Open main menu
Warning! Please do not post any new comments on this page. This is a discussion archive first created on 01 January 2016, although the comments contained were likely posted before and after this date. See current discussion.

Contents

Requests for global rollback permissions

Global rollback for Максим Підліснюк

Not ending before 12 January 2016 23:45 UTC

I am an active member of SWMT and additional right only would help me. --Максим Підліснюк (talk) 23:45, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

  • Hello and thanks for applying! I would like to support your request, but you don't have much experience reverting across language barriers - you certainly have edits on a few wikis, but most of that is from global renaming. I would like to see experience in dealing with a wide variety of small-wiki vandalism first, per the policy on these rights. Ajraddatz (talk) 07:20, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
Sorry for my language problems I am a long time member SWOT, but active periods, not constantly, so the list of my edits rollbacks vandalism overlapping global renaming --Максим Підліснюк (talk) 11:41, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
Dear Максим, unfortunately constant activity is what the policy requires before global rollback access can be granted. Regards, --Vogone (talk) 14:58, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support Trusted user. --Ochilov (talk) 09:50, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Don't see constant activity. --Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 18:02, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
    I find this REALLY dissapointing. --Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 22:00, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
    It looks like in this case the rollback tool would rather help the user to not do a mistake, as absence of the "rollback" link would be a signal to double check the situation. Just a comment, though. --Base (talk) 22:04, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
    License CC-BY-SA 3.0 is withdrawn. In addition, standard tools do not allow you to quickly discern the author or vandal --Максим Підліснюк (talk) 22:08, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
    Nothing in the global rollback toolkit will tell you that either. Ajraddatz (talk) 22:10, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
    imo it just goes to show that the user is not well thoughtful about whatever edit he is reverting, since it was the author of the page that blanked the page (think he wanted the page deleted). --Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 22:12, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

Another example: [1] --Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 22:21, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

  •   Support--6AND5 (talk) 11:08, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support Rollback is not a big deal. The links above do not lead me to believe that the user would abuse the tool. -FASTILY 06:44, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

  Comment Request is past its deadline. --Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 12:26, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

FYI, no such thing as a deadline exists here on SRGP. --Vogone (talk) 14:11, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
Oh, thank you. --Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 18:06, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
  Not done - No clear consensus. - Taketa (talk) 12:46, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Requests for global sysop permissions

Global sysop for Infinite0694

Not ending before 21 January 2016 01:28 UTC

2nd nom. Hi, I'm an active member of the SWMT and am a global rollbacker since June 2015. I think the global sysop right would be useful for me to help out with GS scope wiki. Thanks, --Infinite0694 (Talk) 01:28, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

  •   Support No objections. Jianhui67 talkcontribs 16:22, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
  •   За 幸運 )))--6AND5 (talk) 18:38, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support--BRP ever 04:30, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support--HakanIST (talk) 09:20, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support--Lanwi1(Talk) 10:15, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support. Excellent candidate. QuiteUnusual (talk) 11:02, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support You got my sign of approval ;-) --Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 15:55, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support Reguyla (talk) 20:59, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support--hyolee2/H.L.LEE (talk) 08:04, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support. Looks good and we needed more global sysops, especially with Infinite's language skills. Érico (msg) 03:29, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support Though I'm an active user on Japanese wikipedia, where Infinite0694 is mainly working, I cannot find the issue to be noted there. Good Luck.--Yapparina (talk) 11:34, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support --Holder (talk) 15:22, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support --Defender (talk) 16:38, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Biplab Anand (Talk) 00:55, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support -FASTILY 06:39, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support Sure. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 11:55, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support Courcelles 22:36, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support alright eurodyne (talk) 17:22, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support --Kolega2357 (talk) 11:11, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support--Syum90 (talk) 08:13, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 12:32, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support of course, Alan (talk) 13:52, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support ~ Nahid Talk 18:36, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support --Steinsplitter (talk) 18:45, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
  Done Clear consensus --Shanmugamp7 (talk) 04:01, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Thanks all! --Infinite0694 (Talk) 05:28, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Global sysop for BRPever

