Steward requests/Checkuser/2020-04

Requests

Someone1692@zh.wikipedia

  Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 09:38, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
  •   Confirmed 香港獨立萬歲, Someone1692, ホンコンどくりつばんざい, 想不到好的名字

Oops, save button didn't work. Anyway, from a technical point of view. This does not include verification of behavioral patterns or editing types. In judging sockpuppets, it is necessary to comprehensively look at behavior pattern or editing type. --Sotiale (talk) 10:14, 1 April 2020 (UTC)

Thank you, results were brought back. --Super Wang hates PC You hate, too? 10:19, 1 April 2020 (UTC)

Pyruvate@zh.wikipedia

  Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 08:18, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
  •   Confirmed Group 1: Crystalfyy1998, Babarstampfrhe, Millshiedvregredf, Girliloveteddybear, Ronnytacos, Ritachongwingyi, Coredmasonrge, Trhsretsryjnty, Rosinsims, Lirasmoledvwar, Rilkewormsdgs, Pithenact, Edemabaden, Kaneslotparking, Basewryer, Thanhthanhviet, Prestingsrtgerrgr, Macyliter888, Bullscooks, Sorrywilly112, Rodeoohioohio, Dutychump332, Sizerspace667, Termobama, Bakurifledgergr, Krochuntskrochunts, Swardagille, Doteddellshter, Geeksyoginrhe, Vaultwillyhgerht, Shahyapsshahyaps, Antsruseantsruse, Risenbaskdgsr, Estesbakeredter, Hicksdijonrgerg, Overlysoletertge45r, Tramgibedtramgibed, Sinewgaza, Trystcrestdfger, Creedwane332, Careperil
  •   Confirmed Group 2: Pyruvate, Ryopus, Puremagic888
  •   Confirmed Group 3: Lubesstood, Baronaxum, Altonscuds

  Unrelated Group 1 and 2.   Likely Group 1 and 3.

From a technical point of view. This does not include verification of behavioral patterns or editing types. In judging sockpuppets, it is necessary to comprehensively look at behavior pattern or editing type. --Sotiale (talk) 10:22, 3 April 2020 (UTC)

@Sotiale: Thanks, transferred and reported back.Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 10:26, 3 April 2020 (UTC)

Swanthitha@ta.wikipedia

  Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 09:52, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
  •   Confirmed Group 1: Rosini okc, NIVETHA OKC
  •   Possible Teju pooja
  •   Unrelated Swanthitha

Possible and unrelated are compared to Group 1.

From a technical point of view. This does not include verification of behavioral patterns or editing types. In judging sockpuppets, it is necessary to comprehensively look at behavior pattern or editing type. --Sotiale (talk) 10:16, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

Thank you, Sotiale --AntanO 11:53, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

Pyruvate@zh.wikipedia

  Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 11:25, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
  •   Confirmed Group 1: Purefalachen777 (Same as Group 1 from previous request)
  •   Confirmed Group 2: (Same as Group 2 from previous request)
  •   Confirmed Group 3: CLT Terr, Sam abc 1211, Fhimggdgj + Kelly chan 12345
  •   Unrelated Stevencocoboy

  •   Unrelated Each group Group 1 and 2, Group 1 and 3.   Possible Group 2 and 3.   Likely Setthestagefor and Group 1.
  • Several experienced users have appeared and the investigation has been lengthened. However, as a result of additional investigation, the IPs of public facilities are used, and the timeline is also different. In addition, no technical commonalities are found in other IPs they used. So it is not disclosed.

From a technical point of view. This does not include verification of behavioral patterns or editing types. In judging sockpuppets, it is necessary to comprehensively look at behavior pattern or editing type. --Sotiale (talk) 13:30, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for your effort. --Super Wang hates PC You hate, too? 13:34, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

Oops, investigating whether experienced users are relevant, 2 data were missing. Group 2 and Group 3 must be modified as   Possible, not   Unrelated(In some IPs, it is found that the same mobile band). The rest are double-checked, but the results are same without Kelly chan 12345 of Group 3. + I checked for the third time to see if there was anything missing, but there wasn't. --Sotiale (talk) 14:34, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

