Open main menu

Requests for global rollback permissions

Global rollback for Frigotoni

Hi everybody. Since I'm active on #cvn-swconnect almost every day, I now ask for Global Rollback, because I think that it could help me on revert vandalism and spam link. I understand that the tool must be used only in obvious vandalism cases. Lots of users suggested me to ask for this tool recently, but I wanted to wait some more. This is my crossactivity; you can see that, the projects where I’ve already had the local rollback flag (id est the wikis where I’m used to reverting vandalism through RecentChanges, these mainly are Simple, En, Es and Pt). I want to say that if you give me the toll, I will use it mostly in small wikis with SWMT channel. Please feel free to tell me whatever you want. Thank you for your time.--Frigotoni ...i'm here; 17:04, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

  •   Support Ok for me. Trijnstel 17:07, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
    • Striked until I have an answer to my question. (I also have to think about it.) Trijnstel 19:10, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
  •   Support enough activity, why not? Striker talk 18:10, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Hm... let's say neutral because of your over-enthusiastic misfire. (Will change to oppose if someone digs up another one of those). Seb az86556 18:35, 3 October 2011 (UTC) and sockpuppetry Seb az86556 19:37, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Sure, user is active in global cv and trusted. Some concerns with Seb az's link, and I might change my stance if other are found (I could not find any myself) - Ajraddatz who is unable to sign at the moment.
  •   Question: What about these blocks on your homewiki (itwiki) for sockpuppetry, personal attacks and block evasion? Trijnstel 18:49, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Full disclosure: local rollbacker rights were already asked and denied one, two, three times. --Brownout(msg) 18:58, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Per Seb and because of sockpuppetry. --WizardOfOz talk 19:09, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
  closed as no due to above issues fr33kman 19:17, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
Good to know that you feel that the issues are strong enough to close, but isn't that for the community to decide? I'd request that you reopen this until the user withdraws or five days is complete. That sockpuppetry happened over a year ago, and so long as the user respects the GR policy and doesn't use GR on it.wikipedia I don't see a problem here. Ajraddatz (Talk) 19:34, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
Don't shoot yourself in the foot. We don't need sockers with global rights. Seb az86556 19:39, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

Global rollback for Katarighe

The following request is closed: not done

I would like to use this tool because, I combat vandalism across all Wikimedia wiki's. Sometimes, its hard to find a vandalism on other lauguages, mostly on enwiki and simplewiki and also i'm a trustful user and im not abusive to others.

  • Oppose: you have too little crosswiki experience, in my opinion, and it feels to me like you're just collecting hats. Please gain more experience and perhaps - after a while - request this flag when you really need it. Kind regards, Mathonius 22:27, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
  •   Comment I couldn't see heavy use of revert on many wikis in your cross-wiki edits. You can monitor many small wikis through #cvn-swconnect. Finding vandalism is not hard when you know the pattern of those edits (page blanking, insertion of nonsense or gibberish into pages, removal of interwikis or categories etc.) and you use machine translation for the languages you don't speak. Good luck! Striker talk 22:30, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
  •   strong no! Sorry, but I don't recognize you from simplewiki at all and it's my home wiki. On top of that, your xwiki contribs do not meet my criteria for support. Frankly, you should just withdraw this request, you'll not get any supports, imho. fr33kman 22:52, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Oppose, not enough xwiki experience. Ajraddatz (Talk) 23:07, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
  • I did a mistake, please close this as a user request. Thanks --Mohamed Aden Ighe 23:24, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
  Not done User withdrew (thanks for understanding, it shows real maturity) fr33kman 23:36, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

Global rollback for Ezarate

I am sysop on eswiki and commonswiki, I was rollbacker so long time ago and now I'd like combatting vandalism crosswiki and this tool may revert the edits quickly. Regards!!!--Esteban 22:49, 7 October 2011 (UTC)