Not ending before 12 February 2016 15:55 UTC

Hi, I'm an active member of the SWMT. I want this permission to help the wikimedia project with no sysops and inactive sysops. I think the global sysop right would be useful for me to help small developing wikiproject . Thanks,-BRP ever 15:55, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

  Oppose, going through your global edits; I could not find any undo actions from you, except on big projects (enwiki, simplewiki) that are not GS wikis and on newiki (your home-language wiki). You should be more active [global] vandal fighter before asking for a GS flag. --Stryn (talk) 18:26, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
  Oppose Per Stryn. You're still relatively new here as your account was created 56 days ago. eurodyne (talk) 03:04, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
  Oppose He don't have any experience, and he should to contribute for continue.

IkhsanNH (talk) 04:29, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

  Neutral because I don't want to pile on. BRPever, thank you for your application! I think it is quite early for you to consider applying for global rights. I suggest continuing your good work and coming back when you have enough experience. Jianhui67 talkcontribs 04:39, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
  Neutral because I don't want to pile on. Thank you for being an active member of the SWMT and for helping small wikimedia projects, it is definitely appreciated. I personally like to see either admin experience on a wikimedia project or global rollback experience before I can support a user endeavoring to be a global sysop. I wish you the best of luck in the future. Riley Huntley (talk) 05:37, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

  Request withdrawn I think I should be more active [global] vandal fighter and I need more experience so Iwithdraw. Thanks,--BRP ever 06:32, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

Requests for global IP block exemption

Global IP block exempt for Юрій Булка

I would like have the option to edit over Tor. My main motivation is the following. I visit and make edits on Wikimedia projects on near-daily basis. As a consequence, Wikimedia's servers contain quite a detailed log of IP addresses associated with my real-world identity (my account name is my real name). I would like to have the option to edit from my account while remaining location-anonymous to Wikimedia's servers. I want to emphasize that this is not about making any anonymous edits, but only about having an option to not log my IP on the server, while still editing under my real name. --Yury Bulka (talk) 22:34, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

  Support Trused user --Максим Підліснюк (talk) 20:53, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
  Done Ruslik (talk) 16:19, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

Global IP-block exempt for Farsizabon

Hi! My fellow wikipedian asked in a social network to make him a request here per a new checking policy in UZB; he would like to use open proxy. Regards, Ochilov (talk) 07:28, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

  Done Ruslik (talk) 17:14, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Global IP block exempt for 0x90 rekt

I am requesting this because I keep getting caught by IP blocks on Wikipedia. I assume it's because they have more vandals and so more IP addresses get blocked when a vandal uses them. I'm not a vandal and I have intentions to help prevent abuse, thanks, --0x90 rekt (talk) 01:33, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

  Done Ruslik (talk) 20:11, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Global IP block exempt for Arifys

I am make a requesting because I want to keep the wikipedia of the hands of vandals who where using permissions abused. I also keep wikipedia away from nosy hand with access rights. I have intentions to help prevent abuse, Thanks Arifys (talk) 09:31, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

This permission is granted only to people who need to circunvent global IP blocks. —MarcoAurelio 18:50, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
Arifys, why are you blocking me?--6AND5 (talk) 21:06, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
Dear Marco, please look this page [2]--6AND5 (talk) 21:06, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
Looks weird. You don't have any edit there yet you've been blocked. I can't read the block message. Maybe @Arifys: can explain us a bit, but not in this page. @6AND5: please raise the issue on the SN, which might be a better place. The request for global IP block exemption is denied as no valid reason was provided for this permission to be given. —MarcoAurelio 21:33, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Requests for global rename permissions

