Steward requests/Global/2011-12

Requests for global (un)block

Global block for

Status:    Not done

The "important updates" of this user contain totally wrong and unsourced numbers. As you can see from the revision history of the articles edited by this IP, this is not his first try. --Iste () 11:12, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

Withdrawn, the user stopped his disruptive edits himself. --Iste () 12:57, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

Global block for

Status:    Done

Cross-wiki spam. --Orlodrim 01:39, 10 December 2011 (UTC)

Done. — Tanvir | Talk ] 01:41, 10 December 2011 (UTC)

Global unblock for

Status:    Done

Open proxy check. -- DQ (t) (e) 02:08, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

Done. Jafeluv 14:42, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

Global block for

Status:    Done

Vandalism on various projects, including simplewiki and nlwiki --TBloemink talk 18:49, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

  Done, blocked for 1 day by Wpedzich. Trijnstel 13:01, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

Global block for

Status:    Done

Cross-wiki vandalism.” Teles (T @ L C S) 09:21, 16 December 2011 (UTC)

Blocked for one year as an open proxy. --Mercy 13:50, 16 December 2011 (UTC)

Global block for

Status:    Done

Cross-wiki vandalism. Already blocked on several projects, such as Commons, en and [1]. --viniciusmc 16:25, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

  Already globally blocked by Barras yesterday. -- Quentinv57 (talk) 16:30, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

Global unblock for Amazon proxy service

Status:    Done

The rangeblock this IP is a part of seems to be set to deny talk page access. Could this block be modified to allow legitimate editors to request ip block exemptions? Thank you. w:User:Hersfold editing as Hersfold non-admin 01:27, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

Global blocks can't be disabled at the local level anyways, so what good would that do? To be globally IP block exempt, a user would need to add a request to SRGP (which can be done from a gblocked IP iirc) Ajraddatz (Talk) 02:06, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
Actually they can. See Special:GlobalBlockWhitelist (this exists on every project affected by global blocks). I have modified the block to anon-only. Please use the whitelist above if you wish to remove the block on enwiki. Thanks, PeterSymonds (talk) 11:23, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
I assume you only modified the block of, but are you aware of the fact that Bastique g-blocked many more ranges? Trijnstel 18:31, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
Please note that some of Bastique's actions were official actions and should not be reversed. —Marco Aurelio (Nihil Prius Fide) 11:23, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
This seems resolved so I'm closing as done. Users affected by this should follow the instructions in the block message. —Marco Aurelio (Nihil Prius Fide) 11:24, 24 December 2011 (UTC)

Requests for global (un)lock and (un)hiding

Global lock for Inkoschwein

Status:    Done

evw --Hozro 15:22, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

Done. -Barras 15:28, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

Global lock for WayKurat.

Status:    Done

Vandalism-only account.” Teles (T @ L C S) 00:53, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

Done by DerHexer. a×pdeHello! 05:55, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

Global unlock for Tyciol

Status:    Not done

Reasons: The lock was inappropriate and should be rescinded. Policies and guidelines did not visibly support it. One of the current Stewards, User:Laaknor who dealt with the case on July 21 when someone tried to make it happen via this page, rejected it.

I do not know if he was aware of this rejection by a fellow Steward at the time, but User:Kylu came 18 days after it was not done and instated the lock.

I am in agreement with Laaknor's original assessment that I am not a vandal. I remain confused now as to what policy and purpose attributed to locks made locking my account an acceptable action.

I draw attention to the current disclaimer that I read prior to making this post:

This is not the place for asking for locks based on your opinion that someone is disruptive. Global locks are used exclusively against vandalism and spam, not because content disputes, not because you think that someone deserves to be globally blocked. In such cases, you should ask for local blocks at appropriate places.

I initially brought this up on #Wikimedia-Stewards, but did not receive any support from those active while trying to solve it casually. New steward User:PeterSymonds conveyed to me that he is in support of the lock, as did User:Thogo (was informed by User:Trijnstel that he is sort of active but is an ombudsman) though neither informed me of the reasons for their stance.

This request, having been delayed over a year, is not 'urgent', but it seems important. If policy supports the continued existence of the lock, can it be communicated why the paragraph I quoted, the one I read defining what a just lock is, is wrong? Are there new policies from Talk:Global_locks which are accepted but not reflected in this requests page? Was Laak wrong to object in July? Was Kylu right to lock in August? I would like to know how policy at the various times, the thens and now, apply to these decisions.

I would also like to remind people, according to global locks:

Global IP blocks do not apply on Meta.

I hope this stays in effect. I don't consider this use of editing to be vandalism.

