Steward requests/Checkuser/2020-08


Elana Barker@af.wikipedia

  Doing... --Alaa :)..! 19:08, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

  Confirmed Elana Barker, Liami Smith, Hardus.Maree

--Alaa :)..! 19:13, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

Thanks so much. Lefcentreright (talk) 19:16, 3 August 2020 (UTC)


  Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 09:48, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
  •   Unrelated Duckera, Zaphirioutheodoros

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 09:58, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

Cartoons attack plantimon@hi.wikipedia

  Confirmed Cartoons attack, Cartoons attack plantimon, Plantimon and princes, Plantimon, Patel jenil lk, प्लेंटीमोन - एक साहसिक अभियान, Alien zoo cartoon, Mooshak gungun, Jenil p, Jenil pkenal, Plantimon 2020, Manoj dey youtuber, Cartoons attack. youtube, Plantimon - a journey of an, Plantimon - a journey of an adventure, Plantimon cartoon, Plantimon c.a

--Sakretsu (炸裂) 12:15, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

விக்னேஷ்வர் பா மாளுசுத்தியார்@ta.wikipedia

  Doing... --Alaa :)..! 15:02, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
  •   Unrelated விக்னேஷ்வர் பா மாளுசுத்தியார், Sivakumar430, Dhashwanth K.L.
  •   Confirmed Dhashwanth K.L., Bal58328oo
  •   Confirmed Sivakumar619, Sshyam2992, Sivakumar212, Sivakumar430
  • Also, notice that Dhashwanth K.L. blocked on enwiki as Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Latha bsf + Dashukl.

Reminder: this is 100% technical analysis and does not include behavioral evidence

Ping @Ivanvector: as Dhashwanth K.L. = Bal58328oo (editing on enwiki) --Alaa :)..! 15:21, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

Thank you. --AntanO 16:12, 4 August 2020 (UTC)


  Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 09:29, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
  • All his accounts appearing in the IP band used by above accounts are locked or blocked. No other sleepers found.

--Sotiale (talk) 09:39, 5 August 2020 (UTC)


What is the exact reason for the request? Want to find sleepers? --Sotiale (talk) 09:43, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
@Sotiale:Yes. —SecurityXP 09:48, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
  Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 09:49, 5 August 2020 (UTC)

If can categorize these accounts based on technical information and my experience,

  • 坦帕灣光芒460 == MCC 127, MCC 074, MCC 011, MCC 966, MCC 240, MCC 053, MCC 020, MCC 998, MCC 988, MCC 380, Ay1np2508373, MCC 981, MCC 038, MCC 065, MCC 091, MCC 109, MCC 424, MCC 263, 冰川月巴使者, 710248fc (All accounts are locked and blocked. No other sleepers found.)
  • But 台风黑格尔把霜奶仙吹飞了 is unfamiliar technical information and IPs. It's proxy band, so I investigated the band, but no account appeared to be the same user based on the account's technical information.

--Sotiale (talk) 10:03, 5 August 2020 (UTC) :Thank you for the day. All results above brought back. --Super Wang hates PC You hate, too? 10:47, 5 August 2020 (UTC)


  Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 04:44, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
  •   Confirmed Group 1: Sunnycludy, 陽陽乎與之俱遊, 璀璨星空月下河
  •   Likely Group 1 and above 雷添堯(.) account group

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 04:54, 5 August 2020 (UTC)


  Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 12:21, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Above 3 accounts are technically   Unrelated.
  • I looked up the bands they used, but there were no technically similar accounts in each band.

--Sotiale (talk) 12:39, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

Much appreciated. --Super Wang hates PC You hate, too? 13:39, 6 August 2020 (UTC)


  Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 06:59, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
  •   Confirmed Mousamimanjiri, Sindhujawriter, Meenunag, Qarib16, Indianhub12, Radhey1699

From a technical point of view. Yes, it's Viralvilla. All locked. --Sotiale (talk) 07:14, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

Huan-Ching Chou@zh.wikipedia

  Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 10:36, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
  •   Confirmed 东方星莲船, Keu Tjhi Djieu == ColinPan1999
    • No other accounts not blocked in the bands they used.
  • The technical information of Huan-Ching Chou and Zhao-Wu tao is different from those of the above accounts, and I am also new. Technically   Unrelated.
    • Each of these accounts(Huan-Ching Chou, Zhao-Wu tao) did not have users with similar technical information in the bands they used.
    • If your community is convinced as ColinPan1999, please let me know. In that case it will be reflected in the next checkuser.

