Steward requests/Global/2009-04

Request for global (un)block

Request for global (un)lock and (un)hiding

Global lock and hide for Popoypipi

  • Status:    Done
  • Popoypipi
  • Vandalism-only account and abusive username. Thank you. —Dferg (talk) 16:52, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
  Locked and hid --Mardetanha talk 16:54, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Global lock/unlock

Thanks, Huib talk 08:56, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

Thanks, Lymantria 08:58, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

  Done --FiliP × 08:59, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

Global lock and hide request

  • Status:    Done
  • name hidden
  • Vandalism-only account and abusive username. Thank you. —Dferg (talk) 16:58, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
Done. --Erwin 17:20, 4 April 2009 (UTC)


The following discussion is closed.
Status:    Done
  • TruthAletheia
  • CU confirmed sock puppet of a disruptive user. Account subsequently blocked on enwiki, but was recreated on other wikis. ~Troy 23:08, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
  Done — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 02:11, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

Troy is a parasite

  • Troy is a parasite
  • CU confirmed sock puppet of a disruptive user. Account was blocked on enwiki, but was recreated on other wikis. ~Troy 05:50, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
  Done, best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 08:07, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

Global lock and hide request

  • Peneasesino
  • Putoman
  • Vandalism-only account and abusive username (translation hidden, avalaible trough source code) . Thanks, —Dferg (talk) 18:47, 15 April 2009 (UTC) Added "Putoman" account for the same reasons as above —Dferg (talk) 18:50, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
  one locked and hin other doesn't have sul --Mardetanha talk 21:58, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

Several lock and hide requests

Please, lock and hide this accounts, all of them with very improper usernames. All of them makes reference to bit**, sh** ... (the worst ones have been hidden in the template). Thanks —Dferg (talk) 18:07, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

  Done by Drini (talk contribs count logs page moves user rights block log email)Dferg (talk) 20:48, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

More accounts

Insultant usernames related to bi*** and penises. From Special:Globalusers, SUL via ~vvv tool checked. Thanks. —Dferg (talk) 10:49, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

  Done, all locked and hidden , except the last, as this was already locked and with testwiki as home wiki. Laaknor 11:12, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

Global lock/unlock for Hårsnegl

Cross wiki vandalism & blocks, thanks --Herby talk thyme 12:03, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

  •   Done - now locked. oscar 12:10, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Offensive accounts

  1. Shit Head929
  2. Shit at hoe
  3. Shit diver
  4. Shit sandwich
  5. Shit toucher
  6. Shit-voices
  7. Shit10
  8. Shit256
  9. Shit4lore
  10. ShitCreek
  11. ShitEater666
  12. ShitMcGee
  13. ShitStaintotheMAX
  14. Shitaround
  15. Shitass7
  16. Shitattack
  17. Shitballs09
  18. Shitballsack
  19. Shitfacebummer
  20. Shitfacedcumkwat
  21. Shitfaceddickhead
  22. Shitfcuk

Abusive usernames. —Dferg (talk) 10:59, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

  Done --Mardetanha talk 11:09, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

Requests for global permissions

Global rollback for J.delanoy

I've done a good bit of vandal-fighting on many projects over the past four or five weeks, mostly by monitoring #cvn-sw, and I think this tool would make it much easier, especially when a vandal uses a script or something to vandalize several pages in quick succession. I have used rollback extensively on enwiki, so I know how the tool works and I have a good grasp of when it is appropriate to use. J.delanoygabsadds 03:40, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

  •   Support, Over a hundred cross-wiki antivandal actions, has been doing it for months. [1] If he's sure he wants the job, he can have it IMO. Kylu 03:47, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
  •   Support - I'm surprised he hasn't gone insane without it for so long.  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 04:03, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
  • I agree and endorse this user gaining global rollback abilities. Cheers, Razorflame 05:28, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
  •   Support so be prepared to fight with new tools . Good luck --Mardetanha talk 17:04, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
  •   SupportDerHexer (Talk) 18:24, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
  Done --Meno25 00:52, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