I will remain transparent here, this is not the first movement to globally unlock the acount. The first was in 2010, initiated by Kylu, which lestaty closed as 'not done'. Kylu stepped down from Stewardship so does not appear to be active on Meta to interact with now.

Based on the precident that 'not done' does not indicate a final closure on the issue (or Laak's choice would have stood), I am bringing it up again in hopes that we can review the purposes of the 'lock' function and whether or not there is evidence that it should be used here. -- 00:14, 8 December 2011 (UTC)

  • Allow me to put it to you simply: "in rare cases until global blocking is extended to named accounts, users who would be eligible for a global block are locked in this way as well"[2]. Your account is subject to a global lock because we are technically unable to apply a global block to it. — Coren (talk) / (en-wiki) 20:17, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
  Not done I don't see any *substantial* reason to remove the lock I see just some more drama. --Vituzzu 20:44, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

Global lock for Masarap na Baboy

Status:    Done

Cross-wiki vandalism. Multiple socks on, Meta and others.” Teles (T @ L C S) 07:56, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

  Done Thanks for reporting, and sorry for locking this one too late. We should try to find a solution to stop these attacks that always happen at night. -- Quentinv57 (talk) 08:53, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

Global lock for Holidaygclub

Status:    Done

Cross-wiki spamming.” Teles (T @ L C S) 08:02, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

  Done -- Quentinv57 (talk) 08:54, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

Global lock for Teles3

Status:    Done

An obvious sockpuppet of Masarap na Baboy, which was blocked just hours earlier. He is now vandalizing on I am also requesting for the admins to check on the user's IP address and apply the necessary blocks. Thanks. -WayKurat 09:24, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

  Done by Darkoneko -- Quentinv57 (talk) 09:32, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
  Non-steward comment: Both Teles2 and Teles3 are locked. I don't think that any of them are a sock of Masarap na Baboy. The first sock was created on and it is probably the same vandal that vandalized my page on that project hours ago. He saw my request right above and created an account on If you check it, you will find a proxy. That is my guess.” Teles (T @ L C S) 09:34, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
  Non-steward comment: I think that Teles2 and Teles3 are two different persons. Teles3 is Masarap na Baboy (or more specifically Dragon2016). He vandalized my talk page in, the same way he vandalized your talkpage there. It will be much appreciated if we can stop this longterm vandal once and for all since for the past months, the vandal creates user accounts and attack, and among others. -WayKurat 09:59, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
I just checked : that was the Selena Gomez Fan. -- Quentinv57 (talk) 10:06, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

Global lock for Sanblas22

Status:    Done

Cross-wiki vandalism. Ruy Pugliesi 02:28, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

  Done -- Quentinv57 (talk) 07:23, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

Global lock for Ponts-de-Fahrleitung

Status:    Done

Edgar von Webern, Oversight needed --Schniggendiller 16:47, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

  Done Thanks a lot for reporting this. -- Quentinv57 (talk) 16:55, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

Global lock for Warezhd

Status:    Done

Spam-only account.” Teles (T @ L C S) 09:01, 13 December 2011 (UTC)

  Done by Quentinv57. Trijnstel 15:26, 13 December 2011 (UTC)

Global lock for Bollion

Status:    Done

Edgar von Webern, Oversight needed --Schniggendiller 17:30, 13 December 2011 (UTC)

  Done Thanks for reporting. -- Quentinv57 (talk) 17:34, 13 December 2011 (UTC)

Global lock for Medicalschool

Status:    Done

Only contributions are a spam page on Commons and the same on en wp. On Commons they appear to have abused multiple accounts but non SUL at present. Thanks --Herby talk thyme 09:25, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

Done. --Mercy 09:36, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

Global lock for เกลียดกันต์ ชุณหวัตร and sockpuppets

Status:    Not done

The following users had vandalised Thai Wikipedia by creating articles with a content insulting the Thai actor Gun Chunhawat. Please also checkuser เกลียดกันต์ ชุณหวัตร on thwiki and lock them all please?

