Steward requests/Checkuser/2013-09



If it is WP:DUCK, why do you need a CU? Ruslik (talk) 08:25, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
No valid reason presented, and no indication of the value of running checks. You can deal with the accounts for their actions, without confirming with checkuser data. — billinghurst sDrewth 14:50, 2 September 2013 (UTC)


  Not done no reason provided — billinghurst sDrewth 14:50, 2 September 2013 (UTC)


These are a duck but were confirmed by the CU. There are numerous accounts that look like sleepers but the technical evidence is not conclusive so there's little more that can be done at this time. Thanks for the report QuiteUnusual (talk) 08:28, 12 September 2013 (UTC)


  Confirmed. Found a few blocked accounts; one unblocked sock: SuperRouoetyjsjabdb. I'll give you IP info off-wiki. Trijnsteltalk 13:02, 15 September 2013 (UTC)