Open main menu
Warning! Please do not post any new comments on this page. This is a discussion archive first created on 01 February 2015, although the comments contained were likely posted before and after this date. See current discussion.

Requests for global rollback permissions

Global rollback for Matiia

Hello, I have been doing countervandalism for a while on #cvn-sw (among other channels), and I would like to have the GR flag, it will be easier than using Twinkle, that sometimes doesn't load very well or I can't use it until I have a few edits, and my Internet doesn't help hehe, also, I could avoid captcha issues. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Matiia (talk)

  • Sure. I've seen you around here and Wikia, and you do good counter-vandalism work. Ajraddatz (talk) 01:08, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Support. Active and helpful user. I often see him around fighting vandalism. Ruy Pugliesi 02:13, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Support But would you put up a userpage? :p Eurodyne (talk) 03:21, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Support I've also seen this user active at #cvn-sw and it looks like this tool will be useful to them. Glaisher (talk) 04:37, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Support Keep seeing Matiia tagging and reverting everywhere, and none so far are incorrect revert. I am truly pleased.--AldNonymousBicara? 06:06, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support Active user reverting vandalism. Why not? Jianhui67 talkcontribs 06:09, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Support, sure. --Stryn (talk) 06:19, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Support Why not? -FASTILY 06:59, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support Whenever I spot a bad diff on IRC, it has already been reverted by Matiia. Nirmos (talk) 07:27, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support --Uğurkenttalk 07:52, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support Good job on the SWMT--Syum90 (talk) 08:30, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support from my wikiholidays. Alan (talk) 10:55, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Support, does good work. Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 14:04, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support Trijnsteltalk 15:08, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support--Calak (talk) 20:49, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support Irwin Dime 16:43, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Support ///EuroCarGT 22:04, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Support. --MF-W 03:00, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support. Érico Wouters (msg) 03:05, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support --Defender (talk) 04:13, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support. –BruTe talk 11:15, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Yes, per above. -- M\A 11:18, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support --Nastoshka (talk) 16:35, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support.—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 18:05, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support --Florence (talk) 22:09, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 04:11, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
  •   A favor     Muy a favor--Philip J Fry (talk) 02:50, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
  •   A favor    Muy a favor --ElGatoSaez (talk) 02:51, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
  • I went though a few of your reverts, and most of them were good, but I'd like to hear your thoughts on the few questionable ones I found:
    • Please explain this revert. It looks like the IP was trying to "move" the page with copy/paste (not ideal but "okay" if a link to the old one is given), but now there are two identical pages. Do you think this "move" was appropriate? Would asking the IP editor about this have been better? (I don't know Shona, so I have no idea which title is better)
When I saw that edit, the IP address had not created yet that page, I saw he was making a redirection from that page to a broken link, that's why I made that edit. And no, it was not right, the user didn't respected the "attribution". I think I should have waited a little more and see what was the user going to do after that, and see if he was going to create the page. --Matiia (talk) 06:05, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
    • Why did you revert the addition of a correct Croatian translation of "bedsheet" on Bulgarian Wiktionary?
It was a mistake. Already fixed. --Matiia (talk) 06:05, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
    • This revert looks like it might correct, but I'm not sure, since it added (mostly correct) content with incorrect capitalisation. Although I probably would have left it to the local community, I think the revert was OK; just wanted to put it here in case anyone else is interested. PiRSquared17 (talk) 04:46, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support, Jmvkrecords (Intra Talk) 05:09, 22 February 2015 (UTC).
  •   Support--DLeandroc 22:57, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
  Done Ruslik (talk) 18:30, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
Thank you all. Matiia (talk) 18:42, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Global rollback for Bigwill91

Just created my new account, Bigwill91. If I see vandalism on a page, I can use this tool to revert it to the last revision. Bigwill91 (talk) 21:38, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

  •   Question: Have you read GR policy and requirements? Alan (talk) 21:55, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
Yes. However, I think my account has been autocomfirmed. Bigwill91 (talk) 22:01, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
  Not done no edits except from this request. --Vituzzu (talk) 22:08, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
Well, this means that I only did less edits. Bigwill91 (talk) 22:15, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
Guess what; I did one revert on Translations:Tech/News/17/ja, because I found vandalism. Regards, Bigwill(History) Timestamp: 05:09, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
  Comment This user is a sock of a globally locked user: Wikimedia Forum#Cannot login to Wikipedia. Ping Snowolf. Trijnsteltalk 15:43, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