  • Accounts that have already been verified in previous request have been excluded.

--Sotiale (talk) 11:01, 9 August 2020 (UTC)

Thank you.--Super Wang hates PC You hate, too? 11:13, 9 August 2020 (UTC)

चंद्रशेखर (धारावाहिक)@hi.wikipedia

  Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 03:39, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
  •   Confirmed चंद्रशेखर (धारावाहिक), Dinesh k Maravi

  • No other accounts with similar technical information are in bands they used.

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 04:18, 10 August 2020 (UTC)

As these accounts are clearly promotional, can't we lock them globally? QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 06:05, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
Oh, I saw your message late. I have never reviewed their edits. I only checked that they had grounds to investigate for various reasons, such as editing the same page. Could you post it on SRG? --Sotiale (talk) 14:07, 10 August 2020 (UTC)

Utkarsh Classes Jodhpur@hi.wikipedia

  Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 13:26, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
  •   Confirmed ShankarDheedhas, Utkarsh Classes Jodhpur, WikipageVerified, SawroopSolanki, Bishnoi sudhir, Mr. Shankar Patel, SudhirBishnoi06, AnjanaMultimedia

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 13:43, 11 August 2020 (UTC)

Sachin Rathe@en.wikinews

  Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 10:37, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
  •   Confirmed Soumya Bhat, Harish Kant, Dilnaz Khan
  •   Likely Sachin Rathe

  • These users used open proxy or VPN.

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 10:53, 11 August 2020 (UTC)


  Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 09:01, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
  •   Confirmed(not blocked) 叫我長頸鹿, 林建祥, 長頸華

  • Already blocked accounts are not listed.
  • All   Confirmed, but Onliegames has different technical information.

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 09:25, 12 August 2020 (UTC)


Hello. Please provide the reasons(or evidence, diffs, etc) you believe the accounts you presented to us are related to Xsaorapa. Thanks. --Sotiale (talk) 14:56, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
  • removal of content critical of Islamism citing notability: [3] [4][5] [6]
  • Very similar removals of criticism of Islamism or topics related to Islam and violence [7] [8] [9]
  • edits in same type of articles:[10] [11] etc.
  • edits in same article and removal or tagging of the same source(s) [12] [13]
  • edits in same topics: [14] [15] [16] [17] etc.
  • addition of content with apologist pov: [18] [19] etc.
  • editing of same source (mary boyce) and deletion of mention of a source (K. Elst) he seems to strongly dislike : [20] [21]
The revealer

These examples are for the user accounts. For the dozen of IPs many more examples can be added. --დამოკიდებულება (talk) 15:35, 13 August 2020 (UTC)

  Doing... --Wim b 17:49, 13 August 2020 (UTC)

All users use the same operative system and browser (only Xsaorapa used also another browser).

Xsaorapa the 21/5/2020 shared IP and User Agent with Sunfee, blocked for "Abusing multiple accounts". Ujimasa, Kawm Alemşah and Postspud always contributed by VPN, Xsaorapa instead it contributed with 2 VPNs and then only with various IPV6s and one IPV4s from the same operator. On two separate occasions, Xsaorapa shared both the same IP and the same UA with another user who does not seem to have the same interests, although I think it is plausible that it is always the same person behind, but there is no evidence to state this. The revealer could not be checked. IMHO is   Confirmed --Wim b 18:46, 13 August 2020 (UTC)

