Open main menu
Warning! Please do not post any new comments on this page. This is a discussion archive first created on 01 May 2015, although the comments contained were likely posted before and after this date. See current discussion.

Contents

Requests for global rollback permissions

Global rollback for Uğurkent

The following request is closed.

Hello Wikimedians. I have some local wikis bureaucrat, sysop, editor, patroller and translation admin rights. I can use many tools (eg:Twinkle) including with this code. Some stewards and global sysops recognize me. I need their help in some cases. I'm stuck to some wikis captcha application. That's why I can't rollback to the some vandalism. I'm trying as best I can. I want to help more so get the opinion of the community to access this application. --Uğurkenttalk 16:41, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

  •   Support --Nastoshka (talk) 19:03, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
  •   Comment - I think you need a bit more crosswiki experience. You can help out by reverting at #cvn-swconnect, and stalking RC. We always need more willing users like you! :D Caliburn (talk) 19:08, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
I'm trying to enter into the IRC channels in my spare time. Even a few users, we are exposed to a vandal's jokes so, including me. :) --Uğurkenttalk 20:00, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
  • I would prefer to see more crosswiki experience. --Rschen7754 20:54, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support --Kolega2357 (talk) 21:11, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support I believe he has crosswiki experience, although the fact that he's not that active (activity here are not editcount but rather Uğurkent habit to stop patrolling and doing something else for a long period of time) may raise concern to some, I am fine with it, he's experienced enough to see clear vandalism on other languages.--AldNonymousBicara? 16:12, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
  •   Weak support Jianhui67 talkcontribs 10:13, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support Why not? -FASTILY 01:37, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support, per Aldnonymous. And we could use a Turkish native speaker among the global rollbackers imho. Trijnsteltalk 10:27, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 11:36, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support Mardetanha talk 16:04, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support Syum90 (talk) 09:42, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

Appointed. While not unanimous, I see consensus to promote Uğurkent to the global rollbackers group. -- MarcoAurelio 16:36, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

Global rollback for Infinite0694

Hello all. I believe that I have sufficient x-wiki experience, so I wish to have Global Rollback as user rights to make me much more quickly to fight any x-wiki vandalism, especially, I think that Skipcaptcha rights would be very useful for me. Plus, I've been granted the rollback permission on the en Wikipedia, so I am sure that I know how to use it well. But, there are several reasons why my work on Wikipedia is limited by not having this tool, for example, I am not able to rollback to the some vandalism due to the fact that I have an experience with stumbling over Capita system. Additionally, I have been spending more time on Wikipedia to help the community, and I reckon my editing history shows that I am enough to handle this rights.--Infinite0694 (talk) 04:34, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

  •   Neutral You had a great start by joining SWMT but As far as I can see, I can not find significant patrol activity (only en.wp and ja.wp), Special:CentralAuth/Infinite0694 here state you only have activity on en.wp and ja.wp, and most edit on ja.wp is reverting edits which is great but I think it might be better to get local rollback on en.wp and ja.wp because your anti vandalism activity are centered only to those 2 Wikis, I am neutral on this because knowledge on Vandalism on other language other than English like what you did on ja.wp which is Japanese is a great asset, maybe it might be better if you join us patrolling on #cvn-swconnect channel on IRC, you might want to know how to do correct revert and deletion tagging on other language than English and Japanese.--AldNonymousBicara? 04:53, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
@Aldnonymous: Thank you for making a comment, but did you not see it[1]? EDIT: I'm sure that it shows I became familiar with the anti-vandalism patrol even though I am still in the early days of SWMT member. So, I request you will reconsider. Thanks,--Infinite0694 (talk) 05:27, 6 May 2015 (UTC)--Infinite0694 (talk) 18:28, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Too soon. It seems like you just recently got into SWMT activity. Eurodyne (talk) 05:40, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose To soon --Atcovi (talk) 23:22, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

  Request withdrawn I reckon that it is a little bit too early for me, so I withdraw. Thanks,--Infinite0694 (talk) 05:05, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

Global rollback for Grind24

I'd like to apply for rollback. I've been an active member of the SWMT for some months;doing many reverts and taggings. The rollback tool is more efficient than manually undoing and twinkle so this would make it much easier to revert nonsense/spam edits. Plus there are still some wikis where I have to install my global.js so TW is not there when needed most and I think that rollback globally would help me do the job faster.Grind24 (talk) 21:16, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

