Steward requests/Checkuser/2020-12

Please do not post any new comments on this page. This is a discussion archive first created in December 2020, although the comments contained were likely posted before and after this date. See current discussion.

Requests

紅神琦@zh.wikipedia

Status: Done

List of users: 紅神琦 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 滄海77 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Janet492 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log
Discussion: zh:Wikipedia:元維基用戶查核請求#紅神琦

Reason(s): 紅神琦 is duck blocked as LTA zh:WP:X43. Please compare them to Group 1 from last round of investigation on X43, also perform sleeper check. Thank you. --Super Wang hates PC _{You hate, too?} 02:11, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

Doing... --Wim b 08:18, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

Janet492 and 滄海77: Same IP but different user agent

紅神琦 have a user agent like Janet492 and all 3 users have the same ISP.
Imho if the duck test is positive, from a technical point of view are Confirmed--Wim b 08:33, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

Thank you! --Super Wang hates PC _{You hate, too?} 09:35, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

Swissiopi@th.wikipedia

Status: Done

List of users: Swissiopi (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Coral Harvey (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Jong94 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log
Discussion: SPI request and thwiki's LTA report

Reason(s): User:Swissiopi (who is currently blocked on thwiki) and User:Coral Harvey have violated the page-moving process on thwiki. They also have the same edit patterns as those of User:Jong94 (who was checked here almost three weeks ago) and User:Paybig's sockpuppets. Note: You may see more information about User:Paybig on CheckUser wiki. Potapt (talk) 02:00, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

Results:

Confirmed: Swissioopi, Coral Harvey
The above two are Possible Annop Nakabut
However I find Jong94 Unlikely (maybe my colleague Sotiale saw something there that I am not seeing)

Please note that this analysis is based on technical evidence only.

Regards, —MarcoAurelio (talk) 18:53, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

Thank you. Potapt (talk) 21:20, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

George Rouskas@el.wikipedia

Status: Not done

List of users: George Rouskas (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Georgee1212 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log
Discussion: w:el:Βικιπαίδεια:Μαριονέτα (sockpuppetry)

Reason(s): Although with a handfull of edits it seems that these accounts belong to the same person who appeared in el/WP for promotional reasons. They might both be socks of a blocked troll, as well. ǁǁǁ ǁ Chalk19 (talk) 13:41, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

PS. Updateː no reason to run the CU. The user finally admitted that he had both accounts [1], and one of them has been blocked indef. at el/WP. ǁǁǁ ǁ Chalk19 (talk) 18:50, 5 December 2020 (UTC)

Noted, Chalk19. I just took a look at their edits (no CU) and they clearly look like a duck to me too. Regards, —MarcoAurelio (talk) 19:01, 5 December 2020 (UTC)

Sandesh9822@en.wikipedia

Status: Not done

List of users: Sukeshani (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); भारतभूषण प्रकाश नरंदेकर (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log
Discussion: w:en:Special:Diff/972392358/992051969

Reason(s): See Below

Long-term abuse. Cross-wiki abuse. There has been long history of socking by this w:en:Sandesh9822, recently new account w:en:User:Sukeshani which was reported at w:en:Special:Diff/972392358/992051969 grabbed my attention again and I looked for more evidence.

On Commons uploads by c:Special:ListFiles/भारतभूषण_प्रकाश_नरंदेकर show similar obsession in statues of ambedkar photos uploaded by c:User:Sandesh9822.
- Their first photo was uploaded c:Special:Permalink/330794787 and the very next day Sandesh9822 created a c:Special:Permalink/330879773 category for that photo and then other photos were categorised in the same category.
- All of their uploads related to Ambedkar on commons have edits by User:Sandesh9822. c:File:Dr._Babasaheb_Ambedkar's_statue_at_Bindu_Chowk,_Kolhapur.jpg&action=history Sandesh catogorised this file the very next day. c:File:Bust_of_Dr._Babasaheb_Ambedkar_at_Bindu_Chowk_in_Kolhapur.jpg&action=history Sandesh categorised this file in only 35 minutes after it was uploaded.
Sandesh on mrwiki and भारतभूषण_प्रकाश_नरंदेकर on enwiki.
- w:en:Vanchit Bahujan Aaghadi remains special interest for all of their accounts, Vijay Brahmane created it and it was further expanded by Sandesh Tupsundre, भारतभूषण प्रकाश नरंदेकर. On mrwiki, simplewiki and hiwiki it was created and expanded by Sandesh9822 using same references and same content.
Sandesh on mrwiki and Sukeshani on enwiki.
- w:mr:विद्यार्थी_दिन_(महाराष्ट्र) was created by Sandesh and Sukeshani created it on enwiki w:en:Special:Diff/987500890/987504124 with same news sources, its rough translation of the same mrwiki article with minor changes. Even on hiwiki w:hi:विद्यार्थी दिवस (महाराष्ट्र) it was created by Sandesh with same news sources w:hi:Special:Diff/3798241.
- w:en:Statue of Dr. Ambedkar, Wolverhampton is not on mrwiki but, there are several other articles w:en:Category:Statues of B. R. Ambedkar the category itself was created by Vijay Brahmane another sock of Sandesh. So the same obsession persists with Sukeshani too.

Similar and aggressive page moves with Tupsundre, Vijay, Sandesh, संदेश not to say that their page moves were wrong but, same intention of giving official names, all of them have done aggressive page moves out of which some are problematic too.

Interaction analyser links

Between 2016-01-01 and 2020-12-04 on en.wikipedia.org User:Sandesh9822 (talk | contribs) and User:भारतभूषण प्रकाश नरंदेकर (talk | contribs) both made edits to some pages in common. You can see a chronological list of all their edits on the Interaction Timeline or a table view on the Interaction Analyser.

Between 2016-01-01 and 2020-12-04 on en.wikipedia.org User:भारतभूषण प्रकाश नरंदेकर (talk | contribs) and User:Sukeshani (talk | contribs) both made edits to some pages in common. You can see a chronological list of all their edits on the Interaction Timeline or a table view on the Interaction Analyser.