Thank you Wim b. Sunfee was already confirmed as a sock of this user, I forgot to mention this ([30]). Another confirmed sock on wikiquote was Feitoria. So all the user accounts (Ujimasa, Kawm Alemşah and Postspud) are confirmed except the revealer which could not be checked. Thank you for checking. P.S.: If that other user shared the same IP and UA on wikiquote it could be another case of block evasion on wikiquote or on one of the other wikis where the user is blocked. --დამოკიდებულება (talk) 19:09, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
დამოკიდებულება: he registered 2 months ago and made edits only on en.wq --Wim b 19:48, 13 August 2020 (UTC)

Fr Bateau@barwiki

  Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 14:06, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
  •   Unlikely Nerote, Fr Bateau
  •   Stale Aubervilliers2

  • Some user used open proxies or VPN.

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 14:25, 14 August 2020 (UTC)


  Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 02:45, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
  •   Confirmed(William20200604's friends, but not blocked): WilliamKwok20200604, WilliamKwok2020, Wk202085
  • No accounts seen as 南侠 or 9527计划 in the band used by other accounts.
  • WangShengXin1998 is   Unrelated: using VPN and different technical information.

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 03:06, 15 August 2020 (UTC)

Thanks will report back. --Wright Streetdeck 04:42, 15 August 2020 (UTC)


  Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 12:19, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
  •   Confirmed Group 1: Blbj, 维百自行车纳米, 新冠肺炎, 首页挖方色鬼黑社会热, 发鬼地方金刚护法, 创建账户我们恳请您输入下面方框中显示的文字, 天才小能描
  •   Likely Qnmb and Group 1

  • This user uses VPN.

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 14:07, 15 August 2020 (UTC)

  • Thanks, the results was report back. --SecurityXP🔒 15:02, 15 August 2020 (UTC)


  Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 12:44, 17 August 2020 (UTC)

  • Lab06 N used VPN.
  • No other sleepers found (already blocked or locked)

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 14:41, 17 August 2020 (UTC)


  Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 13:09, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
  •   Confirmed All accounts above.

  • All related accounts are blocked and no other accounts not blocked are found.
  • They are all blocked already, but if you need a list of their accounts, please ask.

--Sotiale (talk) 13:16, 18 August 2020 (UTC)

Mohamadin barghout@arz.wikipedia

  Doing... --Alaa :)..! 18:47, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
  •   Confirmed محمدين السيد عبدلله برغوت ,محمدين السيد برغوت
  •   Confirmed Mohamadin barghout, Mohamadeen75, 75mohamadin
  • Group1   Likely Group2
  •   Unrelated A7medibnmo7med

Reminder: this is 100% technical analysis and does not include behavioral evidence

--Alaa :)..! 18:56, 18 August 2020 (UTC)


Hello. Of course, by reading the discussion in your community, I can get a rough idea of what the request is, but a lot of who 醍醐的花見 is and why this investigation is necessary is omitted. Please explain in a little more detail what happened and why this investigation is necessary. If he revealed that 13 accounts were his, and asked to find out if there were other accounts, some explanation would be needed. This is because if an account that is suspicious among them is added, or if there is a suspicion among the accounts he revealed, it is possible to investigate, but if it is all revealed that these are his accounts and is to find another accounts without any doubt, the investigation becomes difficult(This is because there is a risk of being seen as fishing). Thank you. --Sotiale (talk) 03:19, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
I dont see any message which is sent by 醍醐的花見 and revealing his all accounts. Among targets here, NetdaniaFX has not been processed by CheckUser yet at least. I think our community want to use this request to check their relationship and find out other sleepers if able. Please ping me if there is any other concern regarding this message. --Hamish 11:08, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
@Hamish: Thanks. But I am now confused about the initial reason for this request, looking at your statement and the reason for this request. Could you or another user restate in detail why the request was made? You do not need to create a new request, just tell me the reason for the request again. --Sotiale (talk) 13:07, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
@Sotiale:I bet, as per local discussion, it is to check sleepers and provide more data for local admins to handle 醍醐的花見's block review on their talk page. An old way, ping if necessary pls. --Hamish 17:37, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
As the blocking admin, I hope this can provide some context for the request. After their latest socks, 反惡意編輯, was blocked, 醍醐的花見 stated on #wikipedia-zh that they had employed paid editors to push their view. However no list of accounts have been disclosed. NetdaniaFX and Metatrader, both attempted to gain autoconfirm through trivial edits in order to edit the semi-protected pages, are likely to be the paid editors. -Mys_721tx (talk) 00:41, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
Cool. I'll handle it within today. --Sotiale (talk) 00:50, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
  Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 06:20, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
  •   Confirmed 醍醐的花見 == 反惡意編輯, 二刀流, FlycarAuto, 激石集團, 看拼經濟, 南粵国, 巴士的, 阿思達克, Tradays, 寶馬香車, NetdaniaFX, Metatrader, 魚龍舞, 大秦征百越06
  • 天然123 is   Unlikely; Technical information is different from 醍醐的花見's other accounts.
  • Putting the old and newly collected data together, now I can say that   Likely 葡萄適 and 醍醐的花見. (Previously I declared this as   Possible.)
  •   Likely 清平樂10404 and 醍醐的花見. Also,   Confirmed 南越王趙佗 and 清平樂10404.