This is the list of sockpuppets:

  1. คนเกลียดกันต์ ชุณหวัตร
  2. กันต์ชุณหว ัตร หัวดอ
  3. 2554ตักตักตักตัก
  4. กวยชุณหวัตรหัวคันต์
  5. มินิอรสา
  6. หนุ่ยมาเอง
  7. 41เม้มปาก
  8. นวดกะปูช้างช้าง
  9. บร๊ะจ้าว
  10. 8หมวกจิก
  11. ปุณณกันต์ปูก้าม
  12. เรไทศง
  13. กุเกียดกันต์ ชุณหวัตร
  14. อยากทืบกันต์ ชุณหวัตร
  15. เหิ้ยกันต์ ชุณหวัตร
  16. ล.เลไธสง

Can you lock them please? -- 04:51, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

  Comment Hmmmm, I really don't like to see lock requests by IPs ... a×pdeHello! 09:01, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

  Comment All users have been locally blocked on th.wikipedia, and this doesn't really look like a cross-wiki vandal. Global lock is probably not needed here. Jafeluv 14:39, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
  Not done per Jafeluv. Moreover, only two of them have an unblocked account on enwiki, others are blocked on every wikis they exists so no need to lock them. -- Quentinv57 (talk) 16:38, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

Global lock for Haroldariston

Status:    Done

Spammed across wikis *(electronic cigarettes). Already cleaned The preceding unsigned comment was added by Billinghurst (talk • contribs) 22:47, 14 December 2011‎ (UTC)

  Done - Sad to see this spammers back again :/. Thanks. —Marco Aurelio (Nihil Prius Fide) 22:54, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

Global lock for Trijnstel2

Status:    Done

Impersonation account - I've had a mail from the real Trijnstel requesting I ask for a lock on this account (I have blocked it and run CU). Thanks --Herby talk thyme 08:49, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

Done, thanks. PeterSymonds (talk) 09:00, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

Global lock for User talk:Trijnstel2

Status:    Done

Impersonator. -- 08:05, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

Done. PeterSymonds (talk) 09:00, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

Global lock for Susanbell84

Status:    Done

Cross-wiki spamming.” Teles (T @ L C S) 08:51, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

Done, thanks. PeterSymonds (talk) 09:00, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

Global lock for Cory Washington

Status:    Done

Cross-wiki vandalism adding non-relevant and off-topic material. -- Tegel (Talk) 03:46, 16 December 2011 (UTC)

Locked by PeterSymonds -- Quentinv57 (talk) 13:32, 16 December 2011 (UTC)

Global lock for Astroscienco

Status:    Done
Just a notice to tell for transparency that I locked this account and unattached Astroscienco@eowiki, the only wiki where there was no vandalism (I discussed with a sysop here and he wanted to give a last chance to this user on eowiki). This user has been abusing multiple accounts, having a disruptive behaviour and vandalizing cross-wiki. All those accounts are currently blocked. -- Quentinv57 (talk) 21:03, 17 December 2011 (UTC)

Global lock for Nguyễn Nhan Bộ Đảng IV

Status:    Done

Cross-wiki vandalism. -- Tegel (Talk) 03:19, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

Done. — Tanvir | Talk ] 04:30, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

Global lock for Isang oras lang

Status:    Done

Cross-wiki vandalism - same as above. Striker talk 03:24, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

Done. — Tanvir | Talk ] 04:30, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

Global lock for Nguyễn Nhan Bộ Đảng Family

Status:    Done

Obvious Vietnamese-Filipino sockpuppets of Warlord Dragon2016, They're vandalized Selena Gomez on viwiki aside from article of the same name on tlwiki and mswiki (Which are vandalized by other pro-Dragon2016 vandals) and claim her as their target. --Chtak Yuno 12:13, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

Done. --Mercy 12:17, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

Global unlock for Erik Evrest

Status:    Not done

my account named erik evrest and my alternative account named erik evermtus can not log in and from the results of my investigation it is because I suspected that "works" only canvassing continues across Wikimedia. But try to understand once again, actually I also contribute as a normal user. Just look at the link where I make my contribution account (Wikipedia Indonesia), in Java Wikipedia, and also in Malay Wikipedia. So, please just blocked my Meta-Wiki, but please allow me to log in. -- 02:41, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

Not done. Find yourself another hobby. --Mercy 10:19, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
I promised that if the status block is released I will not repeat them -- 11:05, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
then explain the reasons why you all do not want to (un) blocking I -- 09:27, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

Global locks from spammer pattern accounts

Status:    Done

Recent series of pattern accounts that I think have mostly only troubled Meta but it seems sensible to lock the accounts anyway - I'll watch for any more in the pattern (the IPs vary at present) thanks --Herby talk thyme 16:17, 23 December 2011 (UTC)

  Done. Trijnstel 16:21, 23 December 2011 (UTC)

Another one today please --Herby talk thyme 08:42, 24 December 2011 (UTC)

There's no need to lock an account which is blocked on all wikis it exists. Here it exists only on meta and you blocked there, so it's equivalent as if it was locked ;) - Thanks Herby. -- Quentinv57 (talk) 10:21, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
Sorry - didn't check SUL - apologies & thanks :) --Herby talk thyme 10:36, 24 December 2011 (UTC)