Here the case was filed but as there is no technical data available for the alleged master on enwiki and all the behavioural evidence is cross wiki. So I am requesting CU here. thanks w:en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Sandesh9822 --QueerEcofeminist [they/them/their] 14:32, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

@QueerEcofeminist Fixed for you, the previous request was malformed, cannot use "|" in the reason field, the template will be broken. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 16:49, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

thanks, I was trying to fix it and couldn't do it earlier. QueerEcofeminist [they/them/their] 16:51, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

@QueerEcofeminist stop this blame game on me. I am not aware of any such accounts created or used by me. You are always been harrassing me with this techniques and everytime behind me with these fake links to prove me a sock master. There were no confirmed sock puppet investigations in the past except the one account which I made in English font when i was unaware of Wikipedia policies. You have always been here behind me to block me globally and locally for your selfish enemities on wikipedia. Your harassment on Marathi Wikipedia, Hindi wikipedia and the way you harassed many Marathi volunteers on English Wikipedia is the same for all volunteers who have left Wikipedia editing because of your harrasment. You even tried these techniques on Wikimedia commons and blocked me and other Marathi speaking editors there. It is all because of your mess we have lost many good editors on Marathi Wikipedia. You was even blocked on Marathi Wikipedia because of this same bad habits. Just let us live in peace. -- Sandesh9822 (talk) 17:36, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

Do you really think all of those admins who blocked you on three major projects including hiwiki, enwiki and commonswiki all are wrong and I was able to influence all of them? And enwiki SPI has caught your several socks even all of it is fake? QueerEcofeminist [they/them/their] 19:50, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

QueerEcofeminist I don't owe you any explanations as I am aware of your long time harrasment techniques with me and other active users of Marathi Wikipedia.

Stewards, please check past Checkuser requests on English Wikipedia and other places where this person has claimed every editor that edits Babasaheb Ambedkar or its related articles as me. There is no confirmed Checkuser comments where It was shown that I am the owner of these accounts. Either they are stale or unrelated. Stewards he has also been able to manipulate admins on local projects showing these results and blocking my accounts without any reasons everywhere. Why is this always that I am not given any chance and inspite of it not been my accounts tagged as mine? I even see experienced users of global community getting influenced by this person who is the reason for the failure of Marathi Wikipedia and has become a dictator of Marathi Wikisource where he is misusing his administrator powers in the name of maintainance. Never the less when Marathi Wikipedia editors say against this person he tries to show English Wikipedia rules and block them as they are unaware and he treats them as vandalism. It is very shameful to see that they are doing this for harrasment and feeling good when they get blocked. Steward please give us justice from this harrassment. Sandesh9822 (talk) 04:37, 5 December 2020 (UTC)

I note here that, now Sandesh is making personal attacks on not just me but on several admins from three Wikimedia projects, I request admins here to take note of this incivility. If someone needs more info or more links/diffs on the above CU case, I would be happy to provide. thanks and regards. QueerEcofeminist [they/them/their] 13:43, 5 December 2020 (UTC)

English Wikipedia has their own CU, and their own procedure. We do not enter enwiki. If you are not requesting enwiki to be checked, please specify the correct wiki to CU. Thanks. (Reminder: There is no such thing as Global CheckUser as of 2020. There must be a wiki to check.) — regards, Revi 13:48, 5 December 2020 (UTC)

Now the problem is user:sandesh9822 is already blocked on three projects. Sukeshani is only active on enwiki, भारतभूषण नारांदेकर is also only active on enwiki. So there is no single wiki where the technical data is available for master and alleged socks. And behavioral evidence is crosswiki . enwiki cu has already shown alleged socks unrelated and they can't check sandesh9822 as they were blocked long before. Behavioral evidence is enough? Can a impartial trusted user or stewards look at evidences here? QueerEcofeminist [they/them/their] 15:55, 5 December 2020 (UTC)

This page is strictly for technical CU tool data request. Unlike SPI, SRCU does not perform behavior analysis. That is local wiki's job. We only give technical data for those wikis without CU, so local people can do behavioral analysis on their local wiki. — regards, Revi 19:32, 5 December 2020 (UTC)

Musicman78949@zh.wikipedia

Status: Done

List of users: Musicman78949 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Drumofftaiwan2020 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log
Discussion: w:zh:Wikipedia:元維基用戶查核請求#Musicman78949

Reason(s): They edited the same article and have a similar editorial tendency. Some users, including some sysops , think it cannot be duck. So a user check is requested. Thank you. --Yining Chen (Talk) 13:51, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

Doing... --Alaa :)..! 15:10, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

Confirmed Musicman78949, Drumofftaiwan2020

No sleepers --Alaa :)..! 15:13, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

Thanks. --Yining Chen (Talk) 15:25, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

Lukavac77@hr.wikipedia

Status: Done

List of users: Lukavac77 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Lordluka99 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Macak87 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Citatelj77 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Nekitip88 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log

Reason(s): Hello, I believe this user might be a sockpuppet of user Lordluka99, who's recently been blocked indefinitely for sockpuppeting and who might be performing a block evasion. I listed all recent sockpuppets of his, including his main account, and I'm of the opinion that it's quite obvious that this user's name follows a certain thread. Also, his first edit was on the article about Hermione Granger (Lordluka99 has also edited articles related to Harry Potter franchise). I'd be glad if you could do a CU check on him. Thank you in advance! --Neptune, the Mystic (talk) 23:42, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

On hold --Alaa :)..! 20:03, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

Confirmed --Alaa :)..! 20:06, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

Android 1248163264@en.wikinews

Status: Done

List of users: Android 1248163264 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Android 13610152128 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log
Discussion: See the contrib history n:Special:Contributions/Android_1248163264 and n:Special:Contributions/Android 13610152128

Reason(s): These two users have been inserting non-sense in multiple pages, bragging about "writing the longest article", and causing a real mess. The vandal style of the account seems similar and I think they are the same user, and pretty sure there is at least one more editor using that IP. Can anyone please check who the person is, and if account creations from that IP/range can be restricted, or some other measure to prevent abuse. acagastya 18:36, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

Doing... --Wim b 16:50, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

These two users have different IPs and UAs, but:
Group1: Android 1392781243 and Android 1248163264 same IP ands UA;

Group2: Android 13610152128 and Android 1123581321 same IP;
Taking into the usernames and the behavior of the users with whom they share, in part, the data, IMHO is very, very,very Likely --Wim b 18:04, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

- @Wim b: Since Special:CentralAuth/Android_1392781243 is globally locked, shall we lock the rest? Thanks. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 18:08, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

Camouflaged Mirage Done --Wim b 18:11, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

Thanks @Wim b :) Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 18:11, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

