Please do not post any new comments on this page. This is a discussion archive first created in December 2016, although the comments contained were likely posted before and after this date. See current discussion.
Κόκκινος Ποταμός has been spotted as chaotic, aggressive, making personal attacks and acting against policy, by the community and admins, and has been punished. In the particular incident of "notable similarity" he persistently erased ip contributions fetching sources in a discussion page for a deletion of an article, by these edit summaries:
, which were followed by the "notable similarity" comment that revealed to old users the id of the ip. Another user spotted it first so we missed the chance to prove Κόκκινος Ποταμός to be an old user.
Around this behavior of his, there has been this A.N. discussion where, even if he was shown by users to be out of limits and policy, he insisted in revealing of the ip's identity, and got a light punishment for breaking the 3RR only. Since then we have to spot his bad behavior early, but he is still out of control from time to time, leading to edit wars and disruption, using flaming comments.
I am utterly surprised that ManosHacker is using this page to attack me personally. These accusations belong nowhere else than the local Admins' noticeboard and they should be discussed there (if they haven't already). This is a checkuser request page and this is a valid request. Comments like the previous one should be considered misleading. On the other hand, the evidence I've brought to you above is undisputable and technical confirmation is required, so the community can address the problem without any doubt. If ManosHacker believes that other users, inclunding me, use puppets, he is free to request a checkuser. Thank you for your time. --Κόκκινος Ποταμός (talk) 07:39, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
Also, please, notice that the user is not denying that it was him who made the rude comment with the ip and later mentioned me with his account at the Admins' noticeboard. --Κόκκινος Ποταμός (talk) 07:45, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
Not done We do not identify users with ip addresses. Ruslik (talk) 16:02, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
@Ruslik0: I beg your pardon, but I am aware of at least one case, during which the checkuser was able to link a user with an IP ("I have done this anyway to check if any more abuse had been taking place"). Why isn't there the ability to execute the procedure in this case? --Κόκκινος Ποταμός (talk) 16:43, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
Not done. En.wikipedia has local checkusers that will handle the request. You need to request a check on en.wiki. -- Tegel(Talk) 11:56, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
@Tegel: Please link(en.wiki)? Please now moved ):request--123~metawiki (talk) 12:12, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
Please don't change the status of the case. At the top of this page under the headline "Before making a request" at item 3 there is a link to the relevant page on en.wikipedia. -- Tegel(Talk) 12:31, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
Fa.wiki has local checkusers that is active. When there is local users that can do the task we can't do it based on policy. Place your request for fa.wiki check on fa.wiki. -- Tegel(Talk) 13:36, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
User uploading copyright files from a range of socks,; all blocked. The resolution that we are seeking is IP range block(s) for up to three months to prevent account creation and editing. Noting that the user is acting cross-wiki and appears to be a minor. — billinghurstsDrewth 10:10, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
Confirmed. I've already blocked the IP range with an expiry time of three months as there is a huge amount of sockpuppets on it, though there may be a small collateral damage. Please pay attention on this. Regards, RadiX∞ 13:43, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
Reason(s): User ΣΕ ΘΕΛΩ has been blocked indefinetely for aggressive behavior and puppeting. User Κροβρεντζίδο is quite clearly the same user (mentioning the same non existing political party). User Criminal Angel by the moment his was created came to ask my help at mine discussion page without even been welcomed (his is obviously an old user). User Giorgos456 is a user that has been participating in deletion discussions despite being a user with few edits and left a message at Κροβρεντζίδο's page to stop puppeting (something the puppets of ΣΕ ΘΕΛΩ have done). C messier (talk) 12:06, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
User:RadiX, Κροβρεντζίδο and ΣΕ ΘΕΛΩ are confirmed as puppets by duck test (these two accounts are the only to have mentioned the same non-existing political party, among many other behavior traits). Thanks for the other users revealed. --C messier (talk) 17:22, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
Maxus96@ro.wikipedia and Random20161229@ro.wikipedia
Reason(s): Same vandal-type behavior: no edits to articles, insistent deletions of own discussion page (which is not allowed at rowiki), with no good reason, just to demonstrate he can impose his own will. -- Victor Blacus (talk) 19:23, 30 December 2016 (UTC)