  • "Plus there are still some wikis where I have to install my global.js" - isn't there GlobalCssJs? --Rschen7754 21:23, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
I made reference to TW includes in my global.js that doesn't answer of times when I have the more necessity--Grind24 (talk) 22:17, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support, good crosswiki activity, good crosswiki editcount, and Grind24 focus on helping GS with "Gs eyes" page are greatly appreciated.--AldNonymousBicara? 21:29, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose For now, because by checking crosswiki edits I don't see that Grind is active on reverting vandalism or spam. I see however a lot of userpage creations which could be avoided by our new Global Userpage extension and some speedy deletion tagging, for which rollback is not required. And while I appreciate your work, this does not give me the impression that GR is needed by now :-( — MarcoAurelio 21:57, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Per Marco and the hat collecting clause. See this. Eurodyne (talk) 07:09, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
Eurodyne if you charge me of hats collecting, what we will say of this,this, email crat to become admin, another diff, on pl.wiki,mediawiki,en.wikibook,es.wikipedia;definitely it is the true hat collection , I don't know why you pursue me every time, then me you advice to assume the good faith.--Grind24 (talk) 11:11, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
@Grind24: This request is concerning you and does not have anything to do with me. I may have been a hypocrite, but that's beyond the point in this request specifically. Eurodyne (talk) 20:05, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
It might help if you speak in French, which I think would help me understand you better (I can translate). Also, Eurodyne's hat collection, while a problem I do have, does not discredit yours as a concern; I also have this same concern with you.--Jasper Deng (talk) 19:32, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per Marco and Eurodyne. --Rschen7754 08:25, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
    • Also disturbed by the combative behavior towards those opposing this request. --Rschen7754 19:50, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose En: This hat collection has been concerning. In addition to the vecwiki case, I've seen requests for rights on MediaWiki.org, on testwiki, and now here. I would like you to wait at least a year before making another request for user rights. Fr: Ce remassage des droits d'utilisateurs m'a inquiété. En plus du cas vecwiki, j'ai vu des demandes pour des droits sur MediaWiki.org, sur testwiki, et maintenant, ici. Je voudrais que tu attende au mois une anée avant de faire une nouvelle demande pour des droits d'utilisateurs.--Jasper Deng (talk) 08:38, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per Marco and, I could not see heavy use of reverts globally.--Infinite0694 (Talk) 16:31, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose - Unfortunately, you have had a history of hat collecting. I do indeed agree with Jasper on this one. Sorry. Caliburn (talk) 08:07, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
comment: As far as I can see, there's hardly any reverts outside of Meta and English Wikipedia. Most of your activity has been content translations and welcoming users. Of course, there's that "issue" the others above have mentioned. I recommend using Twinkle across more wikis other than just the English ones. Tropicalkitty (talk) 09:18, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

  Request withdrawn Decidedly all seems to indicate that it won't happen well,in addition to this interpretation of hats collection, so I withdraw --Grind24 (talk) 15:48, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Requests for global sysop permissions

Requests for global IP block exemption

Global IP block exempt for Talueses

I use a VPN service, because in my contry the goverment censor exist. I am a active user in ES:Wiki and I'm contributing with my chapter (Wikimedia Venezuela), so, please, someone help me? Thanks. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Talueses (talk)

I moved this request from Steward requests/Global permissions/2015-04. --Matiia (talk) 18:46, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
Done. Ajraddatz (talk) 19:48, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Global IP block exempt for Metamorforme42

I am using Tor because I would be anonymous on internet (in my country, the government has just made a law who permitted them to espionning people) but when I using Tor I can't edit wikipedia's pages (if I login without, they could know what is my ip and who I am/where I live/what I am doing/who are my friend…). In there someone who can give me some privacy? Thanks --Metamorforme42 (talk) 23:46, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

  Done, Linedwell (talk) 08:30, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Global IP block exempt for Eloquenzministerium

I am a candidate to the german Arbcom(Schiedsgericht)-elections running from the 8th to the 22nd of May[2]. A previous problem concerning an IP-range I am using from time to time, has very gently been solved by Steward Billinghurst, kindly converting a hard into a soft block, thereby allowing me to follow up on comments made by the users in their vote-comments in a timely manner. In his answer to my e-mail-request at stewards@m, he invited me to consider asking here to avoid further problems of this kind.

Indeed, I am travelling quite regularly, not only during the ongoing voting period. I am also contributing to the english- and french-language wikipedia and recently asked the danish WP for advice on an account originating there, who asked to be unblocked for the de:WP, so a local exemption in my home-wiki alone would be less helpful.

