Steward requests/Checkuser/2021-07



  Doing... --Alaa :)..! 09:47, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

  Unrelated From the technical point of view --Alaa :)..! 09:50, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

Thanks! -- Victor Blacus (talk) 12:42, 1 July 2021 (UTC)


Can you please provide diff examples of the "same style, makeing the same spelling errors" for those who do not speak bulgarian? -- Amanda (aka DQ) 22:01, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
Ilianpetrov98: "най - негативен" should be "най-негативен", "21 - та" => "21-та" , "най - отдалечено" => "най-отдалечено", "най - често" => "най-често"
Vaskokolev03: "91 - ва" => "91-ва", "най - южният" => "най-южният","най - еднородната" => "най-еднородната", "по - евтино" => "по-евтино"
Putting spaces around dash in these words is extremely uncommon mistake. --StanProg (talk) 02:46, 30 June 2021 (UTC)

  Confirmed Ilianpetrov98 & Vaskokolev03 -- Amanda (aka DQ) 17:50, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

C.Chandra Kanth Rao@te.wikipedia

The IP addresses can not be connected to accounts by policy. I see no evidence presented to directly check the two users listed, especially with high edits counts. Please refile with the accounts with evidence for them to be checked. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 18:10, 4 July 2021 (UTC)


  Confirmed Leexiaolu, Leeyitong, 玛丽莲梦 -- Amanda (aka DQ) 17:34, 4 July 2021 (UTC)


Anshul81 and Vijuvb are   Stale from a CU viewpoint.   Not done -- Amanda (aka DQ) 16:07, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

Professor TS@az.wikipedia

  Confirmed Subbotnikov, Ocaqova, Sollova, Cumayeva

  Likely Ustacli & Professor TS are related to the above From a technical viewpoint only. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 17:28, 7 July 2021 (UTC)


@AmandaNP: thanks. Can you also check User:İstirahetci? And this: Steward_requests/Global#Global_lock_for_İstirahetci --NMW03 (talk) 20:55, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
Split from above. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 00:34, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

  Possible I think this is someone else, but even after getting data from meta CUs, there is only a very slight hint of a connection to the above. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 01:16, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

Insect flyyyy@zh.wikipedia

  •   Confirmed 今天又沒有下雨了,怎麼辦? & Insect flyyyy trouble
  •   Likely Insect flyyyy
  •   Inconclusive 今天又有下雨了,怎麼辦?- on a proxy

-- Amanda (aka DQ) 00:44, 11 July 2021 (UTC)


Could you please provide some evidence, including diffs, of this pattern that you see. Simply removing speedy deletion templates and editing the same topic area is not enough for a check. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 22:26, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
@AmandaNP: Here are the examples:
  • In the edits of Stopshalon (e.g 1, 2), they wrote like "Character A is the son and the adopted nephew of Character B", "Character B is the mother and the adopted aunt of Character A", and so on. This is a really weird way of writing relationships between characters in Chinese (and I believe even in English): if Character A is already the son of Character B, why would anyone care about their relationship in adoption after Character B's sister adopts Character A?
  • The editing behavior above is commonly and only seen used by long-term abuser Wen Ng Ng (e.g 1, 2). Itcfangye (talk) 14:40, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
    By the way, Reefssump and Rarewing are confirmed socks of Wen Ng Ng. Itcfangye (talk) 14:43, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
  • I added Lookserse to the CU list because they tried to add back abuse edits made by Wen Ng Ng's socks (e.g [1]). Their other edits also share similarity with the LTA. Itcfangye (talk) 02:35, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

All 4 accounts (Stopshalon, Reefssump, Rarewing, and Lookserse) are   Confirmed directly back to Wen Ng Ng themselves among several other already blocked socks. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 17:44, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

@AmandaNP: I think it would be helpful if you could list out the checked users for us to verify that there were not unjustified blocks. --LuciferianTalk 12:45, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
The list is quite long and would take some time, plus CU never guarantees that all the socks will be listed by the nature of how CU works. If you still want the list, it'll have to wait till I have some extra free time to sit down and do it. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 02:21, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
I think only those who weren't found from previous CUs would be enough. LuciferianTalk 05:55, 6 July 2021 (UTC)


  • Wen Ng Ng
  • Stopshalon
  • Lookserse
  • Reefssump
  • LuciferianThomas2
  • Rarewing
  • Koreapoets
  • Kindasilva
  • Irmahelix
  • Trayslags
  • 愛心能量
-- Amanda (aka DQ) 00:49, 11 July 2021 (UTC)


Unsurprisingly, both accounts are   Unrelated. No other accounts found. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 04:24, 13 July 2021 (UTC)


  •   Stale MonsterHunter32
  •   Declined to comment on the IP
  •   Additional information needed in the form of diffs for MonstrumVenandiXXXII & ZeGoyMan -- Amanda (aka DQ) 04:11, 13 July 2021 (UTC)

Thank you AmandaNP for the reply.

