Open main menu

Requests for global rollback permissions

Global rollback for Darwinius

The following request is closed.

I would really appreciate if I could have global roll-back, since as part of my duties as a Commons admin I restore files that should not have been deleted, as well as their use on the sister wikipedia projects. It generally implies a mere "undo" on the CommonsDelinker action on those projects, but it really is a drag in the projects I don't have roll-back (I currently only have it in the English and Portuguese speaking wikis). I've no plans for the moment to be part of the SWAT team (or whatever it is called), nor to combat vandalism at a global level, but this is something that would be really useful, considering that I often do this kind of actions dozens of times on a single occasion, and they are in the interest of everyone. Thanks, --- Darwin Ahoy! 20:54, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

  • {{support}} Trusted user and no big deal at all, IMO Vogone (talk) 21:05, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Weak Oppose. Out of the GR scope. Not interested in the SWAT/SWMT. Isn't there a way of making the bot rollback itself if the file is restored? I only found 45 reverts of the bot's edits in your luxo (outside of the wikis where you have rollback), which would in any case be too little, IMO. Savhñ 21:11, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
  •   weak oppose per Savh.--Jasper Deng (talk) 21:50, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
  •   Oppose I agree with Savh as well. And I undo edits of CommonsDelinker too, but I never use my rollback tool for that. Undo suffices the job. Trijnsteltalk 22:22, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
    • Yes, undo suffices the job indeed (as it suffices for everyone else, I suppose, SWAT or not SWAT), but it's much more practical with GR. Those are uncontroversial reverts, and I *do* really feel a significant difference with rollback. I do not understand why the scope of this tool is limited to SWAT. Anyway, this is not especially in my interest, since I could simply skip those actions and leave them to the projects. And being a drag as it is, I will logically refrain to do such actions more often, since they are tiresome. If this is indeed out of scope of GR, then please close this request, but if that is the case indeed, I believe that scope should be reviewed and extended. If it is in the global interest, I don't see why it should be limited by mere bureaucracy.--- Darwin Ahoy! 06:25, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
      • It's SWMT, not SWAT Rollback is a counter-vandalism tool in general, so that's why GR is mainly limited to SWMT.--Jasper Deng (talk) 06:31, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
  • &  outside of scope and a bad idea: rollbacks remove all the edits a user makes, hence it would be conceivable that it could at some point rollback a valid edit by the bot that was the last edit on the page before the edit you wanted to revert, hence undo or a user script should be the preferred choice. Snowolf How can I help? 23:17, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
  •   Weak oppose per Snowolf Vogone (talk) 23:27, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Out of scope for GR, which is an anti-vandalism tool. I suppose we could remedy this with a Commons re-linker bot. -FASTILY (TALK) 01:57, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
  •   Oppose As mentioned above, out of scope of GR usage. Riley Huntley (talk) 16:27, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
  Comment I would prefer as well if a bot could do that automatically. If that is possible, please ignore this request. I would need GR basically for that, anyway, since I've already been to SWMT and was not particularly enchanted by it. Thanks, and apologies for any trouble. --- Darwin Ahoy! 18:18, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

  Not done Closing request per above. To answer your last question, doing such a stuff can easily be done by a bot. By the way, if the bot CommonsDelinker could do it, it would be better, because it's part of its functions. If you need any more help on the issue, feel free to contact me or any other steward. Regards, -- Quentinv57 (talk) 18:29, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

Global rollback for The Illusive Man

I am expanding into new English language Wikis, but as a man of few talents (a vandal fighter), it is impractical to reapply each time to several Wikis. It is inconsistent. I need this tool to be an effective Vandal reverter. That said, I understand things work differently outside en-Wiki, and welcome any constructive criticism you may have. It strikes me as obvious that a glaring issue here is my lack of experience in cross Wiki work, but I would ask the community to look to my fine and extended productive use of this very tool on my local project as an example that I could be trusted with the tool in smaller communities, where I feel that irresponsibility and/or misuse of this privilege could cause even more damage. Thank you.