Dias-e9500wagnL081784248@zh.wikipedia

Status: Done

List of users: Dias-e9500wagnL081784248 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); เชนไดร้ท์ฆ่าเอ็มซีซี214 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log
Discussion: zh:Wikipedia:元維基用戶查核請求#Dias-e9500wagnL081784248

Reason(s): The first username follows a pattern zh:WP:TPW (an LTA) used, the second one has a disruptive username, which TPW also displayed. Both users posted explicit personal attack on local pages. We'd like stewards to check these users and see if there's any sleepers not blocked yet. Thanks. --Super Wang hates PC _{You hate, too?} 02:38, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

Doing... --Wim b 18:08, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

Only a sleeper already blocked --Wim b 18:16, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

OK, thank you!--Super Wang hates PC _{You hate, too?} 00:07, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

Philomenahhgf@zh.wikipedia

Status: Done

List of users: Philomenahhgf (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Egbertdfgs (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Hungarcviet (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Kelseyjtree (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log
Discussion: zh:Wikipedia:元維基用戶查核請求#Philomenahhgf

Reason(s): These are spambots, all their contribs are adding spam links into articles. Though they are locked, we'd like to know their relationship and if there are any accounts (sleepers) not blocked yet. Thanks. --Super Wang hates PC _{You hate, too?} 10:13, 11 December 2020 (UTC)

Likely Philomenahhgf, Egbertdfgs, Kelseyjtree

Unlikely Hungarcviet
Group 1: same UA and /16 range. No sleepers

--Alaa :)..! 22:13, 11 December 2020 (UTC)

Thank you, I have transferred the message to the local wiki CU request page. --LuciferianThomas．Talk 23:57, 11 December 2020 (UTC)

Suradnik 105@hr.wikipedia

Status: Done

List of users: Suradnik 105 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Kubura (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Zeljko (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Croq (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Lordluka99 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log

Reason(s): You might be familiar with the far-right controversy about the Croatian Wikipedia and with the sockpuppet-incidents. Basically, we are trying to fix all the controversial and problematic articles right now. Out of no where, a new user called "suradnik 105" appreared. It looks like this user has just created an account to contribute on a very, very, very problematic article, example - the controversial article about the Jasenovac concentration camp. Some discussion page entries contain POV-pushing and WP:OR. In his first talk-page entry, the user has unironically lowered the number of holocaust victims in the former Yugoslavia, quote: "...because there were more camps, it is impossible that Jasenovac had more than 30 thousand victims". If you ask me, this is way more than just a WP:OR and NP:NPOV violation! His editing and Wikipedia-knowledge skills show that it must be someone with experience, and not some new user who first edited Wikipedia on December 6th. Also, who would become an Wikipedian to just contribute on such controversial articles?! Can you please take a look at this? It is really important to check if this user is a sock, which might be the case. Best regards, Koreanovsky (Ča–Kaj–Što?!) 11:52, 12 December 2020 (UTC)

Inconclusive --Martin Urbanec (talk) 17:32, 12 December 2020 (UTC)

已经遭到@zh.wikipedia

Status: Done

List of users: 已經遭到 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); ドデカイうーメン (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Yoga Wu (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Wikikiki Wu (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Easterlles (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Chico tv ohdoyc (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); EasterIies (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Yega Wu (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Izterlice (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); SHB17 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log
Discussion: Wikipedia:元維基用戶查核請求#已經遭到

Reason(s): These users have similar editing behavior. Most of them were confirmed that they were sockpuppets, but we don't know which is the main account. Then, a sleeper checking is requested. Thank you. --Yining Chen (Talk) 14:50, 11 December 2020 (UTC)

Yage Wu just admitted that ドデカイうーメン, Kengoodgoodair7639, Jimbobo697, Izterlice, เชนไดร้ท์ฆ่าเอ็มซีซี214, そらごみ, CCP Winnie, Yes2LOLKuso, 1147vds, 常見咔咔咔咔咔, Xia'an'an4tt214 are his socks. Itcfangye (talk) 00:19, 12 December 2020 (UTC)

Doing... --Martin Urbanec (talk) 17:40, 12 December 2020 (UTC)

Confirmed Group 1: 已經遭到, Yaga Wu

Confirmed Group 2: Wikikiki Wu, Yoga Wu, Chico tv ohdoyc

Confirmed Group 3: Yage Wu, Lhramsist, 1147vds, Yes2LOLKuso, 龍紀文

Inconclusive for the rest of the accounts.

--Martin Urbanec (talk) 19:04, 12 December 2020 (UTC)

Arstartia@el.wikisource

Status: Not done

List of users: Arstartia (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Arsinoi777 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log

Reason(s): New accounts who both insist on creating a spammish promotional article on a some kind of "Dielectical Academy", and not only at el/Wikisource, but at el/WP as well (see Arsinoi777's log there [2]). ǁǁǁ ǁ Chalk19 (talk) 23:58, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

It looks like a duck to me based on their edits at s:el:Ακαδημία Διαλεκτικών Νόησις (deleted), as such I feel that a check here would be unnecessary. If both accounts engaged in disruptive or counter-policy editting that's reason enough to block them without the need of CheckUser evidence. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 16:27, 13 December 2020 (UTC)

@MarcoAurelio: Thanks for your response. ǁǁǁ ǁ Chalk19 (talk) 16:59, 13 December 2020 (UTC)

Closing. — regards, Revi 06:35, 14 December 2020 (UTC)

炸弹天师@zh.wikipedia

Status: Done

List of users: 炸弹天师 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 白猫羊驼 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 黑猫羊驼 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 杨洋已经是我的老公了 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); ひらひらさやさや (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 上善若水不是誰 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log
Discussion: zh:Wikipedia:元維基用戶查核請求#炸弹天师

Reason(s): These accounts are recently duck-blocked socks of the xwiki LTA 冏, some of which are global locked. Please perform a sleeper check based on these accounts' tech info, thank you very much. --Super Wang hates PC _{You hate, too?} 08:51, 14 December 2020 (UTC)

Doing... --Wim b 18:17, 14 December 2020 (UTC)

Done: あの香りは頭いい, No173thePINUT and 诶丝西皮基金会会长 share IP and UA with 恐龍皇帝 , 韩锦衣卫, 白猫羊驼 and 黑猫羊驼; no unlocked sleeper for other users. --Wim b 18:30, 14 December 2020 (UTC)