In the past, I have repeatedly run into this kind of problem and then either abstained from editing at all or waited until I came across an unblocked opportunity to contribute. As I often try to solve ongoing conflicts, it is sometimes time-critical for me to be able to intervene before a debate heats up beyond a point of no return.

Therefore I would be most grateful for granting me the global IP block exemption-flag. Thank you in advance, should any further clarification to this request be needed, I'll be glad to oblige, just ask. Best Regards --Eloquenzministerium (talk) 12:01, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

  Done  — billinghurst sDrewth 12:24, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

Global IP block exempt for

Chinese government blocked zhwp and some of my proxy was blocked globally(#70597).--GY Fan 10:01, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Done. Ajraddatz (talk) 20:28, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Requests for global rename permissions

Global rename for Mxn

Not ending before 12 May 2015 09:25 UTC

DHN has indicated that he'll be unable to service user renaming requests for a few weeks. As the Vietnamese Wikipedia's other bureaucrat (and also a bureaucrat at the Vietnamese Wiktionary), I've been asked to step in and help out. Our local queue has continued to flow despite a big orange notice about SUL finalization at the top of that page. (I've performed numerous user renames there, back in the old days, when user names were all local, organic, and sustainably caught.) – Minh Nguyễn 💬 09:25, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

  Done SPQRobin (talk) 12:58, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

Global rename for Bonaditya

Not ending before 14 May 2015 15:07 UTC

I was told by Aldnonymous that there are only 2 global renamer for Indonesian language query (Bennylin as steward and Mimihitam our local bureaucrat), meanwhile Mimihitam currently are busy IRL and can't handle the request, meanwhile there are backlog on w:id:Wikipedia:Pengubahan nama pengguna/Permohonan that need to be processed, hence I request global renamer bits to be added to my account. I'm currently serving as sysop and oversighter for Indonesian Wikipedia, previously I was sysop for bug.wikipedia. Thank you for reading this request. --Bonaditya (talk) 15:07, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

  •   Support Yes, finally that backlog will be processed. (Sorry, too busy to even help on this matter).--AldNonymousBicara? 15:08, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support Jianhui67 talkcontribs 15:10, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
  •   Comment trusted user, but imho not experienced enough (looking at users CA). not now. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:22, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
  • As Steinsplitter, I am also rather unable to judge this user, given there is a very little editing history. Vogone (talk) 18:33, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support --Kolega2357 (talk) 22:26, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
  •   OK No issues. Can be trusted with OS, so with global rename too. I assume you've read & understood the Global rename policy? Trijnsteltalk 13:26, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
  Comment I've read and understand that (global rename policy) --Bonaditya (talk) 16:20, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose not enough experience with global activities imho. But I will certainly support at a later time. Natuur12 (talk) 16:30, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
  •   Comment I have asked/"selected" some id-N users (or other user form South-East id>3) to join the GR group, so I know for sure that candidates with bigger experience than you, especially cross-wiki experience, are possibile. You don't seem experienced enough, that's it. Personally, I would support next time, but if there is a clear consensus to give you the flag, I wish you good luck.--Alexmar983 (talk) 19:53, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
    @Alexmar983:. The problem are. Example, people who do crosswiki like I and Bennylin are not interested with helping on renaming. Hence I ask around people on Sysop level on id-project to help and this is the best I can get.--AldNonymousBicara? 00:55, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
    @Aldnonymous: I don't understand what is "the problem", you did fine. Proposing a candidate costs nothing, especially if (s)he has enough experience. Some candidates are perfect, so it does not matter if there is someone as perfect as them... other ones are less perfect, so it would better to be sure if they are in fact the best we can get. I am not opposing, I simply has to be coherent with my standard, that's it. I asked Meursault2004 (id-N) some months ago, for example. Tonight I contancted Aurora (id-2), in the future there will be someone else, I don't know... Mimihitam for example. Information about GR flag is not perfect, but I think the gap will be filled in the following months for all the languages.--Alexmar983 (talk) 01
    34, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
    @Alexmar983:. This is the problem, the disparity of data owned by me are different than what you own, I already ask Meursault2004 for GRenamer IRL, and he says he's too busy IRL, and can't or not able to ask this rights for now, (I don't know when he will have the time for this GRenamer) I still asking fellow sysops or other 'crats for oncoming months.--AldNonymousBicara? 01:44, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
    Don't worry, if the community think that level of experience is enough, my opinion is not crucial. I also consider that some id-N are not active on idwiki(s). For example: Pras, he is bureaucrat on jvwiki but he is id-N--Alexmar983 (talk) 02:10, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
    @Alexmar983: He's busy with WMID project to digitalize the Java Books (see here for WMID projects See his name Pras/Prasetyo there) hence the low activity on jv.wikipedia, I even met him IRL Yesterday at Yogyakarta. I told you I already ask around people who could help, only Bonaditya is available. If Bonaditya don't pass then I might reconsider to run GRenamer myself (But I don't really like this option).--AldNonymousBicara? 04:24, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Concerned about the low level of activity. --Rschen7754 04:19, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support. Seems to be trusted and there is no significant harm in granting the bit. --L235 (talk) enwiki 21:51, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

