Steward requests/Checkuser/2020-12

Requests

紅神琦@zh.wikipedia

  Doing... --Wim b 08:18, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
  • Janet492 and 滄海77: Same IP but different user agent
  • 紅神琦 have a user agent like Janet492 and all 3 users have the same ISP.
Imho if the duck test is positive, from a technical point of view are   Confirmed--Wim b 08:33, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
Thank you! --Super Wang hates PC You hate, too? 09:35, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

Swissiopi@th.wikipedia

Results:
  •   Confirmed: Swissioopi, Coral Harvey
  • The above two are   Possible Annop Nakabut
  • However I find Jong94   Unlikely (maybe my colleague Sotiale saw something there that I am not seeing)
Please note that this analysis is based on technical evidence only.
Regards, —MarcoAurelio (talk) 18:53, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
Thank you. Potapt (talk) 21:20, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

George Rouskas@el.wikipedia

PS. Updateː no reason to run the CU. The user finally admitted that he had both accounts [1], and one of them has been blocked indef. at el/WP. ǁǁǁ ǁ Chalk19 (talk) 18:50, 5 December 2020 (UTC)

Noted, Chalk19. I just took a look at their edits (no CU) and they clearly   look like a duck to me too. Regards, —MarcoAurelio (talk) 19:01, 5 December 2020 (UTC)

Sandesh9822@en.wikipedia

  • Similar and aggressive page moves with Tupsundre, Vijay, Sandesh, संदेश not to say that their page moves were wrong but, same intention of giving official names, all of them have done aggressive page moves out of which some are problematic too.

Interaction analyser links

Here the case was filed but as there is no technical data available for the alleged master on enwiki and all the behavioural evidence is cross wiki. So I am requesting CU here. thanks w:en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Sandesh9822 --QueerEcofeminist [they/them/their] 14:32, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

@QueerEcofeminist Fixed for you, the previous request was malformed, cannot use "|" in the reason field, the template will be broken. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 16:49, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
thanks, I was trying to fix it and couldn't do it earlier. QueerEcofeminist [they/them/their] 16:51, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

@QueerEcofeminist stop this blame game on me. I am not aware of any such accounts created or used by me. You are always been harrassing me with this techniques and everytime behind me with these fake links to prove me a sock master. There were no confirmed sock puppet investigations in the past except the one account which I made in English font when i was unaware of Wikipedia policies. You have always been here behind me to block me globally and locally for your selfish enemities on wikipedia. Your harassment on Marathi Wikipedia, Hindi wikipedia and the way you harassed many Marathi volunteers on English Wikipedia is the same for all volunteers who have left Wikipedia editing because of your harrasment. You even tried these techniques on Wikimedia commons and blocked me and other Marathi speaking editors there. It is all because of your mess we have lost many good editors on Marathi Wikipedia. You was even blocked on Marathi Wikipedia because of this same bad habits. Just let us live in peace. -- Sandesh9822 (talk) 17:36, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