Global rollback for Brackenheim

Hello, I'm an active filemover on Commons who tries to keep Category:Media requiring renaming empty, so global autopatrol would be really useful and lokal users needn't mark changes like this as vandalism-free any more. Kind regards, --Brackenheim (talk) 17:55, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

  •   Oppose Absolutely not, this is not the Global Rollback bit scope which is purely used for reverting spam and vandalism, please do read the pertaining policy here (Global rollback).--AldNonymousBicara? 18:09, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Sorry, not in the scope of GR. Jianhui67 talkcontribs 18:10, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per GR. Alan (talk) 19:35, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
  Request withdrawn by the user per [1]. Snowolf How can I help? 22:16, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

Global rollback for R3kt

Hi all! I'm R3kt (formally Samuel Najdowski (also known as Snaj, alpha, etc on IRC) and I'd like to request global rollback today because I'm a member of the Counter-vandalism network and SWMT. You see, I was a newbie about a year ago, and now that I plan to stick to this account I've been sticking to for 5+ months, I'd like to request for these rights. I'm helpful in the SWMT channel, I know policies of when to revert and when not to (I've done Counter-vandalism on Wikia, but I've decided to move to WMF CVN recently) and in addition to that, even though my edit count is low atm, I plan to do more counter-vandalism even after I request this.. so no hard feelings if people say oppose. I'm known throughout the countervandalism community as a helper and a knowledgeable person when it comes to countervandalism (I've done it since October 2013); I've been active in most of the channels for a while now. Some Wikians might not like me due to past behavior, but I can assure you that isn't me anymore. Last but no least, I know what the rollback tools do and when to use them and when not to, as I've stated and most Wikimedians should know that. I'm just starting out, but my experience is high in this field and I feel I can be a great help if I put my mind to it.. the choice is yours. R3kt (talk) 22:40, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

  •   Oppose. No cross-wiki experience. -- Tegel (Talk) 22:43, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
  •   Comment. Tegel, even if I haven't done much yet, I /do/ have crosswiki experience from learning from other and I was good with crosswiki countervandalism at Wikia; if that means anything. I know exactly what to do in a crosswiki vandalism/spam situation. R3kt (talk) 22:47, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
  • The fact that you changed usernames again shows me no more maturity than before. I don't care what you did on Wikia, but I don't think that there is much use for you to have these rights here. Ajraddatz (talk) 22:48, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Ajr, I *renamed* because I had a privacy concern, I *didn't* change accounts and haven't for over five months. You and everyone else that has ever known me at Wikia calls me immature. I like you ajr, but basing everything on the past is hardly a fair assumption to make. R3kt (talk) 22:52, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per Tegel. There are big differences between Wikia and the Wikimedia Foundation wikis and thus your experience there, while laudable, is insufficient for this.--Jasper Deng (talk) 23:02, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Not much cross-wiki experience and per Jasper Deng. Sorry. Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:04, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose No. Eurodyne (talk) 21:56, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
  Request withdrawn per user request on IRC. --Stryn (talk) 22:41, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

Requests for global sysop permissions

Global sysop for Aldnonymous

Not ending before 1 February 2015 12:16 UTC

Hi everyone, I'm volunteering for Global Sysopship to fight Vandalism and Spam, that keep happening on most Small wikis, on my previous Nom (can bee seen Here) People told me to wait for 2-3 month (Ruslik) and Goldenburg says to wait for 6 month, it's been 7 month since then, My experience with Sysop tools are coming from my temp Adminship on id.wikiquote, at that time I manage to caught 1 LTA (Hendrix) that keep spamming unnoticed on many small wiki (Including big wikis such as fr.wp and en.wp), other than that Sysop experience, I can offer different time coverage than most GS (Europe users), and different language skill because most Small wikis come from Global South. Thanks for reading this request.--AldNonUcallin?☎ 12:16, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