0此名0@zh.Wikiversity

Status: Done

List of users: 0此名0 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 0emaneht0 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log
Discussion: v:zh:Wikiversity:互助客栈#请管理员处理破坏

Reason(s): It's an inter-wiki vandal account and was firstly discovered on Chinese Wikiversity. After our investigation, there are no other socks locally. However, this user also has disruptive behavior on Chinese Wikipedia, so I hope to check sleepers. Yo Yan 17:24, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

@游魂: Where you want to check them, if it's zhwp there's need to be a local discussion at zhwp HAM page apparently, if it's zhwikiversity the page linked is sufficient. Btw, the meta userpage of 1st user makes it clear they are the same, but well a sleeper check is good too. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 18:03, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

There is a SRG report on these 2 users. SCP-2000 asked for a global lock. I think this might be suitable for a loginwiki CU. Just my 2 cents. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 18:07, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

Doing... --Alaa :)..! 19:21, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

Completed

Confirmed KanameB, 0emaneht0, 醜陋隱杆線蟲, Urrooo, 0此名0, JakeFYT, ERIKQQY, 赭青邃
Based on zhwikiversity and loginwiki

--Alaa :)..! 19:25, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

Thank you! --SCP-2000 00:52, 16 December 2020 (UTC)

Thank you@علاء Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 13:12, 16 December 2020 (UTC)

EsperantoLanguage@en.wikiquote

Status: Done

List of users: EsperantoLanguage (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Your continued donations are trashed (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log
Discussion: No local checkuser policy, though checkusers are discussed at q:Wikiquote:Administrators#CheckUser and oversight

Reason(s): Compare deleted user pages: EsperantoLanguage and Your continued donations are trashed. Already indeffed, but since they claim to have the same ip (152.26.89.241, which I've since blocked) there may be other accounts that were created. --DannyS712 (talk) 16:53, 17 December 2020 (UTC)

I'll note that I've also blocked `Your continued donations are trashed` on meta, and a lock request has been posted to SRG, so if these are confirmed and/or any other socks are found these may warrant locking too --DannyS712 (talk) 16:55, 17 December 2020 (UTC)

Confirmed:

Your continued donations are trashed
EsperantoLanguage
Kokoro Ni!
It will be made by people like you
KokoroNiToKeKoNu
MassAccountCreation
BRAND NEW BEDTOWN
BREAKDOWN BR3AKDOWN
A blocked manager can block the blocking manager

No comment with respect to IP address(es).

—MarcoAurelio (talk) 17:25, 17 December 2020 (UTC)

Thanks DannyS712 (talk) 17:35, 17 December 2020 (UTC)

Infantry234@th.wikipedia

Status: Done

List of users: Infantry234 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); กรมทหารปืนใหญ่ที่ 6 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); คนหลังเขา (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); พล.ร.6 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); กองพันทหารม้าที่ 8 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); ส.22 ทภ.2 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Engineer6 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Boomvcdcom (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Chayathon1996 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); ชนาวุธ นนสุทธี (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log
Discussion: Community discussion

Reason(s): These users have similar editing behavior to create content about Thailand's military agencies on their's sandboxs. Some username have similar as a agency which violate local username policy about promotional names. Although they aren't direct vandalism but have community's concerns about sockputpets and maybe use sandboxs for promote their's organization or abuse conflict of interest guideline on project. You can see other accounts in community discussion link. Best regard, Geonuch (talk) 05:53, 17 December 2020 (UTC)

Doing... --Alaa :)..! 21:41, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

Completed

Confirmed กรมทหารปืนใหญ่ที่ 6, Vut623, พล.ร.6, ราชาแห่งสนามรบ, Chayathon1996, Infantry234, คนหลังเขา, ส.22 ทภ.2

Possible กองพันทหารม้าที่ 8, ชนาวุธ นนสุทธี

Unrelated Boomvcdcom, Engineer6

--Alaa :)..! 21:56, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

Crosswiki spambots, single use accounts

Status: Done

The following are accounts that have all spammed wikis with the same url, and created a user page. Would think that there is a good chance of a common element to them, and if so there will be others. All seem to be single-use disposable spambot accounts, with this repeating style of username. — billinghurst sDrewth 04:47, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

Nealvitale (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date ^(alt) • CA • ST • lwcheckuser)
Willymarshall (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date ^(alt) • CA • ST • lwcheckuser)
Rosaleedortch (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date ^(alt) • CA • ST • lwcheckuser)
Alfredanita (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date ^(alt) • CA • ST • lwcheckuser)
Cordeliashala (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date ^(alt) • CA • ST • lwcheckuser)

I am taking a look. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 16:54, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

Completed. @Billinghurst and Wutsje: Looks like you've hit quite the jackpot.

The following accounts are

Confirmed technically and behaviourally. Listing bellow from newest account to oldest and in parentheses the list of spammed domains per account:

Jaclynmasters (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date ^(alt) • CA • ST • lwcheckuser) (banthang.vip)
Nealvitale (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date ^(alt) • CA • ST • lwcheckuser) (banthang.vip)
Retamoreno (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date ^(alt) • CA • ST • lwcheckuser) (banthang.vip)
Thietkecanhochungcu (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date ^(alt) • CA • ST • lwcheckuser) (aeros.vn)
Youngnorris (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date ^(alt) • CA • ST • lwcheckuser) (banthang.vip, asianbetting.net)
Alfredanita (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date ^(alt) • CA • ST • lwcheckuser) (banthang.vip)
Cordeliashala (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date ^(alt) • CA • ST • lwcheckuser) (banthang.vip)
Rheaknox (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date ^(alt) • CA • ST • lwcheckuser) (banthang.vip)
Hollistomas (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date ^(alt) • CA • ST • lwcheckuser) (banthang.vip)
Willymarshall (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date ^(alt) • CA • ST • lwcheckuser) (banthang.vip)
Makedamcfarlane (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date ^(alt) • CA • ST • lwcheckuser) (none)
Jeanellejoni (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date ^(alt) • CA • ST • lwcheckuser) (bongdatructuyen.vip)
Shawnjackelyn (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date ^(alt) • CA • ST • lwcheckuser) (switchcisco.vn)
Korijeter (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date ^(alt) • CA • ST • lwcheckuser) (ketquamoinhat.com)
Carmeliaboyles (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date ^(alt) • CA • ST • lwcheckuser) (ketquamoinhat.com)
Thresabaird (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date ^(alt) • CA • ST • lwcheckuser) (ketquamoinhat.com)
Miquelstacie (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date ^(alt) • CA • ST • lwcheckuser) (switchcisco.vn)
Vasilikipearlene (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date ^(alt) • CA • ST • lwcheckuser) (sieuthimang.vn)
Jesseniaathena (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date ^(alt) • CA • ST • lwcheckuser) (sieuthimang.vn)
Melainegussie (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date ^(alt) • CA • ST • lwcheckuser) (sieuthimang.vn)
Cherriezetta (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date ^(alt) • CA • ST • lwcheckuser) (bongdatructuyen.vip)
Merylpulley (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date ^(alt) • CA • ST • lwcheckuser) (bongdatructuyen.vip)
Horaciostiles (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date ^(alt) • CA • ST • lwcheckuser) (bongdatructuyen.vip)
Bernardasusana (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date ^(alt) • CA • ST • lwcheckuser) (bachtuoc.tv)
BryceWaller (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date ^(alt) • CA • ST • lwcheckuser) (bachtuoc.tv)
DownsTrenton (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date ^(alt) • CA • ST • lwcheckuser) (rfcafe.com, thietbimangcisco.vn)
DrakeStrong (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date ^(alt) • CA • ST • lwcheckuser) (winevn.com)

