Steward requests/Checkuser/2020-03

Requests

Casaalba@ro.wikipedia

These two are   Confirmed, einsbor talk 11:54, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

Spambots at Wikimania:

  In progress... --Martin Urbanec (talk) 14:23, 8 March 2020 (UTC)

  Done Handful of global blocks placed. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 15:10, 8 March 2020 (UTC)

Lasha-george@ka.wikipedia

  Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 15:00, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
  Unrelated From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 15:16, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Loycarmo@zh.wikipedia

The above request is the users' only global edit, suggesting a single purpose account that may itself warrant checking --DannyS712 (talk) 02:13, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
  Declined Chinese Wikipedia posts a request after discussion for sockpuppets investigation. Therefore, I cannot accept this investigation. Also, because there is no specific reason for conducting an investigation without discussion, the request is declined. --Sotiale (talk) 02:37, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

Lisprofessional9999@mr.wikisource

  •   Stale Lisprofessional9999
  •   Confirmed दिपक कोतकर, कल्याणी कोतकर
  •   Unrelated Svnavare, Pooja Jadhav

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 03:02, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

@Sotiale:, Additional information which is needed while confirming this case is, both the confirmed accounts are not sock-puppets of each other but, they are two individuals who use the same machine to edit because they live in same house, because they are married to each other!. And all others are totally unrelated as they are different continents(metaphorically!). I know all of them personally as I have met them in many offline wiki events and even otherwise. this request was clear case of harassment to all of the users active on mrwikisource. I request stewards to have a look at w:mr:Special:Diff/1744503/1744902 where User:Tiven2240 is requesting blocking of all of them here. its total missuse of all of the tools. QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 06:54, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
@QueerEcofeminist: I have already suggested the possibility of not being sockpuppet accounts for his block request(Please see my talkpage). In fact, it's technically the same, but if the two are relatives, we can't see them as simple sockpuppets. Additionally, I have already described it as 'from technical POV', which opens up behavior or other possibilities. It should be noted that it is not possible to view it as sockpuppets on this basis alone. Therefore, if proper reason such as behavior pattern is not proved, it will be difficult to block only with the result of this checkuser. In the discussion on mrwiki, if there should be a block, it should be noted that besides the result of checkuser, there should be a separate discussion about whether it is actually the same user. --Sotiale (talk) 14:57, 16 March 2020 (UTC)

え06@zhwikipedia

--Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 10:23, 17 March 2020 (UTC)

  •   Unrelated え06, 夏夜雨纷纷, Soaring swallow

From a technical point of view. This does not include verification of behavioral patterns or editing types. This alone cannot be judged as being sockpuppets or not, and cannot be used as a single proof. In judging sockpuppets, it is necessary to comprehensively look at behavior pattern or editing type. --Sotiale (talk) 11:39, 17 March 2020 (UTC)

@Sotiale: Thanks. Reported back.--Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 11:52, 17 March 2020 (UTC)

Lovefrombutch@sq.wikipedia

  •   Confirmed Lovefrombutch, Marshallwoburn, Designedbybutch

From a technical point of view. This does not include verification of behavioral patterns or editing types. In judging sockpuppets, it is necessary to comprehensively look at behavior pattern or editing type with this result of checkuser. --Sotiale (talk) 13:10, 17 March 2020 (UTC)

@Sotiale: Thank you, could you please also check Codingrefined for the same reason or do I need to make a new request? --Olsi (talk) 23:57, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
@Sotialte: this also appears to be the same user. Praxidicae (talk) 00:47, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
@Olsi: No. His or her accounts have already locked with crosswiki spamming. They are the same user, and they continued to do the same thing on enwiki using multiple accounts. Other accounts are locked except Marshallwoburn. And thanks @Praxidicae:! --Sotiale (talk) 01:13, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Okay, thank you Sotiale and Praxidicae! --Olsi (talk) 01:17, 18 March 2020 (UTC)

420peace@zhwikipedia

  Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 14:34, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
  •   Confirmed 尤里的1994的亲爹, 共匪鞑子和他们的台巴子帮凶
  •   Likely 420peace
  •   Unlikely 沙必小粉红, 风云北洋和尤里的1994互相查皮眼
  •   Inconclusive

All comparisons were made against confirmed group.

From a technical point of view. This does not include verification of behavioral patterns or editing types. This alone cannot be judged as being sockpuppets or not, and cannot be used as a single proof. In judging sockpuppets, it is necessary to comprehensively look at behavior pattern or editing type. --Sotiale (talk) 15:12, 18 March 2020 (UTC)

Thanks and translated.--Hamish 15:19, 18 March 2020 (UTC)

Vikas.bikaneri@hi.wikipedia

@हिंदुस्थान वासी: Hello. Please see it (enwiki SPI). Both accounts are blocked on enwiki with sockpuppets, his or her account or behavior is very similar. Is there another reason to investigate? --Sotiale (talk) 08:15, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
@Sotiale: Thanks, now also blocked on hiwiki.--Hindust@niक्या करें? बातें! 08:28, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
@हिंदुस्थान वासी: Good. If another user who is ambiguous to confirm with account pattern or behavior pattern abuses, please feel free to request it. Thanks! --Sotiale (talk) 08:35, 20 March 2020 (UTC)

Termobama@zh.wikipedia

  Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 23:43, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
  •   Confirmed Group 1: Rodeoohioohio, Dutychump332, Sizerspace667, Termobama, Bakurifledgergr, Krochuntskrochunts, Swardagille, Doteddellshter, Geeksyoginrhe, Vaultwillyhgerht, Shahyapsshahyaps, Antsruseantsruse, Risenbaskdgsr, Estesbakeredter, Hicksdijonrgerg, Overlysoletertge45r, Tramgibedtramgibed, Sinewgaza, Trystcrestdfger
  •   Confirmed Group 2: Creedwane332, Careperil
  •   Confirmed Group 3: Altonscuds, Baronaxum, Lubesstood

  •   Confirmed Group 1, Group 2 +   Likely Group 3 and 1+2.