Iphoneuser88@zh.wikipedia

The following request is closed. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
this is personal attack. the request is rejected some days before see zh:Wikipedia:元維基用戶查核請求#SiuMai. nominator User:DavidHuai1999 is known to like attack other users see their blockk log. now they just repeat checkuser to trouble other users.
CheckUser_policy#Use_of_the_tool say "The tool is to be used to fight vandalism, spamming, to check for sockpuppet abuse, and to limit disruption of the project. It must be used only to prevent damage to any of the Wikimedia projects. The tool should not be used for political control; to apply pressure on editors; or as a threat against another editor in a content dispute. There must be a valid reason to check a user." it is now used for troubling me. i dont know any other user. i use vpn in my school.--Iphoneuser88 (talk) 09:53, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
"known to act as veterans and use tools smoothly" this is not reason to check. "to tag articles abusively and to attack others" is false. see my block log. again, i dont know other people, but i know my edittings.--Iphoneuser88 (talk) 10:09, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
  • The reason is just simply both account display close editing patterns and some sort of overlaps in user behaviours. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 10:18, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Per Camouflaged Mirage and Super Wang. According to my evidence in zh:WP:SRCU, Iphoneuser88 and 不寫條目的鼻涕蟲 maybe the puppetry of SiuMai. I think 不寫條目的鼻涕蟲 is more obvious. By the way, it's worth noting that Iphoneuser88 often disrupt Wikipedia and attack many users. --DavidHuai1999 (talk) 10:35, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
my block log say everything. "close editing patterns and some sort of overlaps in user behaviours" have no evidence.
User:DavidHuai1999 known to abuse report 3RR, vandal, checkuser... for troubleing users.--Iphoneuser88 (talk) 10:59, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
Please don't discuss irrelevant topics. Your argument is not convincing. What's more, I'm not the only one who suspects you. --DavidHuai1999 (talk) 11:02, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
Later discussions should go to local page, not here. Note that users haven't to be blocked before a check takes place. --Super Wang hates PC You hate, too? 11:04, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
It must be used only to prevent damage to any of the Wikimedia projects. i make no damage. i am target only because User:DavidHuai1999 like attack users. see my block log and see DavidHuai1999 block log
the request is rejected some days before zh:Wikipedia:元維基用戶查核請求#SiuMai. but DavidHuai1999 continue and claim other random account to continue attack. i dont know any one.--Iphoneuser88 (talk) 11:09, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
In my opinion, if the request is a personal attack or disruptive editing, it will be rejected by the community. But in this case, no oppose in local discussion except the reported user. In conclusion, this case has not any problem. --SCP-2000 11:39, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
see zh:Wikipedia:元維基用戶查核請求#SiuMai! users reject!
but today suddenly User:DavidHuai1999 use other random account to continue! no evidence! It must be used only to prevent damage to any of the Wikimedia projects. i have no damage!
DavidHuai1999 continue attack is not first time. he is also block before because that! see DavidHuai1999 block log!--Iphoneuser88 (talk) 11:48, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
in zh:Wikipedia:元維基用戶查核請求#SiuMai other users explain and conclude i have no damage! so request is rejected!
but because that, User:DavidHuai1999 start again! maybe because users here dont speak chinese, so you dont understand zh:Wikipedia:元維基用戶查核請求#SiuMai is rejected before!--Iphoneuser88 (talk) 11:52, 9 April 2020 (UTC)

  Additional information needed Can one of the zhwp admins confirm that there is consensus in the request? If there is confirmation of admin, I will proceed with the investigation. --Sotiale (talk) 11:53, 9 April 2020 (UTC)

  • Just wait here, wait for a confirmation from one of our sysops.# SteepPeak 12:02, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
  • I am zhwp admind , I confirm this.--蟲蟲飛♡♡→♡℃Talk 12:04, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
  • I don't see consensus within ZHWP. Please hold on. --UjuiUjuMandan (talk) 12:08, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
"*This editing by Iphoneuser88 and this editing by 不寫條目的鼻涕蟲 have something in common. --DavidHuai1999 (talk) 11:59, 9 April 2020 (UTC)" is a joke! User:DavidHuai1999 known to spam user talk with fake warnings, part of his attack! I use wikipedia tool to get rid of his fake warning when i have enough. now this is evidence????
only evidence DavidHuai1999 show you is after he trouble other users, other users delete his personal attack! yes that is similar, because he attack users and users get tired similarly!!!--Iphoneuser88 (talk) 12:15, 9 April 2020 (UTC
  • the discusstion have started for many days UjuiUjuMandan just joint the discussion for few mins.--蟲蟲飛♡♡→♡℃Talk 12:17, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
User talk:蟲蟲飛 you are admin you should know! User:DavidHuai1999 repeat zh:Wikipedia:元維基用戶查核請求#SiuMai. it is rejected some days ago! he repeat request rejected and so you dont see oppose. but same thing is already rejected!--Iphoneuser88 (talk) 12:18, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
  • @蟲蟲飛: Again you see some consensus whilst other admins don't. I have no more comments on that. --UjuiUjuMandan (talk) 12:55, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
  • which admins oppose? so many support and provide so many evidence. The discussion start for a long time and you join the discusion for few mins and only you oppose without any evidence here.--蟲蟲飛♡♡→♡℃Talk 13:04, 9 April 2020 (UTC)