Do you really think all of those admins who blocked you on three major projects including hiwiki, enwiki and commonswiki all are wrong and I was able to influence all of them? And enwiki SPI has caught your several socks even all of it is fake? QueerEcofeminist [they/them/their] 19:50, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
QueerEcofeminist I don't owe you any explanations as I am aware of your long time harrasment techniques with me and other active users of Marathi Wikipedia.
Stewards, please check past Checkuser requests on English Wikipedia and other places where this person has claimed every editor that edits Babasaheb Ambedkar or its related articles as me. There is no confirmed Checkuser comments where It was shown that I am the owner of these accounts. Either they are stale or unrelated. Stewards he has also been able to manipulate admins on local projects showing these results and blocking my accounts without any reasons everywhere. Why is this always that I am not given any chance and inspite of it not been my accounts tagged as mine? I even see experienced users of global community getting influenced by this person who is the reason for the failure of Marathi Wikipedia and has become a dictator of Marathi Wikisource where he is misusing his administrator powers in the name of maintainance. Never the less when Marathi Wikipedia editors say against this person he tries to show English Wikipedia rules and block them as they are unaware and he treats them as vandalism. It is very shameful to see that they are doing this for harrasment and feeling good when they get blocked. Steward please give us justice from this harrassment. Sandesh9822 (talk) 04:37, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
I note here that, now Sandesh is making personal attacks on not just me but on several admins from three Wikimedia projects, I request admins here to take note of this incivility. If someone needs more info or more links/diffs on the above CU case, I would be happy to provide. thanks and regards. QueerEcofeminist [they/them/their] 13:43, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
English Wikipedia has their own CU, and their own procedure. We do not enter enwiki. If you are not requesting enwiki to be checked, please specify the correct wiki to CU. Thanks. (Reminder: There is no such thing as Global CheckUser as of 2020. There must be a wiki to check.) — regards, Revi 13:48, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
Now the problem is user:sandesh9822 is already blocked on three projects. Sukeshani is only active on enwiki, भारतभूषण नारांदेकर is also only active on enwiki. So there is no single wiki where the technical data is available for master and alleged socks. And behavioral evidence is crosswiki . enwiki cu has already shown alleged socks unrelated and they can't check sandesh9822 as they were blocked long before. Behavioral evidence is enough? Can a impartial trusted user or stewards look at evidences here? QueerEcofeminist [they/them/their] 15:55, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
This page is strictly for technical CU tool data request. Unlike SPI, SRCU does not perform behavior analysis. That is local wiki's job. We only give technical data for those wikis without CU, so local people can do behavioral analysis on their local wiki. — regards, Revi 19:32, 5 December 2020 (UTC)

Musicman78949@zh.wikipedia

  Doing... --Alaa :)..! 15:10, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Confirmed Musicman78949, Drumofftaiwan2020

No sleepers --Alaa :)..! 15:13, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

Thanks. --Yining Chen (Talk) 15:25, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

Lukavac77@hr.wikipedia

  On hold --Alaa :)..! 20:03, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

  Confirmed --Alaa :)..! 20:06, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

Android 1248163264@en.wikinews

  Doing... --Wim b 16:50, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

These two users have different IPs and UAs, but:

Taking into the usernames and the behavior of the users with whom they share, in part, the data, IMHO is very, very,very   Likely --Wim b 18:04, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
Camouflaged Mirage   Done --Wim b 18:11, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
Thanks @Wim b :) Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 18:11, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

Dias-e9500wagnL081784248@zh.wikipedia

  Doing... --Wim b 18:08, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
Only a sleeper already blocked --Wim b 18:16, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
OK, thank you!--Super Wang hates PC You hate, too? 00:07, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

Philomenahhgf@zh.wikipedia

  •   Likely Philomenahhgf, Egbertdfgs, Kelseyjtree
  •   Unlikely Hungarcviet

Group 1: same UA and /16 range. No sleepers

--Alaa :)..! 22:13, 11 December 2020 (UTC)

Thank you, I have transferred the message to the local wiki CU request page. --LuciferianThomasTalk 23:57, 11 December 2020 (UTC)

Suradnik 105@hr.wikipedia

  Inconclusive --Martin Urbanec (talk) 17:32, 12 December 2020 (UTC)

已经遭到@zh.wikipedia

  • Yage Wu just admitted that ドデカイうーメン, Kengoodgoodair7639, Jimbobo697, Izterlice, เชนไดร้ท์ฆ่าเอ็มซีซี214, そらごみ, CCP Winnie, Yes2LOLKuso, 1147vds, 常見咔咔咔咔咔, Xia'an'an4tt214 are his socks. Itcfangye (talk) 00:19, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
  Doing... --Martin Urbanec (talk) 17:40, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
  Confirmed Group 1: 已經遭到, Yaga Wu
  Confirmed Group 2: Wikikiki Wu, Yoga Wu, Chico tv ohdoyc
  Confirmed Group 3: Yage Wu, Lhramsist, 1147vds, Yes2LOLKuso, 龍紀文
  Inconclusive for the rest of the accounts.
--Martin Urbanec (talk) 19:04, 12 December 2020 (UTC)