User:MonstrumVenandiXXXII is the exact translation of Monsterhunter32.
Monstrum = Monster
Venandi = Hunter
XXXII = 32

And the user is editing in the same topic areas.

But after looking more into this, it seems rather this is the sockpuppet TwoHorned/Xsaorapa impersonating an innocent user (MonsterHunter32). TwoHorned/Xsaorapa is a LTA sock who is indef blocked on multiple wikis and has a massive history of sockpuppetry and of impersonating other users. Please see the new case below. --어떤 자유 사회도 말을 두려워해서는 안 된다 (talk) 23:03, 13 July 2021 (UTC)


Thank you very much Amanda. I did not have the time to show all examples and diffs, but here I am adding a few more.

Sylvester Millner should be checked because the suspected sock edited the same article [43] with an edit suggesting that the viewpoint of the Pakistani military which committed the 1971 Bangladesh genocide is missing, and the new account Sylvester Millner added external links with the said viewpoint.

JonMilkins should be checked due to edits exactly the same as those of MonstrumVenandiXXXII. Examples:

  • Rearranging of quotes (while at the same time deleting some content, so the censorship of quotes is camouflaged, he deletes content, doesn't say anything in the edit summary, and at the same time adds other material so no one notices the removal)
  • Deleting references and content (of authors and views he doesn't like), another typical behaviour.
  • JonMilkins [53] (deletes reference to Dr. A. Bostom) Note that in this edit the same was done [54] by an IP previously blocked as a sock of Xsaorapa
  • MonstrumVenandiXXXII [55] [56] [57] (there are more examples)
  • Articles and topics both MonstrumVenandiXXXII or JonMilkins and Xsaorapa edited (there are many more examples)
  • Example Article Islamic terrorism
  • Example articles on Jews:
    • [60][61] and a few more examples in his edits ]
    • previous socks: [62][63]
    • a thread showing previous socks pushing anti semitic conspiracy theories [64]
    • there is even an article on a wikipedia userpage about his anti semitism [65]
  • JonMilkins adding cleanup tags:[66]
  • MonstrumVenandiXXXII adding cleanup tags: [67] (many more examples) [68]
  • Xsaorapa adding npov tags to same article as MonstrumVenandiXXXII [69][70] (there are many more examples of Xsaorapa adding npov and cleanup tags)

So I think also JonMilkins and Sylvester Millner should be checked with MonstrumVenandiXXXII. Of course it is also possible that MonstrumVenandiXXXII is MonsterHunter32, but after I saw the JonMilkins account I think now it is more likely they are socks of TwoHorned/Xsaorapa. --어떤 자유 사회도 말을 두려워해서는 안 된다 (talk) 20:40, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

  Declined. While I did check MonstrumVenandiXXXII, they were on a proxy. Nothing immediate came up for ZeGoyMan. The evidence from there is weak at best and insufficent for a CU to be ran on the other accounts.   Stale Xsaorapa. TwoHorned does not exist locally. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 18:29, 18 July 2021 (UTC)


    • @Itcfangye:基本复制自百度百科,另外有些页面被G13(快速删除标准G13:粗劣翻译)了(They're created page was from the BaiduBaike. And some page was SpeedyDeleted because the translate was VERY BAD.)。--CreeperDigital1903 (talk) 14:34, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
  •   Likely Windy8786, Jacky8931
  •   Unlikely 阿于
  •   Declined Brucechen0857, 秋月若水子

From a technical viewpoint. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 18:18, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

@AmandaNP: For clarfication, "declined" means "not checked" instead of "unrelated"?--GZWDer (talk) 21:06, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
@GZWDer: Brucechen0857 has no available contributions while 秋月若水子 has too few, I think it's too hard to judge the relation between that account and others. --Super Wang (Chinese Wikimedian since 2009 | Greetings from Dalian) 22:58, 18 July 2021 (UTC)


  Confirmed plus el:voy:User:Chalk19 is   Likely -- Amanda (aka DQ) 17:35, 18 July 2021 (UTC)


  Inconclusive While they obviously have some relation, none are showing any technical connection. 不爱思考的鸡 does not exist. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 18:04, 18 July 2021 (UTC)


MachSpilt is   Unrelated to Barrakudaw from a technical viewpoint. Bodiadub is   Stale and has no local contribs. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 18:07, 18 July 2021 (UTC)


  •   Unlikely 幻羽乘风 & 安糖
  •   Unrelated 潘潘潘225
  •   Inconclusive Jack55233 - on proxies
-- Amanda (aka DQ) 03:56, 21 July 2021 (UTC)


  Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 10:53, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
  •   Confirmed Group 1: Hale0202, Halelin0202
  •   Unrelated(compared to Group 1): TNT1123 and 黃亭瑜

