Steward requests/Checkuser/2020-02



  • @C933103: Please discuss in local first, otherwise stewards will not process your request. Thank you. --SCP-2000 04:03, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

  Not done moved to SRCU without local discussion --Alaa :)..! 14:34, 5 February 2020 (UTC)


Added one account. --Super Wang hates PC You hate, too? 11:39, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
Add 3 more suspecious meatpuppets as situation worsen. --TechyanTalk) 08:46, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
+WeAreScientist --TechyanTalk) 09:12, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
+Kevin Smith Chen --TechyanTalk) 13:14, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
No, he meant adding FalloutFantansy. Kevin is innocent. --Super Wang hates PC You hate, too? 01:33, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
  Doing... --Alaa :)..! 13:42, 5 February 2020 (UTC)


All mentioned accounts   Unrelated technically
Scvrush8588   Confirmed Scvletsgosir

Reminder: this is 100% technical analysis and does not include behavioral evidence --Alaa :)..! 13:56, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

Thanks. --Super Wang hates PC You hate, too? 00:26, 6 February 2020 (UTC)


  1.   CheckUser is not for fishing.
  2. SRCU does not accept request from an IP. Please log in. — regards, Revi 13:41, 11 February 2020 (UTC)

Tobias Conradi (or 影武者?)@wikidata

  • As a notice, Nipponese Dog Calvero (known in Chinese and Japanese as 影武者) is   Stale for a long time. --Super Wang hates PC You hate, too? 09:28, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
    • The masters are stale (so I remove them from the list), But there may be records in checkuserwiki. Arachn0 seems an established user since 2006.--GZWDer (talk) 12:04, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
  Unlikely They definitely can not be NDC. There is a small possibility that they belong to TC. Ruslik (talk) 20:05, 16 February 2020 (UTC)


I'm one of the participants of the discussion. As far as I can see, the two users aren't threatening anyone. There might be some misunderstanding. --Matt Smith (talk) 15:25, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
I accept the checkuser request. But the actual reason is not what "User:Super Wang" said; instead, it is just that the other editor "User:Chinuan12623", who holds opposite opinions in the article discussion, is wondering whether I and Winertai are the same person. For the details, please see zh:Wikipedia:元維基用戶查核請求#S89176.--Barter84 (talk) 13:07, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
OK, as a result of GFW I didn't get online these days, and I admit I used wrong expressions. Apologies. I will now strike them off. --Super Wang hates PC You hate, too? 11:46, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
  Doing... --Alaa :)..! 16:45, 18 February 2020 (UTC)


Barter84   Unrelated to Winertai
Babyincar   Likely to Winertai

Reminder: this is 100% technical analysis and does not include behavioral evidence --Alaa :)..! 16:57, 18 February 2020 (UTC)


Indeed your wiki does not have a checkuser, but we generally want you to discuss your allegation within your community before bringing it up on SRCU for non-clearcut cases, because we lack the background information your fellow community members might have. Request itself sounds bit-  CheckUser is not for fishing for me. — regards, Revi 14:49, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
@-revi: They were already reported at w:ro:Wikipedia:Reclamații, but I did not receive any feedback, be it good or bad; neither thumbs-up nor thumbs-down. My two cents are that it is a socks farm, there were many accounts beginning with Fant or Fanta just recently created at Odd, don't you think? All four accounts edited the same article between 25 January 2020, 16:17 and 26 January 2020, 23:07, which is too improbable to be a mere coincidence. All four are less than a week-old accounts, and all happened to edit the very same article, one of them performing DUCK edits by undoing my correction. Besides Fantaim is the Romanian phonetic spelling for the English Fantime (or Funtime). As manifest from the history of that article, they weren't edit warring just against me, but against NGC 54 as well. Tgeorgescu (talk) 22:09, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
@-revi: DUCK at the same article by Cocalarul Blanao. Tgeorgescu (talk) 20:48, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
  Doing... --Alaa :)..! 17:31, 18 February 2020 (UTC)


  Confirmed Fantait + Fantaip + Fantaim + Fantime + Fantaio + Cocalarul Blanao

Reminder: this is 100% technical analysis and does not include behavioral evidence --Alaa :)..! 17:35, 18 February 2020 (UTC)


The accounts created in December are:

These accounts may also be socks (low confidence):

Update: User:許三觀賣血記 now started a block appeal. CheckUser result by Stewards will be helpful in the appeal process.--GZWDer (talk) 19:14, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
@GZWDer:User:Inufuusen's nickname seems to be (removed--Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 11:15, 17 February 2020 (UTC)), not 犬風船.-- Sunny00217 -(talk) 10:53, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
@Sunny00217: The only nickname for him is 犬風船 (I mean the only one he put it openly), the other one is sort of insulting to him. I shall remove. --Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 11:15, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
  Doing... --Alaa :)..! 16:57, 18 February 2020 (UTC)


  Confirmed 臭名昭著的樂清人章仙珍 + 海蠣餅是福州傳統的風味小吃 + 許三觀賣血記 + 李煌教授壯烈成仁 + 時代力量 + 薄荷姊姊人美心善 + 圖畫裡,雞不飛狗不跳,小小書僮可笑可笑 + 東北老漢 + 氣球神教,橫空出世 + 愛新覺羅風船 + 九条丈太郎 + 腦瘀血鐵弱智韓導請滾出維基 + 帕秋莉諾蕾姬 + 大地風火 + 六六開的氣球 + 虎風船 + 犬風船是個人才 + 灭蝗王者 + 电子信息专家 + さんもさ + 违纪百科是由像您这样的人建立的 + 维基百科是由像您这样无聊的人建立的 + 放韓假 + Rowinghope + 工口姬月 + Nekofuusen + Dog, Wind and Ship + 油墩子柯南 + Innufusen + Paleyhail + 反对滥权鸡米花

Reminder: this is 100% technical analysis and does not include behavioral evidence.

