he is one of the most trusted users. He is always helpful to other users and I trust him to be a global renamer. The language skill is a plus since the other Arabic global renamers are not so active. --Meno25 (talk) 16:49, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[]
  •   Support trustworthy user, we need another GR who speak Arabic, we have 3 only and 2 of them are inactive, alaa has good experiences with rename requests, and have good cross-wiki contributions--Ibrahim.ID 20:01, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[]
  •   Support Alvaro Molina ( - ) 20:13, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[]
  • For reference, the bureaucrat right on was removed today shortly after it had been granted to him because the request had not been closed according to local criteria. Mentioning this since the user indicates in his statement that he is a bureaucrat, which no longer is the case. I do agree that having another Arabic speaking user would be useful. Savhñ 20:38, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[]
@Savh: I add this request due to a mistake in votes count by my colleague only, that is is not mean he not qualified for this permission, he is one of best and active admins in arwiki, he has good experiences and suitable for GR permission --Ibrahim.ID 21:36, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[]
It isn't, but it is worth noting that the user is no longer a bureaucrat considering it's mentioned on the request. Savhñ 21:43, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[]
@Savh: I'm a bureaucrat now, thank you for your note--Alaa :)..! 19:01, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[]
  •   Support Alaa is one of the trusted users on ar. wiki and one of the best additions we had to our admins group, i'm sure he'll do a great job--باسم (talk) 21:04, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[]
  •   Support most of times the requests of change names are accumulated for several weeks and some users grumbling and apply directly on Meta, and Ala'a on of the most active users and he is familiar with polices. --بدارين (talk) 08:10, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[]
  •   Support Obviously there is a need in this, especially with what the above has said. --Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 11:56, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[]
  •   Support very active editor and admin. bureaucrat right has no mistake to be removed because the local policy states: At least 15 user must to vote not support, and User:علاء get 92% and 18 user vote in his requests.--مصعب (talk) 17:52, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[]
  •   Strong support User:علاء now an bureaucrat.جار الله (talk) 19:19, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[]
  •   Support Seems legitimate request. Need for X language, I think is not a good argument, though, having in mind that the arabic script is difficult to handle for someone that is unfamiliar with it, I think makes the argument a bit valid. Since the whole bureaucrat thing was an uncontroversial confusion (the bureaucrat that asked for removing the bit, supports here, and the bit was finally restored) makes my support more confident.—Ah3kal (talk) 05:41, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[]
  •   Support - Admin and crat, very active, trusted, and there's a clear need for Arabic-speaking renamers. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 14:13, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[]
  •   Support Would be a net positive. Jianhui67 talkcontribs 15:53, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[]
  •   Support, seems fine. --Ks-M9 [disc.] 17:30, 3 February 2017 (UTC).[]
  •   Support The OTRS permission is the main reason why I am supporting. OTRS can be stressful (from hearsay) and requires a position of trust. If this user can be trusted with OTRS they can be trusted with global rename. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 17:39, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[]
{{strong support}}: Per all users above. Thanks, 2602:304:68AD:3220:6579:27EC:1313:9E76 17:16, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[]
Struck troll !vote -FASTILY 20:11, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[]
  •   Support -FASTILY 11:29, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[]
  •   Support, Alaa is an active admin and editor in the Arabic Wikipedia. he follows up frequently and discusses logically. I believe he'll manage a new task in a good way. --Mervat Salman (talk) 22:07, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[]
  •   Support. Per k6ka. RadiX 01:56, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[]
  •   Support, per Atcovi. DARIO SEVERI (talk) 15:36, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[]

  Done, Linedwell [talk] 12:48, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[]

Global rename for Kipala

Not ending before 16 February 2017 11:20 UTC

I request global rename permission. I have been admin and bureaucrat on swwiki for several years. Presently we have nobody who can do rename. As we start a series of workshops etc. this will bring groups of newbies where the point of name choice and regrets pops up. Furthermore we usually work from same IP for 1 workshop and will have to prepare accounts for participants to use to avoid the mass account creation problem. Looks easier to have some prepared accounts ready to start with which later can be renamed. And I have read the Global rename policy and believe to have understood it. Kipala (talk) 11:20, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[]