  • Accounts that have been previously confirmed/likely as 醍醐的花見 are excluded from the above list.

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 07:08, 19 August 2020 (UTC)


Wrong venue meta checkuser request go to Meta:Requests for CheckUser information. Can I Log In (talk) 18:47, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
  Not done Please visit Meta:Requests for CheckUser information. I cannot do checkuser on meta(have local checkusers team)--Sotiale (talk) 00:53, 19 August 2020 (UTC) spammers

Status:    Done
List of users

Reason: see User:COIBot/XWiki/ additions. Note that enwiki and enwiktionary have local checkusers, but the issue here is accounts that don't edit on the same wikis as each other. This is a cross-wiki issue that local CUs can't help with (three accounts on four wikis). Per CheckUser policy#Access to CheckUser - stewards can perform checks on wikis with their own CUs for crosswiki issues. Or, a loginwiki CU might capture them all. Requesting so that the underlying ip address of the spammers can be blocked. --DannyS712 (talk) 08:19, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

  Confirmed and locked; Martjackj, Markantany0, Markentry0, Johnwer, Martinbgh, William john mart. --Sotiale (talk) 08:24, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
Now at Special:AbuseLog/1012012 - John makes1 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser) --DannyS712 (talk) 08:39, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
Locked. --Sotiale (talk) 08:42, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

Luong Trung Minh@zh.wikipedia

  Additional information needed Has consensus been formed for this request? There appear to be some accounts that haven't been blocked yet. --Sotiale (talk) 12:47, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
Hi Sotiale, SinuGod follows a pattern of mimicking other usernames (victim is User:XinuGod), which ColinPan does a lot; and SinuGod admits 东方绀珠传 as their sock, on their user pages. I hope that was clear enough. --Super Wang hates PC You hate, too? 13:09, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
What I asked was whether or not there was enough consensus. It seems that nobody has any oppose, and since it is well-known LTA, I will process it. --Sotiale (talk) 13:59, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
  Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 13:59, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
  •   Confirmed Group 1: Tao Tran Ngoc, Luong Trung Minh
  •   Confirmed Group 2: SinuGod, 东方绀珠传
  •   Confirmed Group 3: Piccolo Latte Fresco, The Notorious P.X.D., Mr.Zhieh, La Chin-teh, Su Cin-tshaon, 乡下妹
  •   Confirmed Group 4: 东北人指导你做人, Bruss1985

  •   Likely Group 1 and 2 /   Likely 2, 3 /   Likely 1, 3
  •   Likely ColinPan1999 and Group 1/2/3
  •   Unrelated Group 4 and 1/2/3

  • For group 4, please tell me if you are sure with PXD. It will be reflected in the next checkuser.