Note: Thanks for Camouflaged Mirage to help me in understand this request! GZWDer please try to keep requests simple then we can understand what you want.

Thanks --Alaa :)..! 17:29, 18 February 2020 (UTC)

@علاء: 维基百科是由像您这样无聊的人建立的 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser) does not exist. Please correct it.--GZWDer (talk) 18:19, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
And 帕秋莉諾蕾姬 appears twice.--GZWDer (talk) 18:20, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
@GZWDer: I removed the repetition. About account which doesn't exist, probably it's stopped by local abusefilter --Alaa :)..! 10:34, 19 February 2020 (UTC)

Put all local blocks ON HOLD as behavioral evidence suggests one or more accounts listed above may be affected because of shared proxy. --TechyanTalk) 00:12, 19 February 2020 (UTC)

Hello @Techyan: can you explain which accounts? --Alaa :)..! 10:34, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
@علاء: Hello, sorry for being absent for a few days. In my opinion 工口姬月 is an innocent user, they don't have bad record and a disruptive username. For the filter-stopped account, the reason of block may be the username contains "维基百科" (Chinese for "Wikipedia"). Hope this helps. --Super Wang hates PC You hate, too? 13:04, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
@Techyan:Anyway, in my opinion, upon the edition pattern of users like "許三觀賣血記", I think now it's safe to say at least some accounts are socks of "李煌教授壯烈成仁".--Kuon.Haku (talk) 15:08, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
I did looked at the contributions of the users from this case, I agree with what Kuon.Haku said above, and why not take this discussion back to WP:HAM. As far as what stewards need to do, they have done what they could already. --Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 15:12, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
Ok, no problem. Let's talk about these affairs at wikipedia@zh.--クオン·-{夢か……現なのか?}- 15:14, 19 February 2020 (UTC)

  Completed @GZWDer, Techyan, Kuon.Haku, Camouflaged Mirage, and Super Wang: Re-checked:

All other accounts confirmed, so if there's any ambiguity around any accounts please write here so I can replay. Thanks --Alaa :)..! 16:12, 19 February 2020 (UTC)

Updated. Local discussions speculate the CU result may need to further break down into two groups, but we will handle that locally. I think major concerns regarding the CU result itself have solved. Thanks. --TechyanTalk) 16:27, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
Thanks @Techyan: and please pass my point that requests on SRCU should be as simple as it can, not like this way! as when it simple we can understand it and process it as fast as we can! Also, no need for community discussion to be on meta, you should discuss it locally then put in SRCU the summary without too long details. Thanks on advance --Alaa :)..! 16:40, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
The {{CU request}} template can only list ten accounts, but in this case there're more accounts to check. So probably I have to list all accounts in "reason" like this.--GZWDer (talk) 16:52, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
I pointed out CU request can handle at most 10 accounts in local discussion, but it seemed too late as GZWDer posted here at SRCU first. Screw that firewall. --Super Wang hates PC You hate, too? 01:01, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
What I usually do for more than 10 accounts is to put in the additional account using {{checkuser}} in the reason column. If that's help GZWDer.--Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 07:04, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
Hi, علاء, Techyan, Camouflaged Mirage, GZWDer, Kuon.Haku and Hamish, please notice that another technically-unrelated sock-puppet appeared. See this, thank you. --悔晚斋 (talk) 12:53, 21 February 2020 (UTC)


See also: Steward requests/Checkuser#李煌教授壯烈成仁@zh.wikipedia


  Confirmed 苏州河畔 + Makekucing + 割手-裆打之粘 + CiouChiJiou + 批批撸与撸吸吸 + 臭名昭著的樂清人章仙珍 + 海蠣餅是福州傳統的風味小吃 + 許三觀賣血記 + 李煌教授壯烈成仁

Reminder: this is 100% technical analysis and does not include behavioral evidence. --Alaa :)..! 13:29, 21 February 2020 (UTC)

  • @علاء: Thank you, and this user has been blocked locally. --悔晚斋 (talk) 07:54, 22 February 2020 (UTC)

El Banker

BAICAN XXX is   Stale. El Banker Lingvistic has no other socket puppets. Ruslik (talk) 08:56, 22 February 2020 (UTC)


  • Furthermore, I hope you can check their IP address whether using a proxy or not. Thank you. --SCP-2000 08:56, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
  Doing... --Alaa :)..! 13:38, 23 February 2020 (UTC)


  Confirmed 绿豆汤三分糖 = 程海峡 = 抖胸瑟琴主播 = 氦氖氩氪氙氡 = Makechaos = 造喵 = 海蠣餅是福州傳統的風味小吃 = 時代力量 = 圖畫裡,雞不飛狗不跳,小小書僮可笑可笑 = 薄荷姊姊人美心善 = Nekofuusen = 帕秋莉諾蕾姬 = Rowinghope
  • Using a proxy or no? Yes. I blocked most of them globally under NOP.

Reminder: this is 100% technical analysis and does not include behavioral evidence --Alaa :)..! 13:49, 23 February 2020 (UTC)


  Confirmed Ruslik (talk) 20:25, 27 February 2020 (UTC)


@Tgeorgescu: For DUCK why do you need CU? Care to explain? Sleepers sweep?--Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 11:21, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
@Camouflaged Mirage: Yup, sleepers is a real possibility, since it was a half dozen socks. I will report at admins anyway. Tgeorgescu (talk) 11:24, 28 February 2020 (UTC)


  Confirmed Fantaim = Fantime = Glemarom

Reminder: this is 100% technical analysis and does not include behavioral evidence --Alaa :)..! 11:48, 28 February 2020 (UTC)