  • In case anybody missing my previous Nom it can be found here Steward requests/Global permissions/2014-05#Global sysop for Aldnonymous
  •   Support Jianhui67 talkcontribs 12:24, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
  • Support, unfortunately not as active as before, but certainly a sensible SWMT member who also lives in a time zone where way less global sysops are available. Vogone (talk) 12:27, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
  • Now you have my support, yes. Alan (talk) 12:48, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support Strong support! --Bonaditya (talk) 13:30, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support fine by me --Grind24 (talk) 14:00, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
  • Support--DangSunM (talk) 14:40, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support Matiia (talk) 15:10, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
  •   Yes. He will be okay with the tool. Ruy Pugliesi 15:12, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support Experienced SWMT member. ~ Nahid Talk 15:37, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support IMO you didn't need to wait 7 months. Thanks for volunteering :-) Ajraddatz (talk) 17:07, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support Eurodyne (talk) 18:34, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
  • Support, no issues. Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 19:08, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Saya sangat mendukung anda mendapatkan perkakas ini. Anda adalah Steward Wikimedia masa depan yang sangat aktif dan potensial. Salam sejahtera. -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 00:57, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
  • supportDerHexer (Talk) 00:59, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
  • Support. --Stryn (talk) 06:11, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support, sure. Einsbor (talk) 08:02, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support, I see no objection. --Randykitty (talk) 12:12, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support ok Natuur12 (talk) 12:33, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support and thanks for helping. :) Trijnsteltalk 13:27, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
  • Support --MF-W 00:31, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support --Kolega2357 (talk) 00:59, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support. Geagea (talk) 03:59, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support Why not? -FASTILY 09:36, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support Of course! Syum90 (talk) 14:55, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support --Uğurkenttalk 19:54, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support. LlamaAl (talk) 00:15, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
  • Support, trusted and helpful user. ///EuroCarGT 02:25, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support YUP. — Revi 16:10, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support nothing against. —Ah3kal (talk) 16:37, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support. Érico Wouters (msg) 23:18, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support.--Florence (talk) 22:06, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support--Calak (talk) 11:11, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
  • ok -- M\A 17:17, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
  Done Ruslik (talk) 12:54, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

Requests for global IP block exemption

Global IP block exempt for Zhaofeng Li

Hi, I'm an editor from China and have to use proxies to bypass Internet censorship. Though Wikimedia projects aren't currently blocked here, the connection can get sometimes wacky. The particular proxy I'm using is my own VPS, 162.220.8.43 (whose rDNS points to zhaofeng.li), which is range-blocked globally by Vituzzu per NOP. I understand that some VPSes in the range may be used as open proxies, but I don't run any on my machine. I already have the exemption locally on enwiki, but having the global bit will make it easier for me to work on other projects. Thank you. Zhaofeng Li [talk... contribs...] 00:51, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Another option is to review whether such a long rangeblock is ever necessary. Zhaofeng Li [talk... contribs...] 00:54, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
  Done Ruslik (talk) 16:45, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
Thank you. Zhaofeng Li [talk... contribs...] 01:02, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
To note that I have softened the block on the range, though cannot guarantee that it will stay that way. Within two days of coming of its last global block of a year, it was back on again for spamming within two days. So this may be an issue that you wish to raise with the service provider about dealing with spambots.  — billinghurst sDrewth 21:02, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

Global IP block exempt for Atcovi

Hey. I am Goldenburg111, now known as Atcovi. I currently have reviewer rights on Wikibooks and rollback on Simple Wiktionary. I have a global account as well. I edit at school, as well as home and other places. I'm always affected from global blocks that my IP has been getting, I can't even log into my account to edit. The last global block was from November 22 to December 22 from Billinghurst after my school IP vandalized Wikipedia, Wikisource, and went up to Wiktionary I believe. The students in my school know about Wikipedia and they usually mess around with wikipedia and the other projects as well. So I can stay away from these global blocks and be able to edit without having to be blocked for "abuse", in which I didn't do, I hope to recieve the Global IP Block Exempt so I can avoid any other global blocks in the future, thanks, --Atcovi (talk) 23:29, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

  Done Ruslik (talk) 19:44, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
Not so sure about this outcome due to his, pretty recent (2013), history with sockpuppets, see here. Trijnsteltalk 20:07, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
Thanks Ruslik. Oh and Trijnstel I do apologize for that incident, but that was 2 years ago, isn't that a bit old? --Atcovi (talk) 20:11, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
Plus he as well did blank that report due to courtesy. --Atcovi (talk) 20:13, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
BTW It doesn't seem like it has been added, is it not supposed to be added yet? --Atcovi (talk) 20:14, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
Now indeed done. Vogone (talk) 18:05, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
Thanks @Vogone and Ruslik. Oh and thanks as well Trijnstel for bringing that matter up, I do apologize for it tho. :) Regards, --Atcovi (talk) 22:02, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Global IP block exempt for Lwen1090

<Add an explanation here>, thanks, --Lwen1090 (talk) 00:53, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

@Lwen1080: The block in place is a soft block, so as long as you are logged into your Wikimedia account, you should still be able to edit, so as such, this process is redundant for soft blocks.  — billinghurst sDrewth 12:47, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Global IP block exempt for Pathoschild

I recently began using always-on anonymising proxies to improve privacy, but this means I run into global blocks placed against proxies. I think granting an IP block exemption to my account is safe and won't reduce the blocks' effectiveness in preventing anonymous abuse, since it would only apply when I'm logged in. —Pathoschild 16:18, 08 February 2015 (UTC)