The above accounts will be globally locked, but we'll need to cleanup the spam not yet removed.

Merry Christmas. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 17:30, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

@MarcoAurelio: Done, also with thanks to Billinghurst. Wutsje (talk) 19:06, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

all the kudos to @Wutsje:. I am just joining the dots, seeing the pattern and knowing we had hole in the fence. Blacklisting completed. — billinghurst sDrewth 22:31, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

Qaz01471qa1@zh.wikipedia

Status: Done

List of users: Qaz01471qa1 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Oaz01265987 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 逸箖傳統診復 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log
Discussion: w:zh:Wikipedia:元維基用戶查核請求#Qaz01471qa1

Reason(s): We know that these users are the sock puppets of w:zh:WP:小昌, but we would like to know if there are any "sleepers". So a sleeper checking is requested. Thank you. --Yining Chen (Talk) 11:28, 17 December 2020 (UTC)

No sleepers --Alaa :)..! 21:40, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

文晞@zh.wikipedia

Status: Done

List of users: 文晞 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Xiaobaishialan (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Waicheehang (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Davidwong4896 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 林寯深 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 黃乙洲 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 我是伞兵 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 爱赉 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 黄伟宏 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Jibaidiaohai (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log
Discussion: zh:Wikipedia:元維基用戶查核請求#文晞

Reason(s): One more account following:

Xiqosoen520 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

These accounts are signed up on Dec. 21. They made disruptive edits to famous esports clubs and tweaked cyberathletes' nationalities. However, as their usernames don't indicate a duck, we'd like stewards to check their relationship. Thanks. --Super Wang hates PC _{You hate, too?} 03:02, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 10:32, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

Unlikely 文晞, Xiaobaishialan, Waicheehang, Davidwong4896, 林寯深, 黃乙洲, 我是伞兵, 爱赉, 黄伟宏, Jibaidiaohai, Xiqosoen520
In this case, in my experience, this is most likely MEAT. Note this when dealing with this on your local.

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 11:35, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

Thanks. Miss u so much! --Easterlies (talk) 11:39, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

I am returning to SRCU starting today :D --Sotiale (talk) 11:42, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

Axesamend@zh.wikipedia

Status: Done

List of users: Axesamend (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Snapsbauer (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Spinyclew (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Lunarmourn (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Privatesociallife (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Briertripe (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Mailsparry (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Iraqclefs (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Proverusks (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Katiekatiegirl (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log
Discussion: zh:Wikipedia:元維基用戶查核請求#Axesamend

Reason(s): Another two accounts:

Jessicaclayclaydavis (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Muckssnob (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

These accounts are confirmed that they were sock puppets of zh:WP:爱莎. We would like to know that if there are any sleepers. Thank you. --Yining Chen (Talk) 12:59, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 11:37, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

Confirmed Iraqclefs, Briertripe, Shaleniece, Vaduzdemo, Sabrebays, Polspins, Anisemesas, Shrekjails, Rebeccamorganlitition, Katiekatiegirl, Psstvice, Mailsparry, Swishduos, Privatesociallife, Servespew, Learclung, Oddlyisle, Grimynary, Larscooed, Oasesdusty, Kmartlyle, Idledsans, Sabreapply, Gagedsalad, Proverusks, Plathabase, Typosamid, Dentalto, Datemonthyoyo, Sapspita, Jiltskilo, Valetbeams, Inurebrad, Cashchewy, Khufusteal, Jessicaclayclaydavis, Heelovid, Licksmire, Mutertunic, Broilsamoa, Burstrue, Arielacing, Reisthees, Nagslarge, Cararedid, Lymanxmas, Ablymodal, Novelbind, Mushhath, Chiletrues, Brisknarks, Ridstasks11, Wailtuber, Ochrejean, Globemiles, Lunarmourn, Rolestogas, Blestnites, Moundwring, Swamiwoods, Angstdebt, Muckssnob, Harmpork, Rulergybe, Putswires, Romeobeans, Minisannul, Swagmerle, Curlsclerk, Loewiiliad, Carloloath, Carlysixty11, Gypdfsdgsgsyadam, Mangeteas, Diracdolt, Oinkomsk, Aspensemis, Giftinner, Visitshula, Heirsbland, Midgebiddy, Manicburma, Cantochars, Lordblast, Wormwisps, Swaysgolfs, Skulkchid, Campcroom, Lookcolscrol, Troysigbal, Murkypawl, Jasonlong22, Ayersgully, Vicesbobbi, Sorturks332, Creamhans, Artsmonet, Midasevian, Spinyclew, Joanaabeck, Ingeclear, Pawnviols, Meantonya66, Searcokes, Axesamend, Banjogeeks, Minorshrew, Renewunfit, Kyotolure, Nobeljelly, Noisedweeb, Partynape, Czechkeith, Pureenfanydae, Burochtalks

Ugh.. From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 12:15, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

Accounts not listed are outdated;

Stale. --Sotiale (talk) 12:19, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

Much appreciated. --Yining Chen (Talk) 13:34, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