  Not done There is no consensus. --MF-W 22:09, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

Global rename for Aldnonymous

Not ending before 29 May 2015 16:14 UTC

Hello everyone, today I ask for Global Rename permission to be added on my account, reason for this request is because the backlog on rename request already long (w:id:Wikipedia:Pengubahan nama pengguna/Permohonan), and there's only 2 Renamer available (bennylin as stewards, and Mimihitam as G Renamer) but Bennylin have no interest handling this request and Mimihitam are on vacation IRL, another reason that pushing me to ask for this permission is that Bonaditya request for Global Renamer got rejected because he have no/little experience with Xwiki, Bonaditya is one of the active admins currently id.wp have on it's undermanned status (We currently only have 26 admins to handle all this stuff), so in actuality currently there's no Indonesian Global renamer that needed to handle id, ace, bjn, map-bms, bug, jv, min, su and other local language that have wiki Inside Indonesia (Indonesian sister projects). I made this request so I could handle the request and solve the backlog. For my suitability for this rights, I think I have crosswiki experience, and language skill to handle the request and I am familiar with Xwiki works. Thank you for reading this request.--AldNonymousBicara? 16:14, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

  •   Support Jianhui67 talkcontribs 16:15, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support --Kolega2357 (talk) 21:45, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
  • sigh I guess I don't really like that this request comes just a few weeks after d:Wikidata:Requests for permissions/Administrator/Aldnonymous, where concerns were raised regarding the candidate's communication; running for something else so soon after that just doesn't sit well with me. I also don't think the rationale is that valid either: the local request pages are a convenience, not a necessity, and if the staffing doesn't exist to run the page, then it should be redirected to Meta, or to that new tool in the Special: namespace that was recently developed. So I would have to oppose this. --Rschen7754 01:25, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
    @Rschen7754: Easy for you to say that, I already ask local crat to ask for this rights, only mimihitam asking it, meanwhile others give disinterest response, I ask other local sysops, only Bonaditya ask it, but even so, he got rejected because no xwiki experience, we also already place the pointer page to meta, but they don't want to place it here because meta still using mainly english on its request page, then we try communicating with them offline from facebook and explain the process, even so they got dejected and give up on the renaming process, I am actually depressed with this situation, and the mistake few days ago on Chinese G Renamer renaming Indonesian user wrongly because it was a spam account and religious attack account didn't make it all better, hence this request. I probably only going to use this G Renamer temporarily until there are other Indonesian G Renamer.--AldNonymousBicara? 04:22, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
    Then we should take the issue up with those global renamers. Meanwhile, Special:GlobalRenameQueue and associated pages are supposed to be translated as part of the interface. --Rschen7754 15:44, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
    @Rschen7754: Your answer made me realize you are not really familiar with renaming please do see w:id:Istimewa:GlobalRenameRequest It's already in Indonesian (This link already inserted on local rename pages but they don't use it -senior editor like Anbu(see w:id:Pembicaraan_Pengguna:Aldnonymous/Arsip_002#Bls:_Akun_global) and Hiro Hamada(see w:id:Wikipedia:Pengubahan_nama_pengguna/Permohonan#Andika_Rahman_Hakim_.E2.86.92_HiroHamada1)-, after the wrong rename by some Chinese Global Renamer, indicating that experienced user don't trust this special pages request despite the endorse to using it onwiki and offwiki), some people already made the request, some don't made the request after they saw the wrong rename happened to some of the editor, it's showing that language comprehensive are required when handling request from specified language such as Asian (non germanic) language.--AldNonymousBicara? 16:38, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
    I don't think that is a problem of the page itself, which is IMHO very intuitive. You just have to enter the desired username and a reasoning and hit "Submit". If people is being wrongfully renamed I think that they a) need to read the pages before submitting requests or; b) find that user making bad global renames and educate him on doing right his job or remove their rights as Rschen7754 said. I'd say that that special page would be the only way to request renamings in the future when the SUL-F process is fully done... and many major projects are replacing local request pages in favor of this centralized system (eswiki for example). Best regards. -- MarcoAurelio 22:34, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
