Steward requests/Checkuser/2015-03


  Confirmed Dmitryne, KuznecovGrigory, Ruþín16, OstapBinder, MedvedevDmitriy. He did a pretty good attempt to cover tracks. Almost had me missing it. I don't speak Russian, though I do speak CU and IP. <g>  — billinghurst sDrewth 14:46, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[]
@Billinghurst: Thank you. I not undersatnd your last phrase "I do speak CU and IP", what's CU and IP? -- Sergey kudryavtsev (talk) 18:48, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[]
@Sergey kudryavtsev: checkuser and IP4 addresses (, it was meant to be a joke, though not a good one. :-)  — billinghurst sDrewth 10:05, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[]


Picker78, Lonesome Warrior, Promiscuous man and Sakis Sg are   Confirmed to be the same user. LowRider69 is   Possible. Ruslik (talk) 17:40, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[]


If it is so obvious why to ask for checkuser? Ruslik (talk) 16:44, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[]
I don't have enough clue to take action. They all show the same interest in ethnic-related topics, but apart from recently created مادستان, Ali1like account was created on 11 Aug 2014 and Eligold in May 2013. مادستان is most probably a suckpuppet, but I am not sure to which of the two it belongs. -- Nojan (talk) 02:59, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[]
مادستان is   Likely socketpuppet of Ali1like. Ruslik (talk) 19:32, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[]


  Likely - Technical evidence suggest that both users may be related. -- M\A 23:17, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[]


  Not done You are blocked on the wiki, and there is no evidence that there is a requirement.  — billinghurst sDrewth 04:45, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[]

Ism schism@en.wikipedia

  Not done has local checkusers that will handle this locally. -- Tegel (Talk) 10:10, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[]
The filer is blocked on en.wikipedia and other wikis; maybe a CU should be done on the filer... --Rschen7754 05:07, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[]


This request probably would not be done. The IPs usually do not need to be checked since they are dynamic and we can block them in our local Wikipedia temporarily if there would be any violation. Therefore IMO as a sysop, if you believe these IPs had wrong edits, you can write it on Admins' Noticeboard. ● Mehran Debate 07:47, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[]
I am rejecting this request because in my opinion it will have the effect to publicy link, if possitive, accounts with IP addresses in a situation not covered by the privacy policy for such a disclosure. If negative, it would be fishing. Anyway, if the block of the account can be justified without the need of technical evidence then there is no need generally to perform a CU. Thanks. -- M\A 12:13, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[]


These two are   Likely. No other sockspuppet found. einsbor talk 15:07, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[]
Thanks a lot. ● Mehran Debate 15:35, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[]


  Additional information needed @Ammartivari: Hello. Since I can't read Albanian I had to rely on automatic translation to read the discussions you linked. It seems that in the first one, at the bottom, Koka11 admits that he and Rrjedha do work for the same company or work for the same editorial line. Is that correct? If so, if both are disruptive, why can't them just be blocked without CU? Best regards. -- M\A 12:20, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[]

  Not done. No response. -- M\A 10:00, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[]

Gire 3pich2005@fa.wikipedia

It's compromised account, he made one in fawikivoyage too. Mjbmr (discussioncontribs) 18:40, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[]
  Comment user clearly mentioned that both accounts belong to him, no need to CU Mardetanha talk 22:31, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[]
I withdraw Amir (talk) 14:07, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[]