I wanted to confirm that there was no opposition(some user mentioned above), but there seems to be opposition. First of all, please discuss again on local. --Sotiale (talk) 12:21, 9 April 2020 (UTC)

see https://zh.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:元維基用戶查核請求&diff=59073809&oldid=59073769 . when other users disagree, User:DavidHuai1999 also attack them! without any evidence!--Iphoneuser88 (talk) 12:28, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
  • I just want to say that, we post a request here, just for one purpose, to confirm if there is any technical relation between you and another user. I do not understand why you are so blamed for this. Actually, if you've done nothing, the stewards will report "Not related" to us, then you will just get no punishment. But as you post lots of opposition here, I could only come up with one idea, is that you ARE technically related with another user listed for some reason that you knew.# SteepPeak 12:46, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
CheckUser_policy#Use_of_the_tool say "The tool is to be used to fight vandalism, spamming, to check for sockpuppet abuse, and to limit disruption of the project. It must be used only to prevent damage to any of the Wikimedia projects. The tool should not be used for political control; to apply pressure on editors; or as a threat against another editor in a content dispute. There must be a valid reason to check a user."
you need to show damage to any of the Wikimedia projects. in zh:Wikipedia:元維基用戶查核請求#SiuMai users explain i have no damage!
DavidHuai1999 only want to trouble me and continue report! to apply pressure on editors; or as a threat against another editor in a content dispute.!--Iphoneuser88 (talk) 12:54, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Using sockpuppet is defined as a kind of vandalism locally on zhwiki. We just want to check it.# SteepPeak 13:00, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
evidence is a joke. if editting same wikipedia == similar behaviour == sockpuppet, then what can i edit??? show evidence i am similar to any one. of course i always edit something and other people also edit something. of course you can create evidence!--Iphoneuser88 (talk) 13:05, 9 April 2020 (UTC)

Iphoneuser88, know that you should not bring your zhwiki dispute to metawiki. Do that in zhwiki, not here. You have been warned, and ignorance is no longer applicable. — regards, Revi 13:03, 9 April 2020 (UTC)

User:-revi i am sorry but i did not start this.
today i read wikipedia and the bell show notification, so i see this.
it is already rejected on zh.wikipedia.org many days agao, but they suddenly start again and write here, so i write here.--Iphoneuser88 (talk) 13:07, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
Simply speaking, we are not interested in listening about your dispute in SRCU. We are not part of Chinese Wikipedia community, so we are only interested in processing check request with consensus. Sotiale decided that this is not yet mature to deserve an check. Continue your discussion in zh:WP:HAM. Thanks. — regards, Revi 13:11, 9 April 2020 (UTC)

  Not done Discussions are already taking place locally. Please do not write any further comments on this request. And If the local discussion is complete, request a new one. Thanks. --Sotiale (talk) 13:05, 9 April 2020 (UTC)

Please note that the last request was withdrawn by the applicant for further local discussion, not rejected.--蟲蟲飛♡♡→♡℃Talk 13:32, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
Please note that Sotiale had already asked no more comments be written below his comments. Hence, the comment above is not appropriate. I had used the templates to mark this as closed to prevent further comments. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 14:49, 9 April 2020 (UTC)

Washington_G8603@zh.wikipedia

  Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 10:38, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
  •   Likely Washington_G8603, Sinoprofessional
  •   Unlikely Zhonghuaminzu6
  •   Unrelated 19carol19

  • Some users have used Open proxy or VPN.

From a technical point of view. This does not include verification of behavioral patterns or editing types. In judging sockpuppets, it is necessary to comprehensively look at behavior pattern or editing type. --Sotiale (talk) 11:26, 9 April 2020 (UTC)

  • reported back, Thank you. --SCP-2000 11:31, 9 April 2020 (UTC)

黄冰楠@zh.wikipedia

  Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 08:07, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
  •   Confirmed Group 1: Wjabc1996bingnan, 03ktss, 1996无名氏, 司马贞河, 谢昇谚2020
  •   Confirmed Group 2: 宋祖德宋祖英, 前田庆次2, 张文瀚1
  •   Likely 黄冰楠 and Group 1, 肖战前男友 and Group 1, Yishuniaoren and Group 1, 0huang1996426 and Group 2.

  •   Likely Group 1 and 2.
  • These users used VPNs and OPs.