Global rollback for Wutsje

Hi. I'd like to request global rollback. Recently I've been monitoring changes on small wiki's on #cvn-sw rather intensively, reverting vandalism where and when appropriate (as you can see here), and I've come to a point where I feel that I could make good use of this tool. As an admin on nl:wiki I'm already quite familiar with it and I think I can say that I know when to use this tool and when not. Wutsje 14:07, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

  •   Comment - I'm fully supporting this user, he is very active and trustable and he deserves GR. —Dferg (talk) 14:09, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
  •   Support "recently monitoring" is an understatement, Wutsje is one of our best and most active globally active vandalism/spam removers/reverters, thanks for helping, best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 14:09, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
"rather intensively" is an understatement as well, he beats the rest of us to it almost every time. Effective and committed, as well as reliable and knows when &how to revert. Finn Rindahl 14:45, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
  •   Comment - I have noticed his good work, user is a good admin and has my trust.. Without a doubt I believe he can and will use it in a good way. Huib talk 14:35, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
  •   Support --FiliP × 14:49, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
  •   Support as Finn Rindahl said he beats the rest of us to , i will stab him to death next time :P --Mardetanha talk 14:52, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
    <awkward silence> --kevlar unitard
  •   Support --Erwin 17:13, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
  •   Support I usually do a brief count of manual reverts to see if the user will have use of the tool. He hit my arbitrary number defining "need" before I got to "C". Kylu 18:16, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
  •   Comment - Definite support. -- sj | help translate |+ 21:50, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
  •   Comment Although I will probably regret this given how often he beats me... ;) I definitely support this. Thingg 01:15, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
  Done --Meno25 14:55, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

Global rollback for Techman224

I been doing vandalism "undoing" on small wiki for some time now by monitoring #cvn-sw, this tool would be much easier to use since I can rollback an edit without waiting for the text to load and freezing my browser sometimes. I have rollback on en and simple wikipedias, and also on English Wikibooks, so I know what rollback is and know when to use it and when not too. I also have been working on User:COIBot/XWiki lists. Techman224Talk 17:09, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

  Comment I don't want to say no , But you are very new to SWMT and you don't have many crosswiki edits , 689 projects scanned. 10534 contributions found in 73 projects and 10229 of your edits is just in four projects enwiki meta enwikibooks and simple . so i think better to wait a bit more , Then i will support you for sure --Mardetanha talk 17:18, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
I agree - I'd prefer to see some more experience and maturity before such a request.  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 21:48, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
Sorry but I tend to a no here, I have the feeling the user has too little experience in this area, please remember small wikis are sensitive communities. Best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 10:31, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
no consens to grant grollback for now, best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 14:44, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

Global rollback for Juliancolton

The following discussion is closed.

Hi all. I'm a sysop on the English and Simple English Wikipedias, where I've used rollback extensively. In addition, I've used the undo feature on several other wikis. I can hardly call myself the most active cross-wiki vandal fighter, but I do patrol #cvn-sw a bit. Overall, I think the tool would make my job quite a bit easier. Thanks for your consideration! –Juliancolton | Talk 20:36, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

  Comment I trust you and i think you are familiar with tools but i don't see enough cross-wiki activity 58052 out of 58245 edits are just only 3 projects enwiki,simplewiki and commons and some of your edits in other 27 projects are just creating your user page .I would be happy to support you, next time with more cross-wiki activity --Mardetanha talk 20:55, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
Fair enough entirely. Thanks for the feedback. –Juliancolton | Talk 21:05, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Hello, sorry, but I tend to a   no here, I don't see enough longtime-crosswiki activity, sorry, maybe in some months if You keep working in that area, thanks for helping and the interest, best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 01:30, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
  •   Sorry, I concurr with spacebirdy. :/ Hopefully later! :) Kind regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 14:57, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
  • At this point, I think it's   Not done. Please do continue to assist with SWMT and when you have a longer history of cross-wiki work you can return and place another request. Thanks  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 02:13, 13 April 2009 (UTC)


Please remove my global rollback as am I not going to be active on Wikimedia projects for the time being. Thank you, Razorflame 16:17, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

  Done  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 16:18, 21 April 2009 (UTC) (note to whoever archives, please put it in the archives of SRG)
  Comment - Request moved from SRP under the same title. —Dferg (talk) 20:12, 21 April 2009 (UTC)