Global rename for Cyberpower678

Not ending before 12 January 2016 02:23 UTC
Hello. I am a user on the English Wikipedia and can speak both German and English. I primarily do bot work on enwiki, but also volunteer at ACC. For those not familiar with ACC, it is a place for new users to request accounts. ACC volunteers are privy to sensitive information, requiring users to be identified to the foundation. Working there requires me to be quite adept with username policy there, and sometimes, we are asked to change usernames. It would be useful as an ACCer that having someone with the ability to rename would be quite helpful. —cyberpower ChatHello! 02:23, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support Just as he mentioned in my request below, Cyberpower678 and I have worked closely together. I can definitely attest that this is a trustworthy user, and one of the more dedicated members of the account creation team. I see no reason why global renamer wouldn't assist in these efforts — MusikAnimal talk 16:30, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support Trusted user, and has also developed the replacement clerking bot for w:en:WP:CHUS, although I find their work at ACC to carry much more weight in convincing me to support this request. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 16:54, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support--6AND5 (talk) 17:40, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support per K6ka and MusikAnimal.--Grind24 (talk) 18:32, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support trusted user --Ochilov (talk) 05:25, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support per all above me. Kharkiv07 (T) 05:42, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support Jianhui67 talkcontribs 05:57, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support per OchilovHakanIST (talk) 09:40, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support Seems like a good "use case"/rationale to me, and per what k6ka said.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:52, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support trusted user-- Biplab Anand (Talk) 09:57, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 05:12, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support seems trustworthy.--Alexmar983 (talk) 21:38, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
  •   OK fine by me. Ruy Pugliesi 05:44, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 08:14, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support Sure, valid reason for requesting and is a trusted user. Ajraddatz (talk) 08:15, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Low x-wiki activity. --Steinsplitter (talk) 20:53, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support --Infinite0694 (Talk) 16:41, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support He's done some bot work for Wikidata so I don't think crosswiki stuff is completely foreign to him. --Rschen7754 17:31, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support--Lanwi1(Talk) 15:43, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support--BRPever (talk) 15:46, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
  •   SupportReguyla (talk) 21:00, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support per MusikAnimal. Doctree (talk) 23:11, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
  Done. --Stryn (talk) 05:02, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Global rename for MusikAnimal

Not ending before 12 January 2016 04:32 UTC
See en:Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)#Allow admins to rename users?, which arose due to the not-so-friendly procedure us admins employ when dealing with good-faith username violations. I am an admin on enwiki and run into this scenario quite a bit. We may try to send them to en:Wikipedia:Changing username, Special:GlobalRenameRequest, or perform a soft-block as necessary. Especially in the latter case, being able to do the rename myself would make the process much easier for the newcomer, and avoid all the scary templates, walls of text, and exposing of bureaucracy involved with the project -- when all they wanted to do was make some simple contributions but were unaware their username was an issue. They could simply tell me what they wanted to change it to and I'd do it right there and then, barring any concerns with the new username, and won't need to block the account at all. If granted this meta right, I'd primarily utilize it for the aforementioned use case, but being a backlog hater I'm sure I'd make my way here and at en:WP:CHUS to process requests. I realize username policy may vary wiki to wiki, but I suspect I could get away with using common sense. If they opt to go with a foreign language username (albeit discouraged for an English language project), I would be sure that the translation doesn't imply something inappropriate. Many thanks — MusikAnimal talk 04:32, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support Definitely. I've worked with this user on and off wiki quite a lot. I trust him implicitly.—cyberpower ChatHello! 13:11, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support Of course.--Grind24 (talk) 13:20, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support per rationale --HakanIST (talk) 13:34, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support I've known MusikAnimal for a long time now, and I have confidence that they'll be able to use the global rename tools effectively. Their admin work on enwiki is simply prolific, and I'm happy to see them take on more responsibility. By the way, MusikAnimal, you can always pass off rename requests made in an unfamiliar language to another global renamer if you don't feel confident in processing the request, and you're not required to know all local username policies. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 16:52, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support Well known, trusted user on enwiki. eurodyne (talk) 17:16, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support--6AND5 (talk) 17:40, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support Looks like a reasonable case for Global Renamer, with K6ka's caveat.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 18:14, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
  •   Surely. Trusted user and admin on enwiki. Would be a great addition and would certainly use the tools wisely. Ruy Pugliesi 21:15, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support I know him on enwiki, trusted user. --Ochilov (talk) 05:25, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support Will be a valuable asset to the global community. Kharkiv07 (T) 05:42, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support why not? Jianhui67 talkcontribs 05:58, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support Trusted user and admin on enwiki-- Biplab Anand (Talk) 10:01, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 05:13, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support --Alexmar983 (talk) 21:38, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 08:14, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support Sounds good. Ajraddatz (talk) 08:15, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support --Infinite0694 (Talk) 16:41, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support--Lanwi1(Talk) 15:43, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support--BRPever (talk) 15:47, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support Reguyla (talk) 21:01, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support Trusted user with technical skills. BethNaught (talk) 22:36, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support Sure. Doctree (talk) 22:59, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
  Done. --Stryn (talk) 05:02, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Requests for other global permissions