  Done Ruslik (talk) 20:53, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
Thanks! —Pathoschild 21:11, 09 February 2015 (UTC)

Global IP block exempt for odder

I would like to request the global IP block exemption for reasons similar to @User:Pathoschild; namely because I have recently taken to using technical means of protecting my on-line privacy and security as well as preventing third parties from using traffic analysis originating from my home; unfortunately, many of the end IP addresses are covered by global IP blocks which prevents me from editing Wikimedia wikis. As a Commons administrator, I already have the local ipblock-exempt user right which should help me avoid local blocks, if they occur. Thanks, odder (talk) 19:27, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

  Done Ruslik (talk) 20:11, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
Thanks a lot, @Ruslik. odder (talk) 04:47, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

Global IP block exempt for Jim Carter

To enable online anonymity (privacy reason) I'm using TOR. Just like Pathoschild, I think it would be good if IP exemption is granted to my account. Thanks! Jim Carter (talk) 11:47, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

Yeah, me too, but check this out #Global IP block exempt for Mjbmr. Mjbmr (discussioncontribs) 13:54, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

  Done by Billinghurst on 13:17, 16 February 2015 (UTC). Trijnsteltalk 21:38, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

Global IP block exempt for Kharkiv07

Hi! I've been making a lot of contributions to the English Wikipedia, but due to scheduling many of my work will have to be done from an institution that has unfortunately received a global IP block. It would be great if I could receive an exemption so I can continue to edit. You can check out my contributions or my talk page for verification of my clean record. Thanks for consideration! Kharkiv07 (talk) 17:42, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

(Note that the IP in question is 173.86.206.114) Kharkiv07 (talk) 14:26, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

if you are only editing enwiki, you don't need global ip block exempt, you can ask it localy for enwiki Mardetanha talk 14:29, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
Done. The local IPBE group no longer exempts people from global blocks, and honestly forcing them to go through the hoops locally and then come back here if they are ever globally active doesn't seem like a good use of anyone's time. Ajraddatz (talk) 07:28, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
When was this change made? Ruslik (talk) 18:33, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
Not sure, but it has been in place for at least a year now. I first noticed in March of last year when I was confused about stewards not granting the global flag to people only active on one wiki. Ajraddatz (talk) 18:40, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
I am not sure that you are right. Ruslik (talk) 18:49, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
I am looking at the composition of both groups. The local IPBE group contains only ipblock-exempt, when it seems that globalblock-exempt is required to be exempt from local blocks. I have not tested it. Regardless, as I said on the mailing list, moving between projects is increasingly common on Wikimedia (especially with commons and wikidata). Not granting the global flag only prevents users from contributing to other projects when they are clearly trusted enough to not be blocked. Ajraddatz (talk) 19:07, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
Just tested; the ipblock-exempt user right does exempt from global blocks as well. Good call Ruslik0. I still maintain, however, that bouncing users back to the local communities after they request the right here doesn't make sense. Ajraddatz (talk) 19:13, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
Priority is with local right, Global IP block exempt is definitely for people whose nature of work is cross-wiki if not they should ask their respected local community Mardetanha talk 21:34, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
I just assumed that since it was a global IP block it needed to be appealed globally, and a steward in the IRC mentioned that too. If I may recommend that that be clarified somewhere, I would've just gone to enwiki if I saw that it was just a hard block on there as opposed to global. Kharkiv07 (talk) 03:19, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

Global IP block exempt for Scoopfinder

Travelling a lot, I've to use TOR, VPN and anonymous proxies in some countries / companies / schools to access/edit the projects safely. I already have the right on frwiki, but I plan to be active on commons, meta, frwikivoyage and enwiki (and probably more), so becoming a member of this global group seems a time saving oppportunity. (~16k edits, bot with ~50k edits, abusefilter editor on frwiki, no block history) --Scoopfinder (talk) 17:39, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

Global IP block exempt will only exempt your from global blocks, not from local. Ruslik (talk) 20:29, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
I know, Ruslik, I read the policy carefully and, for what I understood, TOR and anonymous proxies can also be global blocked, nope ? For the wikis where I edit mostly, I'll ask for the local exemption (already have it on frwiki + wikidata). Tell me if I'm wrong =) --Scoopfinder(d) 23:04, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
  Done  — billinghurst sDrewth 23:28, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