From a technical point of view. This does not include verification of behavioral patterns or editing types. In judging sockpuppets, it is necessary to comprehensively look at behavior pattern or editing type. --Sotiale (talk) 10:34, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

@Sotiale: Thanks. Will report back. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 10:35, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

Iphoneuser88@zh.wikipedia

  Doing...Thanks for the fish! talkcontribs 17:24, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

  Completed:

  •   Unlikely: Iphoneuser88 and 不寫條目的鼻涕蟲

  • User Iphoneuser88 is using an open proxy.
  • No other accounts were found on the searched ranges/IPs.

From a strict technical point of view, not including behavioral analysis. —Thanks for the fish! talkcontribs 17:49, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

Zgaba@ro.wikipedia

  Doing...Thanks for the fish! talkcontribs 16:13, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

  Completed:

  •   Confirmed: Zgaba and Ark25

From a strict technical point of view, not including behavioral analysis. —Thanks for the fish! talkcontribs 23:37, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

Mahdisanei5@www.wikidata

  Doing...Thanks for the fish! talkcontribs 17:40, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

  Completed

  •   Confirmed Group 1: Mahdisanei5 and Mahdisanei
  •   Confirmed Group 2: Mmdsanei and Msaneimsanei

  Likely Group 1 and 2. Adding the behavioral data, I'd say   Confirmed.

Thanks for the fish! talkcontribs 18:00, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

Coagulans@ro.wikipedia

  Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 23:09, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
  •   Confirmed SenatorulX, Senatorulx
  •   Unrelated Coagulans

From a technical point of view. This does not include verification of behavioral patterns or editing types. In judging sockpuppets, it is necessary to comprehensively look at behavior pattern or editing type. --Sotiale (talk) 23:18, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

Yurin Wilde@zh.wikipedia

  Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 14:31, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
  •   Likely Yurin Wilde, 鹿島聖
  •   Possible Former <Yeh Le-pin> accounts group

From a technical point of view. This does not include verification of behavioral patterns or editing types. In judging sockpuppets, it is necessary to comprehensively look at behavior pattern or editing type. --Sotiale (talk) 15:15, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

Thank you. But I'm an Innocent account. I have no relationship between 鹿島聖.Yurin Wilde (talk) 15:23, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
Innocent or not, that belongs to zhwp. Not here.Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 15:24, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
Maybe we used same VPN and then shared same IP address. Yurin Wilde (talk) 15:29, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
@Yurin Wilde: Please appeal your block on zhwp, not here. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 15:30, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

Mh1am@zhwp

  Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 14:05, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
  •   Confirmed Mh1am, Angus Tsung

From a technical point of view. This does not include verification of behavioral patterns or editing types. In judging sockpuppets, it is necessary to comprehensively look at behavior pattern or editing type. Technically they are the same, and it is possible that they have accessed from the same space. Please refer to it when making a decision. --Sotiale (talk) 14:15, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

A predictable result, but thank you all the same. Will report back now. --Super Wang hates PC You hate, too? 14:19, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

Agungsn@id.wikipedia

idwp have local checkusers. @Adrizky: Please request at idwp. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 15:07, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
OK. Adrizky (talk) 15:40, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

Neteroster@zh.wikipedia

  Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 14:59, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
  •   Possible Neteroster, Mrawa wsl
  •   Unrelated Hanser Official, Cloudche

  • These users used VPNs or open proxies.
  • When making decisions about users in   Possible group, it is recommended to make decisions based on behavior patterns and edit types locally.

From a technical point of view. This does not include verification of behavioral patterns or editing types. In judging sockpuppets, it is necessary to comprehensively look at behavior pattern or editing type. --Sotiale (talk) 15:20, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

Sumbamu@zh.wikipedia

  Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 09:33, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
  •   Confirmed Group 1: Sumbamu, Weekenddrag, Mugsbret, Lemonade999
  •   Confirmed Group 2: Codybrown9, Hyperstormcc, Parklane2, 21mccgoon, Bustermcct, Lanepark8, Annajarvis, 412chanmcc, Pingchen9, Pingvhan, Pingchan9, Fs9p3dxp10, Lgwinn9, Dolchesterccm
  •   Confirmed Group 3: Lanepark7, Dragc17, Lanepark9, Dragonc17

  •   Confirmed Group 1, Group 2, Group 3

From a technical point of view. This does not include verification of behavioral patterns or editing types. In judging sockpuppets, it is necessary to comprehensively look at behavior pattern or editing type. --Sotiale (talk) 10:15, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

@Sotiale:. Thanks. Transferred back. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 10:18, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

