Steward requests/Checkuser/2015-10



IslamicPhilosopher has one   Confirmed sock: X-Force. Waleed17284 and Danyx2 are   Unrelated to them. Ruslik (talk) 17:52, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

@Ruslik0: Thank you, what about these two ips: (talk · contribs) (talk · contribs)? They typed the same insults in short time, I think they are one person--M777 23:09, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

We do not associate IPs with usernames. Ruslik (talk) 19:16, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

Sinaaaaaa 55@fa.wikipedia

hi, plz check this request, this user 1, 2 and This all vandal in this Article, check for also vandal user for this en and fa sockpuppets . i,m from from SWMT and need for this reponce --Florence (talk) 15:23, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

  Inconclusive For checkuser, usernames from months ago is pointless, all that we can check is data for the last three months, and in this situation you are going to need to provide better data for any checkuser investigation above an edit here and there, over the diverse period. For an article, if there is problem editing, then it is better to deal with it outside of checkuser, checkuser generally is of little value unless you are looking to place a block. I am not certain what else is expected to happen in this case. @Elph: can you assist the user in the background to checkuser, useful article history.  — billinghurst sDrewth 13:54, 4 October 2015 (UTC)


  Confirmed. And you have two other sleepers: AdmerOFVolleyball and JESSARICAN2. QuiteUnusual (talk) 07:22, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
I believe the IP for these is Can QuiteUnusual confirm if this IP is a high school, college, or university in the Philippines? --Marshallsumter (talk) 12:21, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
I can't disclose the IP. As for checking the ownership or geolocation of an IP, if you look at the contributions page for the IP you will find links to a number of useful tools. QuiteUnusual (talk) 18:09, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
Thanks! Found it in the Philippines. --Marshallsumter (talk) 19:41, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

Alejandro R. Martín@wikidata

Kevin Cadilac@no.wikipedia

Use of the signature button is very common in the nowiki community, and use of chevrons («») as quotation marks are according to common writing style in Norwegian and is part of the styleguide for nowiki. Do check the accounts, but don't use the provided claims as proofs – they are not. — Jeblad 00:37, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
Pinging MarcoAurelio and Billinghurst to see if I can get any help here. I have blocked Kevin Cadilac after he has done several hundred edits over the last days. I've also added Vanntanke to the list of suspected sock. The account was created only a couple of hours after the block, and seems to follow the same edit pattern. - 4ing (talk) 22:33, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
I cannot do anything today as I am travelling. Not certain that I see a reason for a CU. If the user is problematic, then block them. What does a CU do in this situation?  — billinghurst sDrewth 16:06, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
@Billinghurst: While the last accounts (Kevin Cadilac, Vanntanke and also the newest Trillobrist) have mostly constructive edits, the user has a long record of abruptive editing. A trend is also that the constructive editing turns into less constructive discussions after a short while. A CU will probably allow us to block the accounts (due to block evasion) before the editing becomes problematic. - 4ing (talk) 07:09, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
CU is, broadly, inconclusive especially as the data is stale for the older accounts. Vanntanke and Trillobrist have sufficient data to confirm they are related, but they can't be conclusively linked to any other account. QuiteUnusual (talk) 07:59, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
Thanks, Vanntanke and Trillobrist have already been blocked as ducks. - 4ing (talk) 10:44, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

MS Wiki

We usually do not reveal IP addresses. In this case dynamical IP addresses are used, so IP blocks will be useless. Ruslik (talk) 20:09, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
If the same dynamical IP addresses is used and there is no other contributions in last 10 years, can I request that the dynamical IP addresses be block 1 month anyway. I don't expect any useful contribution for the same person anyhow. And he have history of threatening other users (in English Wiki). Not comfortable with such unstable user. Yosri (talk) 01:23, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
They contribute from /16 ranges that can not be blocked. Ruslik (talk) 16:39, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

Vandal accounts@no.wikipedia

Since this request was posted, Mynas-3, Mynas-4, Mynas-5, Mynas-6, Mynas-7, Mynas-8, Mynas-9, Mynas-10, Mynas-11 and Sanym-5 have been blocked as sockpuppets. The accounts are probably created by a user who edited unregistered earlier this year (June-August) from - 4ing (talk) 11:29, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
Mynas-12, Mynas-13 and Mynas-14 have now appeared and been blocked. - 4ing (talk) 14:14, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
  Confirmed Spypose, Rask og søppel, Spy-meg-i-øret, SyvOceaner, SiebenWeltmeere, Volgatrial2, Volgatrial1, Mynas-3, Tensesloan1, Ellsevar, Pvtvete, Sanym-5, Mynas-4, Slimfetta, Mynas-11, Mynas-10, Mynas-9, Mynas-15, Mynas-14, Mynas-13, Mynas-12, Luremus, Mynas-2, Kabulblent, Aktiv åpen proxy, Mynas-3, Mynas-16, Mynas-8, Mannen-i-Romsdal, Mynas-7, Mynas-6, Robinduds1, Suttekluten. Publicly identifying an IP address or an IP range for a user is undesirable. Stewards can undertake blocks if your community would like for that to occur, and from my looking at this data. A range block would appear to have some collateral damage, though I would think that a soft block could slow down this user.  — billinghurst sDrewth 07:56, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
To note that for stewards I have named this vandal as "Mynas" as the case name.  — billinghurst sDrewth 08:13, 20 October 2015 (UTC)


JuanTouk and Jønes ķing are   Confirmed to be the same user. El Gaafary is   Unrelated. Ruslik (talk) 09:55, 26 October 2015 (UTC)