{{strong support}}: Good user. Thanks, 2602:304:68AD:3220:FD25:732E:F177:1A07 22:16, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[]
Struck troll !vote -FASTILY 20:10, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[]
  •   Support --Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 22:30, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[]
  • "Furthermore we usually work from same IP for 1 workshop and will have to prepare accounts for participants to use to avoid the mass account creation problem" - this isn't the solution for the problem, the solution is to temporarily get account creator or ask to have the limit temporarily increased on Phabricator. --Rschen7754 05:55, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[]
  •   Oppose Per Rschen7754, additionally, I do not see a global need for this permit. Apply instead for account creator right for that purpose. Alvaro Molina ( - ) 02:06, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[]
{{strong support}} per Atcovi (talk · contribs · page moves · block user · block log) above. Thanks, 2602:304:68AD:3220:6579:27EC:1313:9E76 17:20, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[]
Struck troll !vote -FASTILY 20:10, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[]
  • Oppose per Rschen7754. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:18, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[]
  •   Neutral Trusted user, but I have some concerns with the user not seeming to know what global rename is about. Global rename does not assist in account creation; you'll want the account creator right instead. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 13:03, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[]
    Account creator is not locally enabled by default, bur the admin group already include all the necessary permissions. --Vituzzu (talk) 23:48, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[]
    Yes it is, it's one of the groups enabled by default everywhere. But you're of course correct that admins already have the necessary rights. – Ajraddatz (talk) 23:51, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[]
    It's enabled by default everywhere, but the default does not include any way to grant it locally (it has to be done by stewards). --Rschen7754 01:11, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[]
    Oh @Ajraddatz: I remembered on we had to "ask some config change", but the reason was the one @Rschen7754: wrote. --Vituzzu (talk) 12:37, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[]
  •   Oppose I don't support the premises of creating multiple dummy account in advance just to have to rename them to bypass other controls. — xaosflux Talk 18:50, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[]
  •   Oppose Per above. --TerraCodes (talk) 18:59, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[]
  •   Oppose per above. Not an appropriate reason to request the right. -FASTILY 20:04, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[]
  •   Neutral - per above. Thanks, 03:42, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[]
  •   Comment If the user is an admin then they already have "noratelimit". If the purpose is to create accounts, then this global irhgt request is unnecessary and presumably the wrong right to request.  — billinghurst sDrewth 08:56, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[]
  • @Kipala: you simply need to login with your account, then open this and you'll be able to create as many accounts as needed. --Vituzzu (talk) 12:37, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[]
  Not done. RadiX 13:09, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[]

Global rename for Murbaut

Not ending before 24 February 2017 15:32 UTC

Hi friend. I want help for changing user names, one of them in idwiki, I had already offered assistance for this. I know there is bennylin (steward) and also Aldnonymous but he was not always active in the renaming. I understand the name of prohibited and permitted. I am also a member of SWMT. I've read the procedures of the global rename. I also have an IRC nick: Murbaut. Thanks you for read my request. Murbaut (talk) 15:32, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[]

  •   Support The concerns of your previous request I believe have been addressed. Alvaro Molina ( - ) 15:41, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[]
  •   Oppose The edits vs number of right requests ratio is concerning. --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:01, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[]
I just simply use rights for public purposes. I will not reproduce right number of requests. I ask because I need to use it per idwiki, you can review it. Murbaut (talk) 02:07, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[]
  • I'm not seeing sufficient experience here. Plus, I still am somewhat concerned with the reasons raised on the last request. – Ajraddatz (talk) 22:54, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[]
I have experience about mediawiki code but not much. I understanding how to rename user page do. :) Cheers Murbaut (talk) 08:44, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[]
  •   Support for AlvaroMolina --Samuele2002 (talk) 17:13, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[]
  •   Oppose per Steinsplitter. --Rschen7754 17:42, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[]
  •   Neutral The candidate has canvassed me on IRC about this request, which would normally drive me to oppose, but I'll stay neutral for now as a courtesy. I can't offer much to support this candidate otherwise. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk ·Contributions) 13:56, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[]
I just asked what the problem often faced by users with global rename status and I asked "Am I worthy of being a global rename do you think?". Honestly I don't provocateurs to you. Cheers Murbaut (talk) 04:18, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[]
I looked at my logs and this is not what you wrote to me. Sorry, but I am on the brink of opposing you now for lying, unless there was a misunderstanding between us. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 19:34, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[]
  •   Oppose - I'm sure you can be trusted, but I'd like to see more experience first. Basically, per Steinsplitter. Sorry, –Juliancolton | Talk 04:22, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[]

  Not done, not enough support. Feel free to apply again later. Linedwell [talk] 15:43, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[]

Requests for other global permissions

Global editinterface for Mr. Fulano

Hi, sometimes I edit in codes, helping a importing gadgets to small wikis, and I need edit in MediaWiki pages and I can develop a great work in this wikis, like the and pt.wikivoyage. Thanks, --Mr. Fulano! Talk 19:50, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[]