  • support, no big deal. —DerHexer (Talk) 22:51, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Support, trusted user. Even if he doesn't have 1,000,000 global reverts he will obviously use the tools well. Ajraddatz (Talk) 22:52, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
  •   Why not?--Vituzzu 22:57, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Support, why not? - Hoo man (talk) 23:11, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
  •   Aye — Tanvir | Talk ] 00:51, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Support, good idea to help in cross-wiki stuff ;-) -- Quentinv57 (talk) 05:06, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Weak oppose. Maybe I am the only one, but I don't see this user as "active in cross-wiki countervandalism" and he doesn't "make heavy use of revert on many wikis" after checking cross-wiki edits. Outside of major and Spanish wikis, I see some interwiki fixing, edits on userpage or related with his bot, but very few antivandalism-related edits. Per policy, some evidence of this activity should be provided on this request. Being trusted (as he is for sure) is not enough to have this tool; some experience on foreign wikis is definitely a requirement.” Teles (T @ L C S) 05:41, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Oppose Per Teles. --WizardOfOz talk 05:58, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Oppose — see Teles. Seb az86556 06:07, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Oppose Per Teles, sorry. Email Vaibhav Talk 15:14, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
  • support, no big deal. — Theo10011 15:16, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Support One question though; when were you a global rollbacker? (I can't find it in the logs.) Trijnstel 19:53, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Support: he says he wants to help small projects and there's indeed some cross-wiki activity which shows an authentic interest; he's a sysop so we know that he knows the tools; rollback is needed for sysops, who are frustrated by the "undo" ;-): so let's give him a possibility, there's no room for damage. Nemo 19:58, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
  •   yes Having considered the crosswikiness of the candidate's history and their trust via way of flags I support them for global rollback. fr33kman 20:15, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
  •   Neutral although you're trusted and rollback is not a significative right, I agree with Teles. Striker talk 20:35, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Support A user with two sysop flags, one on a highly multilingual project, asking for a basic anti-vandalism tool. The edits aren't numerous, but he's clearly competent, and this flag is rather minor. Courcelles 21:06, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
  • SupportBruTe talk 06:57, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Support --FalconL ?! 17:57, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Support sysop and trusted user. Well, that's enough and will be helpful to enhance other WP, I think no need for more conditions. Sean 21:27, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Support Why not? -FASTILY (TALK) 04:04, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Support Why not? 2 Béria Lima msg 08:06, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Neutral. The first thing I would like to make clear is that I trust Ezarate, however, I don't see myself able to support him due to his lack of cross-wiki experience. In what I see in his global contribs, he has mostly undone the edits of two spamming IP's on the article of FIFA cross-wiki. This, however, doesn't prove he is able to work in multilingual wikis. Through his other contribs, I have found undo's such as this one. It is quite clear that the user wants to remove the hidden English translation, as the article is already translated. Another example is frwikiquote, where he undid the edits of an IP removing a non-exitant template. A GR should be more careful when using his rollback tool, and verify he has reverted correctly. My last concern is, that even though the long-time activity on his home projects, he only really has been active in the SWMT since 7 october. I don't think it is possible to judge if a user will use tool correctly on a less than three days activity basis. I'd be happy to support later, when more experience is acquired. Suerte, Savhñ 12:56, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
      Done First, there is a clear consensus that Ezarate can be trusted with the global rollback tool. Second, while he has an extensive cross-wiki experience (including adminship on Commons – a multilingual project), it is primarily not in the area of counter-vandalism or anti-spam activity. Several participants of this discussion opposed based on the latter criterion. Nevertheless, overall consensus seems to be that Ezarate should be given a chance to demonstrate that he is capable of using global rollback responsibly, by giving him this tool. Ruslik 18:37, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

Global rollback for Reder

I would like GR rights to revert more easily vandalisms and wrong edits. I monitor #cvn-swconnect if I can every day and I'm a member of SWMT. I have more than 14000 edits globally, and I work in many wikis. My home wiki is the Tarantino wiki where I'm admin and where I have almost 10000 edits. I'm an admin also in some little wikis where I help to fight vandalism where there are no active communities. I'm also a test-admin on Incubator and an autopatroller user on Meta. I thank you for your consideration. --Reder 10:51, 15 October 2011 (UTC)