remove global OTRS flags

Thx. --Krd 17:06, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

  Done - all removed. -Barras talk 17:12, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Please also:

Thx. --Krd 17:57, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

  Done. Ruy Pugliesi 17:59, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

add global OTRS-member for DaB.

Please re-add. Thx. --Krd 21:37, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

  Done -Barras talk 21:39, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

OTRS-member for Darwinius

Thanks, stews. Happy New Year! Rjd0060 (talk) 20:22, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

  Done. Thx and the same for you! 😊 Stryn (talk) 20:26, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

add global OTRS-member for Angus Guilherme

Thanks, --Krd 07:47, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

Done. Ajraddatz (talk) 09:26, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

add global OTRS-member for Guillaume70

Thanks, --Krd 19:11, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

  Done. --Stryn (talk) 19:13, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

add global OTRS member for Vitor Mazuco

thanks, --Krd 08:30, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

  Done - Taketa (talk) 08:38, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

add global OTRS member for Edmenb

thanks, --Krd 08:39, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

  Done - Taketa (talk) 08:41, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Global abusefilter-helper for MusikAnimal

This will make my second global rights request in a week's time, but the timing is purely coincidence :) Right now I've been working on a bot task that monitors edit filters and reports changes to a watchable page. Per request I now have this running on the Portuguese Wikipedia, and likely will be adding it to the French Wikipedia and possibly others. For this purpose I don't actually need to see pattern (regex) of private filters, as the bot doesn't track that, but it does track all other changes that I'm currently unable to verify is being done correctly. I am an edit filter manager on enwiki which is what spawned this effort. Additionally, I'm currently helping with a case of cross-wiki abuse, communicating with a Commons edit filter manager via the enwiki edit filter mailing list. Being able to see details/logs over on Commons just means I can further assist with this matter. Regards — MusikAnimal talk 05:37, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

  •   Support Fine for me.--Grind24 (talk) 15:32, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support I was the one who suggested that they implement my filter for a sockpuppet. I've made changes to the filter which he can't see. Techman224Talk 03:41, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support Seems like a good case for AFH, given MusikAnimal's activity on the enwiki AF. As for asking many rights at once, IMO it is OK so as long as a) one does clearly illustrate an use case and suitability for each and b) one has enough time avaliable for everything.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 08:57, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
  • Is there a specific timeframe during which you will need these permissions? Ajraddatz (talk) 09:26, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
    For the bot task, yes, but not sure how long that would be. I'm sort of asking around if other wikis are interested, in the hopes it will help them as much as it's helping us on enwiki. The i18n work is quite fun, but I digress. In regards to working with Techman, this is not the first cross-wiki abuse situation I have ran into, and surely not the last. Having the read-only rights will certainly assist with these situations moving forward — MusikAnimal talk 19:53, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
    Ok. Sounds like a good rationale for indefinite access. Ajraddatz (talk) 20:12, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
  Done - Taketa (talk) 06:12, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

add global OTRS member for Aoke1989

Thanks, --Krd 16:40, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

  Done, einsbor talk 16:45, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

add global OTRS member for Cosine02

Thanks, --Krd 06:14, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

  Done - Taketa (talk) 06:36, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

remove global OTRS member for Vungadu

Thanks, --Krd 05:35, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

  Done. --Stryn (talk) 05:38, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Access to Abuse filter helpers global group for Hégésippe Cormier

Hi. The global abuse filters were activated on fr.wikipedia.org for a few weeks, after a first community poll (launched by Elfix).