成人玩具掌櫃@yue.wikipedia

Status: Done

List of users: 打王國皇帝 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 胖虎爆奶，小夫爆菊, (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 丁丁成人玩具掌櫃 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 基佬百科 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 丁丁成人用品掌櫃 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 寶可夢817 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 叔叔歸頭痛 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 回歸頭好痛 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log
Discussion: Local LTA page

Reason(s): Obscene user names, some started editing with same disruptive behaviour. H78c67c (talk) 06:11, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 06:16, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

Confirmed 打王國皇帝, I have big dick, 基佬百科, 丁丁成人玩具掌櫃, 胖虎爆奶，小夫爆菊,, 丁丁成人用品掌櫃, 回歸頭好痛, 寶可夢817, 叔叔歸頭痛, 打丁王國國王

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 07:00, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

Yhc1681@zh.wikipedia

Status: Done

List of users: Yhc1681 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Ykc1235 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Erpss123 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Eryeap123 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log
Discussion: zh:Wikipedia:元維基用戶查核請求#Yhc1681

Reason(s): Would any of the stewards help us check sleepers please? The accounts listed are confirmed during last check. --Super Wang hates PC _{You hate, too?} 08:53, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 09:27, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

Confirmed Erpss123, Eryeap123, Yhc1681, Giyyee1235, Epttpp, Ykc1235

From a technical point of view. Please be sure to present a new account in this checkuser case from next time. --Sotiale (talk) 09:45, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

Thanks. I'll inform local community of that. --Super Wang hates PC _{You hate, too?} 09:59, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

Mikhaliov ~ ltwiki@lt.wikipedia

Status: Done

List of users: Mikhaliov ~ ltwiki (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Sociaken (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log

Reason(s): User's edits like this is a dead giveaway he or she does not speak Lithuanian nowhere near at a native level, and makes similar mistakes to those user Mikhaliov used to do, who also can barely speak Lithuanian. Also, user Sociaken was registered around the same time user Mikhaliov (banned) started showing activity asking for ban lift, and among the first edits user Sociaken did was writing to user Mikhaliov discussion page asking him to cease asking for ban lift. It's extremely unusual that legitimate new users would do something like that and it looks more like a silly act. Last but not least, user Mikhaliov has a history of sockpuppeteering, he did use clones to circumvent block more than once before. Thank you in advance for your help --Nomad (talk) 19:21, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 01:33, 26 December 2020 (UTC)

Confirmed Group 1: Mikhaliov ~ ltwiki, 7elteven

Confirmed Group 2: Sociaken, Nojucka
Possible Group 1 and Group 2

From a technical point of view. In the case of Possible, it is recommended to determine the type of behavior of these users from the newly discovered accounts and handle it. --Sotiale (talk) 02:11, 26 December 2020 (UTC)

開心拼盤@zh.wikipedia

Status: Done

List of users: 開心拼盤 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Signdrugs (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Draforceg (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Bairdbeds (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Lhramsist (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 看門狗3 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log
Discussion: zh:Wikipedia:元維基用戶查核請求#開心拼盤

Reason(s): We'd like stewards to check if there are any sleepers of LTA zh:WP:D17C. Accounts above are selected from previous check in October, and the last three are ducks. Thank you. --Super Wang hates PC _{You hate, too?} 13:11, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

Doing... --Alaa :)..! 13:13, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

@Sotiale: hope if you can do it, as I'm facing personal technical restrictions. Thanks on advance --Alaa :)..! 00:25, 26 December 2020 (UTC)

Okay. I'll do it within today. Thanks for letting me know. --Sotiale (talk) 01:32, 26 December 2020 (UTC)

Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 02:24, 26 December 2020 (UTC)

Confirmed Draforceg, Lhramsist, 看門狗3

Inconclusive Bairdbeds
The account of Inconclusive is at your discretion; Used devices from public facilities.

In my memory, the following examples come to mind; 2020-04, 2020-07, 2020-09, 2020-10. That is, it is confirmed.

Sadly, no sleepers were found. From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 03:32, 26 December 2020 (UTC)

Thank you! --Super Wang hates PC _{You hate, too?} 04:58, 26 December 2020 (UTC)

比连等谈@zh.wikipedia

Status: Not done

List of users: 折成家 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log

Reason(s): Makes similar unsourced changes to artiste BLPs. Master account has been blocked for making numerous unsourced edits. Also have been confirmed as sock in enwiki at en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/比连等谈 (see archive for details). Robertsky (talk) 18:58, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

Hi Robertsky, what other accounts you are suspicious of, and I see that this account had been indeffed at enwp, is that enough? And according to conventions, requests for zhwp need to be discussed locally for some time before handling at this board, so you might want to file at w:zh:WP:HAM. Do let me know if you need help for filing. Thanks. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 19:29, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

@Camouflaged Mirage: As of now, it is currently only this account that I suspected of. I am uncertain as well if it being indeff for being a confirmed sock on enwiki is enough for you, since it is my first time reporting across wiki projects. Please help to file at w:zh:WP:HAM if possible as my zh account has yet to attain autoconfirmed user rights. Robertsky (talk) 21:12, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

@Robertsky I guess not needed here per locally blocked per enwp results. If you are suspecting there are some accounts that are active in zh but didn't register / inactive / stale in en that a zh check will be needed or massive crosswiki abuse, you can approach me with those accounts and I will try to help file in zh HAM page first. I think that is the only reason why we check zh when en is checked already (cc @Super Wang). Else we are all good here, actually if you need assistance, you might want to use the talkpage and file an edit request if I am not there, I'm sure someone will help you. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 11:11, 26 December 2020 (UTC)

What's the necessity of checking on zhwiki if enwiki has already checked? I just wonder. --Super Wang hates PC _{You hate, too?} 01:40, 26 December 2020 (UTC)

Not done If some accounts are confirmed as the same user on enwiki, this could be grounds to support abuse on zhwiki. However, this request has not been discussed on HAM, so it is recommended to discuss it on zhwiki. The common practice of zhwiki is to post it to SRCU after discussion on HAM. Of course, if it is obvious that it is cross-wiki/long term abuse(more than just using multiple accounts on multiple wikis), or if there are other urgent reasons, you can post without going through HAM discussion, but I don't think this is the case. --Sotiale (talk) 02:22, 26 December 2020 (UTC)

絆愛0630@zh.wikipedia

Status: Done

List of users: 絆愛0630 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 給爺爬 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 芭 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log
Discussion: zh:Wikipedia:元維基用戶查核請求#絆愛0630