Cheers! The Illusive Man (talk) 01:42, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

  •   Oppose - cross-wiki counter-vandalism activity is needed; perhaps become active on SWMT. In the meantime, you can use User:Snowolf/How to globally TWINKLE.--Jasper Deng (talk) 01:43, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Global rollback is not merely given out on the assumption that you will use it well, but when you already demonstrated that you are able undo cross-wiki vandalism in a reasonable manner, without "damage". --MF-W 01:54, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Limited x-wiki anti-vandalism experience. Sorry, FASTILY (TALK) 07:00, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
  •   Oppose - Only 1 or two cross wiki reverts, please come back once you have participated more. Riley Huntley (talk) 00:30, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Per above, sorry. Try again with more experience. Ajraddatz (Talk) 01:40, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
  •   Oppose, only 1000+ edits on home wiki, and almost no cross-wiki anti-vandalism experience. --Makecat (talk) 05:00, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Thank you for applying. But I don't think you have enough x-wiki experiences. My answer is not yet. Sorry, --Sotiale (talk) 05:42, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Yeah, not yet, but in a few months of work, I think you'll stand better odds here. Courcelles 23:54, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
  Not promoted per above opinions. --Bencmq (talk) 03:20, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
  Note: he is a sockpuppet of a long-term vandal (WP:SPI), see en:User talk:Trijnstel#Images of Karen Lumley & David Nuttall. Trijnsteltalk 21:01, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
Trijnstel, this is definitely not Eirron, and i'd venture to say it's practically impossible that they are the same person. -- DQ (ʞlɐʇ) 00:34, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
Actually, it is en:User:The Image Man that is M de la E's sock. —DoRD talk 01:07, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
You're both absolutely right; I was confused by the two similar usernames (Illusive, Image...) Anyway, thanks! Trijnsteltalk 11:23, 16 October 2012 (UTC)

Global rollback for Restu20

The following request is closed.

Hi, I'm a member of SWMT and I think that the flag of global rollback will be very useful to me to revert crosswiki vandalism. Thanks Restu20 19:57, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

  •   Strong support--Vituzzu (talk) 20:55, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Support, has enough experience and lots of good reverts looking through his contribs. Ajraddatz (Talk) 20:56, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
  • support, why not. —DerHexer (Talk) 21:00, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
  • I suppose he'll do. PeterSymonds (talk) 21:01, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
  •   Support active and experienced. Érico Wouters msg 21:10, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
  •   Neutral TBH I don't know this user very well, but he looks active (at least recently) and he doesn't have many reverts. Voted neutral. Trijnsteltalk 22:13, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
  •   Support--Jasper Deng (talk) 00:40, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
  •   Support Why not? -FASTILY (TALK) 01:52, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
  •   Support--Shanmugamp7 (talk) 07:24, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
  •   Support Let's the Small Team grow Bigger :-) by adding yet another trusted and devoted user! --Piero Montesacro (talk) 17:13, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
  •   Support Sure. He will do a good job (as he did so far) ;-) --Frigotoni ...i'm here; 17:19, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
  • &  I see no issues with the user from what I can see and with the backlog on synchbot it's even more appropriate to grant active users the right. Snowolf How can I help? 17:24, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
  • No issues, good luck. Courcelles`
  •   Support Good luck--Morning Sunshine (talk) 03:09, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 14:19, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
  •   Support Although I wasn't very familiar with Restu20, I checked some of his reverts, and they all seemed great. I hope he keeps up the great work! :) πr2 (tc) 04:21, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
  •   Support. –BruTe talk 08:22, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
  •   Support Restu20 is recently often active in fighting against global vandalism and his reverts look good. I have no doubts that this will change with the gr permission. ;-) Vogone (talk) 11:08, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

  Done, clear consensus. Trijnsteltalk 12:30, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

Global rollback for Vogone

Hello!

I'm Vogone and a SWMT member. I'd like to request gr for helping to fight against global vandalism in a more efficient way. I failed to gr twice [1][2] due to a lack of experience at that time. I'm now a member for 3 month and I think, I have enough experiences now. Regards, Vogone (talk) 00:10, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

  Support, trusted and active - Hoo man (talk) 00:14, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
  Support good user and active in fighting vandalism, he will do well. Restu20 00:21, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Support, per above. Can handle the one-click revert. Ajraddatz (Talk) 00:40, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Strong support, trusted & active user, has enough cross wiki edits/reverts :)--Shanmugamp7 (talk) 01:31, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
  Support--Jasper Deng (talk) 01:33, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
  Support. Érico Wouters msg 03:24, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
  Support -- Vogone is an active, experienced and committed SWMT member, as shown by his global edits. I trust him to use the "real" rollback. Great work! πr2 (tc) 04:21, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
  Support Why not? -FASTILY (TALK) 08:01, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
  Support. –BruTe talk 08:22, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
  Support Per above. --Sotiale (talk) 08:26, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
  Support and thanks for helping. Trijnsteltalk 11:35, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
  Support --Morning Sunshine (talk) 11:39, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
  Support Yeah! :) --Frigotoni ...i'm here; 11:40, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
support, hurra! —DerHexer (Talk) 12:16, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
  Natürlich! -Mh7kJ (talk) 15:58, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
  Support -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 17:19, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
  Support --Wiki13 talk 18:34, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
  Support.--Avocato (talk) 22:56, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
  Done Ruslik (talk) 12:46, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Requests for global sysop permissions