  •   SupportReasonable request, trusted user who knows what he is doing.   Oppose after Xaosflux' explanation. Better give more time and get more edit on multiple projects. DARIO SEVERI (talk) 02:51, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[]
  •   Support  Oppose After analyzing the user well and seeing the comments that convinced me to change my posture. Global editinterface requires a lot of trust and experience globally, as well as moderately decent knowledge of CSS and JavaScript. Alvaro Molina (Let's Talk) 00:15, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[]
  • This is very unspecific. What codes do you edit? What gadgets do you import and why? And why do you "need edit in MediaWiki pages"? For which "great work"? And why is it not sufficient if you request local rights on and pt.wy? --MF-W 12:51, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[]
@MF-Warburg: I know CSS and JS, and my ideia is import in wikis gadgets like RTRC, Fastbuttons and HotCat. But for do it, I need edit in MediaWiki domain. And I want do it in more wikis, beyond and pt.wy, like the, where there no sysops. I not edit in MediaWiki in because I'm not a sysop, but I already ask there to edit in this domain. Mr. Fulano! Talk 16:49, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[]
  • Oppose - I don't see this work out of your homewiki about this and evidences about your work on the interface, 0 (zero) edits on the MediaWiki namespace, not importing gadgets from other wikis, you need more experience for this right. Also, if you would like a development on these wikis (as you mentioned: cawiki and ptwikivoyage) you can request local adminship for these mission. --Ks-M9 [disc.] 14:03, 29 January 2017 (UTC).[]
  •   Oppose Not convinced, and an edit count of just over 10,000 edits is not enough experience for such a wide-ranging permission. --Rschen7754 05:57, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[]
  •   Oppose No. --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:02, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[]
  •   Oppose per Rschen7754,—Ah3kal (talk) 05:58, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[]
  •   Support User is ok! Gustavopédia (talk) 20:53, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[]
  •   Strong support: Well, I like him. I don't have a reason to hate him. Thanks, 2602:304:68AD:3220:E9E1:136E:19D7:E9F5 02:02, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[]
  •   Oppose with no communities currently providing interface access to even produce a baseline of work adding to all projects is too much. If you want to work on cawiki and ptwikivoyage you should seek access there. — xaosflux Talk 18:49, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[]
Hi @Xaosflux:, in ptwikivoyage and cawiki there are no interface editor flag, and I don't want edit only in this wikis, I want edit in ltgwiki and others wikis where aren't enough interface editors and sysops to edit codes. Mr. Fulano! Talk 21:39, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[]
This access is extremely wide ranging and requires a high degree of community support, without being a sysop on at least one project I'm not really supportive of this. Perhaps if you could demonstrate that you have a long history of placing edit requests on multiple projects that have all been accepted without issue that might overcome this objection of mine - but they would need to be fairly substantial. — xaosflux Talk 00:53, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[]

  Not done. Sorry, Mr. Fulano. There is no consensus that the intended use of this permission would be necessary. The global editinterface is a user group assigned to users who really need to edit the MediaWiki namespace or the JS/CSS globally. Please come back when you meet the criteria. Kind regards, RadiX 02:55, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[]

New ombudsman commissioners appointed & departures

Status:    Done

As per appointment by the Wikimedia Foundation to serve in the ombudsman commission and direct request by Karen Brown from the Support and Safety department, I've taken care of the addition and removal of the ombudsman global user group to the users listed in the diff mentioned previously. Karen will confirm here as well. —MarcoAurelio 16:54, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[]

Confirming that I requested these changes. Thank you, MarcoAurelio! Kbrown (WMF) (talk) 16:57, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[]

add global OTRS member for MichaelMaggs

Thx. --Krd 07:40, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[]

Done. – Ajraddatz (talk) 07:51, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[]

add global OTRS member for Wikitanvir

Thx. --Krd 04:06, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[]

Done. – Ajraddatz (talk) 04:48, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[]

remove global OTRS member for Clarkcj12

Thx. --Krd 08:11, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[]

Done, einsbor talk 08:26, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[]

remove global OTRS member for ~riley

Thx. --Krd 08:11, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[]

Done, einsbor talk 08:26, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[]

remove global OTRS member for Majora

Thx. --Krd 07:01, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[]

Done. – Ajraddatz (talk) 07:21, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[]

add global OTRS member for MichaelSchoenitzer

Thx. --Krd 10:45, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[]

Done. Savhñ 11:29, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[]

add global OTRS member for Civvì

Thx. --Krd 04:56, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[]

You're welcome. ~ Nahid Talk 06:32, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[]

add global OTRS member for Vito Genovese

Thanks, —MarcoAurelio 07:13, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[]

  Done. --Stryn (talk) 12:33, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[]