Arstartia@el.wikisource

  It looks like a duck to me based on their edits at s:el:Ακαδημία Διαλεκτικών Νόησις (deleted), as such I feel that a check here would be unnecessary. If both accounts engaged in disruptive or counter-policy editting that's reason enough to block them without the need of CheckUser evidence. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 16:27, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
@MarcoAurelio: Thanks for your response. ǁǁǁ ǁ Chalk19 (talk) 16:59, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
Closing. — regards, Revi 06:35, 14 December 2020 (UTC)

炸弹天师@zh.wikipedia

  Doing... --Wim b 18:17, 14 December 2020 (UTC)

  Done: あの香りは頭いい, No173thePINUT and 诶丝西皮基金会会长 share IP and UA with 恐龍皇帝 , 韩锦衣卫, 白猫羊驼 and 黑猫羊驼; no unlocked sleeper for other users. --Wim b 18:30, 14 December 2020 (UTC)

0此名0@zh.Wikiversity

@游魂: Where you want to check them, if it's zhwp there's need to be a local discussion at zhwp HAM page apparently, if it's zhwikiversity the page linked is sufficient. Btw, the meta userpage of 1st user makes it clear they are the same, but well a sleeper check is good too. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 18:03, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
There is a SRG report on these 2 users. SCP-2000 asked for a global lock. I think this might be suitable for a loginwiki CU. Just my 2 cents. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 18:07, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
  Doing... --Alaa :)..! 19:21, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

  Completed

  Confirmed KanameB, 0emaneht0, 醜陋隱杆線蟲, Urrooo, 0此名0, JakeFYT, ERIKQQY, 赭青邃

Based on zhwikiversity and loginwiki

--Alaa :)..! 19:25, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

Thank you! --SCP-2000 00:52, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
Thank you@علاء Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 13:12, 16 December 2020 (UTC)

EsperantoLanguage@en.wikiquote

I'll note that I've also blocked `Your continued donations are trashed` on meta, and a lock request has been posted to SRG, so if these are confirmed and/or any other socks are found these may warrant locking too --DannyS712 (talk) 16:55, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
  Confirmed:
  • Your continued donations are trashed
  • EsperantoLanguage
  • Kokoro Ni!
  • It will be made by people like you
  • KokoroNiToKeKoNu
  • MassAccountCreation
  • BRAND NEW BEDTOWN
  • BREAKDOWN BR3AKDOWN
  • A blocked manager can block the blocking manager
  No comment with respect to IP address(es).
MarcoAurelio (talk) 17:25, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
Thanks DannyS712 (talk) 17:35, 17 December 2020 (UTC)

Infantry234@th.wikipedia

  Doing... --Alaa :)..! 21:41, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

  Completed

  •   Confirmed กรมทหารปืนใหญ่ที่ 6, Vut623, พล.ร.6, ราชาแห่งสนามรบ, Chayathon1996, Infantry234, คนหลังเขา, ส.22 ทภ.2
  •   Possible กองพันทหารม้าที่ 8, ชนาวุธ นนสุทธี
  •   Unrelated Boomvcdcom, Engineer6

--Alaa :)..! 21:56, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

Crosswiki spambots, single use accounts

Status:    Done

The following are accounts that have all spammed wikis with the same url, and created a user page. Would think that there is a good chance of a common element to them, and if so there will be others. All seem to be single-use disposable spambot accounts, with this repeating style of username.  — billinghurst sDrewth 04:47, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

I am taking a look. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 16:54, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

  Completed. @Billinghurst and Wutsje: Looks like you've hit quite the jackpot.
The following accounts are   Confirmed technically and behaviourally. Listing bellow from newest account to oldest and in parentheses the list of spammed domains per account:
The above accounts will be globally locked, but we'll need to cleanup the spam not yet removed.
Merry Christmas. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 17:30, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
@MarcoAurelio: Done, also with thanks to Billinghurst. Wutsje (talk) 19:06, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
all the kudos to @Wutsje:. I am just joining the dots, seeing the pattern and knowing we had hole in the fence. Blacklisting completed.  — billinghurst sDrewth 22:31, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