Reason(s): They vandalized virtual YouTuber articles, removed useful images, and pasted copyvio contents from an external wiki (which is not governed by WMF and uses non-commercial license). Though we called 絆愛0630 and 給爺爬 a duck, we still want to know more about them, so please consider running a sleeper check. Thank you. --Super Wang hates PC _{You hate, too?} 14:06, 26 December 2020 (UTC)

Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 00:01, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

Confirmed 絆愛0630, 給爺爬, 芭

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 00:13, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

Andytww@zh.wikipedia

Status: Done

List of users: Andytww (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Andytwn (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); H46823 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Amflussi (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Df4gf45 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log
Discussion: zh:Wikipedia:元維基用戶查核請求#Andytww

Reason(s): These are recently blocked socks of LTA zh:WP:C7. Please check through their data and tell us if there are more not blocked yet. Thanks. --Super Wang hates PC _{You hate, too?} 08:28, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

Confirmed Group 1: Protoss1234567, Df4gf45, Andytww, Protoss123456, Protoss12345

Likely Andytwn and Group 1

Likely H46823 and Group 1

Unlikely Amflussi and Group 1

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 08:45, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

Thank you! --Super Wang hates PC _{You hate, too?} 08:55, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

九品莲花为叶品纬父母亲@zh.wikipedia

Status: Done

List of users: 九品莲花为叶品纬父母亲 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 張通榮林右昌 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 林美雀林尚青黃子銘 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 施美蓮 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 葉品緯陳彥霖葉品緯 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 釋道果法師 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 劉定緯學長同班同學 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 徐臻蔚傅崐萁陳妍安陳彥霖葉品緯鄭文燦侯友宜林明溱柯文哲 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 姜瑞連 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 行政院衛生署長陳時中衛生福利部長陳時中 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

Reason(s): Their user names are similar to some sock puppets of w:zh:WP:HBN, so we want to know the relationship between these accounts and w:zh:WP:HBN. Then a sleeper checking is requested. Thanks.--Yining Chen (Talk) 11:49, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

At first glance, I feel that these are different from the typical characteristics of HBN. Are there any other users in doubt? --Sotiale (talk) 11:56, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

In fact, there are some other accounts that had similar names to these accounts, and they have been confirmed that they were HBN(Steward_requests/Checkuser/2020-07#CLP1996@zh.wikipedia, Steward_requests/Checkuser/2020-07#CMM214@zh.wikipedia). Then, these accounts also have similar editing tendencies to HBN.--Yining Chen (Talk) 12:10, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

Doing... I plan to investigate whether this request is related to HBN. --Sotiale (talk) 10:50, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

  Confirmed Group 1: 姜瑞連, 施美蓮, 林美雀林尚青黃子銘, 葉品緯陳彥霖葉品緯, 劉定緯學長同班同學, 九品蓮花為葉品緯父母親, 釋道果法師, 邱鏡淳楊文科林智堅翁章梁張花冠

  Confirmed Group 2: 徐臻蔚傅崐萁陳妍安陳彥霖葉品緯鄭文燦侯友宜林明溱柯文哲, 陳孝盈教官, 賈青鳳老師, 行政院衛生署長陳時中衛生福利部長陳時中
  Confirmed Group 1 and 2

Likely 張通榮林右昌 and Group 1

In my experience, these are not HBN.

I think, these are WP:110.29.

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 11:00, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

Prirodoslovac9@hr.wikipedia

Status: Done

List of users: Lordluka99 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Prirodoslovac9 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log

Reason(s): Lordluka99 was a previous user who is infinitely blocked on hr.wiki (Croatian language Wikipedia) due to sockpuppetry. He used several accounts after that block in order to circumnavigate it. The names of his sockpuppets usually consist of a word followed by a number, examples include Lukavac77, Macak87, Citatelj77, Nekitip88 (see: [3]). Prirodoslovac9's first edits are on hr:Alkani (Alkanes). Lordluka99 has also previously edited articles regarding chemistry. Lordluka99 also considers himself a great Catholic. A large quantity of his articles are related to Christianity. Prirodoslovac9 edited hr:Apage, an article significantly edited by Lordluka99 [4]. Another article related to Catholicism which Prirodoslovac9 edited is hr:Red zlatnoga runa (Order of the Golden Fleece). Lordluka is also a great admirer of Tolkien (Ovaj je suradnik poštovatelj djela J.R.R. Tolkiena. on his userpage, see his article hr:Kršćanska fantastika, Citatelj77's userpage (The Lord of the Rings (Gospodari prstenova) is listed among his favourite books and Tolkien is listen under his favourite writers.) 7 out of Prirodoslovac9's 11 edits are simillar to the topics about which Lordluka99' usually edits. Croxyz (talk) 22:30, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 05:19, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

Confirmed Lordluka99, Prirodoslovac9, SatanikST

From a technical point of view. Suddenly something urgent came up in real life, so the declaration of the results was late. --Sotiale (talk) 10:18, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

@Sotiale: Thank you! Ivi104 (talk) 10:36, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

紅神琦@zh.wikipedia

Status: Done

List of users: 紅神琦 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); リーダ昕哥 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 淺井39 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log
Discussion: w:zh:Wikipedia:元維基用戶查核請求#紅神琦

Reason(s): These users have similar editing tendencies. And some users think that these accounts may be the sock puppets of w:zh:WP:X43. Then, a sleeper checking is requested (For comparison:m:Steward requests/Checkuser/2020-10#俏绫@zh.wikipedia). Thanks --Yining Chen (Talk) 11:42, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

I feel like the request was posted to SRCU too quickly. And the first user is marked as not having an account. How about going through a discussion for a day or so? --Sotiale (talk) 11:59, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

The first name was typed in a wrong way, sorry about that:( Then, it is OK to wait for some time. --Yining Chen (Talk) 12:10, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 10:26, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

Confirmed 紅神琦, 鏟5敷儲1, リーダ昕哥, 淺井39

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 10:40, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

@Sotiale: Thank you. And I just want to confirm if there is no sleeper. Itcfangye (talk) 12:15, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

Since my investigation is always searching for sleepers, there is no need to ask again. --Sotiale (talk) 12:21, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

Hmvod9@zh.wikipedia

Status: Done

List of users: Hmvod9 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Tinodog (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log
Discussion: zh:Wikipedia:元維基用戶查核請求#Hmvod9