  •   Strong support Very active crosswiki vandal fighter. Trijnstel 10:52, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
  •   Aye — Tanvir | Talk ] 12:04, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
  •   Support I've seen you around doing very good job. But don't revert too fast if you're not sure, that's not a race ;) -- Quentinv57 (talk) 13:07, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Support, about time :-) Ajraddatz (Talk) 14:31, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Support, very active user cross-wiki. Savhñ 14:52, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Support, pretty obvious - TBloemink 15:06, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Support--Frigotoni ...i'm here; 15:55, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Support --WizardOfOz talk 16:04, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Support For sure. Email Vaibhav Talk 16:25, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Support, small abuse potential --FalconL ?! 16:41, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Support, why not? --Striker talk 18:05, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Sim, per FalconL. Ruy Pugliesi 18:10, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Support Why not? -FASTILY (TALK) 21:41, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Support. Meet requirements.” Teles (T @ L C S) 23:52, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Support - Hoo man (talk) 12:40, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
  •   support a×pdeHello! 13:53, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
  •   certo!--Vituzzu 09:12, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Support -- Wagino 20100516 09:39, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
  •   Support Matanya 09:52, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
  •   Support Qualified candidate. Courcelles 08:28, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
  Done. Jafeluv 10:54, 20 October 2011 (UTC)

Global rollback for Iste Praetor

Hello! I often combat vandalism on a lot of small wikis via IRC, where global rollback would help me in many situations like reverting the edits of this persistent vandal. It would also be useful for me to fight vandalism on French Wikipedia because there is no local flag available. On German and English Wikipedia, I already have rollback rights. Regards --Iste () 16:00, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

  •   Nay I think you need more experience with cross-wiki vandalism fighting. — Tanvir | Talk ] 16:13, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Not yet. You don't have enough xwiki experience for me to judge your ability to revert past the language barrier, sorry. Please get some more experience first. Ajraddatz (Talk) 18:00, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
  •   No, sorry I appreciate your help, but this is just too soon for me. Please continue with your good work - the next time I'll probably support your request. Trijnstel 18:04, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
Okay, I will continue fighting vandalism and make a new request later. Regards --Iste () 18:39, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

Requests for global sysop permissions

Requests for global editinterface permissions

Global editinterface for Beau

I would like to request a global editinterface permission to fix scripts and gadgets on Polish projects during the upcoming MediaWiki 1.18 deployment. I will need it for a week, thanks --Beau (talk) 14:08, 2 October 2011 (UTC)

Granted, please let us know when you are done. LeinaD (t) 14:51, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
I have finished making changes, you can remove this permission. Thanks, Beau (talk) 06:38, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
  Removed. Thanks for your help. — Tanvir | Talk ] 06:52, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

Global editinterface for SPQRobin

I have global sysop rights, but I need to fix some CSS issues on common.css pages (mostly concerning the 1.18 upgrade and RTL support), and mostly on wikis that have opted-out of the global sysop system, so it would be useful to have global editinterface rights. If it's only temporarily given, it's okay to remove this right later, although it's difficult to say when most issues are fixed. SPQRobin (talk) 19:48, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

  • Support, can't see a problem with this. Ajraddatz (Talk) 20:00, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
  • I think it's reasonable to assume you can be done with this in 2 months. Seb az86556 21:54, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Support Why not? -FASTILY (TALK) 22:09, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Support temp editinterface access. You've always been wisely in using your tools, so you have my trust. Thanks for your work, Robin ! -- Quentinv57 (talk) 22:28, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Support and let him keep it until he's done; we don't need to artificially discuss this again two months from now just because we pulled a number out of the air now. Courcelles 23:11, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Yes please. –BruTe talk 10:49, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Of course, trusted user and we can need all helping hands we can get (feel free to ask or point me towards issues, especially JS ones, if you need help). Some wikis have badly messed up CSS (and JS) so that it's often hard to see what can be changed without negative side effects... - Hoo man (talk) 10:54, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Support, and I agree with Courcelles. --FalconL ?! 16:14, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