Qaz01471qa1@zh.wikipedia

No sleepers --Alaa :)..! 21:40, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

文晞@zh.wikipedia

  Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 10:32, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Unlikely 文晞, Xiaobaishialan, Waicheehang, Davidwong4896, 林寯深, 黃乙洲, 我是伞兵, 爱赉, 黄伟宏, Jibaidiaohai, Xiqosoen520

  • In this case, in my experience, this is most likely MEAT. Note this when dealing with this on your local.

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 11:35, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

Thanks. Miss u so much! --Easterlies (talk) 11:39, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
I am returning to SRCU starting today :D --Sotiale (talk) 11:42, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

Axesamend@zh.wikipedia

  Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 11:37, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Confirmed Iraqclefs, Briertripe, Shaleniece, Vaduzdemo, Sabrebays, Polspins, Anisemesas, Shrekjails, Rebeccamorganlitition, Katiekatiegirl, Psstvice, Mailsparry, Swishduos, Privatesociallife, Servespew, Learclung, Oddlyisle, Grimynary, Larscooed, Oasesdusty, Kmartlyle, Idledsans, Sabreapply, Gagedsalad, Proverusks, Plathabase, Typosamid, Dentalto, Datemonthyoyo, Sapspita, Jiltskilo, Valetbeams, Inurebrad, Cashchewy, Khufusteal, Jessicaclayclaydavis, Heelovid, Licksmire, Mutertunic, Broilsamoa, Burstrue, Arielacing, Reisthees, Nagslarge, Cararedid, Lymanxmas, Ablymodal, Novelbind, Mushhath, Chiletrues, Brisknarks, Ridstasks11, Wailtuber, Ochrejean, Globemiles, Lunarmourn, Rolestogas, Blestnites, Moundwring, Swamiwoods, Angstdebt, Muckssnob, Harmpork, Rulergybe, Putswires, Romeobeans, Minisannul, Swagmerle, Curlsclerk, Loewiiliad, Carloloath, Carlysixty11, Gypdfsdgsgsyadam, Mangeteas, Diracdolt, Oinkomsk, Aspensemis, Giftinner, Visitshula, Heirsbland, Midgebiddy, Manicburma, Cantochars, Lordblast, Wormwisps, Swaysgolfs, Skulkchid, Campcroom, Lookcolscrol, Troysigbal, Murkypawl, Jasonlong22, Ayersgully, Vicesbobbi, Sorturks332, Creamhans, Artsmonet, Midasevian, Spinyclew, Joanaabeck, Ingeclear, Pawnviols, Meantonya66, Searcokes, Axesamend, Banjogeeks, Minorshrew, Renewunfit, Kyotolure, Nobeljelly, Noisedweeb, Partynape, Czechkeith, Pureenfanydae, Burochtalks

Ugh.. From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 12:15, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

Accounts not listed are outdated;   Stale. --Sotiale (talk) 12:19, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
Much appreciated. --Yining Chen (Talk) 13:34, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

成人玩具掌櫃@yue.wikipedia

  Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 06:16, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Confirmed 打王國皇帝, I have big dick, 基佬百科, 丁丁成人玩具掌櫃, 胖虎爆奶,小夫爆菊,, 丁丁成人用品掌櫃, 回歸頭好痛, 寶可夢817, 叔叔歸頭痛, 打丁王國國王

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 07:00, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

Yhc1681@zh.wikipedia

  Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 09:27, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Confirmed Erpss123, Eryeap123, Yhc1681, Giyyee1235, Epttpp, Ykc1235

From a technical point of view. Please be sure to present a new account in this checkuser case from next time. --Sotiale (talk) 09:45, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

Thanks. I'll inform local community of that. --Super Wang hates PC You hate, too? 09:59, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