LTA@zh small wikis

  Completed Jimmy-qot ~ Jimmy-dot. These are mobile bands. I investigated all /16 of mobile bands, but there was no more information :( All confirmed accounts are locked. --Sotiale (talk) 15:44, 23 April 2020 (UTC)

Nezvolitelná MultiNicka@cs.wiktionary

  Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 15:41, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
  •   Stale Zabavuju flašku chlastu maskovanou jako zubní pastu, Zrozenec ticha srstí porostlý po celém těle
  •   Confirmed Group 1: Nezvolitelná MultiNicka, Asistentka GŘW, FuLAmGNut, OprrDopl'UprPyprr, Zvolme si prosím jiného Xenátora, VletělmipodkolazajícNevadí-Stejně-měl--, Přaedříííjen Nedoříjen, Bobtnačka Polorobotačka, Johanečka, Atrocipède, Náchodský Vrkoč Z nouze pouze, Hlavu mi neümegyééézs, Pyprilescu, Lemmatofyga (K)Lém(m)atophobe, Zobajúca fľaša včas tu pre tu našu hornú kastu, Ogressivnì Mydlithell, Odpaždí čych sticksem tvrdí Na Nagáno buďmež hrdi, UžTvé-ZASE-KLY-se v maso zasekly, Proč ta kočka tolik křičí dělám si z ní čevabč, Megoutkař Alou, Podnapilý Ostříž Štěně z výšky vidí roztří-, Navždy čmuch si pinknem strdí Blahorodí prý nepf--í, Cetiletý pedone-marciatore, Nadává fspěrač na ptačí svěrač neb našel na čince, Rádoby Raádoby, Zahrabává fascio pásku s miskou, vanou pro tu chásku, Zebající fuška plastu pouze pro tu Horní kastu, OprDopl'UprPypr, -geborkah-, Jéleznât-Hroudas, Žilžije&budežítjsanašímvědomímsilou&zbraní, Švelýrmamlyfessy, ŽrávalsAttilovuMacechu, Швелюра-мамлы-фэссю, Abjektyvářství
  •   Confirmed Group 2: Automat na kondomy ve Vatikánu, Country boy named Johnny B. Goode, Povaleč s 9kg nadváhou
  •   Unlikely Homér jede dvacítkou z Anděla âťse z toho Rudoarmějec poœøõô and Group 1 /   Unlikely Group 1 and 2

From a technical point of view. This does not include verification of behavioral patterns or editing types. In judging sockpuppets, it is necessary to comprehensively look at behavior pattern or editing type. --Sotiale (talk) 17:06, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

Thanks!--MrJaroslavik (talk) 17:11, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

Bubunucuarond@ro.wikipedia

+ KalibumKalumum, per ro:Special:Diff/13385951. --NGC 54 (talk | contribs) 08:17, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
  Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 07:44, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
  •   Confirmed Group 1: Bubunucuarond, KalibumKalumum, Gagnerosulnasosul, Danggputulica
  •   Confirmed Group 2: Fan Vic Plut, Fan VP
  •   Possible Victor Plutașu

  •   Possible Group 1 and 2 /   Possible Victor Plutașu and Group 1, 2
  • When making decisions about users in   Possible group, it is recommended to make decisions based on behavior patterns and edit types locally.

From a technical point of view. This does not include verification of behavioral patterns or editing types. In judging sockpuppets, it is necessary to comprehensively look at behavior pattern or editing type. --Sotiale (talk) 09:54, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

Thanks! --NGC 54 (talk | contribs) 10:00, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

Adding: ro:Special:Contribuții/Zuqaqipi, recently created. -- Victor Blacus (talk) 12:12, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

@Victor Blacus:   Confirmed KalibumKalumum == Zuqaqipi. If you need further checkuser, please post a new request. Thank you! :) --Sotiale (talk) 12:21, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
Thanks! -- Victor Blacus (talk) 12:23, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

Tofiq Kərimli@az.wikipedia

  Not done Aydinsalis is   Stale. Ruslik (talk) 20:13, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

MediaAndEntertainment@ro.wikipedia

  Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 03:01, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
  •   Confirmed MediaAndEntertainment, CulturaDeActualitate
  •   Unrelated Alex Ghita
  •   Stale AndreiMoldovanNew

  • There are no recent records from rowiki for AndreiMoldovanNew, and there are no recent records from other wikis that I can checkuser.
  • I checked the adjacent IP bands, but I couldn't find any accounts with sufficient grounds for sleeper.

From a technical point of view. This does not include verification of behavioral patterns or editing types. In judging sockpuppets, it is necessary to comprehensively look at behavior pattern or editing type. --Sotiale (talk) 03:20, 28 April 2020 (UTC)