Could a steward grant it perhaps? I see the right was granted immediately for the previous request... :) SPQRobin (talk) 18:25, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

  Done. clear cut. Matanya 18:27, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
Removed by Tanvir per confirmation -- Quentinv57 (talk) 20:48, 25 December 2011 (UTC)

Requests for global IP block exemption

Global IP block exempt for User:Eneteng Kabisote

I was making non-English (or transliterate) redirects to Selena Gomez and others on enwiki. Today I got a message that I cannot edit it as I haven't open proxy thanks. --Eneteng Kabisote 00:38, 1 October 2011 (UTC)

Can you please paste the message here? It'll aid us greatly. fr33kman 00:44, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
You are currently unable to edit pages on Wikipedia.

You can still read pages, but cannot edit, change, or create them. Editing from your IP address or IP address range has been disabled on all wikis by DerHexer (meta.wikimedia.org). The reason given was "Cross-wiki abuse". To request unblock, visit your talk page and add the text {{unblock|global block — REASON}}. Replace "REASON" with the reason for requesting unblock. Additionally, you may appeal the global block at Steward requests/Global. The block expires on 29 October 2011 at 13:25. --Eneteng Kabisote 03:01, 1 October 2011 (UTC)

  Comment Can you explain [1]? It's not strictly of relevance to your request, but I find it odd. fr33kman 04:00, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
User:112.202.33.89 is not my IP. It is PLDT's IP. A one month global block should be set to anon. only. --Eneteng Kabisote 05:24, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
Modified to anonymous only. Ruslik 08:25, 1 October 2011 (UTC)

Global IP block exempt for Caiyad

I was making one page for UAE Celebrity and editing it and today i got a message that i cannot edit it as i have open proxy please i am not that technical and i dont know how to block may be its our country policy and i am really having tough time to make this article, i dont really understand where i am going wrong....please help thanks, --Caiyad 13:18, 23 September 2011 (UTC)

Can you report the exact message that you saw? Ruslik 17:46, 23 September 2011 (UTC)

Will appreciate if you kindly unblock my account, it seems some WIKEPEDIA Amin is thinking that its for self promotion but i am actually doing it for one of the celebrity lives in UAE and i have provided enough references PLEASE UNBLOCK AND MAKE THE PAGE LIVE FOR USERS, THIS IS FRUSTATING THAT FOR 2 and half years i have been trying to make page live

I SEE THIS MESSAGE This miscellaneous page is being considered for deletion in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policy. Please discuss the matter at this page's entry on the Miscellany for Deletion page. You are welcome to edit this page, but please do not blank, merge, or move it, or remove this notice, while the discussion is in progress. For more information, see the Guide to Deletion. Maintenance use only: Place either Template:Mfd or Template:Mfdx on the page nominated for deletion. Then subst {{subst:mfd2|pg=User:Caiyad|text=...}} to create the discussion subpage. Finally, subst {{subst:mfd3|pg=User:Caiyad}} into the MfD log. Please consider notifying the author(s) by placing {{subst:MFDWarning|User:Caiyad}} Caiyad 09:57, 1 October 2011 (UTC) on their talk page(s).

  Comment: You are probably referring to "w:en:Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Caiyad", correct? If so, your account is not blocked and there is nothing that can be done here; you need to discuss this matter on English Wikipedia, where the deletion was proposed. Somebody proposed "Caiyad Phahad" to deletion for considering that page is out of scope for Wikipedia. Others will read that page and place there their opinions. The only thing you can do is comment on that page, with the reasons to keep according to deletion policy. If my comment has nothing to do with your request, just ignore what I said. Regards.” Teles (T @ L C S) 17:55, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
  Not done -- seems to be a misunderstanding about what IP block exemption is for. Jafeluv 23:21, 7 October 2011 (UTC)

Remove Global IP block exempt for Mys 721tx

I no longer need global IP block exemption now, thanks, --Mys_721tx(talk) 17:35, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

  Done, Good to hear ;) --Bencmq 17:36, 21 October 2011 (UTC)