Reason(s): These users are blocked as D17C's duck, but Hmvod9 posted a block review and claims not to be a sock. Our admin is also in favor of a check to clarify their relationship. For recent D17C's info, please refer to the confirmed group of this round of check. Thank you. --Super Wang hates PC _{You hate, too?} 23:59, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 09:31, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

  Confirmed Group 1: Tinodog, Hmvod9

  Confirmed Group 2: S20030816, Boschacne
  Confirmed Group 1 and 2

Likely 開心拼盤@zh.wikipedia(2020-12)

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 10:10, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

AIT1982@zh.wikipedia

Status: Done

List of users: AIT1982 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); TWD1025 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); JPY0206 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); ADIZ2020 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log
Discussion: zh:Wikipedia:元維基用戶查核請求#AIT1982

Reason(s): This is a request endorsed by the local admin who blocked AIT1982, block reason is adding nonsense to articles. Please check sleepers as they are all considered ducks, thank you. --Super Wang hates PC _{You hate, too?} 11:31, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 12:27, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

Confirmed ADIZ2020, TWD1025, JPY0206, USA1982, AIT1982

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 12:34, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

Lokesha Kunchadka@kn.wikitionary

Status: Done

List of users: Lokesha Kunchadka (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Gowdathi (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Sonia Bhimegowda (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log

Reason(s): I have suspicion that Lokesha Kunchadka is using Sockpuppetry to try to run for Adminship in Kannada Wiktionary. I will give some background about these users.

Lokesha Kunchadka was banned from Kannada Wikipedia in May 2020 for trolling new users and other issues they had before. (w:kn:Special:Block/Lokesha Kunchadka). About a month after they were banned, another user called Gowdathi (w:kn:Special:Contributions/Gowdathi) wrote in the local village pump of Kannada Wikipedia, making personal attacks against one of the Admins and other users. This user was then banned. Gowdathi was a new user who displayed high level of knowledge about Wikipedia policies and wrote in favour of Lokesha Kunchadka. Considering this and the timing, other users had voiced suspicion at the time that it was a sockpuppet account of Lokesh Kunchadka. Details of that can be found here - w:kn:ವಿಕಿಪೀಡಿಯ:ಅರಳಿ_ಕಟ್ಟೆ/ಕಾರ್ಯನೀತಿ_ಚರ್ಚೆ-archive೧೫#Administrative_Review.

Lokesha Kunchadka made a post announcing their intention to run for Adminship in Kannada Wiktionary - wikt:kn:ನಿರ್ವಾಹಕ ನೋಂದಾವಣೆಗಳು / Nominations for Administrator. What immediately raised my suspicion is that the same Gowdathi had casted a vote in Lokesha Kunchadka's support. I remembered the events surrounding them getting banned in Kannada Wikipedia.

Checking the history of the Nomination for Administrator page shows that Gowdathi casted the support vote just 4 minutes after the page was created [5]. Gowdathi's global account information [6] shows that the first time they visited Kannada Wiktionary was 2 minutes before their vote, which is also 2 minutes after Lokesha Kunchadka created the page announcing they were running for Admin. Then Lokesha Kunchadka posted Steward request for Adminship in meta wiki Steward_requests/Permissions#Lokesha_Kunchadka@kn.wikitionary.

Sonia Bhimegowda created a new account from Kannada Wiktionary and the first thing they did was cast a vote supporting Lokesha Kunchadka. This too seems like a Sockpuppet or meatpuppet.

Considering the evidence and that this involves nomination for Administrator, I request Checkuser on these accounts. Thank You. AVSmalnad77 ^chat 06:29, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 06:49, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

Confirmed Group 1: Lokesha Kunchadka, Gowdathi

Unrelated Sonia Bhimegowda

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 06:54, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

Mlav130102@hr.wikipedia

Status: Done

List of users: Lordluka99 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Mlav130102 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log

Reason(s): Lordluka99 has several confirmed sockpuppets, and Mlav130102 seems to follow a similar patter to the other socks (those being Nekitip88, Macak87, Lukavac77 and Prirodoslova9: the username consists of a word and a number, and this user seems to have come out of nowhere, editing topics Lordluka99 had edited before, including conservatism, WWII and religion. User:Imjustthere 18:28, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 06:37, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

Unlikely Lordluka99 and Mlav130102

From a technical point of view. There is only limited information at this point, but it is difficult to find strong connection based on the data. --Sotiale (talk) 06:46, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

IPs @ incubatorwiki

Status: Done

List of users: 194.111.70.50 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 2001:14BB:420:CA9F:ADA6:EBB9:FC61:17AF (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log

Reason(s): This is LTA ValtteriLathi, this time editing logged-out. Are there sleeper accounts? --MF-W 22:12, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

Confirmed: Vyörykkä (active in incubator) and Spermakulli, Sikovandaali iskee jälleen and Moioonjoku (active in fiwiki). Ruslik (talk) 13:31, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

Vyörykkä sounds a little bit unlikely choice to be as a sock puppet and could be a good idea to double-check that. Also, just for transparency, there is a discussion in fiwiki admin noticeboard on ValtteriLahti's socks. W:fi:Wikipedia:Ylläpitäjien_ilmoitustaulu#Miten_toimia? --Zache (talk) 18:31, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

東海高中@zh.wikipedia

Status: Done

List of users: 東海高中 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 詹金麗丁偉謀劉定緯劉逸卉釋上莊下義法師本名劉技進 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 詹金麗女士劉定緯先生 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 華藏淨宗學會 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log
Discussion: zh:Wikipedia:元維基用戶查核請求#東海高中

Reason(s): This is our last request in the year 2020. These are zh:WP:110.29's fresh ducks, please compare them to previous round of check, and of course, check if there are any sleepers. Thank you and wish you a Happy New Year. --Super Wang hates PC _{You hate, too?} 09:54, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

Doing... Oh, that's great news. But today is the last day of 2020, isn't it? :p This means that a new request will be available in about 12 hours! --Sotiale (talk) 12:08, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

Confirmed 華藏淨宗學會, 賈青鳳老師, 陳孝盈教官, 詹金麗女士劉定緯先生, 詹金麗丁偉謀劉定緯劉逸卉釋上莊下義法師本名劉技進, 東海高中
Confirmed 九品莲花为叶品纬父母亲@zh.wikipedia(2020-12)

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 12:22, 31 December 2020 (UTC)