Mikhaliov ~ ltwiki@lt.wikipedia

  Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 01:33, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Confirmed Group 1: Mikhaliov ~ ltwiki, 7elteven
  •   Confirmed Group 2: Sociaken, Nojucka

  •   Possible Group 1 and Group 2

From a technical point of view. In the case of   Possible, it is recommended to determine the type of behavior of these users from the newly discovered accounts and handle it. --Sotiale (talk) 02:11, 26 December 2020 (UTC)

開心拼盤@zh.wikipedia

  Doing... --Alaa :)..! 13:13, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
@Sotiale: hope if you can do it, as I'm facing personal technical restrictions. Thanks on advance --Alaa :)..! 00:25, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
Okay. I'll do it within today. Thanks for letting me know. --Sotiale (talk) 01:32, 26 December 2020 (UTC)

  Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 02:24, 26 December 2020 (UTC)

  •   Confirmed Draforceg, Lhramsist, 看門狗3
  •   Inconclusive Bairdbeds

  • The account of   Inconclusive is at your discretion; Used devices from public facilities.
  • In my memory, the following examples come to mind; 2020-04, 2020-07, 2020-09, 2020-10. That is, it is confirmed.

Sadly, no sleepers were found. From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 03:32, 26 December 2020 (UTC)

Thank you! --Super Wang hates PC You hate, too? 04:58, 26 December 2020 (UTC)

比连等谈@zh.wikipedia

Hi Robertsky, what other accounts you are suspicious of, and I see that this account had been indeffed at enwp, is that enough? And according to conventions, requests for zhwp need to be discussed locally for some time before handling at this board, so you might want to file at w:zh:WP:HAM. Do let me know if you need help for filing. Thanks. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 19:29, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
@Camouflaged Mirage: As of now, it is currently only this account that I suspected of. I am uncertain as well if it being indeff for being a confirmed sock on enwiki is enough for you, since it is my first time reporting across wiki projects. Please help to file at w:zh:WP:HAM if possible as my zh account has yet to attain autoconfirmed user rights. Robertsky (talk) 21:12, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
@Robertsky I guess not needed here per locally blocked per enwp results. If you are suspecting there are some accounts that are active in zh but didn't register / inactive / stale in en that a zh check will be needed or massive crosswiki abuse, you can approach me with those accounts and I will try to help file in zh HAM page first. I think that is the only reason why we check zh when en is checked already (cc @Super Wang). Else we are all good here, actually if you need assistance, you might want to use the talkpage and file an edit request if I am not there, I'm sure someone will help you. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 11:11, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
What's the necessity of checking on zhwiki if enwiki has already checked? I just wonder. --Super Wang hates PC You hate, too? 01:40, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
  Not done If some accounts are confirmed as the same user on enwiki, this could be grounds to support abuse on zhwiki. However, this request has not been discussed on HAM, so it is recommended to discuss it on zhwiki. The common practice of zhwiki is to post it to SRCU after discussion on HAM. Of course, if it is obvious that it is cross-wiki/long term abuse(more than just using multiple accounts on multiple wikis), or if there are other urgent reasons, you can post without going through HAM discussion, but I don't think this is the case. --Sotiale (talk) 02:22, 26 December 2020 (UTC)

絆愛0630@zh.wikipedia

  Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 00:01, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Confirmed 絆愛0630, 給爺爬, 芭

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 00:13, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

Andytww@zh.wikipedia

  •   Confirmed Group 1: Protoss1234567, Df4gf45, Andytww, Protoss123456, Protoss12345
  •   Likely Andytwn and Group 1
  •   Likely H46823 and Group 1
  •   Unlikely Amflussi and Group 1

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 08:45, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

Thank you! --Super Wang hates PC You hate, too? 08:55, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