    True, but it's hard to change habit, local procedure that already prevail for a long time and local sysops/'crat that are used to old rename process is hard to adapt with new rename process, the current gap of number id-N renamer didn't make it better as no id-N renamer available to "actually" explain stuff to them, it's within my interest that I want to change their rename process to match the current meta rename and use that special pages hence I keep asking local sysops or 'crat to ask for G rename as I already explained by me on previous comment, but as expected, Bonaditya got rejected because low Xwiki activity, hence I made this rename request because I already give up on searching local admins that are willing to ask for Grenamer, the fact that the process for this rights are made hard for them because they have low Xwiki activity makes them timid and reject the idea of making them Grenamer.--AldNonymousBicara? 22:46, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
  •   Strong support I don't see why not, and I believe the candidate is a qualified one. --Infinite0694 (Talk) 15:40, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
  •   SupportI see Rschen7754's links but imho they are not relevant to current GRN role. --Vituzzu (talk) 16:08, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per Rschen7754. The amount of rights requests has been rather excessive, in my opinion.--Jasper Deng (talk) 16:11, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support He is the best candidate for an id-N global renamer we had "so far" (=in the last months) and he tried his best to find someone else, so he is just honestly filling a real gap. I know nothing about his request for administrator flag and related doubts, but personally I had no problem with his "communication" style.--Alexmar983 (talk) 21:40, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support As far as I can see, net positive --L235 (talk) enwiki 16:21, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support Good candidate, and IMO his communication is fine. Ajraddatz (talk) 16:24, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support I agree with Ajraddatz --Grind24 (talk) 17:11, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support Agree with the above. A great candidate! Caliburn (talk) 19:16, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support Trusted and reliable user.--Syum90 (talk) 08:31, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support Yes --Atcovi (talk) 22:36, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support Natuur12 (talk) 10:46, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support Matiia (talk) 00:02, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
  •   Very strong support Potential user, have enough experience in XWiki. --Bonaditya (talk) 01:57, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support Aldnonymous has the experience to do this. --Uğurkenttalk 13:17, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 13:46, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
  •   OK Trijnsteltalk 14:16, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support ~ Nahid Talk 07:28, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
  Done While some issues were raised I think there is at least a rough consensus to promote. Ruslik (talk) 17:23, 30 May 2015 (UTC)


Requests for other global permissions

remove otrs-member from Pymouss

Thank you. Rjd0060 (talk) 03:34, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

  Done --Melos (talk) 04:43, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
No problem for me: I'm not really active on OTRS presently. Pymouss Tchatcher - 21:05, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

remove otrs-member from Harold

Thanks! Cbrown1023 talk 19:07, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

  removed, thanks for his service. Linedwell (talk) 19:23, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Add Global OTRS-member for D.bratchuk

New OTRS respondent, thanks, --Tiptoety talk 03:44, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

  Done. -- Mentifisto 03:51, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
Thank you. --D.bratchuk (talk) 06:48, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

CAPTCHA exemptions for Devwebtel

I started patrolling global recent changes (#cvn-sw on IRC) and when I am reverting large edit (when vandal removed external links) I have to enter captcha. I'm not requesting global rollback, because I don't have too much global vandalism reverted. Thanks, --Devwebtel (query) 19:45, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