  •   Unlikely TNT1123 and 黃亭瑜

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 11:05, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

Shek Ming Fai@zh.wikipedia

  Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 06:38, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
  •   Unrelated Shek Ming Fai, Wesleytan, Fung Michael Yu Kin, Tim Cheng koros, A233240

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 06:54, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

MARdF@en, es, fr, hu, id, it, pt, ro, zh and Wikidata

  Doing... If necessary, there may be a delay until cooperation is obtained, as it requires cooperation from multiple wiki checkusers. --Sotiale (talk) 08:51, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
@Sotiale: I would like to add the following accounts (same userpage design, same file upload on commons, same articles created):
Thanks! — Jules* Talk 09:14, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
  •   Confirmed Gaudiem, Mihály64, Cervantes04, FloricaMihalba, Satynath, MARdF, Idoumou33, Aspic80, Pantell
  •   Stale TangoYalin

@Jules*: All of the accounts you suggested except AigeusMare(data available on itwiki) are   Stale, so at this time, no data can be obtained by investigating those accounts. If they are logged in and active, the data is there and they can proceed with the investigation, but this is currently not possible because the data has expired. If you want to investigate AigeusMare, I will contact itwiki checkusers team. Also, ping @TSventon: for notification. --Sotiale (talk) 09:24, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

Sorry @Sotiale:, I did not pay attention to their last contributions beeing old. Yes, please, for AigeusMare. — Jules* Talk 09:27, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
@Jules*: Oh, no problem. After contacting them, I will let you know the results. Have a nice Sunday afternoon. --Sotiale (talk) 09:30, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
Thanks both. I only included SPAs who had edited a version of the main Prix Versailles article and were active in the last 6 months, which coincidentally generated exactly ten names. TSventon (talk) 10:34, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

@Jules* and TSventon:   Confirmed AigeusMare. Thanks to itwiki checkuser for their cooperation. --Sotiale (talk) 10:37, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

Thanks a lot @Sotiale: (and it-wp CU) and good afternoon too! — Jules* Talk 10:46, 25 July 2021 (UTC)


  Done. Checkuser was implemented on loginwiki focusing on unlocked accounts;   Confirmed WKthhhre, Zhurugexia, 貝勒和貝殼, Hankwattsze, Peersnuck, 金融家理财, 精妙啊精妙, Kultomyyt, Hm isadoghaha, Tnihhytgrem. --Sotiale (talk) 12:00, 25 July 2021 (UTC)


Đức Anh (talk) 07:31, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

More accounts of this person. NhacNy2412 (talk) 10:47, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
One more account found and passed on to a steward. I'm nog going to list it here, due to the abusive username. --Daniuu (talk) 10:59, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

  Done. All locked. The list is not provided for several reasons. --Sotiale (talk) 11:51, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

@Sotiale He continues to vandalize with account name hidden (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date (alt) • CA • ST • lwcheckuser). Is there a method to solve the problem completely? ༒𝓷𝓱𝓪𝓬𝓷𝔂༒ Talk to me ♥ 17:19, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
@NhacNy2412: As far as I remember, the ranges they use are normal IP bands, so there are some things to consider to prevent their behavior. And those IP ranges can fluctuate widely, potentially making editing difficult for users in certain country. It is also possible to block the account creation function through a filter, but I don't think it will have much meaning because it is easy to bypass. I will take the necessary measures in consideration of these aspects. --Sotiale (talk) 01:19, 26 July 2021 (UTC)


--ClayM300 (talk) 07:10, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

  Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 12:40, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
  •   Confirmed ColorfulLuxury, Tonggood

  • They used OPs/VPN.

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 12:44, 27 July 2021 (UTC)


Hello @Abhishek0831996. The English Wikipedia has its own checkuser team. The same is true for Wikidata. Stewards are not able to conduct regular checks over there. Are you refering to hi.wikipedia instead? —MarcoAurelio (talk) 17:47, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Could be, after all, he is also acting on hi.wikipedia just like all other socks checked earlier. Abhishek0831996 (talk) 18:00, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
  •   Inconclusive Mealiyta

I changed the target wiki of this request to hiwiki and proceeded with the investigation, but couldn't find a conclusive connection. --Sotiale (talk) 13:07, 27 July 2021 (UTC)


  Not done. enwiki(English Wikipedia) has their own checkusers team, and we can't act on wikis that already have local checkusers, unless there are special circumstances. Please submit your request to enwiki SPI. --Sotiale (talk) 12:34, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

A Wikimedian@global

Unnamed UserName me 05:08, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

  Not done. If you want to lock their accounts, you have to visit SRG and request a lock, or if you want their checkusering, you have to go to viwiki and request for a checkuser. Either way, there is a more appropriate space than here. So, I mark this request as not done. --Sotiale (talk) 12:31, 27 July 2021 (UTC)