Then, a second community poll (also launched by Elfix) had the following result: the local abusefilter status 'owners' would have the right to ask for an access to Abuse filter helpers global group, with the possible right to read all the global bfilters.

So, as an abusefilter on fr.wikipedia.org, I ask to be included in the abuse filter helpers global group. Thanks. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 12:26, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

  Done The abuse filter helper right has been set on this account. Elfix 14:13, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
Thanks Elfix. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 15:34, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
That makes no sense. Why must a local RFC allow people to request rights here? --MF-W 15:38, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
Please check the mailing-list. Elfix 17:07, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
There is nothing there which explains this question. --MF-W 17:24, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
Edit conflict. Isn't a global group a bit overkill for (requested) meta-only access? --Vogone (talk) 15:39, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
Vogone, if there is a way to let AF managers on wikis in the GAF wikiset with read access to the global filters, this would be better, but I don't think there is any other way right now. Elfix 17:07, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
I don't think it would be much of a big deal to get such a local metawiki group created, provided the metawiki users agree. Especially, since frwiki might not be the only wiki demanding read-only access to global abuse filters. --Vogone (talk) 17:16, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
  • I have some concerns here: The "voting" about a global right schould be on meta. Shouldn't it? The requestpage on frwiki has been created by Elfix and Elfix has immediataly granted there right in this request here. This is imho a conflict of interest and the right has been granted out of process. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:56, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
    I think the rationale is the same as there, among other possible locations. Elfix 17:24, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
  • I would also like to direct your attention to the rules in this section. It says "The request will be approved if consensus to do so exists after a short period of consideration. A steward will review the request." The request was placed at 12:26 UTC and you marked it as done at 14:13 UTC, less than two hours later. That's a VERY short period of time I'd say, certainly given that you are closely involved with the community and request itself. It is always better to be on the safe side and wait or let others do the request, as there can always be comments, such as in this case. This is regardless of any explanation on the mailing list, as stewards should work transparently and the community should always have a chance to weigh in. SPQRobin (talk) 20:09, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
  • As a general principle, if communities allow to be included into GAF wikis then we should allow their insiders to join the global group. --Vituzzu (talk) 21:24, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
    @Vituzzu: Well, but the scope of this group is slightly different ("helpers") and the group provides way more access than needed. What effect does e.g. an itwiki filter have on frwiki? None. If we agree on providing these users access to GAF filters additionally, we should be adding a new local group on meta for this purpose instead, in my opinion. --Vogone (talk) 01:14, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
    Assuming we're dealing with wise and responsible people we don't need separate groups imho. --Vituzzu (talk) 17:52, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
    After such a local meta group is created we will use it. But until this happens we have no other option except to add users to a global group. Ruslik (talk) 18:59, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

remove global OTRS member for jeremyb

Thanks, --Krd 18:21, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

  Done. --Stryn (talk) 18:23, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

remove global OTRS member for Mattes

Thanks, --Krd 19:28, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Done. --Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 19:48, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

add global OTRS member for KillerChihuahua

thanks, --Krd 16:06, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

  Done. RadiX 16:08, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

OTRS-member for Howicus

Thank you! Rjd0060 (talk) 20:38, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

Done. -Barras talk 20:42, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

add OTRS-member for Raboe001

Thank you! --Krd 10:51, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

Done Ajraddatz (talk) 10:53, 30 January 2016 (UTC)