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 14:45, 20 August 2020 (UTC)


  Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 05:39, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
  •   Confirmed Gta5mark, ㄱㄱㄱ555, 사과159, 56748FSE
  •   Unrelated Shawn08190819, 但蛋, Bismarck detonation hood, Waduhek1487, Ivanho12345

  •   Unrelated means that it is not affiliated with any other account.
  • No other accounts with similar technical information were found in the IP band they used.

From a technical point of view. Yes, Gta5mark is not a member of other parts, but have an independent group. --Sotiale (talk) 06:12, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

Future vaibhika@mr.wikipedia

If DUCK, then I don't see a need for checking. If behavioural evidence alone supports a block then there's no need for CU IMHO. Thanks, —MarcoAurelio (talk) 11:44, 21 August 2020 (UTC)

  Not done Hello @QueerEcofeminist: I see that Mousami252020 locked globally as (Long-term abuse) by Martin Urbanec. So no need for CU request to Future vaibhika, as if this account create same promotional pages then it's a duck and you can open request on SRG to lock it globally --Alaa :)..! 20:59, 22 August 2020 (UTC)


Could you briefly explain why the top user is suspicious? You just need to briefly explain his editorial tendencies. Thanks! --Sotiale (talk) 11:11, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
First, the username of the top user is similar to LTA sockpuppets (e.g zh:U:R1t5 and zh:U:H4j7). Second, the top user has similar edit behavior, such as has created the machine translated articles in yuewiki and has edited articles about mathematics. Thank you. --SCP-2000 12:17, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
  Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 13:23, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
  •   Confirmed Dkdn4 and past accounts group

Without doubt. Locked by me. --Sotiale (talk) 13:28, 22 August 2020 (UTC)


  Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 12:24, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
  •   Confirmed 鄭煒立, 鄭啟民

From a technical point of view. I hope this clarifies and helps what admin wasn't sure about with duck. --Sotiale (talk) 12:28, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
Thank you. -- Little Thor () 21:09, 23 August 2020 (UTC)

Nanu Market@ro.wikipedia

  Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 15:29, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
  •   Stale PaulCalcii
  •   Inconclusive Nanu Market

--Sotiale (talk) 15:36, 25 August 2020 (UTC)


  Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 09:37, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
  •   Unrelated Huaimin87 and Circa1588

  •   Unlikely Huaimin87 and past confirmed groups
  •   Unrelated Circa1588 and past confirmed groups

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 09:56, 26 August 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for the day. --Super Wang hates PC You hate, too? 10:05, 26 August 2020 (UTC)


  Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 10:54, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
  •   Unrelated Gabiliu, 123ismith, Jjjsn2ji, Weeb,T, Quentin Sheep

  • None of these users had similar technical information.
  • In each of the IP bands they used, there were no users with similar technical information to each account.

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 11:03, 27 August 2020 (UTC)

Thank you. I guess an AF might be of use. --Super Wang hates PC You hate, too? 12:53, 27 August 2020 (UTC)

Ranjana shukla dixit@hi.wikipedia

Are you having difficulty determining that they are the same users? --Sotiale (talk) 09:59, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
They look duck to me for obvious but I thought to rule out possibilities of more accounts related to them, which I might have missed and to save myself from accusing a innocent user I made this request. if it fits in our policies? QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 15:40, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
If you're sure they're the same user, you'll be confident enough to take responsibility for it. In general, in such cases checkuser should be minimized as much as possible, so it is not necessary. If you can be confident enough that there will be other accounts (LTA, ongoing spam) you can request checkuser, otherwise you risk being treated as fishing. It is difficult for checkuser to proceed only with the assumption that there will be another account vaguely. Other reason(xwiki spamming) was suspected, so I proceeded with this investigation, but the result is as follows;
  •   Unlikely Ranjana shukla dixit, Ruchi Ravi

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 11:20, 27 August 2020 (UTC)


  Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 15:42, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
It was late because my laptop broke down :( It will all be processed within today. --Sotiale (talk) 01:40, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
  Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 08:58, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
  •   Confirmed Group 1: 那個四趴黨已經沒用了, 你打火我打氣, 一釐米, 韓之愛, QQCtvdspap, 柯柯柯, 那個四趴黨已經沒用了, 韓柯の中国党, 民眾4%, GGpppeeew, 3你的朋友, 檳榔4趴
  •   Confirmed Group 2: 荃灣聖芳濟馬戲團, 怒吃汕頭牛肉, 保良局李城璧馬戲團, 荃灣呃錢狗
  •   Confirmed Group 3: Zehehwjwj, Krkenhauuejebwjwjj, Lekraieogren, Kelensevieila, Loikon, Wosekim, Foulslanahjfj, Georgeboorth, Kehnwjwsoqajwejhee, Gaualefrazkel, Luaiaram, Watamogoesio, Crahblateto, Cchhnhm, Fajaoshahsannzbb, Kokoshaye, Vaoseovaulke, Leserensam, Loaovasilarvo, Ficklecickle, Italianpiggoshit, Huffinamiotto, Lerkkejqjjnm

  •   Likely Group 1, 2
  •   Possible Group 1/2 and 3
  •   Possible Superflaula and Group 3
  •   Possible Zhfwiki and Group 3
  •   Unlikely IF-WORLD and Group 3
  • Some accounts used VPN.

From a technical point of view. According to my personal experience, if users in group 3 have the same editing pattern as users in group 1 or 2, they are likely to be the same user. --Sotiale (talk) 09:37, 26 August 2020 (UTC)

@Sotiale: The account "那個四趴黨已經沒用了" appeared in Group 1 twice, would you please look into it again to make sure there's no typo? Thanks. --Super Wang hates PC You hate, too? 01:56, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
@Super Wang: Oh, sometimes the same username appears, but if it is in the same group, please ignore it safely. What this means is that the account served as a 'bridge'. You may get additional information that is not very helpful, but it will not affect the result in anyway ;) If you have any other questions, feel free to ping me. --Sotiale (talk) 03:34, 27 August 2020 (UTC)


  Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 05:18, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
  •   Confirmed Machine 1441 Bequales, Триаденос, Tolik28

From a technical point of view. @Ted Masters: done! --Sotiale (talk) 05:23, 28 August 2020 (UTC)


  Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 03:33, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

--Sotiale (talk) 03:45, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

Thank you. H78c67c (talk) 16:02, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

Thuythien Miumiu@zh.wikipedia

  On hold Waiting for a response from related users. --Sotiale (talk) 14:27, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
More have been discussed in zh.wikipedia. Here's a brief translation: We have strong evidence that Thuythien Miumiu and 江以琳 are socks of each other, accourding to their contributions, and it is likely that they are socks of ColinPan1999. However, it has been suggested that some or all of them could also be socks of 黄冰楠. Therefore, we would like a CU to confirm their relations. Itcfangye (talk) 02:04, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

My question was about why ColinPan1997(not Thanhhuy Tan!) was suddenly added that wasn't in the local discussion. I can guess it's an impersonation or his own socks, but next time you add an account, please let the localwiki know. --Sotiale (talk) 05:26, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

  Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 05:26, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
  •   Confirmed Group 1: Thanhhuy Tan, Dora Hamai, Khaithi, Le Giai Ngoc, Daodao Tat, Tulieng

  •   Likely Group 1 and ColinPan1999
  •   Likely 江以琳, 考場之星, Thuythien Miumiu and ColinPan1999
  •   Unrelated ColinPan1997
  • This user used VPN.

From a technical point of view. In my experience, ColinPan1997 is not 黄冰楠. --Sotiale (talk) 05:48, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

Thanks a lot~ --Easterlies (talk) 06:06, 29 August 2020 (UTC)


  Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 16:09, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
  •   Confirmed Dkdn4, 659186djjbw3, 586sueb1385681eidj, 359Ehdh6

From a technical point of view. Oh, this friend... I locked accounts that have not been locked yet(586sueb1385681eidj, 359Ehdh6). --Sotiale (talk) 16:18, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

Thank you. H78c67c (talk) 16:27, 29 August 2020 (UTC)