Requests for global rename permissions

Global rename for Doug

Not ending before 8 February 2015 18:38 UTC
  • Bureaucrat on la.wikisource since 24 October 2011.--Doug.(talk contribs) 18:38, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
  Question: I'm not sure about your rename experience since you've performed only 1 rename in the past three years, out of 14 renames on la.wikisource since 2006. Or perhaps you can show your experience in other ways? Did and do you understand the rename policies (both global and local)? Trijnsteltalk 18:50, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
Sure, I have assisted in the past in local renames on other wikis, including en.wp, where I helped out on w:Wikipedia:Changing username and w:Wikipedia:Changing username/Usurpations. In part due to a lot of work several years back unifying my own account, I was able to search out and assist with correcting errors by local crats in making name changes, for example failure to move the user pages. In addition, I am familiar with Global rename policy and I have read the technical information and understand the extension. As far as the "local rename policy", I understand the policies on many wikis but if you are speaking of la.ws in particular, it has no polices for anything.--Doug.(talk contribs) 21:41, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
  • On none of those projects do you seem to be really active. I really wonder if you are going to use this right. Savhñ 21:30, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
  • I may not, I have been quite inactive for an extended period. Though I am the most likely to use the right on la.ws of anyone. There was essentially an invite posted on la.ws so I decided to request it in case it's needed. I'm a trusted user who knows how and when to use the right; but if you think my inactivity is a bar, then that's cool, I certainly don't have any present need for this right.--Doug.(talk contribs) 01:21, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
  • I know the person, and don't see that the user meets the automatic criteria, and I am not sure that we need more renamers at this time.  — billinghurst sDrewth 05:56, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
    No worries. Withdrawn.--Doug.(talk contribs) 11:20, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

Requests for other global permissions

Global OTRS member for Twotwo2019 and Harold

Thanks, --Krd 11:08, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

  Done. Trijnsteltalk 11:15, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

Global OTRS Member for Mlpearc

Please add the global OTRS user right to Mlpearc, --~ Matthewrbowker Poke me 18:02, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

Done. -Barras talk 18:05, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

remove global OTRS member for Syrio

OTRS account has been closed. --Krd 09:24, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

  Done--Shanmugamp7 (talk) 09:27, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

remove global OTRS member for Wctaiwan

Thank you! Rjd0060 (talk) 00:42, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

Done. Savhñ 00:48, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

Global OTRS member for Benoit Rochon

Thank you. --Tiptoety talk 23:43, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

Done, though no log entry created. Will file a bug report later. Ajraddatz (talk) 23:48, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
Well, I'm seeing "(Global rights log); 02:41 . . 127.0.0.1 (talk | block) changed global group membership for User:Ajraddatz from (none) to OTRS-member ‎(request)" - something went horribly wrong on the server side. --Rschen7754 02:43, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
That was just hoo fixing the log entry. See phabricator:T89205 Ajraddatz (talk) 02:45, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

Global OTRS member for Mbch331

Thank you. --Krd 08:51, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

  Done. -- Mentifisto 09:06, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

remove Global OTRS member for Jeepday

Thank you. --Krd 19:27, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Done. Ajraddatz (talk) 19:33, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Interface editor for Usman on Wp/ps

There are too much interface issues on Wp/ps which should be Corrected,Especially there are problems in Reading the current Font and so many other,I request to grant me Interface editor rights so that I fix those issues , thanks, --UsmanKhann (talk) 21:17, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

Having access to global rights to make changes on one wiki is generally not accepted; please request adminship locally instead. Ajraddatz (talk) 21:19, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
I've taken the liberty of marking this not done. PiRSquared17 (talk) 19:29, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

Global OTRS Member for several

Please add the OTRS-member right to the following:

And remove it from:

Thank you. Rjd0060 (talk) 20:26, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

  Done (Wilfredor was renamed, so I removed it from the other account name) Trijnsteltalk 20:32, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

Global OTRS member for Smihael

Thank you. --Tiptoety talk 21:17, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

  Done. Trijnsteltalk 21:23, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

Global OTRS member for O.Koslowski

Thank you. --Krd 07:20, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

  Done. -- Mentifisto 07:23, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

Global OTRS member for Alnilam

Thank you. --Krd 12:07, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

Done--Shanmugamp7 (talk) 12:14, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

Global OTRS member for FreeRangeFrog

Thank you. --Krd 12:07, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

Done--Shanmugamp7 (talk) 12:14, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

Global OTRS member for Jonathan Groß

Thanks, --Krd 08:53, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

  Done. -- Mentifisto 08:58, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

Global OTRS member for Martin Kraft

Thanks, --Krd 08:53, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

  Done. -- Mentifisto 08:58, 24 February 2015 (UTC)