Requests for global editinterface permissions

Global editinterface for xqt

I am member of the pywikibot developer team (see commits here) and I would like to ask for global editinterface rights which is needed for i18n and l10n features of the bots framework. Some settings are outsourced from the bot's family files which holds site specific localisations and translations to MediaWiki system messages of local sites like MediaWiki:Disambiguationspage and some others regarding interwiki sorting order. This is to be extended: Interface localisation has been a running request for a few years, and I started some initial work on it. This will get local communities the ability to change bot's behavior on their own wishes without the necessidy of contacting developters to change the configuration. On the other hand these pages sometimes need some help especially on small sites. Therefore I need some additional rights, otherwise I have to keep old stuff in the bot scripts and keep track for any new settings which is a bit expensive. Thanks a lot.  @xqt 20:29, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

  • I trust Xqt rationale and need for the tools expressed above, and I trust him not to misuse them. I support temporary access for one year, as always. Thanks. -- MarcoAurelio (talk) 17:57, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
  •   Support, sure! --Frigotoni ...i'm here; 12:57, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
  •   Support Nothing against it, furthermore per MarcoAurelio. Trijnsteltalk 19:55, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
  •   Support Why not? -FASTILY (TALK) 06:59, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Support, the purpose is great! -- Lavallen 08:55, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Support, for a year per MA. Ajraddatz (Talk) 01:41, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
  •   Support, why not? --Makecat (talk) 05:00, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
    The result of this request is   Done for one year until 14 October 2013 based on the apparent consensus in the discussion above. Ruslik (talk) 08:55, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
Thanks a lot.  @xqt 09:22, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
  •   Support Sicher/Sure. Bin ich zu spät? / Am I coming too late? Not a week ago. --Geitost diskusjon 18:21, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
    pfü... immer zu spät, dieser Geitost / pfü... always too late, this Geitost :P Vogone (talk) 18:31, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
    Man kann ja nicht ständig alle Seiten überall im Blick haben … / You can’t watch all the pages everywhere all the time … Man kan ikke stadig observere alle sider … :-P --Geitost diskusjon 19:27, 14 October 2012 (UTC)

Requests for global IP block exemption

Global IP block exempt for Yannkervarec

Our iP was blocked by : Billinghurst<http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Billinghurst> Number of ticket : 2012100210004852 Début du blocage: 4 septembre 2012 à 18:19 and we are on the network of ovh.com, thanks, YK

Happy to do this, however, you don't have a global account, you can do this via preferences or Special:MergeAccount when you are logged in. Once you have done that then I can exempt your global account. If you do not wish to have a global account then we are going to need to get this done at individual wikis, and you would need to tell which wikis to which this should apply. — billinghurst sDrewth 13:54, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
@Billinghurst: global blocks can only be lifted with global-ipblock-exempts; local ipblock-exempt won't work. Trijnsteltalk 22:18, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
@ Trijnstel I was told by Liangent that according to the code, local exempt works for gblock on that particular project as well. Maybe we can test to verify. Bencmq (talk) 03:16, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
Tested and confirmed that local IP exemption for an user account overrides global IP block. Updated local documentation. — billinghurst sDrewth 09:35, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
  Not done There is no global account. Ruslik (talk) 19:26, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

Global IP block exempt for YFdyh-bot

My global bot often run in the PythonAnywhere, but recently it to have been affected by this block, so it needs this permission, thanks. --YFdyh000 (talk) 16:40, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

  Donebillinghurst sDrewth 09:41, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

Global IP block exempt for Makecat-bot

I also use PythonAnywhere to run my bot. For details see above. Thanks. --Makecat (talk) 01:53, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

  Donebillinghurst sDrewth 09:42, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

Global IP block exempt for Church of emacs

I'm currently surfing under the blocked IP 95.211.92.234 which I use to circumvent my ISP's censorship (hint: the ISP became famous for disliking virgin killers). Please give me global ip block exempt since the IP is globally blocked (I'm an admin on German Wikipedia and meta, if that gives some kind of credibility that I won't misuse this right ;P). Cheers, --Tobias talk · contrib 10:19, 23 October 2012 (UTC)

Done --Bencmq (talk) 12:32, 23 October 2012 (UTC)