九品莲花为叶品纬父母亲@zh.wikipedia

At first glance, I feel that these are different from the typical characteristics of HBN. Are there any other users in doubt? --Sotiale (talk) 11:56, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
In fact, there are some other accounts that had similar names to these accounts, and they have been confirmed that they were HBN(Steward_requests/Checkuser/2020-07#CLP1996@zh.wikipedia, Steward_requests/Checkuser/2020-07#CMM214@zh.wikipedia). Then, these accounts also have similar editing tendencies to HBN.--Yining Chen (Talk) 12:10, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
  Doing... I plan to investigate whether this request is related to HBN. --Sotiale (talk) 10:50, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Confirmed Group 1: 姜瑞連, 施美蓮, 林美雀林尚青黃子銘, 葉品緯陳彥霖葉品緯, 劉定緯學長同班同學, 九品蓮花為葉品緯父母親, 釋道果法師, 邱鏡淳楊文科林智堅翁章梁張花冠
  •   Confirmed Group 2: 徐臻蔚傅崐萁陳妍安陳彥霖葉品緯鄭文燦侯友宜林明溱柯文哲, 陳孝盈教官, 賈青鳳老師, 行政院衛生署長陳時中衛生福利部長陳時中

  •   Confirmed Group 1 and 2
  •   Likely 張通榮林右昌 and Group 1
  • In my experience, these are not HBN.
  • I think, these are WP:110.29.

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 11:00, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

Prirodoslovac9@hr.wikipedia

  Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 05:19, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Confirmed Lordluka99, Prirodoslovac9, SatanikST

From a technical point of view. Suddenly something urgent came up in real life, so the declaration of the results was late. --Sotiale (talk) 10:18, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

@Sotiale: Thank you! Ivi104 (talk) 10:36, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

紅神琦@zh.wikipedia

I feel like the request was posted to SRCU too quickly. And the first user is marked as not having an account. How about going through a discussion for a day or so? --Sotiale (talk) 11:59, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
The first name was typed in a wrong way, sorry about that:( Then, it is OK to wait for some time. --Yining Chen (Talk) 12:10, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
  Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 10:26, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Confirmed 紅神琦, 鏟5敷儲1, リーダ昕哥, 淺井39

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 10:40, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

  • @Sotiale: Thank you. And I just want to confirm if there is no sleeper. Itcfangye (talk) 12:15, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
Since my investigation is always searching for sleepers, there is no need to ask again. --Sotiale (talk) 12:21, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

Hmvod9@zh.wikipedia

  Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 09:31, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Confirmed Group 1: Tinodog, Hmvod9
  •   Confirmed Group 2: S20030816, Boschacne

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 10:10, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

AIT1982@zh.wikipedia

  Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 12:27, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Confirmed ADIZ2020, TWD1025, JPY0206, USA1982, AIT1982

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 12:34, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

Lokesha Kunchadka@kn.wikitionary

  Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 06:49, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Confirmed Group 1: Lokesha Kunchadka, Gowdathi
  •   Unrelated Sonia Bhimegowda

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 06:54, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

Mlav130102@hr.wikipedia

  Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 06:37, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Unlikely Lordluka99 and Mlav130102

From a technical point of view. There is only limited information at this point, but it is difficult to find strong connection based on the data. --Sotiale (talk) 06:46, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

IPs @ incubatorwiki

  Confirmed: Vyörykkä (active in incubator) and Spermakulli, Sikovandaali iskee jälleen and Moioonjoku (active in fiwiki). Ruslik (talk) 13:31, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
Vyörykkä sounds a little bit unlikely choice to be as a sock puppet and could be a good idea to double-check that. Also, just for transparency, there is a discussion in fiwiki admin noticeboard on ValtteriLahti's socks. W:fi:Wikipedia:Ylläpitäjien_ilmoitustaulu#Miten_toimia? --Zache (talk) 18:31, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

東海高中@zh.wikipedia

  Doing... Oh, that's great news. But today is the last day of 2020, isn't it? :p This means that a new request will be available in about 12 hours! --Sotiale (talk) 12:08, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Confirmed 華藏淨宗學會, 賈青鳳老師, 陳孝盈教官, 詹金麗女士劉定緯先生, 詹金麗 丁偉謀 劉定緯 劉逸卉 釋上莊下義法師 本名劉技進, 東海高中

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 12:22, 31 December 2020 (UTC)