From a technical point of view. This does not include verification of behavioral patterns or editing types. In judging sockpuppets, it is necessary to comprehensively look at behavior pattern or editing type. --Sotiale (talk) 00:17, 24 March 2020 (UTC)

Thanks, reported back.# SteepPeak 03:39, 24 March 2020 (UTC)

Yeh Le-pin@zh.wikipedia

  Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 13:16, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
  •   Confirmed Group 1: Yeh Le-pin, Shukueichang, 中華民國宇宙無敵超級大總統
  •   Confirmed Group 2: 苏州河畔, 海蠣餅是福州傳統的風味小吃, 時代力量, 薄荷姊姊人美心善, 圖畫裡,雞不飛狗不跳,小小書僮可笑可笑, Makekucing, 割手-裆打之粘, CiouChiJiou, 批批撸与撸吸吸, 臭名昭著的樂清人章仙珍, 海蠣餅是福州傳統的風味小吃, 許三觀賣血記, 李煌教授壯烈成仁
  •   Confirmed Group 3: Rowingbohe, BackScynic

  •   Unrelated Group 1 and Group 2 // Group 2 and Group 3.   Possible Group 1 and Group 3.

From a technical point of view. This does not include verification of behavioral patterns or editing types. In judging sockpuppets, it is necessary to comprehensively look at behavior pattern or editing type. --Sotiale (talk) 14:31, 25 March 2020 (UTC)

  • @Sotiale: Is there some typo in Group 3? In my opinion, Rowingbohe is an innocent user and trusted user in zhwiki. Thank you. --SCP-2000 14:43, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
This is a technical point of view. There is no guarantee that this is actually the user or not. It should be discussed locally. What I can reveal is that there were editslogs of both accounts at about 30 minute intervals, with same technical information on the same IP. --Sotiale (talk) 14:56, 25 March 2020 (UTC)

Chrisshumwiki@zh.wikipedia

  Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 12:32, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
  •   Unlikely Chrisshumwiki, Bollywiz

From a technical point of view. This does not include verification of behavioral patterns or editing types. In judging sockpuppets, it is necessary to comprehensively look at behavior pattern or editing type. --Sotiale (talk) 12:44, 25 March 2020 (UTC)

Thank you! Results will be brought back in a moment. --Super Wang hates PC You hate, too? 12:46, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
Let me show my thanks to Sotiale.--Hamish 12:54, 25 March 2020 (UTC)

SimonBBQ@zh.wikipedia

  Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 15:37, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
  •   Confirmed Group 1: SimonBBQ, Crystalsimon
  •   Likely Group 2: Hahaorz, Ky2020

  •   Unrelated Group 1 and 2.   Possible Group 2 and Susan2019.

From a technical point of view. This does not include verification of behavioral patterns or editing types. In judging sockpuppets, it is necessary to comprehensively look at behavior pattern or editing type. --Sotiale (talk) 16:15, 25 March 2020 (UTC)

HappyPara69@ro.wikipedia

@Victor Blacus: Hi, can you give me a brief description of what abuse they have committed? --Sotiale (talk) 09:45, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
Insistent vandalism as documented by their contributions and their talk pages. Strong suspicion of sockpuppetry. -- Victor Blacus (talk) 09:50, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
  Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 09:53, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
  •   Confirmed AlexGalos07, HappyPara69

  • No other sleepers have been found.

From a technical point of view. This does not include verification of behavioral patterns or editing types. In judging sockpuppets, it is necessary to comprehensively look at behavior pattern or editing type. --Sotiale (talk) 10:00, 27 March 2020 (UTC)

Japanese555@wikidata

  Doing...Thanks for the fish! talkcontribs 14:45, 28 March 2020 (UTC)

  •   Confirmed Japanese555, OTD-Ông_Tuấn_Dũng555., Dung555

  • No other sleepers have been found.

From a technical point of view. This does not include verification of behavioral patterns or editing types. In judging sockpuppets, it is necessary to comprehensively look at behavior pattern or editing type. —Thanks for the fish! talkcontribs 15:05, 28 March 2020 (UTC)

MaryD2020@ro.wikipedia

  Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 09:05, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
  •   Confirmed DanielDan1232020, VladMihai1, Beleiutz
  •   Unrelated MaryD2020

From a technical point of view. This does not include verification of behavioral patterns or editing types. In judging sockpuppets, it is necessary to comprehensively look at behavior pattern or editing type. --Sotiale (talk) 09:58, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

Bradford@es.wikipedia

  Declined Hello, we can't do checkuser on the wiki where CheckUsers already exist. Contact another eswiki CheckUser or OC. --Sotiale (talk) 15:28, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

Voltovin@ro.wikipedia

  •   Confirmed Voltovin, Treferrwik.

Both have been locked. —Thanks for the fish! talkcontribs 18:35, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

Gowiki1@zh.wikipedia

  Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 15:04, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
  •   Confirmed JYWY, Mengmickey, Gowiki1

From a technical point of view. This does not include verification of behavioral patterns or editing types. In judging sockpuppets, it is necessary to comprehensively look at behavior pattern or editing type. --Sotiale (talk) 15:09, 31 March 2020 (UTC)

Thanks Sotiale, reported back, blocked all. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 15:17, 31 March 2020 (UTC)