  • This is kind of weird, because autoconfirmed user don't need to enter CAPTCHA.--AldNonymousBicara? 21:55, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
    • I'm not editing the same wiki, this is global RC, so do 10 edits on each of wikis may be difficult. --Devwebtel (query) 22:05, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
Eh? Since your account is SUL you are autoconfirmed on every wiki you visit as long it's on SUL, hence I said it's weird.--AldNonymousBicara? 22:30, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
No, it doesn't work that way. For example, if Devwebtel gets an autocreated account on xxwikibooks on 9th May, it'll be autoconfirmed only when the local requirements for autoconfirmed are met (usually 4 days/0 edits on most wikis). This won't have an effect on being autoconfirmed at other wikis. I also encountered this issue when I first joined SWMT. There's also a bug/task about this. --Glaisher (talk) 08:37, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
The right to skip captchas doesn't seem to be included in the autoconfirmed group on every wiki. Perhaps that should be fixed. Ajraddatz (talk) 23:11, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
Autoconfirmed is only local group, not global. When I have autoconfirmed (with skipcaptcha right) on xxwikipedia, I don't have it on yywikipedia (and I have to solve captcha). --Devwebtel (query) 10:58, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
Ah yes, probably I was meant to say that, but I never encountered Captcha.--AldNonymousBicara? 17:22, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
  • @Devwebtel: Have you tried User:Krinkle/Tools/Global SUL yet? As Glaisher pointed out, 4 days after you have run that script you should be autoconfirmed on nearly all Wikimedia wikis, even without being in the global CAPTCHA-exempt group. Kind regards, Vogone (talk) 11:20, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
    • I runned this tool, but on some wikis you should have some edits (usually 10) to have autoconfirmed rank. --Devwebtel (query) 12:43, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
      • That's just a few large wikis. --Glaisher (talk) 17:29, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
        • If it is a big problem to grant this permissions, OK. I will wait month and I will request global rollbacker. --Devwebtel (query) 20:17, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
          • Not a problem at all; we just wanted to nail down what the problem was. Done. Thanks for helping out! Ajraddatz (talk) 22:53, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

add global-interface-editor for Jitrixis

I was an ex-sysop on wikidata and I've made some script on it like labelLister, autoEdit, etc... So I'm skilled in Mediawiki's Javascripts. Recently I've seen a bug on many project who support the rename title script for unsupported title. It rename the title seen on the page but not the title of the tab on the browser that is also a SEO mistake. Maybe in the futur I can find some other bug and issue I can resolve on common script, so it will be usefull for me to get this right. Is that possible ? Thanks in advance, Cordialy, --Jitrixis (talk) 10:44, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

  • Unfortunately, I can't understand your request. You saw a bug in a global script (wherever that is located)? Then you should edit that global script or make an editrequest on the talk page wherever that script is. Likewise if you "maybe" find other bugs in scripts, you should edit or request them to be edited accordingly at their locations. --MF-W 13:19, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
    @MF-Warburg: This is not really a bug, it's just a missing feature in the code which make an little SEO problem (non correspondant of the title tag and the subject). The code is located on many wikis on Mediawiki:Common.js, but the problem is recurrent on different wikis like "en" and "fr" wikt, "en" and "fr" wikp, and maybe on others.
    Then I'm a developer so I solve problem by my self, and I'm not a global admin because I don't need those tools, but sometimes I see bugs on protected scripts or someones send me issue about scripts so those tools can help me to do this job instead of delegating the job to someone else. And of course i'm not a barbarian, if I change the way a scripts works I will request it before ;) Cordialy, --Jitrixis (talk) 00:01, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
  •   Question: SEO Mistake?--AldNonymousBicara? 15:52, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
    @Aldnonymous: en:SEO explained above :) Cordialy, --Jitrixis (talk) 00:01, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
    Exemple: wiktionary:fr:Titres_non_pris_en_charge/Signe_inférieur_à the title on the top of your browser isn't the corrected title, so if you search on google the inferior sign you need to type this request ([3] which appear on the top with a weird title) and actually google is able to undertand script, so according to SEO recommendation we also need to change the title of the page (title tag) at the same time we change the title of the article (first level title). And another small lack, there is no message "Title to use to create an internal link" (in french "Titre à utiliser pour créer un lien interne") like here w:fr:1 E18 s, but that's not an SEO problem and also a different kind of problem. --Jitrixis (talk) 00:19, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Does anyone else have input on this? Ajraddatz (talk) 01:36, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
    He do says he need the bit to manage the tools, I see no objection but at the same time no support, just questions, the final decision should be made by Stewards.--AldNonymousBicara? 16:43, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
  Done for 1 year till 16 May 2016. Ruslik (talk) 19:33, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
Granting rights without consensus? Vogone (talk) 19:41, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

OTRS-members removal

Thank you! Rjd0060 (talk) 17:48, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

Done. Ajraddatz (talk) 17:48, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

add global OTRS member for ESkog

New OTRS member. Thx. --Krd 12:46, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

  Done. -- Mentifisto 12:57, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

del global OTRS member for Anon126

No longer OTRS member. --Krd 12:23, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

  Done SPQRobin (talk) 12:47, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

add global OTRS-member for Jon Harald Søby

Thanks, --Krd 05:34, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

  Done, einsbor talk 10:04, 29 May 2015 (UTC)